Trends and predictors for vagotomy when performing oversew of acute bleeding duodenal ulcer in the United States

The Era of the Large Databases: Outcomes After Gastroesophageal Surgery According to NSQIP, NIS, and NCDB Databases. Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The term big data refers to databases that include large amounts of information used in various areas of knowledge. Currently, there are large databases that allow the evaluation of postoperative evolution, such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of information obtained from these registries regarding gastroesophageal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines was performed. The research was carried out using the PubMed database identifying 251 articles. All outcomes related to gastroesophageal surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 articles published between January 2007 and July 2017 were included, for a total of 345 697 patients. Studies were analyzed and divided according to the type of surgery and main theme in (1) esophageal surgery and (2) gastric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The information provided by these databases is an effective way to obtain levels of evidence not obtainable by conventional methods. Furthermore, this information is useful for the external validation of previous studies, to establish benchmarks that allow comparisons between centers and have a positive impact on the quality of care.

Therapy with omeprazole modulates regulatory T cell/T helper 17 immune response in children with duodenal ulcers

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of omeprazole on the regulatory T cell (Treg) and T helper 17 (Th17)-mediated response in patients with duodenal ulcers (DUs). DU patients were randomly divided into omeprazole and colloid bismuth subcitrate treatment groups. The ratios of Th17 and Treg in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were measured. Cytokine production and Foxp3⁺- and RORγt-positive cells were detected. The expressions of STAT3, p-STAT3, STAT5 and p-STAT5 were detected by Western blot. The results showed that DU patients had an imbalanced Treg/Th17 response, as reflected by the higher IL-17 level and Th17 ratio and lower IL-10 level and Treg proportion in serum compared with those in the healthy volunteers. The administration of omeprazole to the patients significantly increased Treg and IL-10 levels and reduced Th17 and IL-17 levels. Omeprazole markedly increased the number of Foxp3-positive cells, decreased the number of RORγt-positive cells and restored the balanced ratio of IL-10/IL-17 in the ulcer tissue. Interestingly, we observed a negative correlation between the ratios of Treg/Th17 and the pathological scores in damaged tissues. Of note, H. pylori-infected PBMCs showed decreased Treg and an increased Th17 proportion, which could be reversed by omeprazole. Finally, omeprazole increased the expression of p-STAT5 and reduced the level of p-STAT3 without any effects on the total expression of STAT5 and STAT3. Our data suggest that omeprazole treatment restores the equilibrium of the Treg/Th17-mediated response in DU patients. Moreover, the modulation of p-STAT3 and p-STAT5 expression by omeprazole induced balanced polarisation of Treg/Th17.

Minimal versus definitive surgery in managing peptic ulcer bleeding: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare radical surgery with a minimal approach for peptic ulcer bleeding in relation to survival.

DESIGN

A Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study from 1987-2008 compared survival after minimal surgery and definitive surgery. The cohort was also stratified into calendar year before and after the year 2000 for subgroup analyses. Data were collected from the Swedish Patient Register. The two surgical groups were matched based on the propensity score to mimic a randomized trial design. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

4,163 patients were included. There were no differences in survival in patients who underwent definitive surgical procedures compared to those who underwent minimal surgery for a bleeding peptic ulcer during the full study period. Using minimal surgery group as the reference, the HRs for death in the definitive surgery group within 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 0.87 (95% CI 0.72-1.05), 0.93 (0.80-1.09), 1.00 (95% CI 0.87-1.14), and 1.05 (95% CI 0.95-1.16), respectively. The corresponding HRs during the calendar period after the year 2000 were 1.05 (95% CI 0.65-1.69), 1.18 (95% CI 0.81-1.73), 1.17 (0.84-1.62), and 1.27 (95% CI 0.99-1.63), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study found no worse overall survival after minimal surgery compared to more extensive surgery for refractory peptic ulcer bleeding, and indicated better long-term survival in the minimal surgery group during the more recent study period. A minimal approach is probably sufficient in most cases.

