Pancreatic cystic neuroendocrine tumors: preoperative diagnosis with endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle immunocytology

Clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis of purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are heterogenous neoplasms, of which the prognosis varies widely. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (C-pNETs) are a small subset of pNETs in which data are extremely rare. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological and long-term survival differences between C-pNETs and solid pNETs (S-pNETs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 242 patients with pNETs underwent resection in our institution from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. Demography characteristics, clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of them were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 242 patients (6.6%) were identified as C-pNETs. Compared with S-pNETs, C-pNETs were more frequently non-functional (75% vs 45%, P = 0.02), and the median tumor diameter of C-pNETs was smaller (36 mm vs. 47 mm, P = 0.001). And the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of C-pNETs was significantly lower (31% vs 78%, P = 0.001). Of note, the majority of C-pNETs were well-differentiated with G1 (81% vs 35%, P = 0.001). And there were no G3 (0 vs 7%, P = 0.001) in C-pNETs. No T4 stage or R1/R2 surgical margin detected in C-pNETs. And only one C-pNETs (6%) had regional lymph node metastasis (N) or synchronous distant metastasis (M). Additionally, only one patient with C-pNETs (6%) suffered tumor recurrence, compared with 24 (13%) for S-pNETs. And survival analysis showed the patients with C-pNETs seemed to be with better disease-free survival (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

C-pNETs are rare subtype with possibly less aggressive behavior comparing with their solid counterparts. Recurrence and tumor-related death still occurs in patients with resected C-pNETs, although they tend to be with more favorable prognosis.

Pancreatic Incidentaloma

Pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) represent a clinical entity increasingly recognized due to advances in and easier access to imaging techniques. By definition, PIs should be detected during abdominal imaging performed for indications other than a pancreatic disease. They range from small cysts to invasive cancer. The incidental diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can contribute to early diagnosis and treatment. On the other hand, inadequate management of PIs may result in overtreatment and unneeded morbidity. Therefore, there is a strong need to evaluate the nature and clinical features of individual PIs. In this review, we summarize the major characteristics related to PIs and present suggestions for their management.

Current update on imaging for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNEN) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with differing pathological, genetic, and clinical features. Based on clinical findings, they may be categorized into functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Adoption of the 2017 World Health Organization classification system, particularly its differentiation between grade 3, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) and grade 3, poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNEC) has emphasized the role imaging plays in characterizing these lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound can help obtain biopsy specimen and assess tumor margins and local spread. Enhancement patterns on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to classify panNEN. Contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging have been reported to be useful for characterization of panNEN and quantifying metastatic burden. Current and emerging radiotracers have broadened the utility of functional imaging in evaluating panNEN. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and somatostatin receptor imaging such as Gallium-68 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid–octreotate PET/CT may be useful for improved identification of panNEN in comparison to anatomic modalities. These new techniques can also play a direct role in optimizing the selection of treatment for individuals and predicting tumor response based on somatostatin receptor expression. In addition, emerging methods of radiomics such as texture analysis may be a potential tool for staging and outcome prediction in panNEN, however further investigation is required before clinical implementation.

Reappraisal of a 2-Cm Cut-off Size for the Management of Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multicenter International Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize an international cohort of resected cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (cPanNENs) and identify preoperative predictors of aggressive behavior.

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of cPanNENs are unknown and their clinical management remains unclear. An observational strategy for asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm has been proposed by recent guidelines, but evidence is scarce and limited to single-institutional series.

METHODS

Resected cPanNENs (1995-2017) from 16 institutions worldwide were included. Solid lesions (>50% solid component), functional tumors, and MEN-1 patients were excluded. Aggressiveness was defined as lymph node (LN) involvement, G3 grading, distant metastases, and/or recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 263 resected cPanNENs were included, among which 177 (63.5%) were >2 cm preoperatively. A preoperative diagnosis of cPanNEN was established in 162 cases (61.6%) and was more frequent when patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound [EUS, odds ratio (OR) 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-4.77] and somatostatin-receptor imaging (OR 3.681, 95% CI 1.809-7.490), and for those managed in specialized institutions (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.57-6.21). Forty-one cPanNENs (15.6%) were considered aggressive. In the whole cohort, LN involvement on imaging, age >65 years, preoperative size >2 cm, and pancreatic duct dilation were independently associated with aggressive behavior. In asymptomatic patients, older age and a preoperative size >2 cm remained independently associated with aggressiveness. Only 1 of 61 asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm displayed an aggressive behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of cPanNENs is increased by the use of EUS and somatostatin-receptor imaging and is higher in specialized institutions. Preoperative size >2 cm is independently associated with aggressive behavior. Consequently, a watch-and-wait policy for sporadic asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm seems justified and safe for most patients.

