1
|
Roelandt P, Bislenghi G, Coremans G, De Looze D, Denis MA, De Schepper H, Dewint P, Geldof J, Gijsen I, Komen N, Ruymbeke H, Stijns J, Surmont M, Van de Putte D, Van den Broeck S, Van Geluwe B, Wyndaele J. Belgian consensus guideline on the management of anal fissures. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2024; 87:304-321. [PMID: 39210763 DOI: 10.51821/87.2.11787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Acute and chronic anal fissures are common proctological problems that lead to relatively high morbidity and frequent contacts with health care professionals. Multiple treatment options, both topical and surgical, are available, therefore evidence-based guidance is preferred. Methods A Delphi consensus process was used to review the literature and create relevant statements on the treatment of anal fissures. These statements were discussed and modulated until sufficient agreement was reached. These guidelines were based on the published literature up to January 2023. Results Anal fissures occur equally in both sexes, mostly between the second and fourth decades of life. Diagnosis can be made based on cardinal symptoms and clinical examination. In case of insufficient relief with conservative treatment options, pharmacological sphincter relaxation is preferred. After 6-8 weeks of topical treatment, surgical options can be explored. Both lateral internal sphincterotomy as well as fissurectomy are well-established surgical techniques, both with specific benefits and risks. Conclusions The current guidelines for the management of anal fissures include recommendations for the clinical evaluation of anal fissures, and their conservative, topical and surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Roelandt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Bislenghi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Coremans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D De Looze
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M A Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - H De Schepper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - P Dewint
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Geldof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - I Gijsen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noorderhart Hospital, Pelt, Belgium
| | - N Komen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Antwerp RESURG Group, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - H Ruymbeke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, VITAZ, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - J Stijns
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Surmont
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - D Van de Putte
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Van den Broeck
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - B Van Geluwe
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - J Wyndaele
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
|
3
|
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDie Analfissur ist eine der häufigsten Pathologien, welche sich dem Proktologen präsentiert. Entsprechend ist es wichtig, verlässliche Leitlinien dazu zu entwickeln. Die aktuelle Leitlinie wurde anhand eines systematischen Literaturreview von einem interdisziplinären Expertengremium diskutiert und verabschiedet.Die akute Analfissur, soll auf Grund ihrer hohen Selbstheilungstendenz konservativ behandelt werden. Die Heilung wird am besten durch die Einnahme von Ballaststoff reicher Ernährung und einer medikamentösen Relaxation durch Kalziumkanal-Antagonisten (CCA) unterstützt. Zur Behandlung der chronischen Analfissur (CAF), soll den Patienten eine medikamentöse Behandlung zur „chemischen Sphinkterotomie“ mittels topischer CCA oder Nitraten angeboten werden. Bei Versagen dieser Therapie, kann zur Relaxation des inneren Analsphinkters Botulinumtoxin injiziert werden. Es ist belegt, dass die operativen Therapien effektiver sind. Deshalb kann eine Operation schon als primäre Therapie oder nach erfolgloser medikamentöser Therapie erfolgen. Die Fissurektomie, evtl. mit zusätzlicher Botulinumtoxin Injektion oder Lappendeckung, ist die Operation der Wahl. Obwohl die laterale Internus Sphinkterotomie die CAF effektiver heilt, bleibt diese wegen dem höheren Risiko für eine postoperative Stuhlinkontinenz eine Option für Einzelfälle.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson RL, Manuel D, Gumienny C, Spencer B, Patel K, Schmitt K, Castillo D, Bravo A, Yeboah-Sampong A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:605-625. [PMID: 28795245 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal fissure has a very large number of treatment options. The choice is difficult. In an effort to assist in that, choice presented here is a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published treatments for anal fissure that have been studied in randomized controlled trials. METHODS Randomized trials were sought in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, EMBASE and the trials registry sites clinicaltrials.gov and who/int/ictrp/search/en. Abstracts were screened, full-text studies chosen, and finally eligible studies selected and abstracted. The review was then divided into those studies that compared two or more surgical procedures and those that had at least one arm that was non-surgical. Studies were further categorized by the specific interventions and comparisons. The outcome assessed was treatment failure. Negative effects of treatment assessed were headache and anal incontinence. Risk of bias was assessed for each study, and the strength of the evidence of each comparison was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS One hundred and forty-eight eligible trials were found and assessed, 31 in the surgical group and 117 in the non-surgical group. There were 14 different operations