Surgical management of failed endoscopic treatment of pancreatic disease

Mind the Gap-Disconnected Duct Syndrome: A Review of Current Diagnostic and Management Strategies

ABSTRACT

Disconnected duct syndrome (DDS) is an adverse sequela of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in which there is disruption of the pancreatic duct leading to a failure to deliver pancreatic secretions into the duodenum. Its presentation may range from a persistent external pancreatic fistula to a treatment-resistant pancreatic pseudocyst. The diagnosis is often delayed in the acute setting if there is concurrent necrosis as management is often directed to the associated peripancreatic fluid collection. A combination of imaging modalities may be required to evaluate ductal anatomy. No definitive consensus has been achieved regarding the optimal treatment strategy for DDS, and there is a lack of published level I evidence on the topic. Treatment should be tailored to each individual patient, depending on the anatomy of ductal disruption, the presence of sepsis, the degree of physiological derangement, and the patients' performance status. Patients with DDS represent a specific cohort of patients with complex pancreatic disease that requires the input from a diverse multidisciplinary team to ensure that a good clinical outcome can be achieved.

[Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in acute pancreatitis]

The review is devoted to diagnosis and treatment of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Data on terminology, indications and options for endoscopic transluminal interventions are presented in detail. The results of numerous studies evaluating clinical efficacy of various endoscopic and open surgical procedures are analyzed. Available data confirm advisability of staged treatment of DPDS with primary endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid accumulations in specialized centers.

Endoscopic Interventions in Acute Pancreatitis: What the Advanced Endoscopist Wants to Know

Endoscopic interventions play an important role in the modern management of pancreatic fluid collections. Successful management of pancreatitis is dependent on proper classification of the disease and its local complications. The 2012 revised Atlanta classification divides acute pancreatitis into subtypes of necrotizing pancreatitis and interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) on the basis of the radiologic presence or absence of necrosis, respectively. Local complications of IEP include acute pancreatic fluid collections and pseudocysts, which contain fluid only and are differentiated by the time elapsed since the onset of symptoms. Local complications of necrotizing pancreatitis include acute necrotic collections and walled-off necrosis, which contain nonliquefied necrotic debris and are differentiated by the time elapsed since the onset of symptoms. Endoscopic techniques are used to treat local complications of pancreatitis, often in a step-up approach, by which less invasive techniques are preferred initially with potential subsequent use of more invasive procedures, dependent on the patient's clinical response and collection evolution. Common interventions performed by the advanced endoscopist include endoscopic transmural drainage and endoscopic transmural necrosectomy. However, some collections require a multimodal approach with adjunctive placement of percutaneous drainage catheters or the use of videoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal débridement. Additional endoscopic interventions may be required in the setting of pancreatic or biliary duct stones or strictures. Common complications of endoscopic intervention in the setting of pancreatitis include bleeding, infection, perforation, and stent migration. This article reviews the classification of acute pancreatitis, familiarizes radiologists with the common endoscopic techniques used in its management, and improves identification of the clinically relevant imaging findings and procedural complications related to endoscopic interventions in pancreatitis. ^©RSNA, 2018.

Laparoscopy-assisted open cystogastrostomy and pancreatic debridement for necrotizing pancreatitis (with video)

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis are well-known complications, described in 10% of cases of acute pancreatitis. Open cystogastrostomy is usually proposed after failure of minimally invasive drainage or in the presence of septic shock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted open cystogastrostomy for treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst with pancreatic necrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2011 and October 2014, all patients with pseudocyst and pancreatic necrosis undergoing open cystogastrostomy were included. Surgical procedure was standardized. The primary efficacy endpoint was the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted open cystogastrostomy as treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst. Secondary endpoints included demographic data, preoperative management, operative data, postoperative data and follow-up.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy-assisted open cystogastrostomy was performed in 11 patients [six men (54%)], with a median age of 61 years (45-84). Nine patients received preoperative radiological or endoscopic management. First-line open cystogastrostomy was performed in two cases. Median operating time was 190 min (110-240). There was one intraoperative complication related to injury of a branch of the superior mesenteric vein. There were no postoperative deaths and two postoperative complications (18%) including one major complication (postoperative bleeding). The median length of hospital stay after surgery was 16 days (7-35). The median follow-up was 10 months (2-45). One patient experienced recurrence during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Open cystogastrostomy for necrotizing pancreatitis promotes adequate internal drainage with few postoperative complications and a short length of hospital stay. However, this technique must be performed very cautiously due to the risk of vascular injury which can be difficult to repair in the context of severe local inflammation related to pancreatic necrosis.

Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: disease classification and management strategies

BACKGROUND

Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) typically complicates acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) and presents as a pseudocyst months after the initial episode of pancreatitis. However, our experience suggests that the presentation of DPDS may be quite varied and might require significant evaluation and judgment before surgical intervention. We sought to determine the presentations of DPDS and assess the management of the various forms of presentation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of all patients with DPDS between July 2005 and June 2011 was performed. Patients were included when CT scan demonstrated a clear disconnected pancreas that was confirmed at operation. Medical records were reviewed in detail to determine clinical presentation, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients identified, 66% were male, with a mean age of 53 ± 16 years. Mortality was 2% and 3 patients (6%) required late reoperation. The DPDS presented in 3 forms: diagnosed concurrently with ANP (concurrent DPDS; n = 28); delayed presentation with a pseudocyst (delayed DPDS; n = 15); and as a consequence of chronic pancreatitis (CP) (CP DPDS; n = 7). Concurrent DPDS was treated with necrosectomy including body/tail resection within 60 days of onset and complicated by a grade B/C fistula in 36%. Delayed DPDS required distal pancreatectomy 440 days after diagnosis, with a 7% fistula rate. Chronic pancreatitis DPDS was treated with lateral pancreatojejunostomy at 417 days with no fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome presents concurrently with ANP, in a delayed fashion, or infrequently in the setting of CP. Prompt recognition and classification with appropriate operative therapy results in low mortality and nonoperatively managed pancreatic fistulas.

