Diffusion-weighted imaging with simultaneous multi-slice echo-planar technique for the diagnosis of breast magnetic resonance imaging

Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of breast lesions based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS rs-EPI DWI), compared with readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (NOSMS rs-EPI DWI), in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated breast lesions from 185 consecutive patients who had undergone preoperative breast MRI. The NOSMS rs-EPI DWI and the prototype SMS rs-EPI DWI sequences were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Two independent radiologists evaluated the image quality of the two sequences using a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) and then assessed the scores through visual grading characteristics analysis (VGC). The values of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and whole-tumor-based histogram parameter (ADC_median) were compared between the two sequences using the Wilcoxon test. Then ROC curves were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The visual assessment showed that the SMS rs-EPI yielded superior overall image quality and lesion delineation than the NOSMS rs-EPI (AUC_VGC = 0.980 and 0.984, respectively; all P_s < 0.001). There were no significant differences in relevant artifacts between the two sequences (AUC_VGC = 0.531, P = 0.462). The SNR values for SMS rs-EPI DWI were significantly lower than for NOSMS rs-EPI DWI (P = 0.019) while there was no significant difference in CNR values between the two sequences (P = 0.955). In addition, evaluation of the diagnostic performance demonstrated that the difference in ADC_median values for both DWI sequences between the malignant and benign lesions was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In contrast, the AUC for ADC_median was higher with SMS rs-EPI than NOSMS rs-EPI (0.879 for SMS vs. 0.839 for NOSMS, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The SMS technique could further improve the image quality and the diagnostic performance of rs-EPI DWI in a comparable time.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

High-Resolution Simultaneous Multi-Slice Accelerated Turbo Spin-Echo Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Head-to-Head Comparison With Routine Turbo Spin-Echo Imaging

Background/Aim: The turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence is widely used for musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging; however, its acquisition speed is limited and can be easily affected by motion artifacts. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of a simultaneous multi-slice TSE (SMS-TSE) sequence can accelerate MSK imaging while maintaining image quality when compared with the routine TSE sequence.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 71 patients [mean age, 37.43 ± 12.56 (range, 20–67) years], including 37 men and 34 women, to undergo TSE and SMS sequences. The total scanning times for the wrist, ankle and knee joint with routine sequence were 14.92, 13.97, and 13.48 min, respectively. For the SMS-TSE sequence, they were 7.52, 7.20, and 6.87 min. Quantitative parameters, including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were measured. Three experienced MSK imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the image quality of bone texture, cartilage, tendons, ligament, meniscus, and artifact using a 5-point evaluation system, and the diagnostic performance of the SMS-TSE sequences was evaluated.

Results: Compared with the routine TSE sequences, the scanning time was lower by 49.60, 48.46, and 49.04% using SMS-TSE sequences for the wrist, ankle, and knee joints, respectively. For the SNR comparison, the SMS-TSE sequences were significantly higher than the routine TSE sequence for wrist (except for Axial-T2WI-FS), ankle, and knee joint MR imaging (all p < 0.05), but no statistical significance was obtained for the CNR measurement (all p > 0.05, except for Sag-PDWI-FS in ankle joint). For the wrist joint, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.24, 100, and 92%. For the ankle joint, they were 100, 75, and 93.33%. For the knee joint, they were 87.50, 85.71, and 87.10%.

Conclusion: The use of the SMS-TSE sequence in the wrist, ankle, and knee joints can significantly reduce the scanning time and show similar image quality when compared with the routine TSE sequence.

High-Resolution DWI with Simultaneous Multi-Slice Readout-Segmented Echo Planar Imaging for the Evaluation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of high-resolution readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used simultaneously with multi-slice (SMS) imaging (SMS rs-EPI) for the differentiation of breast malignant and benign lesions in comparison to conventional rs-EPI on a 3T MR scanner. A total of 102 patients with 113 breast lesions underwent bilateral breast MRI using a prototype SMS rs-EPI sequence and a conventional rs-EPI sequence. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) value of the lesion were measured for comparison. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnosis performance of ADC, and the corresponding area under curve (AUC) was calculated. The image quality scores in anatomic distortion, lesion conspicuity, sharpness of anatomical details and overall image quality of SMS rs-EPI were significantly higher than those of conventional rs-EPI. CNR was enhanced in the high-resolution SMS rs-EPI acquisition (6.48 ± 1.71 vs. 4.23 ± 1.49; p < 0.001). The mean ADC value was comparable in SMS rs-EPI and conventional rs-EPI (benign 1.45 × 10⁻³ vs. 1.43 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, p = 0.702; malignant 0.91 × 10⁻³ vs. 0.89 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, p = 0.076). The AUC was 0.957 in SMS rs-EPI and 0.983 in conventional rs-EPI. SMS rs-EPI technique allows for higher spatial resolution and slight reduction of scan time in comparison to conventional rs-EPI, which has potential for better differentiation between malignant and benign lesions of the breast.

Simultaneous Multislice Readout-Segmented Echo Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancers

BACKGROUND

In diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of breast MRI, simultaneous multislice acceleration techniques can be used for readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) to shorten the scan time.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and scan time of rs-EPI and simultaneous multislice rs-EPI (SMS rs-EPI) sequences.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

In all, 134 consecutive women (mean age: 55.3 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/ SEQUENCES

3.0T; rs-EPI sequence, prototypic SMS rs-EPI sequence and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) sequence ASSESSMENT: For quantitative comparison, two radiologists independently measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion contrast, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). For qualitative comparison, image quality, lesion conspicuity, and reader preference were assessed with a reference of DCE-MRI.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used.

RESULTS

For SNR and CNR, there were no differences between the sequences (P = 0.342 and 0.665 for reader 1; P = 0.606 and P = 0.116 for reader 2). Lesion contrast of SMS rs-EPI was higher than that of rs-EPI (P < 0.05 for both reader 1 and reader 2). Mean tumor ADC was similar in rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences (0.98 ± 0.22 vs. 1.00 ± 0.22; P = 0.291 for reader 1, 0.98 ± 0.21 vs. 1.00 ± 0.22; P = 0.418 for reader 2). Regarding qualitative comparison, image quality and lesion conspicuity were higher in SMS rs-EPI than in rs-EPI (both P < 0.05 for both readers). The two readers regarded SMS rs-EPI as superior or equal to rs-EPI in over 90% of cases. The acquisition time was 4:30 minutes for rs-EPI and 2:31 minutes for SMS rs-EPI.

DATA CONCLUSION

The SMS rs-EPI sequence resulted in a similar ADC value and better image quality than the rs-EPI sequence in a 44.1% reduced scan time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 3.