described in the surgical group and 29 different non-surgical treatments in the non-surgical group along with partial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). There were 61 different comparisons. Of these, 47 were reported in 2 or fewer studies, usually with quite small patient samples. The largest single comparison was glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) versus control with 19 studies. GTN was more effective than control in sustained cure (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.77), but the quality of evidence was very poor because of severe heterogeneity, and risk of bias due to inadequate clinical follow-up. The only comparison to have a GRADE quality of evidence of high was a subgroup analysis of LIS versus any medical therapy (OR 0.12; CI 0.07-0.21). Most of the other studies were downgraded in GRADE due to imprecision. CONCLUSIONS LIS is superior to non-surgical therapies in achieving sustained cure of fissure. Calcium channel blockers were more effective than GTN and with less risk of headache, but with only a low quality of evidence. Anal incontinence, once thought to be a frequent risk with LIS, was found in various subgroups in this review to have a risk between 3.4 and 4.4%. Among the surgical studies, manual anal stretch performed worse than LIS in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open LIS and closed LIS appear to be equally efficacious, with a moderate GRADE quality of evidence. All other GRADE evaluations of procedures were low to very low due mostly to imprecision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Nelson
- Epidemiology/Biometry Division, University of Illinois School of Public Health, 1603 West Taylor Room 956, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - D Manuel
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - C Gumienny
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - B Spencer
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - K Patel
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - K Schmitt
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - D Castillo
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Bravo
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Yeboah-Sampong
- Honors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Does the duration of symptoms of anal fissure impact its response to conservative treatment? A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2017. [PMID: 28629768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative treatment is the first line of treatment for anal fissure. The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of symptom duration on the response of anal fissure to conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective study was conducted on sixty patients with acute or chronic anal fissure who were treated conservatively with bulking agents, Sitz baths, and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) 0.2%. Pain and constipation were assessed prior to treatment and at 6 weeks after therapy using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Wexner constipation score. Adverse effects as headache and postural hypotension were also queried. RESULTS The mean pre-treatment VAS for acute fissure was significantly higher than chronic fissure (8.8 ± 0.96 Vs 5.8 ± 1.12), also the post-treatment VAS for acute fissure was significantly lower at 6 weeks of treatment (0.47 ± 0.8 Vs 2.5 ± 1.3). The baseline Wexner constipation score was comparable in both groups; however, at six weeks of treatment it declined more significantly in patients with acute fissure. Patients with acute fissure achieved significantly better healing than chronic fissure (80% Vs 40%). Healing rates decreased from 100% in patients with symptoms < one month to 33.3% in patients with symptoms >6 months. CONCLUSION Conservative treatment including topical GTN 0.2% significantly hastened healing and relieved pain and other symptoms of acute more than chronic anal fissure. Healing rates of anal fissure in response to conservative treatment showed remarkable decrease in proportion to the duration of complaint.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Despite the fact that countless patients suffer from anal problems, there tends to be a lack of understanding of anal health care. Unfortunately, this leads to incorrect diagnoses and treatments. When treating a patient with an anal complaint, the primary goals are to first diagnose the etiology of the symptoms correctly, then to provide an effective and appropriate treatment strategy.The first step in this process is to take an accurate history and physical examination. Specific questions include details about bowel habits, anal hygiene, and fiber supplementation. Specific components of the physical examination include an external anal examination, a digital rectal examination, and anoscopy if appropriate.Common diagnoses include pruritus ani, anal fissures, hemorrhoids, anal abscess or fistula, fecal incontinence, and anal skin tags. However, each problem presents differently and requires a different approach for management. It is of paramount importance that the correct diagnosis is reached. Common errors include an inaccurate diagnosis of hemorrhoids when other pathology is present and subsequent treatment with a steroid product, which is harmful to the anal area.Most of these problems can be avoided by improving bowel habits. Adequate fiber intake with 30 g to 40 g daily is important for many reasons, including improving the quality of stool and preventing colorectal and anal diseases.In this Special Report, we provide an overview of commonly encountered anal problems, their presentation, initial treatment options, and recommendations for referral to specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chang
- General Surgery Resident completing his training at the Los Angeles Medical Center.
