Heterogeneity of longitudinal and circumferential contraction in relation to late gadolinium enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Assessing heterogeneity on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a novel approach to diagnosis and risk stratification in cardiac diseases

Cardiac disease affects the heart non-uniformly. Examples include focal septal or apical hypertrophy with reduced strain in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, replacement fibrosis with akinesia in an infarct-related coronary artery territory, and a pattern of scarring in dilated cardiomyopathy. The detail and versatility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging mean it contains a wealth of information imperceptible to the naked eye and not captured by standard global measures. CMR-derived heterogeneity biomarkers could facilitate early diagnosis, better risk stratification, and a more comprehensive prediction of treatment response. Small cohort and case-control studies demonstrate the feasibility of proof-of-concept structural and functional heterogeneity measures. Detailed radiomic analyses of different CMR sequences using open-source software delineate unique voxel patterns as hallmarks of histopathological changes. Meanwhile, measures of dispersion applied to emerging CMR strain sequences describe variable longitudinal, circumferential, and radial function across the myocardium. Two of the most promising heterogeneity measures are the mean absolute deviation of regional standard deviations on native T1 and T2 and the standard deviation of time to maximum regional radial wall motion, termed the tissue synchronization index in a 16-segment left ventricle model. Real-world limitations include the non-standardization of CMR imaging protocols across different centres and the testing of large numbers of radiomic features in small, inadequately powered patient samples. We, therefore, propose a three-step roadmap to benchmark novel heterogeneity biomarkers, including defining normal reference ranges, statistical modelling against diagnosis and outcomes in large epidemiological studies, and finally, comprehensive internal and external validations.

Detecting Regional Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The Utility of Myocardial Strain Based on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The value of myocardial strain for reflecting fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been definite. We aim to explore whether there are underlying non-contrast parameters to evaluate myocardial fibrosis and screen which may be the best.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 127 HCM patients (89 men; average age 46.6 ± 15.6 years) and 30 healthy controls (20 men; average age 52.0 ± 13.2 years) who have undergone late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR. Next, 127 HCM patients were divided randomly into two sets including training cohort and validation cohort. Strain and imaging parameters were measured and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Based on univariate and multivariate analysis, segmental circumferential strain (SCS) (p < 0.001) and maximal wall thickness (MWT) (p < 0.001) may differentiate myocardial segments with or without LGE as significant biomarkers for both sets. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.803 (95% CI 0.785-0.820) for SCS and 0.777 (95% CI 0.759-0.795) for MWT to identify myocardial fibrosis. When combining SCS >-13.9% and MWT >16.4mm, the specificity of the model (AUC = 0.779; 95% CI 0.760-0.796) achieved the highest 93.9%, with a sensitivity of 61.8%.

CONCLUSION

Strain analysis in HCM holds promise for myocardial fibrosis detection and SCS is the best strain parameter based on CMR. Nevertheless, the model of combining SCS and MWT could achieve the highest specificity for fibrotic diagnosis.

Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance mechanical parameters for myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Objective

Myocardial fibrosis leads to systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. This study aims to investigate the relationship between cardiac magnetic resonance mechanical parameters for evaluating the left ventricular function in HCM with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%) and the association between myocardial fibrosis defined by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of CMR images of 93 patients with HCM with preserved ejection fraction (HCMpEF) and 96 controls diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at our hospital from July 2019 to January 2022. The myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) was calculated, and myocardial mechanical parameters, including global myocardial longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GLS), and myocardial strain (GLS), were obtained by tissue tracking and LGE quantitative modules of dedicated software, respectively. The correlation between myocardial strain and LGE was analyzed, and a multivariate logistic regression model was developed to discuss the risk predictors of LGE.

Results

Compared to the control group, the left ventricular mechanical parameters GLS (-13.90 ± 3.80% versus -18.20 ± 2.10%, p < 0.001), GCS (-16.62 ± 3.50% versus -18.4 ± 2.69%, p < 0.001), GRS (28.99 ± 10.38% versus 33.02 ± 6.25%, p < 0.01), and MCF (64 ± 16% versus 99 ± 18%, p < 0.001) were found significantly lower in HCM group. Moreover, even in LGE-negative HCM patients, GLS (-16.3 ± 3.9%) and MCF (78 ± 19%) were significantly lower compared to the control group. Left ventricular GLS [OR = 1.61, (1.29, 2.02), p = 0.001] and MCF [OR = 0.90, (0.86, 0.94), p = 0.001] independently predicted myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

Conclusion

In participants of HCM with preserved ejection fraction, the early onset of reduced left ventricular GLS and MCF in patients with HCMpEF may provide new evidence for evaluating impaired myocardial systolic function. The reduction of myocardial mechanical indexes may reflect the presence and extent of myocardial fibrosis, and the more significant the reduction, the more severe the myocardial fibrosis; GLS and MCF may be ideal predictors for LGE.

