Zenker's diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size

C-reactive protein as an early marker of postoperative leakage in patients after endoscopic laser assisted Zenker's diverticulotomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques are the treatment of choice for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Our objective was to evaluate the results and efficacy of endoscopic and open approaches, to determine whether postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels can be used as a marker to exclude the presence of esophageal leakage, and to identify risk factors for development of postoperative leakage and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent transcervical myotomy and diverticulotomy (TMD) or endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (ECM) with CO₂ laser for ZD in years 2008-2021 at our department were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients enrolled, 83 patients underwent ECM and 18 TMD. The procedure time of the endoscopic technique was significantly shorter compared to that of transcervical method (p < 0.001). The median time to oral intake was 6 days for ECM and 10.5 days in the TMD group (p < 0.001). There was a 13% (n = 11) and 16.7% (n = 3) symptomatic recurrence rate and 3.6% (n = 3) and 16.7% (n = 3) major complications rate for ECM and TMD groups, respectively. The incidence of contrast leak (CL) evaluated by postoperative swallow study was 8.9% (9 from 83 patients in the ECM group only). In patients with CL, a significant increase in CRP levels on postoperative day (POD) 2 and 3 was detected when compared to patients without CL.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic diverticulotomy with CO₂ laser represents a safe and efficient treatment of ZD. Elevation of postoperative CRP serum levels over 123.8 mg/L on POD2 and 98.8 mg/L on POD3 may indicate presence of an esophageal leakage.

Per Oral Zenker Diverticulotomy

Zenker diverticulum (ZD) is a rare but treatable surgical disease affecting the elderly. This article reviews current available evidence and management of ZD, which includes open surgical, rigid endoscopic, and flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy with common goal of complete division of cricopharyngeus muscle. Careful patient selection and operative intervention tailored to patient characteristics is important when evaluating patients for operative intervention for ZD. Described in detail is a novel flexible endoscopic approach using submucosal tunneling technique to perform cricopharyngeal myotomy, also called per oral endoscopic myotomy, which is demonstrated to be safe and effective in the management of ZD with low morbidity.

Presentation and Management of Killian Jamieson Diverticulum: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Objective:

To examine the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management of Killian–Jamieson diverticula (KJD) through literature review.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature review was conducted through December 2018 using keywords Killian–Jamieson diverticula/diverticulum. Data extracted included clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, surgical management, and postoperative care.

Sources:

PubMed and Google Scholar.

Results:

Sixty-eight cases of KJD in 59 reports (29M:39F; median 58 years old) were identified for review. The most common presentation was dysphagia (n = 39), suspected thyroid nodule (n = 24) and globus (n = 14). The majority of KJD (n = 51) occur on the left, with rare reports of right side (n = 11) and bilateral (n = 5) presentation. Thirty-two cases describe surgical management: 22 utilizing a transcervical approach, with (n = 13) or without (n = 9) cricopharyngeal myotomy; and 10 reported endoscopic surgery. Diverticula managed transcervically averaged 3.8 cm in size in comparison to average 2.8 cm in the endoscopic group. Time to diet initiation after transcervical surgery averaged 4 days versus 2 days after endoscopic surgery. Complications were reported in 2/68 cases; both were diverticula recurrence after endoscopic surgery.

Conclusion:

Killian–Jamieson diverticula is a rare diagnosis that should be considered in the evaluation of dysphagia, globus, and also suspected thyroid nodule. When patient symptoms warrant intervention, a transcervical approach, with or without cricopharyngeal myotomy, is most commonly utilized. In recent years, an endoscopic approach has been presented as an alternative for smaller diverticula. Further understanding of the optimal treatment and postoperative management for KJD requires larger cohorts.

Level of Evidence:

4

Traction on the septum during transoral septotomy for Zenker diverticulum improves the final outcome

OBJECTIVE

Transoral diverticulostomy/septotomy has become a popular treatment for patients with Zenker diverticulum (ZD). To improve the results of transoral stapler-assisted septotomy, a modification of the technique has been introduced. In this study, we aimed to compare the final outcome of such a modified transoral septotomy (MTS) with the results of traditional transoral septotomy (TTS) in patients with ZD.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with ZD underwent transoral stapler-assisted septotomy between 2010 and 2018. Symptoms were recorded and scored using a detailed questionnaire. Barium swallow, endoscopy, and manometry were performed before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients forming the study population (male:female = 35:17), 25 had TTS and 27 had MTS. The patients' demographic and clinical parameters were similar in the two groups. No intraoperative mucosal lesions were detected, and the mortality was nil. The median time taken to complete the procedure was 25 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 22-35) for TTS, and 30 minutes (IQR: 25-36) for MTS (P < 0.07). The median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 46-95) in the TTS group and 30 months (IQR: 25-35) in the MTS group. All patients in both groups had an improvement in their symptom score after the procedure, but the failure rates were 32% (8 of 25) after TTS and 3.7% (1 of 27) after MTS (P < 0.02). At univariate and multivariate analyses, the procedure was the only predictor of a positive final outcome.