Successful Localization and Resection of Small Pancreatic Cystic Insulinoma Using Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging: A Case Report and Literature Review

Pancreatic cystic insulinoma is an uncommon tumor. Perioperative localization remained challenging if the tumor is atypical with cystic feature or in small size. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging is a technique by injecting fluorescent dye intravenously, which accumulates to the target lesion and creating signal by laser sources. The signal helps surgeons to identify the lesion during operation, but little experience has been reported regarding the use of imaging NIR technique for localizing cystic insulinoma. We present a 29-year-old female patient with a symptomatic pancreatic cystic insulinoma (1.2 cm) as assessed by clinical symptom, laboratory evidence, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. With an aid of NIR imaging technique, this cystic tumor was localized easily at operation. Also, the fluorescence imaging visualized the tumor part, guided us to identify the safe margin, and preserved the normal pancreatic structure. Pathologic report confirmed that the tumor was a well-differentiated cystic insulinoma. This case demonstrates that pancreatic cystic insulinoma in small size can be intraoperatively localized by NIR imaging, a relatively safe and easy technique.

Nondegenerated cystic neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas: a case report

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are typically solid neoplasms but, in very rare cases, present as cystic lesions. We describe a case of a cystic neuroendocrine tumor that developed as a small cystic lesion.

Case presentation

In 2011, a 66-year-old Japanese woman underwent computed tomography (CT) that revealed a cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas measuring 9 mm. She did not have any symptoms. She underwent a CT scan every year thereafter. The cystic lesion gradually increased and was 40 mm in 2019; endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) was then performed. Cytological examination demonstrated class IIIb adenocarcinoma, and we conducted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Pathological examination showed PNET.

Conclusion

Although cystic change of PNET is generally caused by ischemia or necrosis inside the tumor, in our case, PNET occurred as a small cyst that increased without changing form.

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for cystic and non-cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Background and study aims  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NENs) are rare tumors with malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been shown to be superior to other imaging methods in preoperative localization and diagnosis of P-NENs. The objective of this study was to describe the EUS features of non-metastatic cystic and non-cystic P-NENs seen at a referral center and to evaluate the performance of EUS-FNA in diagnosis of P-NENs. Patients and methods  All patients with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic P-NENs, which underwent EUS-FNA prior to surgical resection at the Moffitt Cancer Center between Jan 2005 and Dec 2012 were included. Clinical, endoscopic and pathologic information was abstracted from electronic medical records. Results  Thirty-nine patients, all with non-functional P-NENs, were included in this study. Thirteen tumors were cystic and 26 were solid. Among the cystic tumors, 50 % were partly cystic and partly solid, and 50 % were fully cystic. The cystic tumors were more commonly seen at the body/tail, and the solid tumors were more uniformly distributed. Fluid could be aspirated from 50 % of the cystic tumors, all with a carcinoembryonic antigen level < 192 ng/mL. With surgical pathology as the gold standard, overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA in diagnosing cystic tumors was 62.5 %, and for solid tumors, 95 % ( P  < 0.03). Conclusions  EUS-FNA is much more sensitive in diagnosing solid P-NENs than cystic PNETs. Our results indicate that EUS-FNA may have higher sensitivity for diagnosis of cystic P-NENs than the reported sensitivity of EUS-FNA for all pancreatic cystic tumors.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: review of heterogeneous spectrum of CT appearance

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are uncommon pancreatic neoplasms and can be a diagnostic challenge with heterogeneous spectrum of CT appearance. We review CT findings of PanNETs and other mimics.

CONCLUSION

PanNETs are typically hypervascular and have avid enhancement on arterial and venous phase images. However, dedicated pancreas protocol may be needed due to their sometimes atypical appearance including transient enhancement. Careful evaluation of CT findings will help differentiate PanNETs from their mimics, and can be used to establish the diagnosis of a PanNETs. Although an accurate diagnosis can be based on serological, urine, and CT scan findings, confirmation is made via pathological examination.

