Surgical outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted drug therapy

The association of having a monitoring or blunting coping style with psychological distress, health-related quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients

BACKGROUND

There are two main coping styles regarding information seeking under medical threat; monitoring (information-seeking) and blunting (information-avoiding). The aim of this study is to (1) determine factors associated with a monitoring or blunting coping style in gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients and (2) investigate its association with psychological distress, cancer-related concerns, health-related quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, Dutch GIST patients completed the shortened version of the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory to determine their coping style, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cancer Worry Scale, EORTC QLQ-C30 and part of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were classified as blunters (n = 175, 57%) or monitors (n = 132, 43%). Coping style was not associated with tumour or treatment variables, but being a female (OR 2.5; 95%CI 1.5-4.1; p= <.001) and higher educated (OR 5.5; 95%CI 2.5-11.9, p= <.001) were associated with higher odds of being a monitor. Monitors scored significantly lower on emotional functioning (mean = 86.8 vs mean = 90.9, p=.044), which is considered a trivial difference, more often experienced severe fear of cancer recurrence or progression (53.0% vs 37.7%, p=.007), and had more concerns about dying from GIST in the future (60.6% vs 47.4%, p=.025). Compared to blunters, monitors were less satisfied with the received healthcare and information, and would have liked to receive more information.

CONCLUSION

GIST patients with a monitoring coping style experience a higher emotional burden. Additionally, monitors exhibit a greater need for information. Although this need for information could potentially result in fears and concerns, recognising it may also create an opening for tailored communication and information.

Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of microscopically positive margins (R1) on primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies up to 23 November 2020. The pooled disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between R1 and negative margins (R0) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

Twenty studies with 6,465 patients were included. Compared with R0 resection, R1 was associated with poor DFS in patients who did not receive adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.26-2.09; P = 0.48, I² = 0%; reference: R0). This negative impact of R1 disappeared with the use of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.95-1.60; P = 0.38, I2 = 6%; reference: R0). R1 was related to poor DFS in gastric GISTs (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.15-5.02, I² = 0%; reference: R0), which was attenuated in the subgroup of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.32-15.60; P = 0.84, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Rectal GIST with R1 margin who even received adjuvant Imatinib still had poor DFS (HR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.27-11.31; P = 0.54, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Patients who underwent R1 resection had similar OS compared with those underwent R0 resection regardless of the use of adjuvant Imatinib.

Conclusion

R1 was associated with poor DFS for primary GISTs, which was attenuated by adjuvant therapy with Imatinib. Similar result was observed in the gastric GISTs subgroup. Rectal GIST patients with R1 resection had poor DFS even when they received adjuvant Imatinib. The R1 margin did not influence the OS of GISTs.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors-A Mini Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. They are potentially malignant, and have an unpredictable evolution. The origin of these tumors is in the interstitial cells of Cajal, which are cells that are interposed between the intramural neurons and the smooth muscle cells of the digestive tract. GISTs are characterized by mutations in the gene c-Kit, but also other mutations, such as those of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. The most common locations of these tumors are the stomach and small intestine, although they can occur at any level of the digestive tract and occasionally in the omentum, mesentery and peritoneum. Most cases of GISTs are sporadic, and about 5% of cases are part of family genetic syndromes. The correct diagnosis of GIST is determined by histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry. According to histopathology, there are three main types of GISTs: spindle cell type, epithelioid type and mixed type. The therapeutic management of GIST includes surgery, endoscopic treatment and chemotherapy. The prognosis of patients with GIST varies depending on a number of factors, such as risk category, GIST stage, treatment applied and recurrence after treatment.

Association between R1 resection and oncological outcome in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors without tumor rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of positive microscopic margin (R1) resection on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is controversial. Tumor rupture is significantly associated with the occurrence of R1 resection and may be a confounder of R1 resection in GISTs. The present meta-analysis evaluated the real influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GISTs by excluding the confounding effect of tumor rupture.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Studies that compared R1 with negative microscopic margin (R0) resection in GIST patients and reported the time-to-event data of recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Of the 4896 records screened, 23 retrospective studies with 6248 participants were selected. In the overall analysis, R1 resection resulted in a significantly shorter RFS/DFS than R0 resection for GISTs (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.54-2.10, P < 0.001, I² = 14%). However, the inferior RFS/DFS vanished when tumor rupture cases were excluded (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.98-1.83, P = 0.07, I² = 33%). Sensitivity analysis by high-quality studies brought about a more robust HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 0.88-1.50, P = 0.29), with low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The qualities of evidence for the outcomes were high.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that R1 resection did not influence the survival outcome of GISTs. Reresection may not be necessary when positive microscopic margins exist. This analysis could provide high-quality evidence for the development of guidelines.

