1
|
McDermott J, Kao LS, Keeley JA, Nahmias J, de Virgilio C. Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA Surg 2024:2818236. [PMID: 38691369 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Importance Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is the leading cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for approximately 50% of cases. Without appropriate and timely treatment, patients are at increased risk of disease progression and recurrence. While there is increasing consensus among guidelines for the management of mild GSP, adherence to these guidelines remains poor. In addition, there is minimal evidence to guide clinicians in the treatment of moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. Observations The management of GSP continues to evolve and is dependent on severity of acute pancreatitis and concomitant biliary diagnoses. Across the spectrum of severity, there is evidence that goal-directed, moderate fluid resuscitation decreases the risk of fluid overload and mortality compared with aggressive resuscitation. Patients with isolated, mild GSP should undergo same-admission cholecystectomy; early cholecystectomy within 48 hours of admission has been supported by several randomized clinical trials. Cholecystectomy should be delayed for patients with severe disease; for severe and moderately severe disease, the optimal timing remains unclear. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is only useful for patients with suspected cholangitis or biliary obstruction, although the concomitance of these conditions in patients with GSP is rare. Modality of evaluation of the common bile duct to rule out concomitant choledocholithiasis varies and should be tailored to level of concern based on objective measures, such as laboratory results and imaging findings. Among these modalities, intraoperative cholangiography is associated with reduced length of stay and decreased use of ERCP. However, the benefit of routine intraoperative cholangiography remains in question. Conclusions and Relevance Treatment of GSP is dependent on disease severity, which can be difficult to assess. A comprehensive review of clinically relevant evidence and recommendations on GSP severity grading, fluid resuscitation, timing of cholecystectomy, need for ERCP, and evaluation and management of persistent choledocholithiasis can help guide clinicians in diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James McDermott
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Jessica A Keeley
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Jeffry Nahmias
- Division of Trauma, Burns, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kovács N, Németh D, Földi M, Nagy B, Bunduc S, Hegyi P, Bajor J, Müller KE, Vincze Á, Erőss B, Ábrahám S. Selective intraoperative cholangiography should be considered over routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7126-7139. [PMID: 35794500 PMCID: PMC9485186 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09267-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Decades of debate surround the use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy. To the present day, the role of IOC is controversial as regards decreasing the rate of bile duct injury (BDI). We aimed to review and analyse the available literature on the benefits of IOC during cholecystectomy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed until 19 October 2020 in five databases using the following search keys: cholangiogra* and cholecystectomy. The primary outcomes were BDI and retained stone rate. To investigate the differences between the groups (routine IOC vs selective IOC and IOC vs no IOC), we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of the 19,863 articles, 38 were selected and 32 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Routine IOC showed no superiority compared to selective IOC in decreasing BDI (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66; 1.24). Comparing IOC and no IOC, no statistically significant differences were found in the case of BDI, retained stone rate, readmission rate, and length of hospital stay. We found an increased risk of conversion rate to open surgery in the no IOC group (RR = 0.64, CI 0.51; 0.78). The operation time was significantly longer in the IOC group compared to the no IOC group (WMD = 11.25 min, 95% CI 6.57; 15.93). Conclusion Our findings suggest that IOC may not be indicated in every case, however, the evidence is very uncertain. Further good quality research is required to address this question. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09267-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Kovács
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.,Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Dávid Németh
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Institute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mária Földi
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.,Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bernadette Nagy
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Stefania Bunduc
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Judit Bajor
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Katalin Eszter Müller
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Heim Pál National Institute of Pediatrics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Áron Vincze
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bálint Erőss
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.,Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Szabolcs Ábrahám
- Department of Surgery, Szent-Györgyi Albert Medical and Pharmaceutical Centre, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 8, 6720, Szeged, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Georgiou K, Sandblom G, Alexakis N, Enochsson L. Intraoperative cholangiography 2020: Quo vadis? A systematic review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:145-153. [PMID: 35031229 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few randomized controlled trials with sufficient statistical power to assess the effectiveness of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in the detection and treatment of common bile duct injury (BDI) or retained stones during cholecystectomy. The best evidence so far regarding IOC and reduced morbidity related to BDI and retained common bile duct stones was derived from large population-based cohort studies. Population-based studies also have the advantage of reflecting the outcome of the procedure as it is practiced in the community at large. However, the outcomes of these population-based studies are conflicting. DATA SOURCES A systematic literature search was conducted in 2020 to search for articles that contained the terms "bile duct injury", "critical view of safety", "bile duct imaging" or "retained stones" in combination with IOC. All identified references were screened to select population-based studies and observational studies from large centers where socioeconomic or geographical selections were assumed not to cause selection bias. RESULTS The search revealed 273 references. A total of 30 articles fulfilled the criteria for a large observational study with minimal risk for selection bias. The majority suggested that IOC reduces morbidity associated with BDI and retained common bile duct stones. In the short term, IOC increases the cost of surgery. However, this is offset by reduced costs in the long run since BDI or retained stones detected during surgery are managed immediately. CONCLUSIONS IOC reduces morbidity associated with BDI and retained common bile duct stones. The reports reviewed are derived from large, unselected populations, thereby providing a high external validity. However, more studies on routine and selective IOC with well-defined outcome measures and sufficient statistical power are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Georgiou
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 10679, Greece
| | - Gabriel Sandblom
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm 17177, SE, Sweden
| | - Nicholas Alexakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 10679, Greece