A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Myocardial strain is a convenient parameter to quantify left ventricular (LV) function. Fast strain-encoding (fSENC) enables the acquisition of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images for strain-measurement within a few heartbeats during free-breathing. It is necessary to analyze inter-vendor agreement of techniques to determine strain, such as fSENC, in order to compare existing studies and plan multi-center studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate inter-vendor agreement and test-retest reproducibility of fSENC for three major MRI-vendors. fSENC-images were acquired three times in the same group of 15 healthy volunteers using 3 Tesla scanners from three different vendors: at the German Heart Institute Berlin, the Charité University Medicine Berlin-Campus Buch and the Theresien-Hospital Mannheim. Volunteers were scanned using the same imaging protocol composed of two fSENC-acquisitions, a 15-min break and another two fSENC-acquisitions. LV global longitudinal and circumferential strain (GLS, GCS) were analyzed by a trained observer (Myostrain 5.0, Myocardial Solutions) and for nine volunteers repeatedly by another observer. Inter-vendor agreement was determined using Bland-Altman analysis. Test-retest reproducibility and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV). Inter-vendor agreement between all three sites was good for GLS and GCS, with biases of 0.01–1.88%. Test-retest reproducibility of scans before and after the break was high, shown by ICC- and CoV values of 0.63–0.97 and 3–9% for GLS and 0.69–0.82 and 4–7% for GCS, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were excellent for both parameters (ICC of 0.77–0.99, CoV of 2–5%). This trial demonstrates good inter-vendor agreement and test–retest reproducibility of GLS and GCS measurements, acquired at three different scanners from three different vendors using fSENC. The results indicate that it is necessary to account for a possible bias (< 2%) when comparing strain measurements of different scanners. Technical differences between scanners, which impact inter-vendor agreement, should be further analyzed and minimized.

DRKS Registration Number: 00013253.

Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1207-5874.

Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement

OBJECTIVES

We sought to: (1) determine the agreement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) derived strain measurements, (2) compare their reproducibility, (3) determine which approach is best related to CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

BACKGROUND

While STE-derived strain is routinely used to assess left ventricular (LV) function, CMR strain measurements are not yet standardized. Strain can be measured using dedicated pulse sequences (strain-encoding, SENC), or post-processing of cine images (feature tracking, FT). It is unclear whether these measurements are interchangeable, and whether strain can be used as an alternative to LGE.

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent 2D echocardiography and 1.5 T CMR. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was measured by STE (Epsilon), FT (NeoSoft) and SENC (Myocardial Solutions) and circumferential strain (GCS) by FT and SENC.

RESULTS

GLS showed good inter-modality agreement (r-values: 0.71-0.75), small biases (< 1%) but considerable limits of agreement (- 7 to 8%). The agreement between the CMR techniques was better for GLS than GCS (r = 0.81 vs 0.67; smaller bias). Repeated measurements showed low intra- and inter-observer variability for both GLS and GCS (intraclass correlations 0.86-0.99; coefficients of variation 3-13%). LGE was present in 22 (44%) of patients. Both SENC- and FT-derived GLS and GCS were associated with LGE, while STE-GLS was not. Irrespective of CMR technique, this association was stronger for GCS (AUC 0.77-0.78) than GLS (AUC 0.67-0.72) and STE-GLS (AUC = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

There is good inter-technique agreement in strain measurements, which were highly reproducible, irrespective of modality or analysis technique. GCS may better reflect the presence of underlying LGE than GLS.

Strain-encoded magnetic resonance: a method for the assessment of myocardial deformation

This study aims to assess the usefulness of strain‐encoded magnetic resonance (SENC) for the quantification of myocardial deformation (‘strain’) in healthy volunteers and for the diagnostic workup of patients with different cardiovascular pathologies. SENC was initially described in the year 2001. Since then, the SENC sequence has undergone several technical developments, aiming at the detection of strain during single‐heartbeat acquisitions (fast‐SENC). Experimental and clinical studies that used SENC and fast‐SENC or compared SENC with conventional cine or tagged magnetic resonance in phantoms, animals, healthy volunteers, or patients were systematically searched for in PubMed. Using ‘strain‐encoded magnetic resonance and SENC’ as keywords, three phantom and three animal studies were identified, along with 27 further clinical studies, involving 185 healthy subjects and 904 patients. SENC (i) enabled reproducible assessment of myocardial deformation in vitro, in animals and in healthy volunteers, (ii) showed high reproducibility and substantially lower time spent compared with conventional tagging, (iii) exhibited incremental value to standard cine imaging for the detection of inducible ischaemia and for the risk stratification of patients with ischaemic heart disease, and (iv) enabled the diagnostic classification of patients with transplant vasculopathy, cardiomyopathies, pulmonary hypertension, and diabetic heart disease. SENC has the potential to detect a wide range of myocardial diseases early, accurately, and without the need of contrast agent injection, possibly enabling the initiation of specific cardiac therapies during earlier disease stages. Its one‐heartbeat acquisition mode during free breathing results in shorter cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocols, making its implementation in the clinical realm promising.