Do microscopic surgical margins matter for primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor?

BACKGROUND

Although tumor size and mitotic rate are established prognostic factors for worse survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the impact of microscopic margins, or R1 resection, is not completely established.

METHODS

Patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgical resection for stage I to III gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors were identified from the 2010 to 2013 National Cancer Database and divided into 2 cohorts, R0 and R1 resections. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan Meier survival estimates were utilized to analyze 5-y overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 2,084 patients, those with R1 resection (57, 2.7%) were more likely to have tumors >10 cm (28.1% vs 11.9%, odds ratio 3.51, P = .017) and stage III disease (26.3% vs 11.2%, odds ratio 2.26, P = .047). Although margin status was associated with higher risk tumors, it was not associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy. After multivariate Cox regression, R1 and R0 patients did not have a difference in 5-y overall survival (82.5% vs 88.6%, hazards ratio 1.26, P = .49). When stratified by stage of disease, there remained no difference in survival across all stages when comparing R1 and R0 patients.

CONCLUSION

Positive microscopic margins are uncommon but do not appear to impact survival outcomes in patients with resected localized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor as a Gateway for Streptococcus anginosus Causing Multiple Liver Abscesses

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common type of mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract but consist of only 1% of all primary gastrointestinal neoplasms. Differentiated from other spindle cell tumors, GISTs are uniquely positive for CD117 expression which allows for molecular targeting therapy with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec). Clinical presentations are variable, ranging from asymptomatic to vague symptoms of abdominal pain, early satiety, abdominal distention or gastrointestinal bleeding. Very rarely, patients can present with tumor-bowel fistula and intra-abdominal abscesses. In this article, we discuss a rare presentation of a middle-aged male with multiple liver abscesses found to have a primary small bowel GIST. This patient received prompt intravenous antibiotics; however, hepatic abscesses can be easily misinterpreted as cystic hepatic metastases which can delay appropriate therapy. Streptococcus anginosus was found to be responsible for the formation of the liver abscesses visualized on computed tomography (CT) scan. Similar to Streptococcus bovis, knowledge in the literature is arising about the association between S. anginosus and gastrointestinal malignancies. This case highlights the importance of identifying concomitant primary GISTs with intra-hepatic abscesses, as these lesions can be easily misconstrued as liver metastases and consequently mismanaged. We herein emphasize that hepatic abscesses are a potential sequela of GISTs and should thus prompt further investigation for potential malignancies, if warranted, so that there is no delay in treatment of these gastrointestinal tumors.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Implications

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. They have recently been recognized as a separate nosological entity and the literature on these stromal tumors has rapidly expanded.

Materials and methods

The surgical records of 50 patients with primary GISTs treated at the Digestive Surgery Department of the Catholic University of Rome from January 1993 to December 2010 were reviewed and the prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

Surgery was performed in all patients with curative intent. The median age at presentation was 66.5 years (range, 28–81). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 26 (52%) cases. Median follow-up was 71 months (range, 5–208). There was an 8% recurrence rate. The actuarial 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 66.3% and 57.2%, respectively. High mitotic rate (P <0.001), tumor size greater than 10 cm (P = 0.007) and tumor rupture (P = 0.05) were the only prognostically significant negative factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The present study confirmed the important role of aggressive surgical management of GISTs to offer these patients the most appropriate treatment for long-term survival.

Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299-0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161-0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128-2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608-3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583-2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was "moderate" for DFS and "low" for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective.

Prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours: are they the same in the multidisciplinary treatment era?

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has lead to increasing use of combination of medical and surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to look at outcomes from a series of surgically treated GISTs and determine prognostic factors in the context of multimodal therapy.