Current concepts in molecular genetics and management guidelines for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: an essential update for radiologists

Cystic neoplasms in the pancreas are encountered frequently on imaging, often detected incidentally during evaluation for other conditions. They can have a variety of clinical and imaging presentations, and similarly, wide-ranging prognostic and treatment implications. In the majority, imaging helps in diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) and guides management decisions. But, a significant minority of the PCNs remain indeterminate. There have been multiple recent advances in biomarkers and molecular genetics which will likely prove helpful in risk stratification of PCNs. Several prominent national and international societies, as well as consensus groups have put forth recommendations to help guide management of PCNs. The purpose of this article is to discuss the role of imaging in evaluation of PCNs, review the recent advances in molecular genetics and pancreatic cyst fluid analysis, and analyze the pros and cons of major evidence-based and consensus guidelines for management of PCNs.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors represent 13% of all neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study is to analyze the phenotype and biologic behavior of resected cystic neuroendocrine tumors. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted until September 2016 using a search in Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE with the terms "cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm", "cystic islets tumors" and "cystic islets neoplasms". From the 795 citations recovered 80 studies reporting on 431 patients were selected. 87.1% (n = 387) were sporadic tumors and 10.3% (n = 40) corresponded to multiple endocrine neoplasia endocrine type 1. Were diagnosed incidentally 44.6% (n = 135). Cytology was found to have a sensitivity of 78.5%. Were non-functional tumors 85% (n = 338), and among the functional tumors, insulinoma was the most frequent. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, 87.8% were limited to the pancreas (I-IIb), and 12.2% were advanced (III-IV). Disease-free survival at 5 years in stages (I-IIIa) and (IIIb-IV) was 91.5% and 54.2%, respectively; and was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in functional tumors. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia there was a higher incidence of functional (62.5%) and multifocal (28.1%) tumors. Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 60%. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors exhibit phenotypical characteristics which are different to those of solid neuroendocrine tumors.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Pathogenesis and Malignant Potential

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers despite extensive research. Further understanding of precursor lesions may enhance the ability to treat and prevent pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) with malignant potential include: mucinous PCLs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasm), solid pseudopapillary tumors and cystic neuroendocrine tumors. This review summarizes the latest literature describing what is known about the pathogenesis and malignant potential of these PCLs, including unique epidemiological, radiological, histological, genetic and molecular characteristics.

Neuroendocrine neoplasm of pancreas with cystic degeneration mimicking mucinous cystic neoplasm

Endoscopic ultrasound is increasingly being used for evaluation of pancreatic diseases and pancreatic tumors. Among various pancreatic cystic lesions, cystic degeneration of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm is of the challenge in making diagnosis. Although unique characteristic of each type of pancreatic cystic lesions has been proposed abundantly, typical morphology of cystic degeneration of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm is still unclear. We, herein, reported a case of 66-year-old woman who was incidentally found to have a cystic lesion in the tail of pancreas upon screening transabdominal ultrasonography. A well-defined cystic lesion with rim calcification was noted on subsequent abdominal computed tomography. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a markedly thick-wall cystic lesion containing solid nodule inside which was not enhanced following contrast-enhanced study. A mucinous cystic neoplasm was suspected and the patient was proceeded with distal pancreatectomy. A definite diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasm was confirmed after staining with synaptophysin and chromogranin A. We performed a meticulous review on current literatures focusing on endoscopic characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with cystic degeneration.

Rupture of small cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with many microtumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are particularly rare. The various forms of PNETs, such as cystic degeneration, make differentiation from other similar pancreatic lesions difficult. We can detect small lesions by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and obtain preoperative pathological diagnosis by EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA). We describe, here, an interesting case of pNET in a 42-year-old woman with no family history. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an 18 mm × 17 mm cystic lesion with a nodule in the pancreatic tail. Two microtumors about 7 mm in diameter in the pancreatic body detected only by EUS, cystic rim and nodules all showed similar enhancement on contrast-harmonic EUS. Preoperative EUS-FNA of the microtumor was performed, diagnosing multiple pNETs. Macroscopic examination of the resected pancreatic body and tail showed that the cystic lesion had morphologically changed to a 13-mm main nodule, and 11 new microtumors (diameter 1-3 mm). Microscopically, all microtumors represented pNETs. From the findings of a broken peripheral rim on the main lesion with fibrosis, rupture of the cystic pNET was suspected. Postoperatively, pituitary adenoma and parathyroid adenoma were detected. The final diagnosis was multiple grade 1 pNETs with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. To the best of our knowledge, no case of spontaneous rupture of a cystic pNET has previously been reported in the English literature. Therefore, this case of very rare pNET with various morphological changes is reported.

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cysts: A Shifting Paradigm Toward Selective Resection

Due to the widespread use of high-quality cross-sectional imaging, pancreatic cystic neoplasms are being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Clinicians are therefore asked to counsel a growing number of patients with pancreatic cysts diagnosed incidentally at an early, asymptomatic stage. Over the last two decades, accumulating knowledge on the biologic behavior of these neoplasms along with improved diagnostics through imaging and endoscopic cyst fluid analysis have allowed for a selective therapeutic approach toward these neoplasms. On one end of the management spectrum, observation is recommended for typically benign lesions (serous cystadenoma), and on the other end, upfront resection is recommended for likely malignant lesions (main duct IPMN, mucinous cystadenoma, solid pseudopapillary tumor, and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors). In between, management of premalignant lesions (branch duct IPMN) is dictated by the presence of high-risk features. In general, resection should be considered whenever the risk of malignancy is higher than the risk of the operation. This review aims to describe the evolution and current status of evidence guiding the selection of patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms for surgical resection, along with a specific discussion on the type of resection required and expected outcomes.