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Board-Certified Colorectal Surgeon, Chief of Colorectal Surgery, and Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery at the Los Angeles Medical Center in CA.
| | - Talar Tejirian
- Board-Certified General Surgeon with a special interest in anal health care at the Los Angeles Medical Center in CA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: A prospective randomized study. Asian J Surg 2014; 37:178-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2013] [Revised: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
8
|
Arslan K, Erenoğlu B, Doğru O, Kökçam S, Turan E, Atay A. Effect of chronic anal fissure components on isosorbide dinitrate treatment. World J Surg 2012; 36:2225-9. [PMID: 22526048 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1604-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic anal fissure is diagnosed in the presence of persistent symptoms: The classic triad includes a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers, hypertrophied anal papilla, and a sentinel skin tag. Thus, chronic anal fissure can be divided into three components: the fissure itself; hypertrophied anal papilla; the sentinel skin tag. Not every chronic anal fissure has all three components; some have two components, and others present with only a persistent fissure. The success rate of medical treatment for chronic anal fissure is reported as 42-86 %. In this study, we intended to observe the effect of said components on healing with isosorbide dinitrate treatment. METHODS A total of 105 patients with chronic anal fissures were admitted and were divided into three groups. Patients in group I had a single component (only the fissure with a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers); group II had two components (skin tag or hypertrophied papilla in addition to the fissure); group III had all three components (fissure, skin tag, hypertrophied papilla). Isosorbide dinitrate 0.25 % was applied three times a day. RESULTS The success rates in the study groups were 93, 74, and 64 %, respectively. The success rate was significantly higher for group I than for groups II and III. CONCLUSIONS Chronic anal fissure components should be considered when evaluating the success rates of studies reporting the results of various medical treatments. The number of components seems to be an important factor that affects the results of isosorbide dinitrate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Arslan
- Department of General Surgery, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya 42100, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure. SEARCH METHODS Search terms include "anal fissure randomized". Timing from 1966 to August 2010. Further details of the search below. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry. MAIN RESULTS In this update 23 studies including 1236 participants is added to the 54 studies and 3904 participants in the 2008 publication, however 2 studies were from the last version reclassified as un included, so the final number of participants is 5031.49 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 75 RCTs. Seventeen agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide mono & dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or CCBs), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, minoxidil, indoramin, clove oil, L-arginine, sitz baths, sildenafil, "healer cream" and placebo) as well as Sitz baths, anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy. GTN was found to be marginally but significantly better than placebo in healing anal fissure (48.9% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.0009), but late recurrence of fissure was common, in the range of 50% of those initially cured. Botox and CCBs were equivalent to GTN in efficacy with fewer adverse events. No medical therapy came close to the efficacy of surgical sphincterotomy, though none of the medical therapies in these RCTs were associated with the risk of incontinence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, currently consisting of topical glyceryl trinitrate, botulinum toxin injection or the topical calcium channel blockers nifedipine or diltiazem in acute and chronic fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is marginally better than placebo. For chronic fissure in adults all medical therapies are far less effective than surgery. A few of the newer agents investigated show promise based only upon single studies (clove oil, sildenifil and a "healer cream") but lack comparison to more established medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Nelson
- Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Poh A, Tan KY, Seow-Choen F. Innovations in chronic anal fissure treatment: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2:231-41. [PMID: 21160880 PMCID: PMC2999245 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i7.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2010] [Revised: 07/15/2010] [Accepted: 07/22/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A chronic anal fissure is a common perianal condition. This review aims to evaluate both existing and new therapies in the treatment of chronic fissures. Pharmacological therapies such as glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), Diltiazem ointment and Botulinum toxin provide a relatively non-invasive option, but with higher recurrence rates. Lateral sphincterotomy remains the gold standard for treatment. Anal dilatation has no role in treatment. New therapies include perineal support devices, Gonyautoxin injection, fissurectomy, fissurotomy, sphincterolysis, and flap procedures. Further research is required comparing these new therapies with existing established therapies. This paper recommends initial pharmacological therapy with GTN or Diltiazem ointment with Botulinum toxin as a possible second line pharmacological therapy. Perineal support may offer a new dimension in improving healing rates. Lateral sphincterotomy should be offered if pharmacological therapy fails. New therapies are not suitable as first line treatments, though they can be considered if conventional treatment fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Poh
- Aaron Poh, Kok-Yang Tan, Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore 768828, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|