Progress in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis

Pancreatic necrosis, a complication of severe pancreatitis, may become infected, resulting in significant morbidity and potential mortality. Infected necrosis was heretofore considered a surgical condition, and despite aggressive operative management, the mortality remained high. With a better understanding of the natural history of necrosis, established methods to diagnose infection and the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques, less aggressive therapies have been utilized with some success. The present study evaluated a step-up approach for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis, utilizing endoscopic and percutaneous techniques, and if ineffective, necrosectomy with a minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach. They compared this step-up approach to the standard open necrosectomy. They demonstrated that when using such an approach compared with open necrosectomy, the frequency of major complications such as organ failure, perforation, fistula or even death was significantly less than in those who received conventional open necrosectomy. Indeed, for those randomized to the step-up approach, roughly a third of the patients were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage alone. In the long-term, development of diabetes was also less frequent in those receiving less aggressive therapy. These findings, in combination with other reports, suggest that the dogma that open necrosectomy is mandatory for all patients with infected necrosis should be re-evaluated, and that less aggressive treatments as part of a multidisciplinary approach can reduce morbidity and mortality.

A long-term follow-up study on endoscopic management of children and adolescents with chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Data on therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for chronic pancreatitis (CP) in children and adolescents, especially with long-term follow-up of consequences, are rarely reported. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term follow-up results of therapeutic ERCP for CP in children and adolescents.

METHODS

All patients with CP who received therapeutic ERCP at Changhai Hospital from January 1997 to May 2009, with the age at first onset of pain being less than 18.0 years, were included. Attempts were made to contact all adolescents and follow-up data were recorded. Clinical data were assessed before and after every ERCP.

RESULTS

Follow-up information was available in 42 (91.3%) of the 46 patients who received therapeutic ERCP. There were 20 boys and 22 girls, with the age at first onset being 11.8+/-4.5 years. A total of 110 therapeutic ERCP sessions were performed in the 42 patients. The post-ERCP complication rate was 17.3%, including mild and moderate pancreatitis (n=17) and mild cholangitis (n=2). The mean follow-up period of time was 61.4 (range: 24-132) months. Five patients underwent subsequent surgery because of refractory abdominal pain after endotherapy. Of the remaining 37 patients who received therapeutic ERCP alone, abdominal pain improved in 30 (81.1%) patients, and was completely relieved in 24 (64.9%) patients during the period of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic ERCP may offer long-term improvement in pain in children and adolescents with CP.

Open cystogastrostomy, retroperitoneal drainage, and G-J enteral tube for complex pancreatitis-associated pseudocyst: 19 patients with no recurrence

INTRODUCTION

Various techniques have been described to achieve definitive resolution of complex acute pancreatitis associated pseudocysts (PACs). Many of these strategies, inclusive of open, minimally invasive, and radiological procedures, are hampered by high recurrence or failed resolution, particularly for PAC near the pancreatic head. The present series describes a multimodal strategy combining a minilaparotomy for anterior gastrostomy for the creation of a stapled posterior cystogastrostomy, placement of an 8F secured silastic tube for intentional formation of a cystogastric fistula tract in combination with gastric drainage, and postduodenal enteral alimentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database, patients with complex PAC undergoing the above procedures were identified. PAC location, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and time to start enteral feeding were identified. PAC were assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan prior to operation, 1 month after drainage, and patients with PAC resolution were started on oral diet, with the fistula silastic tube kept in place for an additional month.

RESULTS

Over the interval 2003 to 2008, 19 patients were managed with the stated strategy. PACs were located at the pancreatic body/tail in 12 patients, and 7 patients had PAC at the level of the pancreatic head/neck area. In this cohort, prior to surgical drainage, 17/19 patients had undergone failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with decompressive stent placement and 13/19 had a failed percutaneous PAC drainage. There was no perioperative mortality after open surgical drainage. All patients started on jejunal tube feeding 24 h after surgical procedure. Median postoperative LOS was 7 days (4-13). At 1 month, 16/19 (84%) of patients showed complete resolution of the PAC on CT scan and were started on oral diet; 3/19 required additional month for complete resolution. After a mean follow-up of 31 months, there was no PAC recurrences in any of these patients demonstrated on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The described strategy is safe, efficient, and allows early restoration of enteral feeding with early hospital discharge. High resolution rates and absence of PAC recurrences in this series supports this approach for complex PAC.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing debridement of pancreatic necrosis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic necrosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The Atlanta Classification underwent proposed revisions in 2007 to better categorize acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2008, patients with pancreatic necrosis treated with surgical debridement were analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) images were independently reviewed to classify of pancreatic collections according to the revised Atlanta classification.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were categorized as infected extrapancreatic necrosis (40%), sterile extrapancreatic necrosis (29%), infected pancreatic necrosis (15%), sterile pancreatic necrosis (11%), or post-necrotic collection (5%). Mortality was 14%, and morbidity was 55%. Debridement with external drainage or open packing was associated with higher mortality than cystgastrostomy (p = 0.03). Atlanta Classification was not associated with operative procedure or mortality. Degree of chronic disease, demonstrated by albumin level, and infection were associated with longer stay (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Type of necrosis by the revised Atlanta Classification was not associated with outcomes or type of operation. Debridement by cystgastrostomy was associated with lower mortality rates than external drainage or open packing. Length of stay was increased in patients with evidence of chronic disease, infection, and postoperative complications. Necrotizing pancreatitis continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality and should undergo aggressive treatment at tertiary care centers.