Assessment of disease aggression in cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A CT and pathology correlation study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the clinical significance of cystic components in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This may be related to differences in the identification of cystic NET through imaging and/or pathology. Tumors may also be microscopically or macroscopically cystic. Our primary objective is to determine radiology-pathology correlation for the identification of cystic components. Our secondary objective is to determine if cystic components are associated with indices of tumor aggression.

METHODS

60 tumors with correlative surgical pathology were assessed retrospectively for cystic components on CT and pathology. Tumor was categorized as solid or cystic on CT and pathology. If cystic on pathology, cystic components were categorized as macroscopic or microscopic. Cystic components were estimated as <50% and ≥50% tumor volume. WHO/Hochwald grade and presence of metastases were used to stratify disease aggression. Associations were tested with Chi square/Fisher's exact test and differences were tested with t-test/Wilcoxon rank sums test.

RESULTS

There is moderate agreement between CT and histology for presence of cystic components. Discrepancies were mostly attributable to the presence of microscopic cystic components in tumors appearing solid on CT. There was no difference in size between cystic and solid tumors on CT or pathology. No association between CT-determined cystic components and tumor grade was found. Tumors with cystic components (cystic by CT, and macroscopically cystic by pathology) demonstrated less association with metastases than solid tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic components, comprising ≥50% of the tumor by CT and observed macroscopically on pathology, are associated with less aggressive disease.

Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A and Carcinoembryonic Antigen: A Highly Accurate Test for the Diagnosis of Serous Cystic Neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Accurate differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions is important for pancreatic cancer early detection and prevention as well as avoidance of unnecessary surgical intervention. Serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) have no malignant potential, but may mimic premalignant mucinous cystic lesions: mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). We recently identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A as a novel pancreatic fluid biomarker for SCN. We hypothesize that combining cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with VEGF-A will improve the diagnostic accuracy of VEGF-A.

METHODS

Pancreatic cyst/duct fluid was collected from consenting patients undergoing surgical cyst resection with corresponding pathologic diagnoses. Pancreatic fluid VEGF-A and CEA levels were detected by ELISA.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-nine patients with pancreatic cystic lesions met inclusion criteria. Pathologic diagnoses included pseudocyst (n=14), SCN (n=26), MCN (n=40), low/moderate grade IPMN (n=34), high grade IPMN (n=20), invasive IPMN (n=10) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (n=5). VEGF-A was significantly elevated in SCN cyst fluid compared to all other diagnoses (p<0.001). With a threshold of >5,000 pg/ml, VEGF-A alone has 100% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity to distinguish SCN from other cystic lesions. With a threshold of ≤10ng/ml, CEA alone identifies SCN with 95.5% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity. Sensitivity and specificity of the VEGF-A/CEA combination are 95.5% and 100% respectively. The c-statistic increased from 0.98 to 0.99 when CEA was added to VEGF-A alone in the ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although VEGF-A alone is a highly accurate test for SCN, the combination of VEGF-A with CEA approaches the gold-standard of pathologic diagnosis, thus importantly avoiding false positives. Patients with a positive test indicating benign SCN can be spared a high risk surgical pancreatic resection.

Light scattering spectroscopy identifies the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts during endoscopy

Pancreatic cancers are usually detected at an advanced stage and have poor prognosis. About one fifth of these arise from pancreatic cystic lesions. Yet not all lesions are precancerous, and imaging tools lack adequate accuracy for distinguishing precancerous from benign cysts. Therefore, decisions on surgical resection usually rely on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Unfortunately, cyst fluid often contains few cells, and fluid chemical analysis lacks accuracy, resulting in dire consequences, including unnecessary pancreatic surgery for benign cysts and the development of cancer. Here, we report an optical spectroscopic technique, based on a spatial gating fibre-optic probe, that predicts the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic lesions during routine diagnostic EUS-FNA procedures. In a double-blind prospective study in 25 patients, with 14 cysts measured in vivo and 13 postoperatively, the technique achieved an overall accuracy of 95%, with a 95%confidence interval of 78-99%, in cysts with definitive diagnosis.