| | - Lars Enochsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, SE, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
da Costa DW, Schepers NJ, Bouwense SA, Hollemans BA, Doorakkers E, Boerma D, Rosman C, Dejong CH, Spanier MBW, van Santvoort HC, Gooszen HG, Besselink MG. Colicky pain and related complications after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:745-751. [PMID: 29602557 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-admission cholecystectomy is advised after gallstone pancreatitis to prevent recurrent pancreatitis, colicky pain and other complications, but data on the incidence of symptoms and complications after cholecystectomy are lacking. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study during the previously published randomized controlled PONCHO trial on timing of cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis. Data on healthcare consumption and questionnaires focusing on colicky pain and biliary complications were obtained during 6 months after cholecystectomy. Main outcomes were (i) postoperative colicky pain as reported in questionnaires and (ii) medical treatment for postoperative symptoms and gallstone related complications. RESULTS Among 262 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis, 28 of 191 patients (14.7%) reported postoperative colicky pain. The majority of these were reported within 2 months after surgery and were single events. Overall, 25 patients (9.5%) required medical treatment for symptoms or gallstone related complications. Acute readmission was required in seven patients (2.7%). No predictors for the development of postoperative colicky pain were identified. DISCUSSION Some 15% of patients experienced colicky pain after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis, which were mostly single events and rarely required readmission. These data may be used to better inform patients undergoing cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W da Costa
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bob A Hollemans
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Doorakkers
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees H Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel B W Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hein G Gooszen
- Department of Operating Theatres and Evidence Based Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verma S, Wichmann MW, Gunning T, Beukes E, Maddern G. Intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A clinical trial in rural setting. Aust J Rural Health 2016; 24:415-421. [DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Verma
- Department of General Surgery; Mount Gambier Hospital; Mount Gambier South Australia Australia
| | - Matthias W. Wichmann
- Department of General Surgery; Mount Gambier Hospital; Mount Gambier South Australia Australia
| | - Thomas Gunning
- Department of General Surgery; Mount Gambier Hospital; Mount Gambier South Australia Australia
| | - Eben Beukes
- Department of General Surgery; Mount Gambier Hospital; Mount Gambier South Australia Australia
| | - Guy Maddern
- Division of Surgery; Queen Elizabeth Hospital; University of Adelaide; Woodville South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Single-stage cholecystectomy at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy is safe and prevents future biliary complications: a 20-year single institutional experience with 217 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:32-7; discussion 37-8. [PMID: 25270594 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2650-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current guidelines recommend cholecystectomy (CCY) during the index admission for mild to moderate biliary pancreatitis as delayed CCY is associated with a substantial risk of recurrent biliary events. Delayed CCY is recommended in severe pancreatitis. The optimal timing of CCY in necrotizing pancreatitis, however, has not been well studied. We sought to determine the safety of single-stage CCY performed at the time of necrosectomy and its effectiveness in preventing subsequent biliary complications. METHODS We retrospectively queried our institutional database of patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis from 1992 to 2012. RESULTS We identified 217 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy during the study period. The most common etiologies of pancreatitis were biliary (41 %) and alcoholic (24%), with a median computed tomography (CT) severity index score of 6 ± 1.6 and a 63.6% incidence of infected necrosis. Ninety-eight patients had undergone CCY prior to necrosectomy. Seventy patients (59% of those with gallbladders in situ) underwent CCY at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy. CCY was not performed in the remaining 49 due to a clear non-biliary etiology (35%), technical difficulty (29%), intraoperative hemodynamic instability (18%), or surgeon preference (18%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was no different between the CCY and no CCY groups, with no bile duct injury or bile leaks in patients undergoing CCY at the time of necrosectomy. Of the patients undergoing CCY, 43% of patients without cholelithiasis or biliary sludge on preoperative imaging had gallstones or sludge identified pathologically after single-stage CCY. Of those who did not receive a single-stage CCY, biliary complications developed in 17 (35%) of patients (21% cholecystitis, 14% recurrent gallstone pancreatitis) at a median time to incidence of 10 months. Seventeen (35%) patients eventually received a postnecrosectomy cholecystectomy, of which 75% required an open procedure. CONCLUSION Single-stage CCY at the time of pancreatic necrosectomy is safe in selected patients and should be performed if technically feasible to prevent future biliary complications and reduce the need for a subsequent separate, often open, CCY.
Collapse
|
7
|
Surlin V, Săftoiu A, Dumitrescu D. Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:16544-16549. [PMID: 25469022 PMCID: PMC4248197 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography (US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) seems to be a more effective tool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes. As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or EUS, especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD, the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients. ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies, especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones. Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful. A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge. In conclusion, the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis, serum biochemistry and then TUS, followed by EUS or MRCP. In the end, bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Gallstone disease is the most common cause of acute pancreatitis in the Western world. In most cases, gallstone pancreatitis is a mild and self-limiting disease, and patients may proceed without complications to cholecystectomy to prevent future recurrence. Severe disease occurs in about 20% of cases and is associated with significant mortality; meticulous management is critical. A thorough understanding of the disease process, diagnosis, severity stratification, and principles of management is essential to the appropriate care of patients presenting with this disease. This article reviews these topics with a focus on surgical management, including appropriate timing and choice of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cucher
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, PO Box 245005, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Narong Kulvatunyou
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245063, Tucson, AZ 85724-5063, USA
| | - Donald J Green
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245063, Tucson, AZ 85724-5063, USA
| | - Tun Jie
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245066, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Evan S Ong
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245066, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
| |
Collapse
|