Vagotomy/drainage is superior to local oversew in patients who require emergency surgery for bleeding peptic ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To compare early postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing different types of emergency procedures for bleeding or perforated gastroduodenal ulcers.

BACKGROUND

Although definitive acid-reducing procedures are being used less frequently during emergency ulcer surgery, there is little published data to support this change in practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data for patients from the 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent emergency operation for bleeding or perforated peptic ulcer disease was performed to determine the association between surgical approach (local procedure alone, vagotomy/drainage, or vagotomy/gastric resection) and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Multivariable regression analysis was used to adjust for a number of patient-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 3611 patients undergoing emergency ulcer surgery (775 for bleeding, 2374 for perforation) were included for data analysis. Compared with patients undergoing local procedures alone, vagotomy/gastric resection was associated with significantly greater postoperative morbidity when performed for either ulcer perforation or bleeding. For patients with perforated ulcers, vagotomy/drainage produced similar outcomes as local procedures but required a significantly greater length of postoperative hospitalization. Conversely, vagotomy/drainage was associated with a significantly lower postoperative mortality rate than local ulcer oversew when performed for bleeding ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple repair is the procedure of choice for patients requiring emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer disease. For patients requiring emergency operation for intractable ulcer bleeding, vagotomy/drainage is associated with lower postoperative mortality than with simple ulcer oversew.

Changing Paradigms in Acute Care Surgery: A Shift to the Hindgut

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.

Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality in acute nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Acute nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage (NVUGIH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of NVUGIH.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Participating hospitals from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004.

PATIENTS

All discharged patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of NVUGIH based on the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, ninth edition codes.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided into 3 groups based on discharge from hospitals with annual discharge volumes of 1 to 125 (low), 126 to 250 (medium), and >250 (high).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization charges.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 135,366, 132,746, and 123,007 discharges with NVUGIH occurred from low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. On multivariate analysis, when adjusting for age, comorbidity, and the presence of complications, patients at high-volume hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74-0.98]) than patients at low-volume hospitals. Patients at high-volume hospitals were also more likely to undergo upper-GI endoscopy (OR 1.52 [95% CI, 1.36-1.69]) or early endoscopy within 1 day of hospitalization compared with low-volume hospitals (60.5% vs 53.8%, adjusted OR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02-1.61]). Undergoing endoscopy within day 1 was associated with shorter hospital stays (-1.08 days [95% CI, -1.24 to -0.92 days]) and lower hospitalization charges (-$1958 [95% CI, -$3227 to -$688]).

LIMITATIONS

The study was based on an administrative data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality and with higher rates of endoscopy and endoscopic intervention in patients with NVUGIH.

Outcomes of weekend admissions for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Previous studies have identified a weekend effect in outcomes of patients with various medical conditions suggesting worse outcomes for weekend admissions. The aim of our study was to analyze if weekend admissions for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) have higher mortality and longer hospital stay compared with those admitted on weekdays, and to examine if this effect differs by hospital teaching status.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004. A total of 28,820 discharges with acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) and 391,119 discharges with acute nonvariceal UGIH (NVUGIH) were identified through appropriate International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition codes. Admissions were considered to be weekend admissions if they were admitted between midnight on Friday through midnight on Sunday. In-hospital mortality, frequency, and timing of endoscopy were measured.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, NVUGIH patients admitted on weekends had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.35) and were less likely to undergo early endoscopy within 1 day of hospitalization (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.68). Weekend admission was not predictive of in-hospital mortality in patients with AVH (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.18), but was associated with lower likelihood of early endoscopy in nonteaching hospitals (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.82). Early endoscopy was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays (NVUGIH, -1.08 days; AVH, -2.35 days) and lower hospitalization charges (NVUGIH, -$1958; AVH, -$8870).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NVUGIH admitted on the weekend had higher mortality and lower rates of early endoscopy. Patient with AVH admitted to nonteaching hospitals also had lower utilization of early endoscopy, but no difference in survival. There is a need for research into identifying the reasons for the weekend effect.