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare, heterogeneous group of neoplasms infamous for their endocrinopathies. Up to 90% of PNETs, however, are nonfunctional and are frequently detected incidentally on axial imaging during the evaluation of vague abdominal symptoms. Surgery remains the mainstay of therapy for patients diagnosed with both functional and nonfunctional PNETs. However, the multifaceted nature of PNETs challenges treatment decision making. In general, resection is recommended for patients with acceptable perioperative risk and amenable lesions.

Pancreatic Cytopathology

Pancreatic cytopathology, particularly through the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), has excellent specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Such diagnoses can help guide preoperative management of patients, provide prognostic information, and confirm diagnoses in patients who are not surgical candidates. Furthermore, FNA can be used to obtain cyst fluid for ancillary tests that can improve the diagnosis of cystic lesions. In this article, we describe the cytomorphological features and differential diagnoses of the most commonly encountered pancreatic lesions on FNA.

AACE/ACE disease state clinical review: pancreatic neuroendocrine incidentalomas

Incidental detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has substantially increased over the last decade due to widespread use of advanced imaging studies. Reliable initial imaging-based characterization is crucial for the differential diagnosis from other exocrine neoplasms and to determine the appropriate management plan. Measurements of chromogranin A, pancreatic polypeptide, and calcitonin are recommended for the biochemical evaluation. A thorough medical history needs to be performed to rule out multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1. The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS)/Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system together with a grading based on the Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic counts has proven to give more appropriate prognostic information than the World Health Organization (WHO)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging but may still fail to safely differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Poorly differentiated PNETs generally present with metastases and are rarely amenable for resection. Well- or intermediately differentiated tumors ≥2 cm with imaging evidence of malignancy or with a Ki-67 >2% should be resected. It has been suggested that non-MEN related, nonfunctioning, and asymptomatic PNETs <2 cm with a Ki-67 index ≤2% carry a low risk of metastasis and may be observed in the absence of clinical or radiologic criteria of malignancy or progression, especially in older patients. However, because metastases may occur with long delay with smaller PNETS, physicians should consider patient age, lesion location, and the risks of operation, and patients not undergoing surgery need to be closely followed closely.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: Degree of cystic component predicts prognosis

BACKGROUND

Although most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are solid, approximately 10% are cystic. Some studies have suggested that cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are associated with a more favorable prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent operative resection between 1999 and 2014 at a single academic medical center was performed. Based on cross-sectional imaging performed before operation, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were classified according to the size of the cystic component relative to the total tumor size: purely cystic (100%), mostly cystic (≥50%), mostly solid (<50%), and purely solid (0%). Clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence-free survival were assessed between groups.

RESULTS

In the study, 214 patients met inclusion criteria: 8 with purely cystic tumors, 7 with mostly cystic tumors, 15 with mostly solid tumors, and 184 with purely solid tumors. The groups differed in terms of tumor size (1.5 ± 0.5, 3.0 ± 1.7, 3.7 ± 2.6, and 4.0 ± 3.5 cm), lymph node positivity (0%, 0%, 26.7%, and 34.2%), intermediate or high grade (0%, 16.7%, 20.0%, and 31.0%), synchronous liver metastases (0%, 14.3%, 20.0%, and 26.6%) and need for pancreaticoduodenectomy (0%, 0%, 6.7%, and 25.0%), respectively. No cases of purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were associated with synchronous liver or lymph node metastasis, intermediate/high grade, recurrence, or death due to disease. Among patients presenting without metastatic disease, 10-year recurrence-free survival was 100% in patients with purely and mostly cystic tumors versus 53.0% in patients with purely and mostly solid tumors; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors demonstrate a spectrum of biologic behavior with an increasing cystic component being associated with more favorable clinicopathologic features and prognosis. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may represent 1 subset that can be safely observed without immediate resection.

Risk factors for aggressive nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and the role of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration

Background:

Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) are increasingly being diagnosed but management, especially of small tumors, remains a clinical dilemma. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is now routinely used for diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) but has not been well studied as a tool for identifying aggressive disease.

Materials and Methods:

A systematic search of the cytology database identified all patients at our center who underwent EUS-FNA from 1999 through 2011 and were diagnosed with NF-pNET.

Results:

A total of 50 patients were identified. Though patients with metastatic disease had a mean tumor size of 40 mm compared to 25 mm in patients without metastatic disease (P = 0.04), we also identified several patients with tumors <20 mm who presented with metastatic disease. Furthermore, we found no statistically significant difference in metastatic disease between tumors <20 mm and >20 mm (P = 0.13). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we found that using a cutoff point of 20 mm only led to a sensitivity of 85% in screening for metastases, while lowering the cutoff point to 18 mm allowed for a sensitivity of 95%.