CONCLUSION

Albeit with the intrinsic limitations of the study (retrospective, different time window, and different follow-up), traction on the septum during transoral septotomy improves the final outcome of this treatment in patients with ZD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:637-640, 2020.

Adverse Events after Rigid and Flexible Endoscopic Repair of Zenker’s Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

To determine adverse events after endoscopic flexible vs endoscopic rigid cricopharyngeal myotomy for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD).

Data Sources

Systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all years according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Additional studies were identified from review citations and a by hand search of manuscripts referencing ZD.

Review Methods

A structured literature search was conducted to identify studies for this systematic review. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were applied to assess study quality. For inclusion, each study had to provide data for at least 10 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic ZD repair reporting clear association with the postprocedure course in each case. Data extracted included all reported adverse events, recurrences, follow-up, and operative times.

Results

In total, 115 studies were included. All but 8 were retrospective case series. Sixty-one reported series of patients after rigid endoscopic stapler repair, 31 after rigid laser repair, and 13 with other rigid endoscopic instruments. Twenty-nine flexible endoscopic studies were included. Mortality, infection, and perforation were not significantly more likely in either the rigid or the flexible group, but bleeding and recurrence were more likely after flexible endoscopic techniques (20% vs <10% and 4% vs 0%, respectively). Dental injury and vocal fold palsy were reported rarely in the rigid endoscopic groups.

Conclusions

Adverse events are rare after endoscopic Zenker’s repair. The flexible approach minimizes exposure limitations and can be completed in some patients without general anesthesia. Transoral rigid approaches result in fewer revision surgeries compared with flexible diverticulotomy.

Is Myotomy Plus Diverticulopexy Suitable for Symptomatic Zenker's Diverticula?

The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcome of myotomy plus diverticulopexy over short and long-terms. A prospectively collected consecutive series (2007-2017) of 37 patients undergoing myotomy plus diverticulopexy was analyzed for clinical condition, operative information, peri-operative events, and follow-up by means of interview and physical examination. Diverticulopexy was scheduled regardless of the diverticulum's features and patient condition, other than operability. There was no choice or selection between possible treatment options. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively, at post-operative day 30 and after 1 year. Follow-up aimed at assessing the subjective condition following treatment. During the interview, patients were asked to self-assess their ability to swallow before and after surgery. No patient had peri-operative events, complications associated with the procedure, wound infection or impaired swallowing. All patients could start drinking the day after operation, could return to solid diet on post-operative day 2 and be discharged on post-operative days 3-4. Barium swallowing was not necessary before discharge. Full solid diet was resumed according to patient's compliance from post-operative day 2 (some patients refused solid diet soon after the operation even if asymptomatic). Follow-up ranged between 1 and 8 years. No patient was lost at follow-up. No disease recurrence was observed. Finally, no patient needed or sought for a clinical examination between the follow-up calls. Patients reported at least 50% improvement of symptomatology after 1 year. Diverticulopexy appears to be clinically safe, methodologically reproducible, and an effective procedure; it avoids suturing and offers good outcome results along with high patient satisfaction.

Zenker diverticulum: Experience in surgical treatment of large diverticula

The purpose of this retrospective study is to show that transcervical diverticulectomy (TD) in treatment of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) can still be a first choice procedure in selected patients and in experienced hands its safety might be compared to the minimally invasive endoscopic diverticulostomy.The study cohort consisted of 44 patients (18 male, 26 female) operated for (ZD). All the patients underwent open diverticulectomy. The decision to choose open surgical repair depended on surgical risk, age of the patient, size of the diverticular septum (the distance between the top of the diverticulum and its bottom on barium study), and patient's preference.Mean age of patients was 64.6 ± 11.9 years; range: 26 to 88 years. A total of 36.4% out of them finished 70 years. Postoperative mortality was nil. Two major complications (4.5%) requiring surgical intervention occurred: leak and hematoma.Data were analyzed by t test for independent samples using Statistica 12.5 software. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Surgical treatment of patients with ZD should be individualized. Large Zenker diverticula with the septum longer than 6 cm should preferably be resected through an open approach because it is not possible to remove the septum completely during one-step endoscopic procedure and diverticulostomy creates a weak and large common cavity in the esophagus. Surgical repair is effective for all sizes of diverticula, but its most serious complications such as leakage or laryngeal nerve injury should be considered, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. However, age alone should not be the main criterion if choosing the treatment option.