METHODS

We analysed 104 single surgeon's patients with GIST. End points of the study were disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year DSS rates were 96.7 and 94.6 %. On univariate analysis, clear resection margins were predictive of DSS. Patients with R2 resection had a worse prognosis (3-year DSS rate of 83.3 %; 5-year DSS rate of 62.5 %) compared to patients with R0 (3-year DSS rate of 98 %; 5-year DSS rate of 98 %) or R1 resection (3-year DSS rate of 100 %; 5-year DSS rate of 100 %) (R0 vs R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Pre-operative factors associated with R2 resection were clinical metastatic disease (p < 0.001), non-gastric tumour site (p = 0.002) and large tumour diameter (p = 0.031). Three- and 5-year DFS rates were 65.5 and 59.8 %. Serosal perforation (p = 0.013) and mitotic rate (p = 0.05) were found to be independently predictive of increased DFS. The presence of serosal perforation was associated with tumour site (p = 0.018), mitotic rate (p = 0.035), tumour diameter (p < 0.001), growth pattern (p = 0.007) and age (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

In the multidisciplinary management of GIST, serosal perforation may represent an additional predictor of recurrence along with mitotic rate. Complete macroscopic surgical resection is the most reliable prognostic factor, and an aggressive surgical approach should be advocated.

Clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in southern Thailand

AIM: To review a single institutional experience in clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and analyze for factors determining treatment outcome.

METHODS: Clinicopathological data of patients with a diagnosis of GIST who were treated at our institute during November 2004 to September 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: Ninety-nine cases were included in the analysis. Primary tumor sites were at the stomach in and small bowel in 44% and 33%, respectively. Thirty-one cases already had metastasis at presentation and the most common metastatic site was the liver. Sixty-four cases (65%) were in the high-risk category. Surgical treatment was performed in 77 cases (78%), 3 of whom received upfront targeted therapy. Complete resection was achieved in 56 cases (73% of operative cases) and of whom 27 developed local recurrence or distant metastasis at a median duration of 2 years. Imatinib was given as a primary therapy in unresectable cases (25 cases) and as an adjuvant in cases with residual tumor (21 cases). Targeted therapy gave partial response in 7 cases (15%), stable disease in 27 cases (57%) and progressive disease in 13 cases (28%). Four-year overall survival was 74% (95% CI: 61%-83%). Univariate survival analysis found that low-risk tumor, gastric site, complete resection and response to imatinib were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION: The overall outcomes of GIST can be predicted by risk-categorization. Surgery alone may not be a curative treatment for GIST. Response to targeted therapy is a crucial survival determinant in these patients.

Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors--a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) comprise < 1% of all gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, but GISTs are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. Dramatic changes in clinical practice have been observed in the last decade. This review highlights the overall management of GIST and its recent developments.

METHOD

We identified literature by searching Medline and PubMed from January 1995 to December 2011 using the keywords "gastrointestinal stromal tumors", "GIST", "imatinib" and "tyrosine kinase inhibitor". Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. There were no exclusion criteria for published information to the topics.

RESULTS

For localized primary GISTs, surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy. The 5-year survival rate after complete resection of GISTs is approximately 50%-65%. Many factors including tumor size, mitotic rate, tumor location, kinase mutational status and occurrence of tumor rupture have been extensively studied and proposed to be predictors of survival outcomes. Adjuvant imatinib is proposed as an option for those patients with a substantial risk of relapse. Unresectable metastatic or recurrent GIST can be treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, with a remarkable response (50%-70%) and prolonged survival (median progression-free survival: 18-20 months; median overall survival: 51-57 months). The standard approach in the case of tumor progression on 400 mg once per day is to increase the imatinib dose to 400 mg twice per day as permitted by toxicity. Use of a second-line targeted agent, sunitinib, in patients with advanced GIST who fail (or are intolerant of) imatinib therapy is advised.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for GISTs has become increasingly complex because of the growing understanding of its biology. A multidisciplinary team that includes radiologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, and surgeons is paramount for the effective treatment of GIST.

