What to do when the pathology from last week's laparoscopic cholecystectomy is malignant and T1 or T2

Trends in port-site metastasis after laparoscopic resection of incidental gallbladder cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The risk of port-site metastasis after laparoscopic removal of incidental gallbladder cancer was previously estimated to be 14-30%. The present study was designed to determine the incidence of port-site metastasis in incidental gallbladder cancer in the modern era (2000-2014) versus the historic era (1991-1999). We also investigated the site of port-site metastasis.

METHODS

Using PRISMA, a systematic review was conducted to identify papers that addressed the development of port-site metastasis after laparoscopic resection of incidental gallbladder cancer. Studies that described cancer-specific outcomes in ≥5 patients were included. A validated quality appraisal tool was used, and a weighted estimate of the incidence of port-site metastasis was calculated.

RESULTS

Based on data extracted from 27 papers that met inclusion criteria, the incidence of port-site metastasis in incidental gallbladder cancer has decreased from 18.6% prior to 2000 (95% confidence interval 15.3-21.9%, n = 7) to 10.3% since then (95% confidence interval 7.9-12.7%, n = 20) (P < .001). The extraction site is at significantly higher risk than nonextraction sites.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of port-site metastasis in incidental gallbladder cancer has decreased but remains high relative to other primary tumors. Any preoperative finding that raises the suspicion of gallbladder cancer should prompt further investigation and referral to a hepato-pancreato-biliary specialist.

Adjuvant Therapy for Gallbladder Cancer: an Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected gallbladder cancer (GBC) is unclear.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with resected GBC (pathologic stage 1-3) from 1998 to 2006 (n = 6690). We compared three groups: surgery only (S, 78.6 %), surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC, 6.2 %), and surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (ACR, 15.1 %). Univariate and Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors influencing overall survival and the use of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

ACR was associated with improved survival for all patients (HR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.66-0.90), especially node-positive patients (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.53-0.78); AC was not associated with changes in survival. Patients were less likely to have their lymph nodes examined if they had any comorbidities, lower income, or were treated at community cancer centers (all p < 0.05). Among patients with unknown lymph node status, those with T2 or T3 disease saw improved survival with ACR (T2: HR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.63-0.99; T3: HR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.30-0.62), while AC did not affect survival.

CONCLUSION

ACR is associated with improved survival for patients with node-positive GBC, as well as those with T2 or T3 GBC with unknown lymph node status.

Practical guidelines for the surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer

At present, surgical treatment is the only curative option for gallbladder (GB) cancer. Many efforts therefore have been made to improve resectability and the survival rate. However, GB cancer has a low incidence, and no randomized, controlled trials have been conducted to establish the optimal treatment modalities. The present guidelines include recent recommendations based on current understanding and highlight controversial issues that require further research. For T1a GB cancer, the optimal treatment modality is simple cholecystectomy, which can be carried out as either a laparotomy or a laparoscopic surgery. For T1b GB cancer, either simple or an extended cholecystectomy is appropriate. An extended cholecystectomy is generally recommended for patients with GB cancer at stage T2 or above. In extended cholecystectomy, a wedge resection of the GB bed or a segmentectomy IVb/V can be performed and the optimal extent of lymph node dissection should include the cystic duct lymph node, the common bile duct lymph node, the lymph nodes around the hepatoduodenal ligament (the hepatic artery and portal vein lymph nodes), and the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal lymph node. Depending on patient status and disease severity, surgeons may decide to perform palliative surgeries.