Simulation of KTP Laser-Based Zenker Diverticulotomy with a Porcine Model and Laryngeal Dissection Station

Zenker’s diverticulum is a rare cause of progressive dysphagia that is treated surgically. Potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser–based diverticulotomy is one effective treatment. Developing a simulation model is helpful for rare conditions. Pigs have a natural hypopharyngeal pouch similar to a diverticulum. We present a model for performing rigid endoscopic KTP laser diverticulotomy in a porcine model with a laryngeal dissection station. Eleven pigs were examined to confirm presence of the hypopharyngeal pouch. A specimen was mounted on the modified laryngeal dissection station, and a KTP laser–based diverticulotomy was performed. Novel aspects include use of the laryngeal dissection station and application of the model for simulating rigid endoscopic KTP laser diverticulotomy. This model allows trainees to practice equipment setup, positioning of the laryngoscope to isolate the cricopharyngeal bar, tissue handling, laser safety techniques, and use of the KTP laser through the laryngoscope under microscopic visualization.

New flexible endoscopic controlled stapler technique for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: A case series

AIM

To report about the combination and advantages of a stapler-assisted diverticulotomy performed by flexible endoscopy.

METHODS

From November 2014 till December 2015 17 patients (8 female, 9 male, average age 69.8 years) with a symptomatic Zenker diverticulum (mean size 3.5 cm) were treated by inserting a new 5 mm fully rotatable surgical stapler (MicroCutter30 Xchange, Cardica Inc.) next to an ultrathin flexible endoscope through an overtube. The Patients were under conscious sedation with the head reclined in left position, the stapler placed centrally and pushed forward to the bottom of the diverticulum. The septum was divided by the staple rows under flexible endoscopic control.

RESULTS

In eleven patients (64.7%) the stapler successfully divided the septum completely. Mean procedure time was 21 min, medium size of the septum was 2.8 cm (range 1.5 cm to 4 cm). In four patients the septum was shorter than 3 cm, in seven longer than 3 cm. To divide the septum, averagely 1.3 stapler cartridges were used. Two minor bleedings occurred. Major adverse events like perforation or secondary haemorrhage did not occur. After an average time of two days patients were discharged from the hospital. In 6 patients (35.3%) the stapler failed due to a thick septum or insufficient reclination of the head. Follow up endoscopy was performed after an average of two months in 9 patients; 4 patients (44.4%) were free of symptoms, 5 patients (55.6%) stated an improvement. A relapse of symptoms did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Flexible endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy by using a surgical stapler is a new, safe and efficient treatment modality. A simultaneously tissue opening and occlusion prevents major complications.

Evolving Management of Zenker's Diverticulum in the Endoscopic Era: A North American Experience

BACKGROUND

Open surgical cricopharyngeal myotomy(CM) is considered standard of care for Zenker's diverticulum(ZD). Trans-oral CM has been described using a rigid stapling device for two decades; however, this remains problematic for severely kyphotic patients. This problem can be overcome with flexible endoscopy utilizing an electrosurgical needle knife. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these techniques to stratify patient selection.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ZD treatment from 1992 to 2015 were reviewed. Demographics, diverticulum size, post-operative complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between open cricopharyngeal myotomy (OpenCM), rigid trans-oral stapling myotomy (RigidCM), and flexible endoscopic myotomy (FlexCM). Dysphagia scores (DS, 0:best-4:worst) and pneumonia incidence were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively.

RESULTS

62 patients underwent OpenCM (39/62(63 %)) or endoscopic CM (23/62(37 %) (8 RigidCM/15 FlexCM)). CM significantly reduced dysphagia for all approaches [OpenCM:2(2-3)-0(0-0); RigidCM:2(2-2)-0(0-0); FlexCM:3(3-3)-0(0-0)]. FlexCM patients had significantly worse pre-operative DS. Endoscopic CM was attempted and completed in 23/35(66 %) patients. Reasons for OpenCM conversion included inability to position the diverticular retractor due to patient body habitus (RigidCM), and the inability to position the overtube due to small ZD (FlexCM). Major post-operative complications were rare and similar in all groups. Medium-to-long-term post-myotomy pneumonia was comparable between groups. LOS (days) was reduced for FlexCM (1(1-2)) versus RigidCM (3(2-6)) and OpenCM (4(3-7)).

CONCLUSIONS

CM is highly effective for treating ZD. Open and endoscopic approaches offer comparable outcomes and dysphagia resolution. FlexCM is efficacious for large ZD and can be performed in most patients irrespective of body habitus. FlexCM represents an excellent approach for large ZD, while OpenCM should be reserved for small ZD for which an overtube cannot be positioned.

[Surgical treatment of esophageal diverticula : Endoscopic or open approach?]

