Reinterventions for specific technique-related complications of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH): a critical appraisal

Perirectal hematoma after stapled surgery for hemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defecation syndrome: case series management to avoid panic-guided treatment

Perirectal hematoma (PH) is one of the most feared complications of stapling procedures. Literature reviews have reported only a few works on PH, most of them describing isolated treatment approaches and severe outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze a homogenous case series of PH and to define a treatment algorithm for huge postoperative PHs. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of three high-volume proctology units was performed between 2008 and 2018, and all PH cases were analyzed. In all, 3058 patients underwent stapling procedures for hemorrhoidal disease or obstructed defecation syndrome with internal prolapse. Among these, 14 (0.46%) large PH cases were reported, and 12 of these hematomas were stable and treated conservatively (antibiotics and CT/laboratory test monitoring); most of them were resolved with spontaneous drainage. Two patients with progressive PH (signs of active bleeding and peritonism) were submitted to CT and arteriography to evaluate the source of bleeding, which was subsequently closed by embolization. This approach helped ensure that no patients with PH were referred for major abdominal surgery. Most PH cases are stable and treatable with a conservative approach, evolving with self-drainage. Progressive hematomas are rare and should undergo angiography with embolization to minimize the possibility of major surgery and severe complications.

Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line

BACKGROUND

Persistent anal pain (PAP) after stapled procedures, be it hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) or stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) may be hardly resolved by medical therapy. The typical objective finding in these patients is the staple line characterized by fixed scar to underlying layers.

METHODS

A total of 21 consecutive patients were operated for PAP after stapled procedure. The scarred staple line was excised and detached from layers below, the mucosal continuity reconstructed by single stitches. From January 2003 to December 2013 1500 patients underwent stapled procedure. Of these patients treated in our unit, 9 (0.6 %) were operated for chronic anal pain and 12 were referred to our center from other hospitals.

RESULTS

Fifteen (71.4 %) patients resolved and do not take any drugs for pain; an overall of 85.7 % (18/21) improved their clinical status. Mean time between the beginning of symptoms and the operation was 4.27 months (range 1-18 months). We divided the patients into three groups: before 3 months, between 3 and 6 months and after 6 months from the beginning of symptoms to the operation. The best results were in the first group with 100 % pain relief and satisfactory functional results.

CONCLUSIONS

The relief of PAP after stapled procedure, in which we recognize a scarred and fixed staple line, depends by the early recognition of this typical finding. The authors suggest the surgical treatment not later than 3-6 months after the onset of symptoms to achieve the best results.

Hemorrhoids and fistulas: new solutions to old problems

Symptoms thought related to hemorrhoids must be carefully considered before intervention. The first line of therapy for any hemorrhoidal complaint remains conservative management with increased fluid and fiber intake and appropriate modification of toileting behavior. Bleeding in grades 1 and 2 hemorrhoids that does not respond to this can be satisfactorily and safely managed with office-based therapies; some grade 3 hemorrhoids would also respond to this, though more treatment sessions would likely be required. Operative therapy is the best choice for management of persistently symptomatic grade 2 disease and for grades 3 and 4 symptomatic hemorrhoids as well. With proper patient selection and preparation, along with a familiarity with instrumentation and techniques, good results can be obtained with newer operative interventions for internal hemorrhoids. Outcomes must always be compared with those obtained with classic excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Rectal perforation with life-threatening peritonitis following stapled haemorrhoidopexy

BACKGROUND

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is a well recognized alternative to haemorrhoidectomy, and is associated with reduced pain and earlier return to normal activity. This paper reports all published cases of life-threatening sepsis following stapled haemorrhoidopexy, identifies causative factors and makes recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching the major electronic databases. All relevant references were reviewed for possible inclusion. All references of the relevant articles were screened for any further articles that were not identified in the initial search.

RESULTS

From 2000 to the present, 29 articles reporting complications in 40 patients were identified. Thirty-five patients underwent laparotomy with faecal diversion and a further patient was treated by low anterior resection. A specific complication was rectal perforation with peritonitis. Factors that led to life-threatening sepsis were identified in 30 patients. Despite surgical treatment and resuscitation, there were four deaths.

CONCLUSION

Severe sepsis can complicate stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Rectal perforation and peritonitis are a particular risk of this technique and the associated mortality rate is high.

Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy as a Day-Surgery Procedure

In the last 10 years, stapled hemorrhoidectomy has gained worldwide consensus. We studied a day-surgery stapled hemorrhoidopexy protocol to allow shorter recovery time and cost reduction. From 2003 to 2008, we performed 292 outpatient stapled hemorrhoidopexies under spinal or local anesthesia including symptomatic Grade III and IV hemorrhoid disease. We used PPH 01 to PPH 03 staplers. We assessed early and late postoperative pain with a Visual Analog Scale, whereas clinical postoperative examinations were performed at sev7en days, 6 months, and 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. The mean surgery time was approximately 18 minutes (range, 13 to 39 minutes). Of 292 patients, 39 were not dischargeable for urine retention, severe pain, or mild bleeding. Four other patients were rehospitalized within 8 days for bleeding. Twenty-one patients reported transient fecal urgency, whereas nobody reported anal incontinence. We can conclude that stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective procedure if performed in a day-surgery unit. The complication rate is comparable to that of inpatient procedures.

Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study with a 6-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy was introduced in 1998 as a new technique for treating advanced hemorrhoidal disease. Despite a clear perioperative advantage regarding pain and patient comfort, literature reviews indicate a higher recurrence rate for stapled hemorrhoidopexy than for conventional techniques.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to present long-term on the use of this technique.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with hemorrhoid prolapse treated at a regional surgical center from May 27, 1999, through December 31, 2003.

INTERVENTION

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy with accompanying resection of residual hemorrhoidal nodules if necessary.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Standardized patient questionnaire regarding satisfaction, resolution of symptoms, and performance of further interventions.

RESULTS

Of 257 patients (82 female, 175 male, mean age 53 ± 13 years) undergoing stapled hemorrhoidopexy, follow-up data were available for 224 patients (87.2%) with a mean duration of 6.3 ± 1.2 years. Of these, 195 patients (87.1%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the operation outcome; 19 patients (8.5%) were moderately satisfied; and 10 (4.5%) were not satisfied. Regarding preoperative anal symptoms, complete relief was observed in 179 patients (80.6%) for prolapse, 172 (77.5%) for bleeding, 139 (85.3%) for mucus discharge, 139 (78.5%) for burning sensation, and 115 (75.5%) for itching. Considering all recorded symptoms, 194 patients (86.6%) reported absence and or an improvement at follow-up. Twelve patients (5.4%) reported newly developed incontinence in the sense of urge symptoms; 42 patients out of 51 patients (82.4%) with preexisting incontinence reported an improvement. Local or topical retreatment (ointment, suppositories, sclerotherapy) was performed in 48 patients (21.4%). Reoperation for residual or newly developed hemorrhoidal nodules was needed in 8 patients (3.6%).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of a comparative group.

CONCLUSION

Our long-term results show that this strategy for stapled hemorrhoidopexy can achieve a high level of patient satisfaction and symptom control, with a low rate of reoperation for recurrent hemorrhoidal symptoms.

Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results

PURPOSE

Haemorrhoidal disease is a frequently occurring entity in the western world. The Procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH) and transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation (THD) are the most important surgical treatments that respect normal anal anatomy. This is the first randomized trial that compares both techniques in the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids.

METHODS

Patients with grade III or IV haemorrhoids were randomized between PPH and THD. Patients were seen after 1 week, 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Primary endpoint was resolved symptoms 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were pain, measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) after 1 day, 1 week and 3 weeks, and complications.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were allocated to PPH versus 23 to THD. Success rates after 6 weeks were 83% in the PPH group versus 78% in the THD group. VAS scores were significantly lower after 1 day and 1 week in the THD group, but equalled out after 3 weeks. Twelve percent of the patients after PPH and 4% after THD needed an urgent readmission to treat an acute bleeding. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Both PPH and THD are safe treatments for grade III and IV haemorrhoids with acceptable complication rates and good short-term results. THD might be the preferred treatment because it carries the similar complication rate and short-term results, but results in less postoperative pain when compared with PPH. Moreover, it is a less invasive, more easily learned and less costly procedure.

Surgical treatment of anal stenosis

Anal stenosis is a rare but serious complication of anorectal surgery, most commonly seen after hemorrhoidectomy. Anal stenosis represents a technical challenge in terms of surgical management. A Medline search of studies relevant to the management of anal stenosis was undertaken. The etiology, pathophysiology and classification of anal stenosis were reviewed. An overview of surgical and non-surgical therapeutic options was developed. Ninety percent of anal stenosis is caused by overzealous hemorrhoidectomy. Treatment, both medical and surgical, should be modulated based on stenosis severity. Mild stenosis can be managed conservatively with stool softeners or fiber supplements. Sphincterotomy may be quite adequate for a patient with a mild degree of narrowing. For more severe stenosis, a formal anoplasty should be performed to treat the loss of anal canal tissue. Anal stenosis may be anatomic or functional. Anal stricture is most often a preventable complication. Many techniques have been used for the treatment of anal stenosis with variable healing rates. It is extremely difficult to interpret the results of the various anaplastic procedures described in the literature as prospective trials have not been performed. However, almost any approach will at least improve patient symptoms.