Transcatheter arterial embolization of hypervascular tumors with HepaSphere: prospective multicenter open label clinical trial of microspheres in Japan

Microspheres as a Carrier System for Therapeutic Embolization Procedures: Achievements and Advances

The targeted delivery of anti-cancer drugs and isotopes is one of the most pursued goals in anti-cancer therapy. One of the prime examples of such an application is the intra-arterial injection of microspheres containing cytostatic drugs or radioisotopes during hepatic embolization procedures. Therapy based on the application of microspheres revolves around vascular occlusion, complemented with local therapy in the form of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE). The broadest implementation of these embolization strategies currently lies within the treatment of untreatable hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and metastatic colorectal cancer. This review aims to describe the state-of-the-art TACE and TARE technologies investigated in the clinical setting for HCC and addresses current trials and new developments. In addition, chemical properties and advancements in microsphere carrier systems are evaluated, and possible improvements in embolization therapy based on the modification of and functionalization with therapeutical loads are explored.

Transarterial chemoembolization for pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with HepaSphere for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Between June 2009 and January 2018, 14 patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from HCC were treated with TACE with a combination of 1-3 chemotherapeutic drugs followed by HepaSphere embolization. As first end point, local tumor response and adverse events were evaluated after the first session of TACE, with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v. 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4 criteria, respectively. Overall survival was evaluated as secondary end point. TACE was repeated on-demand.

RESULTS

TACE with HepaSphere was well tolerated with acceptable safety profile and no 30 day mortality. 1 month objective response and disease control rate were calculated to be 7.1 and 100%, respectively. Mean tumor size reduction rate was 15.6±9.5% at the first month. Two Grade 3 cytopenia events were seen (14.3 %), however none of the Grade 2 or more post-embolization syndrome was observed. The median overall survival time was 15.0 months and the 1 year, 3 year and 5 year survival rate were, 57.1%, 28.6%, 19.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early experience showed that the transarterial treatment with HepaSphere is safe and effective treatment for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from HCC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Currently, the effects of molecular targeted drugs on HCC metastases are limited and side-effects are relatively frequent. In the present study, transarterial treatment might be a promising treatment for HCC metastasis.

Cryotherapy for liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two of the most common groups of malignant tumours: primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer and long-term survival rates reported for patients after radical surgical treatment is approximately 50%. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in the majority of patients. Cryotherapy is performed with the use of an image-guided cryoprobe which delivers liquid nitrogen or argon gas to the tumour tissue. The subsequent process of freezing is associated with formation of ice crystals, which directly damage exposed tissue, including cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, and six other databases up to June 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators for liver metastases, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We extracted information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes important for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each study. One review author performed data extraction and a second review author checked entries.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised clinical trials comparing cryotherapy versus no intervention or versus systemic treatments; however, we identified one randomised clinical trial comparing cryotherapy with conventional surgery. The trial was conducted in Ukraine. The trial included 123 participants with solitary, or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases; 63 participants received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 women and 87 men. The primary sites for the metastases were colon and rectum (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), skin (4.9%), ovaries (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestines (1.6%), pancreas (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The trial was not reported sufficiently enough to assess the risk of bias of the randomisation process, allocation concealment, or presence of blinding. It was also not possible to assess incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting bias. The certainty of evidence was low because of risk of bias and imprecision.The participants were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). The trial reported that the mortality at 10 years was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group. The calculated by us relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02. We judged the evidence as low-certainty evidence. Regarding adverse events and complications, separately and in total, our calculation showed no evidence of a difference in recurrence of the malignancy in the liver: 86% (54/63) of the participants in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the participants in the conventional surgery group developed a new malignancy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). The frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group, except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the conventional surgery group. However, the authors did not report whether there was any evidence of a difference. There were no intervention-related mortality or bile leakages.We identified no evidence for health-related quality of life, cancer mortality, or time to progression of liver metastases. The study reported tumour response in terms of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in 69% of participants, and reported results in the form of a graph for 30% of participants. The carcinoembryonic antigen level was lower in the cryotherapy group, and decreased to normal values faster in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05).

FUNDING

the trial did not provide information on funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy versus conventional surgery in people with liver metastases is of low certainty. We are uncertain about our estimate and cannot determine whether cryotherapy compared with conventional surgery is beneficial or harmful. We found no evidence for the benefits or harms of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, or versus systemic treatments.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization with Spherical Embolic Agent in Patients with Pulmonary or Mediastinal Metastases from Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and feasibility of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with superabsorbent polymer microspheres (SAP-MS) for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastasis from breast cancer.

METHODS

Between November 2002 and January 2015, 14 patients with 29 unresectable pulmonary or mediastinal breast cancer metastases underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using SAP-MS (50-100 μm) after injection of a combination of 2-4 types of anticancer drugs (eg, cisplatin [30 mg] + fluorouracil [500 mg], or epirubicin [40 mg] + mitomycin C [4 mg] + fluorouracil [500 mg]). As a primary endpoint, local tumor response and adverse events were evaluated 1 month after the first transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4 criteria. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was repeated as needed. Overall survival was analyzed as a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Response rate was 28.6% (partial response, 4 patients; stable disease, 10 patients). Median progression rate was -12.7%. No cases of hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or higher were observed. A grade 3 maculopapular rash was observed in 1 patient. After the first transcatheter arterial chemoembolization sessions, 63 additional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization sessions were performed (average, 5.5 sessions per patient; range, 2-10 sessions). The median overall survival time after the first session was 29 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 49.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with SAP-MS is a well-tolerated and feasible palliative treatment option for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastasis from breast cancer.