Esophageal diverticula are comparatively rare. The majority are Zenker's diverticula but parabronchial and epiphrenic diverticula can also occur. Parabronchial diverticula are of low clinical relevance, whereas Zenker's and epiphrenic diverticula both belong to the group of pulsion diverticula and can become clinically apparent by dysphagia and regurgitation. Approximately 100 years after the first surgical treatment, peroral approaches (e.g. stapler dissection and flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy) have now achieved a certain level of importance. Both approaches are less invasive than the open approach but are evidently more prone to recurrences. Accordingly, traditional open diverticulectomy with cervical myotomy should be recommended to patients with a reasonable life expectancy and an acceptable operative risk. This holds particularly true for Brombart stages I-III of the disease, as complete myotomy cannot be achieved via the peroral access. The classical surgical treatment of epiphrenic diverticula is open or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic diverticulectomy with distal myotomy, mostly combined with an anterior partial fundoplication; however, the leakage rate is high and several alternative options are currently being evaluated.

Endoscopic versus surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Zenker's diverticulum is a rare disease in the general population. Its treatment can be carried out by either an endoscopic or surgical approach. The objective of this study was to systematically identify all reports that compare both treatment modalities and to assess the outcomes in terms of length of procedure, length of hospitalization, time until diet introduction, complication rates, and recurrence rates.

METHODS

A search of Medline and Embase selected all studies that compared different methods of surgical and endoscopic treatment for Zenker's diverticulum published in the English, Portuguese, and Spanish languages between 1975 and 2014. The meta-analysis was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data were extracted and analyzed for five different outcomes.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, describing outcomes of endoscopic versus surgical treatment for 596 patients with Zenker's diverticulum. A meta-analysis of the studies suggested a statistically significant reduction in operating time and length of hospitalization, favoring endoscopic treatment (standardized mean difference (SMD) - 78.06, 95 %CI - 90.63, - 65.48 and SMD - 3.72, 95 %CI - 4.49, - 2.95, respectively), just as with the reduction in the fasting period (SMD - 4.30, 95 %CI - 5.18, - 3.42) and risk of complications (SMD - 0.09, 95 %CI 0.03, 0.43) for patients who had undergone the endoscopic approach in comparison with the surgical group. Also, a statistically significant reduction in the risk of symptom recurrence was seen when the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum was carried out by a surgical approach compared with endoscopic treatment (SMD 0.08, 95 %CI 0.03, 0.13).

CONCLUSION

Compared with a surgical approach, endoscopic treatment appeared to result in a shorter length of procedure and hospitalization, earlier diet introduction, and lower rates of complications, but in higher rates of symptom recurrence.

Prognostic variables for the clinical success of flexible endoscopic septotomy of Zenker's diverticulum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Flexible endoscopy septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is an alternative to endostapling; however, long-term data are sparse and studies are heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical success of flexible endoscopy diverticuloscope-assisted septotomy according to all ZD-related symptoms and to identify potential prognostic variables.

METHODS

A prospective database of all patients with ZD undergoing septotomy and followed up for 24 months or longer was analyzed. Septotomy was conducted by using a diverticuloscope-assisted technique. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptoms (during the day and at night) were scored by their weekly frequency from 0 to 3 when on a solid food diet. Clinical success (asymptomatic state) was defined as a maximum of 2 symptoms with a score of 1 (once per week). Prognostic variables of clinical success included age, sex, pretreatment total symptom score, pre- and posttreatment ZD size, and septotomy length. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate the crude and adjusted hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

Septotomy was attempted and achieved in a single session in 89 patients. Clinical success at the intention-to-treat analysis was 69%, 64%, and 46% at 6, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 3 patients: perforation in 2 (2%) and postprocedural bleeding in 1 (1%). Independent variables for failure at 6 months were a septotomy length ≤25 mm (HR 6.34) and pretreatment ZD size ≥50 mm (HR 11.08), whereas at 48 months, they were septotomy length ≤25 (HR 2.20) and posttreatment ZD size ≥10 mm (HR 2.03). Success rates for ZD ranging in size from 30 mm to 49 mm with a septotomy >25 mm were 100% and 71% at 6 months and 48 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Flexible endoscopic septotomy for ZD is feasible and safe. Treatment success correlates with the length of the septotomy and the size of ZD, which should ultimately determine the appropriate approach.