Unusual features of gastrointestinal stromal tumor on PET/CT and CT imaging

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. It can be benign or malignant in behavior. Stomach, being the most common site (70%) for GISTs, is followed by the small intestine (20%). Anorectal, colonic, and esophageal GISTs are uncommon, whereas extraintestinal GISTs are extremely rare. The presenting symptoms are highly dependent on tumor size and location, although a large number of GISTs are asymptomatic. The purpose of this article is to highlight the unusual characteristics of GISTs illustrated by PET/CT and CT imaging. These characteristics are organized into (1) unusual tumor location, (2) unusual clinical presentation, and (3) unusual sites of metastasis. Knowing the uncommon features of GISTs is important, as they are more often seen nowadays with the increasingly important role of PET/CT and CT in GIST management; and these tumors are associated with a poorer prognosis and unwanted delay in diagnosis is avoidable. With the availability of effective treatment by imatinib mesylate, a prompt and early diagnosis is essential for disease control. All GISTs illustrated in this article are pathologically proven.

Imatinib as adjuvant therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review

The high risk of recurrence in resected gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) highlights the need for effective adjuvant treatment. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of imatinib for adjuvant treatment of localized KIT (CD117)-positive resected GIST. Relevant studies were identified by searching several electronic databases from inception to August 2009. Searches were supplemented by examining bibliographies of included studies, searching conference proceedings and consulting experts. All study types were included. Methodological quality was assessed using published criteria. Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial (RCT), three phase II studies, three cohort studies and nine case reports. In the RCT, the estimated 1-year recurrence-free survival was 98% [95% confidence interval (CI), 96-100] in the imatinib group versus 83% (95% CI, 78-88) in the placebo group, corresponding to a 65% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53; p < 0.0001) with an absolute recurrence-free survival difference of 15% at 1 year. Other nonrandomized studies reported similar outcomes demonstrating that imatinib used in the adjuvant setting improved recurrence-free survival. The optimum duration of adjuvant treatment, safety and efficacy is currently under investigation with two ongoing RCTs (EORTC 62024 and SSG XV111) and two nonrandomized studies (NCT00867113 and NCT00171977). This study adds to the evidence (based on one RCT and a number of observational studies) that GIST patients treated with adjuvant imatinib therapy show an improvement in recurrence-free survival compared to placebo or no treatment after resection of KIT-positive localized GIST with tolerable toxicity.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated before and after the advent of c-kit immunostaining

BACKGROUND

Recently developed immunohistochemical markers have revolutionised the classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) whilst tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib) have had a significant impact on the treatment of advanced tumours. We review the clinicopathological features of previously resected mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract in our institution to 1) reclassify the histological diagnosis of those stained prior to c-kit availability; 2) perform survival analysis to identify prognostic factors, and 3) to consider the implications for patients.

METHODS

Clinicopathological records of patients with a diagnosis of mesenchymal tumours treated between May 1992 and April 2007 were reviewed.

RESULTS

82 patients were reviewed. 26 (32%) were reclassified as GISTs following c-kit immunostaining and a further 14 patients were treated for GIST up to April 2007 (Total: 40 patients; 21 males and 19 females, mean age 67, range 30-92 years). 36 (90%) underwent complete resection. 5-year survival of patients with GIST alone was 80%. Females had a better median survival (M: F 43 months: 73 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of c-kit staining allowed 32% of previously diagnosed mesenchymal tumours to be reclassified as GISTs. This may have implications for the follow-up of patients diagnosed prior to the availability of this method.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence following surgery: review of the clinical utility of imatinib treatment

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery with complete removal of the tumor is the primary treatment for resectable GIST and the only chance of cure. However, recurrence after surgery is common. The 2 main prognostic factors are the mitotic activity and the size of the tumor. Tumor rupture is also a risk factor for postoperative recurrence, and extra care should be taken while manipulating this soft and friable tumor. Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec(®), Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and was first studied in the palliative setting for metastatic GIST patients in the year 2000. It is now the cornerstone of metastatic GIST treatment. IM also plays an important role as an adjuvant treatment for resectable GIST and has been shown to increase the recurrence-free survival in phase III studies. However, some points remain to be clarified. Notably, the ideal duration of adjuvant IM after surgery is still unclear. It is also difficult to determine the exact place of surgery in metastatic or recurrent GIST patients in the IM era. A multidisciplinary approach is, therefore, mandatory to offer GIST patients the best treatment available.