Conclusion:

Currently, guidelines suggest that only patients with tumors greater than 20 mm undergo surgical resection, as tumors less than this size are thought to have low risk of metastases. Our analysis suggests that these recommendations could lead to undertreating patients with small tumors. Tumor size alone may be inadequate as a marker for aggressive NF-pNETs. Given this, other risk factors for aggressive pNETs should be studied to help identify the patients most likely to benefit from surgery.

Incremental benefit of preoperative EUS for the detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging as the initial imaging modalities for the work-up of suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental benefit of preoperative EUS (IBEUS) for the detection of suspected PNETs after other investigative modalities have been attempted.

DESIGN

This systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of included articles, and conference proceedings for studies reporting original data regarding the preoperative detection of PNETs. Pooled IBEUS was calculated by using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored by using stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression. Evidence of small-study effects was assessed by using funnel plots and the Begg test.

PATIENTS

Patients with suspected PNETs.

INTERVENTIONS

EUS evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The pooled IBEUS for the detection of PNETs after CT scan, with or without additional investigative modalities.

RESULTS

Among 4505 citations identified, we included 17 cohort studies (612 patients). EUS identified PNETs in 97% of cases. Improved PNET identification with EUS was observed in all of the studies. After adjusting for small-study effects, meta-analysis showed that EUS alone could identify PNETs in approximately 1 in 4 patients (adjusted IBEUS 26%; 95% confidence interval, 17%-37%). The pooled IBEUS varied based on the study design, study size, type of CT scan used, and the number of modalities used prior to EUS.

LIMITATIONS

The majority of included studies were retrospective. Small-study effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative EUS is associated with an increase in PNET detection after other modalities are attempted.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms comprising only 1% to 2% of all pancreatic tumors. In recent years, the number of incidentally discovered PNETs has greatly increased given the widespread use of axial imaging. However, a significant proportion of PNETs may not be visualized on conventional imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an integral part of the diagnosis of PNETs because of its high sensitivity for detecting, localizing, and diagnosing PNETs. EUS-guided tissue acquisition provides histologic and immunologic confirmation, and may also allow prognostication about tumor behavior. In addition to preoperative assessment of these tumors, EUS has also been shown to have an important role in nonoperative management of small nonfunctional PNETs. Finally, recent developments suggest that interventional EUS may be used to aid intraoperative localization of PNETs and to deliver therapeutic agents for the treatment of PNETs. This review will discuss the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of PNETs, with focus on recent advances in the utility of EUS in the clinical management of these tumors.

Cystic neuroendocrine tumor in the pancreas detected by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration: a case report

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are typically solid neoplasms but in very rare cases present as cystic lesions. The diagnosis of cystic tumors in the pancreas is extremely difficult and the use of endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration might be helpful in the work-up of patients with cystic neuroendocrine tumors in the pancreas.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old Caucasian man was admitted with a history of epigastric pain. Laboratory tests were normal. The patient underwent transabdominal ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrating an unclear cystic mass in the head of the pancreas. The patient was referred for endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound showed a hypoechoic lesion (42 × 47 mm) in the head of the pancreas with regular borders and large cystic components. The main pancreatic duct was normal without any connection to the cystic process. The lesion underwent fine-needle aspiration (22 Gauge). Cytological examination demonstrated cohesive groups of plasmacytoid cells staining positively for synaptophysin and chromogranin A, which is suggestive of a neuroendocrine tumor.

Conclusions

Differential diagnosis of cystic lesions in the pancreas is very difficult with conventional radiology, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. This unusual case with a pancreatic cystic neuroendocrine tumor highlights the clinical importance of endoscopic ultrasound in the work-up of patients with unclear lesions in the pancreas.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics of cystic versus solid pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are rare neoplasms, and presently, it is uncertain whether their behavior is similar or distinct from their solid counterparts. This study aimed to review systematically the present literature to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics of cystic PNENs versus their solid counterparts to determine whether cystic PNENs are likely to be a distinct entity from solid PNENs.