Assessment of the Results of Surgical Treatment of Zenker'S Diverticulum in Own Material

Zenker diverticulum (ZD) is the most common type of diverticula of the esophagus. Most often refers to men with a peak incidence in the seventh and eighth decade of life. In the majority diverticula remains asymptomatic and in patients with symptomatic course of the disease symptoms are often nonspecific. Aim of the study was to present the authors' own experience in surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this paper we present an analysis of 31 patients with confirmed ZD treated surgically at the Clinic in 2004-2014. Patients were analyzed in terms of age, gender, clinical symptoms, diverticulum size, type of surgery, the time to return to the oral intake, hospital stay and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

22 men and 9 women were enrolled it this study. The mean age of the patients was 64.8 (SD, 10.7; in the range of 28 to 82 years). 29 patients (93.5%) underwent resection of the diverticulum, while diverticulopexy was performed in two patients. In 25 (80.6%) cases stapler device was used, while in 4 (12.9%) resection was performed manually. The average size of resected diverticulum was 4.9 cm (SD, 1.5). Following the surgery in four patients (12.9%) complications were present. The average operating time was 118.7 minutes (SD, 42.2, in the range of 50 to 240 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay was 9.3 (SD, 3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of ZD is associated with high effectiveness and low recurrence rate. Despite the advantages of endoscopic techniques, surgical treatment is characterized by one- stage procedure. The use of mechanical suture (stapler) significantly improves the operation, although on the basis of our own analysis there was no superiority revealed over hand sewn. Unquestionable adventage of classical technique is the opportunity to histopathological evaluation of resected diverticulum what is impossible to achieve in endoscopic techniques.

A Tailored Approach to the Surgical Treatment of Zenker's Diverticula

The advent of endoscopic techniques has transformed the surgical therapy of Zenker's diverticula. Although the treatment paradigm has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with endoscopic stapling-assisted or laser-assisted repair, traditional transcervical procedures can still play a role in selected cases. The goal of this article is to illustrate our tailored approach to patients with Zenker's diverticula and illustrate our open surgical and endoscopic techniques. The discussion will also include the evidence-based rationale for our preoperative assessment and choice of technique.

Long-term outcome and quality of life after transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum

AIM: To investigate long-term results and quality of life after transoral stapling of Zenker diverticulum.

METHODS: The data of all patients admitted to our institution for the surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum were entered into a prospective database. Demographics, symptoms, intraoperative and postoperative data, morbidity, time to oral feeding, and length of hospital stay were recorded. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a barium swallow study to measure the length of the diverticulum from the apex of the septum to the bottom of the pouch. Transoral stapling was performed using a Weerda diverticuloscope under general anesthesia. Over time, the technique was modified by applying traction sutures to ease engagement of the common septum inside the stapler jaws. Perioperative variables, symptoms, long-term outcome, and quality of life were analyzed. The operation was considered successful if the patient reported complete remission (grade 1) or marked improvement (grade 2) of dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, Version 15, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2013, the transoral approach was successfully completed in 100 patients with a median age of 75 years. Patients with a larger (≥ 3 cm) diverticulum were older than those with a smaller pouch (P < 0.038). Complications occurred in 4% of the patients but there was no mortality. A statistically significant improvement of dysphagia and regurgitation scores (P < 0.001) was recorded over a median follow-up of 63 mo. Similarly, a significant decrease in the median number of pneumonia episodes per year (P < 0.001) was recorded after surgery. The overall long-term success rate of the procedure was 76%. The success rate of the operation was greater in patients of 70 years of age or older compared to younger individuals (P = 0.038). Use of traction sutures on the septum was associated with an improved success rate compared with the standard procedure (P = 0.04). All items of the health related quality of life questionnaire were significantly higher compared to baseline (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Transoral stapling is safe and effective. The operation significantly improves patients’ quality of life. It appears that elderly patients with large diverticula significantly benefit from the procedure and that the modified surgical technique including traction sutures can further improve the success rate.

Treatment of giant pharyngoesophageal diverticulum by video-assisted thoracoscopy

A 67-year-old woman presented with a giant pharyngoesophageal diverticulum (Zenker's diverticulum) that extended deep into the chest. Surgery, using either an open or endoscopic approach, was difficult. We stapled the common wall between the diverticulum and the esophagus using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The patient exhibited good anatomic and functional results at 6 months' follow-up.

Zenker's diverticulum: carbon dioxide laser endoscopic surgery

Nowadays endoscopic diverticulotomy is the surgical approach of the first choice in treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. We report our experience with this procedure and try to sum up recent recommendations for management of surgery and postoperative care. Data of 34 patients with Zenker's diverticulum, treated by endoscopic carbon dioxide laser diverticulotomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic, were prospectively stored and followed in relatively short period from May 2009 to December 2013. The average length of diverticulum was 32 mm. The average duration of surgery was 32 min. The patients were fed via feeding tube for 6.1 days and antibiotics were administered for 7 days. Mean hospitalization time was 7.4 days. We observed one transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and no other serious complications. Recurrence rate was 3%. We recommend complete transection of the diverticular septum in one procedure, systemic antibiotic treatment and exclusion of transoral intake for minimally 5 days, and contrast oesophagogram before resumption of oral intake to exclude fistula. Open diverticulectomy should be reserved for cases with inadequate endoscopic exposure and for revision surgery for multiple recurrences from endoscopic diverticulotomies.

Open Staple Diverticulectomy for a Large Recurrent Zenker's Diverticulum: Still a Valid Procedure

Objectives:

We demonstrate indications for external mechanical stapler diverticulectomy in the modern era of endoscopic treatment. We review treatment of a large diverticulum and discuss considerations that should be made in deciding on the type of surgical treatment.

Methods:

The index case was in a 75-year-old man who had undergone open cricopharyngeal myotomy with diverticulopexy 35 years earlier. He presented with 25 years of recurrent symptoms. A swallow study showed a 6.5 × 5.0-cm diverticulum. The diverticulum was deemed too large for standard endoscopic myotomy, so diverticulectomy was performed with a stapler.

Results:

The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. A swallow study on postoperative day 5 demonstrated no diverticulum or extravasation of barium. The patient resumed a normal diet with resolution of dysphagia. Two additional patients with large Zenker's diverticula that were managed similarly are also discussed.

Conclusions:

Although endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy and stapler diverticulostomy have become standard treatments for Zenker's diverticulum, this case of a large recurrent diverticulum illustrates a situation in which older techniques may be preferred. Use of the mechanical stapler allowed for a shorter surgery time than traditional suture techniques, and the potential for an earlier return to a normal diet.

Dysphagia characteristics in Zenker's diverticulum

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dysphagia characteristics in patients with Zenker's diverticulum (ZD).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Outpatient tertiary care dysphagia clinic.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All ZD cases surgically treated over a 6-year period were identified and reviewed for dysphagia history and dysphagia characteristics on initial presentation using fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Dysphagia symptoms and swallowing abnormalities were compared across groups based on diverticulum size (small <1 cm, medium 1-3 cm, and large >3 cm).

RESULTS

Forty-six patients underwent a total of 52 procedures during the study period. ZD size was available in 49 cases (6 small, 26 medium, 17 large). Regurgitation symptoms were less frequent in patients with small (17%) compared with medium (68%) or large diverticula (76%; P = .03). Postswallow hypopharyngeal reflux (PSHR) was less frequent in patients with small (17%) compared with medium (91%) and large diverticula (87%; P < .01). PSHR was present on all FEES available for patients who presented with a recurrent or residual ZD (n = 7). In all cases, PSHR resolved after successful treatment of ZD. Pharyngeal residue indicating possible weakness was present in 24% of all patients at initial presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative assessment of dysphagia characteristics in ZD patients reveals that PSHR is predictive of a ZD larger than 1 cm and may be useful in surgical planning. PSHR is also helpful in identifying patients with recurrent or residual symptomatic ZD following surgical treatment. Pharyngeal weakness is present in a subset of ZD patients.

Flexible endoscopic and surgical management of Zenker's diverticulum

Zenker's diverticulum is an outpouching of the mucosa through the Killian's triangle. The etiology of Zenker's diverticulum is not well understood. It is thought to be due to the incoordination or incomplete relaxation of the cricopharyngeal muscle. Most patients are men who present with symptoms of dysphagia between the seventh and eighth decades of life. The diagnosis is made with a dynamic contrast swallowing study. Treatment options include open surgical diverticulectomy and diverticulopexy with myotomy or myotomy alone using flexible or rigid endoscopes. Rigid endoscopic treatment is currently the preferred initial choice for Zenker's diverticulum of any size. The flexible endoscopic technique is used when there is a high risk of general anesthesia, or neck extension is contraindicated. Some centers use flexible endoscopy as the initial treatment option. Due to a lack of prospective studies, the treatment choice should be tailored to the individual patient and local expertise.

Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes and predictors of success after transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum are still unclear.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2010, 91 patients with Zenker diverticulum underwent transoral stapling under general anesthesia. Since 2008, the technique was modified by applying traction sutures to ease engagement of the common septum inside the stapler jaws. Perioperative variables, distribution of symptoms, and outcome of surgery were analyzed. Long-term results were compared between patients undergoing standard versus modified technique of transoral stapling.

RESULTS

The transoral approach was successfully completed in 79 (86.8 %) patients with a median age of 74 years. Overall morbidity was 5 %, and there was no mortality. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Six patients were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 53 (range, 12-114) months, an improvement of dysphagia and regurgitation scores (p < 0.001) and a reduction in the number of pneumonia episodes per year (p < 0.001) was recorded. The long-term success rate of the procedure was 80.1 %. At a median time of 12 months, 14 patients complained of recurrent symptoms, 7 of whom needed an open (n = 4) or transoral (n = 3) reoperation. Use of traction sutures resulted in a greater long-term success compared with the standard procedure (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Transoral stapling is a safe and effective technique. A repeat procedure is feasible in case of recurrent diverticulum. The use of traction sutures applied at the apex of the common septum before stapling might increase the long-term success of the technique.