METHODS

Comparative studies of solid versus cystic PNENs studies were reviewed. Cystic and solid PNENs were compared on the basis of several clinicopathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Seven nonrandomized case control studies compared 152 cystic versus 915 solid PNENs. Pooled analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of PNENs to be located in the head/uncinate of the pancreas was lower for cystic than solid neoplasms (27.7% vs 45.5%, odds ratio [OR] 0.452, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.304-0.673, P < .001). Cystic PNENs were less likely to be functional (14% vs 24.4%, OR 0.405, 95% CI 0.221-0.742, P = .003) and were more likely to be benign/uncertain rather than malignant compared with solid PNENs (90.3% vs 65.9%, OR 3.151, 95% CI 1.297-7.652, P = .011). Cystic PNENs were more likely to have a mitotic count <2 per 10 hpf and a Ki67 index <2% (93.3% vs 72.7%, OR 4.897, 95% CI 2.139-11.209, P < .001 and 82.4% vs 54.1%, OR 4.079, 95% CI 2.177-7.641, P < .001), respectively. Cystic neoplasms were also less likely to have regional lymph node metastases than solid neoplasms (11.2% vs 28.9%, OR 0.387, 95% CI 0.219-0.685, P = .001).In this meta-analysis, there was no difference in the 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between cystic vs solid PNENs (92.0% vs 86.8%, P .214) and (98.1% vs 83.9%, P = .185).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that cystic PNENs tend to be biologically less aggressive compared with their solid counterparts; more data, however, with respect to molecular analysis are required to establish whether cystic and solid PNENs were distinct pathologic entities.

Endosonographic and cyst fluid characteristics of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a multicentre case series

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are uncommon neoplasms which may rarely be cystic. Differentiation from other more common cystic neoplasms may be difficult.

AIMS

To describe the morphologic, cytologic, and cyst fluid characteristics of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for endosonographic evaluation of pancreatic cysts at four centres.

RESULTS

27 patients (12 males) with cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours were identified. Prior to endosonography, this tumour was suspected in only 2 patients based on presenting symptoms (7.4%). The median cyst size was 35 mm (range 8-80 mm). Wall thickening was identified in 13 cases. The median carcinoembryonic antigen level was 1.25 (range 0.6-500). Fine needle aspiration cytology in 17 of 24 patients confirmed neuroendocrine tumour (71%). In 8 of 9 patients who had needle targeting of the cyst wall, cytology was consistent with neuroendocrine tumour (88.9%). 18 patients underwent surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour was rarely suspected, including by cross-sectional imaging. Wall thickening was identified in approximately half of cases on endosonography. Cyst fluid was typically non-viscous with very low carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Targeting the wall during fine needle aspiration had a high diagnostic yield and should be performed.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with cystlike changes: evaluation with MDCT

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence and CT appearance of cystlike changes of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET), particularly of small (≤ 3 cm) tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical records, images, and pathologic reports of 74 consecutive patients (average age, 55.5 years) with surgically resected pancreatic NETs who underwent preoperative CT were retrospectively reviewed. The size and location of the pancreatic NETs were recorded. The tumors were classified on the basis of CT appearance as small (≤ 3 cm) or large (> 3 cm) and as solid, partially (≤ 50% or > 50%) cystic, or purely (≈ 100%) cystic. Peripheral contrast enhancement on CT was characterized, and lymph node and liver metastases found by pathologic examination were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 78 pancreatic NETs were reviewed. Five were not visualized on CT, leaving 73 pancreatic NETs in 69 patients (multiple tumors were visualized on CT of three patients) for analysis. The mean size of the 73 tumors was 3.0 ± 2.6 (SD) cm (range, 0.7-13.1 cm); 52 tumors were 3 cm or smaller and 21 tumors were larger than 3 cm. Gross pathologic results confirmed that 13 of the 73 (17.8%) tumors were predominantly (> 50% or ≈ 100%) cystic: 10 of the 52 (19.2%) tumors 3 cm or smaller and three of the 21 (14.3%) tumors larger than 3 cm. Peripheral contrast enhancement was seen in 11 of the 13 (85%) predominantly cystic pancreatic NETs. Compared with solid pancreatic NETs, predominantly cystic pancreatic NETs were less commonly associated with lymph node and liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

Cystic pancreatic NETs are not rare and should be included in the differential diagnosis of a cystic pancreatic mass, particularly if the cystic mass is associated with peripheral contrast enhancement. A minority of cystic pancreatic NETs can present with no peripheral enhancement.

Pancreatic incidentalomas

Pancreatic incidentalomas are defined as asymptomatic pancreatic lesions, discovered incidentally by imaging for an unrelated indication. They are being discovered with increasing frequency as the use of high quality cross sectional imaging is becoming more widespread. These lesions cover a wide spectrum of pathology from benign simple cysts through potentially malignant lesions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, to frankly malignant adenocarcinoma. In this article we outline the incidence, imaging characteristics and natural history of the various incidental lesions with emphasis to neuroendocrine tumors. A diagnostic approach is also suggested, including the rational use of further imaging, serum biochemistry and the utility of ultrasound guided aspiration of cyst fluid if present. We examine several proposed classification systems and discuss the role of surgery, surveillance and prognosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic tumors