Pharyngeal pouch surgery: a combined open and endoscopic approach

Pharyngeal pouches are common, particularly in the elderly population, in whom they can cause significant morbidity. The advanced age of many patients and existing comorbidities mean that in some cases neither open nor endoscopic pouch stapling is possible. We present a technique of combined open and endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery, which may be used when other therapeutic options are limited.

Management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic age: current practice patterns

OBJECTIVES

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a common source of dysphagia with a well-established surgical treatment history. Variations may exist between practitioners in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of patients with ZD because of recent evolutions in surgical approach toward an endoscopic technique.

METHODS

An online survey instrument was prepared and forwarded to the membership of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA) to ascertain the current practice patterns of its members regarding numerous care parameters for patients with ZD.

RESULTS

Data on preoperative evaluation, operative care, postoperative management, and recalled incidence of complications, including mediastinitis, were evaluated. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant differences in multiple care parameters for those surgeons who predominantly perform endoscopic operations (more than 80% willingness to perform endoscopic operations) compared to those who occasionally perform endoscopic operations (less than 80%), including average case number, advancement of oral intake, hospital discharge, use of antibiotics, and views on the efficacy of endoscopic surgical techniques. These changes were noted despite similar times since graduation from training for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data present a contemporary snapshot of clinical care patterns of the ABEA membership for patients with ZD and suggest differences in care patterns for surgeons with a higher enthusiasm for endoscopic techniques and larger case volumes.

Esophageal diverticula and cancer

Esophageal diverticula are rare. The association of cancer and diverticula has been described. Some authors adopt a conservative non-surgical approach in selected patients with diverticula whereas others treat the symptoms by diverticulopexy or myotomy only, leaving the diverticulum in situ. However, the risk of malignant degeneration should be may be taken in account if the diverticulum is not resected. The correct evaluation of the possible risk factors for malignancy may help in the decision making process. We performed a literature review of esophageal diverticula and cancer. The incidence of cancer in a diverticulum is 0.3-7, 1.8, and 0.6% for pharyngoesophageal, midesophageal, and epiphrenic diverticula, respectively. Symptoms may mimic those of the diverticulum or underlying motor disorder. Progressive dysphagia, unintentional weight loss, the presence of blood in the regurgitated material, regurgitation of peaces of the tumor, odynophagia, melena, hemathemesis, and hemoptysis are key symptoms. Risk factors for malignancy are old age, male gender, long-standing history, and larger diverticula. A carcinoma may develop in treated diverticula, even after resection. Outcomes are usually quoted as dismal because of a delayed diagnosis but several cases of superficial carcinoma have been described. The treatment follows the same principals as the therapy for esophageal cancer; however, diverticulectomy is enough in cases of superficial carcinomas. Patients must be carefully evaluated before therapy and a long-term follow-up is advisable.

[Zenker's diverticulum: pro operation]

In case of Zenker's diverticulum, treatment is indicated as soon as the diagnosis is established. Therapy should aim at the elimination of dysphagia and the symptoms of food retention and should reliably prevent recurrence. Currently, three different therapeutic approaches are applied: the classical option is open transcervical myotomy and diverticulectomy/diverticulopexy and alternatively stapled diverticulostomy with a linear stapler or flexible endoscopic diverticulostomy is propagated. As compared to the surgical (open) approach, rigid or flexible endotherapy is less invasive. However, endotherapy is not always feasible for all types of Zenker's diverticulum and the recurrence rate is high. Accordingly, open diverticulectomy is recommended in patients with an adequate life expectancy and good general operability.

Endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy versus open surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to evaluate the results of endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy and the transcervical approach in treating Zenker's diverticulum.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

Results of 155 cases after endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy and the transcervical approach were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

Primary treatment consisted of endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy in 65.2%, and 34.8% were treated by a transcervical approach. Average follow-up time was 61.8 months. Surgical time, duration of hospitalization, and occurrence of minor complications were significantly lower after endoscopic approach. Recurrence rate showed a statistically significant difference in favor of open approach. Including the recurrences, 38.7% could be cured only by transcervical techniques. Patient perception of success was found to be similar for the compared treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic approach proved to be the treatment of first choice. However, the fact that open techniques were necessary in nearly 40% of our cases suggests that this operative technique retains a substantial role in treatment of this disease.

Modern pathophysiology and treatment of esophageal diverticula

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal diverticula are rare. They may occur in the pharyngoesophageal area (Zenker's), midesophagus, or distally (epiphrenic). A motility disorder (either at the level of the esophageal sphincters or body) is frequently associated with esophageal diverticula. The risk of malignant transformation is low.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline/PubMed database.

RESULTS

The treatment of esophageal diverticula must be based on the pathophysiology and natural history of the disease: (a) asymptomatic diverticula do not need a specific treatment, (b) small diverticula may be left in place and not resected, (c) medium-size diverticula may be either treated by diverticulectomy, diverticulopexy, or esophagodiverticulostomy in case of pharyngoesophageal diverticula, (d) resection is probably the ideal therapy for larger diverticula, and (e) a myotomy should always be included to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its rarity, esophageal diverticula must be treated by esophageal surgeons since even in experienced hands the complication rate can be significant.

Endostitch-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulostomy: a tried approach for difficult cases

The aim was to describe a tried approach to endoscopic Zenker's diverticulostomy, especially in those patients with unfavorable anatomy or smaller pouches who may otherwise be relegated to open repair. The study design was a retrospective case series The setting was an urban, tertiary care university medical center There were seven patients, both inpatient and outpatient, with chief complaints of dysphagia. All had a documented Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) on barium swallow. All of the patients were deemed by the primary surgeon to have some anatomic factor that limited exposure of the diverticulum. The patients underwent Endostitch-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulostomy. Records were retrospectively reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative swallowing status, radiographic findings, operative findings, and follow-up results. Seven patients were reviewed, each of whom had successful endoscopic treatment of ZD. Notably, in each case, an anatomical factor precluded the seating of the gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler on the cricopharyngeal bar without the use of endoscopic retention sutures. The majority of the patients were discharged on postoperative day one. All but one patient noted a marked improvement in swallowing function immediately following the procedure and at their outpatient follow-up visit. Endoscopic Zenker's diverticulostomy has been well-described and established as a reliable technique in a majority of cases. We report on our experience using a previously described technique specifically for difficult, unfavorable, or contraindicated cases and suggest the employment of this technique as an alternative method to facilitate endoscopic repair and possibly limit the need for an open approach.

Benign esophageal disease in the elderly

For the most part, the management of benign esophageal disease in all patients is in evolution. Advances in laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, and endoscopic techniques have lessened the morbidity and mortality associated with the traditional approaches to this pathology. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of primary motor disorders remains incomplete but is certainly more advanced than our understanding just a decade ago. As research continues in this area, our knowledge will increase. Persistent development efforts with industry will continue to provide less invasive options for the management of these patients, and, eventually, the results associated with these techniques will improve as well. For the management of these pathologies in the elderly, the critical issues are the associated comorbidities, the current quality of life, the life expectancy, and the desired quality of life. The optimal treatment strategy may be determined by consideration of all of these factors along with the relative effectiveness and durability of each treatment strategy for the individual elderly patient.

Zenker's diverticulum

The cricopharyngeal diverticulum or Zenker's diverticulum is the most frequent type of diverticulum of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It occurs mostly in elderly patients. The predominant symptoms are dysphagia and regurgitation which may result in malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, the latter eventually being life threatening. The underlying cause of Zenker's diverticulum is a dysfunction of the cricopharyngeal muscle and the upper esophageal sphincter, the most common finding being a decreased compliance. The treatment consists in a myotomy of the upper esophageal sphincter and cricopharyngeal muscle combined with a diverticulopexy or diverticulectomy. This procedure is performed via a limited left cervicotomy. Results are excellent to very good in 94% of the patients in our own experience.

Surgical interventions for pharyngeal pouch

BACKGROUND

A pharyngeal pouch is an out-pouching or pocket that develops from the posterior wall of the pharynx just above the entrance to the oesophagus (gullet). Pouches may give rise to difficulty in swallowing, sensation of a lump in the throat or of food sticking in the throat and may lead to troublesome regurgitation of food. Food may enter the pouch rather than passing down the oesophagus and this and regurgitation may result in weight loss, hoarseness of voice and/or recurrent chest infections. The management of patients with a pharyngeal pouch may be either conservative or surgical. The surgical management can be further divided into two broad categories: endoscopic and open procedures. In the first half of the twentieth century an open surgical approach to the pouch was most frequently used, and remains common in some parts of the world. In recent decades endoscopic procedures (where the approach is made through the mouth) have become popular. The superiority of one approach over another has yet to be clearly demonstrated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of open and endoscopic surgical procedures for the management of a pharyngeal pouch.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004, MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1974 to 2004). Reference lists of all identified trials and previous reviews were searched for additional trials. Further electronic searches for key authors identified were made. There were no language restrictions. The date of the last search was September 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion in the review, based on pre-determined criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No trials were identified which fulfilled the criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from high quality randomised controlled trials to demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic compared with open procedures for pharyngeal pouch. There is no good evidence to establish whether one endoscopic procedure is superior to another.