Cystic pancreatic tumors (CPTs) have more frequently been identified in the last decade because of increased use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging. Although serous CPTs follow an indolent course and do not necessarily require surgical resection or long-term follow-up, mucinous CPTs (mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) have a greater risk for malignancy. Although most CPTs are initially detected with imaging modalities such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, these tests alone rarely permit an accurate clinical diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration allow real-time examination and biopsy analysis of CPTs, which increases diagnostic accuracy because cytopathology features and tumor markers in cyst fluid can be analyzed. Management of patients with mucinous CPTs by surgery or imaging surveillance is controversial, partially because of limited information about disease progression and the complexities of surgical resection. We review approaches to diagnosis and management of common CPTs.

Unusual paraneoplastic syndrome accompanies neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas

Neuroendocrine tumours comprise a small percentage of pancreatic neoplasia (10%) (1). Diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours is difficult, especially if the tumours are small and nonfunctional. CT scans, MRI, and nuclear scans are sufficiently sensitive assessment tools for tumours with diameters of at least 2 cm; otherwise, the sensitivity and specificity of these techniques is less than 50% (2). Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a heterogeneous neuromuscular junction disorder that is primarily caused when antibodies form against the acetylcholine receptors (Ab-AchR). MG can develop in conjunction with neoplasia, making MG a paraneoplastic disease. In those cases, MG is most commonly associated with thymomas and less frequently associated with extrathymic malignancies. The mechanism underlying this paraneoplastic syndrome has been hypothesized to involve an autoimmune response against the tumour cells (3). No published reports have linked malignant pancreatic diseases with MG. Here, we report the case of a young woman, negative for Ab-AchR, with a neuroendocrine tumour in the pancreatic head, who experienced a complete resolution of her MG-like syndrome after surgical enucleation of the tumour.

Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of enucleation versus resection in patients with small pancreatic, ampullary, and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

Multi-institutional retrospective review identified all patients with pancreatic and peri-pancreatic NETs who underwent surgery from January 1990 to October 2008. Patients with tumors < or =3 cm and without nodal or metastatic disease were included.

RESULTS

Of the 271 patients identified, 122 (45%) met the inclusion criteria and had either an enucleation (n = 37) and/or a resection (n = 87). Enucleated tumors were more likely to be in the pancreatic head (P = 0.003) or functioning (P < 0.0001) and, when applicable, less likely to result in splenectomy (P = 0.0003). The rate of pancreatic fistula formation was higher after enucleation (P < 0.01), but the fistula severity tended to be worse following resection (P = 0.07). The enucleation and resection patients had similar operative times, blood loss, overall morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and 5-year survival. However, for pancreatic head tumors, enucleation resulted in decreased blood loss, operative time, and length of stay compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that most outcomes of enucleation and resection for small pancreatic and peri-pancreatic NETs are comparable. However, enucleation has better outcomes than pancreaticoduodenectomy for head lesions and the advantage of preserving splenic function for tail lesions.

Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Current Diagnostic Modalities and Management

Cystic neoplasm of the pancreas is a relatively uncommon condition covering a wide spectrum of pathology. The increasing incidence as a result of routine imaging tests in asymptomatic patients presents a diagnostic and therapeutic problem to the clinician. This paper discusses the role of the various investigative modalities in the management of cystic neoplasia of the pancreas. Key words: Frantz tumour, Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, Mucinous cystadenoma, Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, Mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Pancreatic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic surgery is a very challenging field and the management of pancreatic diseases continues to evolve. This report reviews the most recent information relating to pancreatic surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Startlingly, it appears that a third of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer do not receive an operation in the United States, but for those who do receive surgery new emphasis on adequate lymph node staging has been reported. Assessment of guidelines for the treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and cystic lesions of the pancreas appear to validate the current practice. Extended pancreatic resections with vascular resection appear safe and with reasonable survival outcomes. The use of laparoscopic techniques for the pancreas continues to advance. Finally, patients with chronic pancreatitis appear better served by operative techniques rather than endoscopic approaches.

SUMMARY

Pancreatic surgery is a fascinating field as we learn more about the biology of the conditions that afflict this gland and the best practices to address these diseases.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: endoscopic diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This review highlights advances over the last year in EUS in the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

We will focus on recent findings regarding the accuracy of EUS, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-fine needle aspiration), emerging cytologic markers obtained from fine needle aspiration samples, and the role of EUS screening for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Additionally, we will introduce potential therapeutic EUS interventions in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

SUMMARY

The present review highlights recent advances in the utility of EUS in the clinical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Key studies from the last year demonstrate the important role of EUS in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.