Cost-effectiveness of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus observation in older patients presenting with mild biliary disease

GMM, Maegele M, Maggiore D, Magnone S, Maier RV, Maier RV, Major P, Manangi M, manetti A, Mantoglu B, Marafante C, Mariani F, Marinis A, Mariot ES, Marseglia GR, Martãnez-Pãrez A, Martines G, Perez AM, Martino C, Mascagni P, Massalou D, Matãas-Garcãa B, Mazzarella G, Mazzarolo G, Melo RB, Mendoza-Moreno F, Meric S, Meyer J, Miceli L, Michalopoulos NV, Milana F, Mingoli A, Mishra TS, Mohamed M, Mohamed MIEA, Mohamedahmed AY, Mohammed MJS, Mohan R, Moore EE, Morales-Garcia D, Muhrbeck M, Mulita F, Mustafa SMS, Muttillo EM, Naimzada MD, Navsaria PH, Negoi I, Nespoli L, Nguyen C, Nidaw MK, Nigri G, Nikolopoulos I, O’Connor DB, Ogundipe HD, Oliveri C, Olmi S, Ong ECW, Orecchia L, Osipov AV, Othman MF, Pace M, Pacilli M, Pagani L, Palomba G, Pantalone D, Panyko A, Paolillo C, Papa MV, Papaconstantinou D, Papadoliopoulou M, Papadopoulos A, Papis D, Pararas N, Parreira JG, Parry NG, Pata F, Patel T, Paterson-Brown S, Pavone G, Pecchini F, Pellino G, Pelloni M, Peloso A, del Pozo EP, Pereira RG, Pereira BM, perez AL, Perra T, Perrone G, Pesce A, Petagna L, Petracca G, Phupong V, Picardi B, Picciariello A, Piccoli M, Piccolo D, Picetti E, Pikoulis Pikoulis E, Pintar T, Pirozzolo G, Piscioneri F, Podda M, Porcu A, Privitera F, Punzo C, Quaresima S, Quiodettis MA, Qvist N, Rahim R, de Almeida FR, Ramely RB, Rasa HK, Reichert M, Reinisch-Liese A, Renne A, Riccetti C, Rodriguez-Luna MR, Roizblatt D, Romanzi A, Romeo L, Roscio FPM, Rosnelifaizur RB, Rossi S, Rubiano AM, Ruiz-Úcar E, Sakakushev BE, Salamea JC, Sall I, Samarakoon LB, Sammartano F, Arteaga AS, Sanchez-Cordero S, Santoanastaso DPM, Sasia D, Sato N, Savchuk A, Sawyer RG, Scaioli G, Schizas D, Sebastiani S, Seeliger B, Lohse HAS, Seretis C, Sermonesi G, Serradilla-Martin M, Shelat VG, Shlyapnikov S, Sidiropoulos T, Simoes RL, Siragusa L, Siribumrungwong B, Slavchev M, Solaini L, soldini G, Sopuev A, Soreide K, Sovatzidis A, Stahel PF, Strickland M, Sultan MAH, Sydorchuk R, Sydorchuk L, Syed SMAM, Syed AM, Tallon-Aguilar L, Tamburini AM, Tamini N, Tan ECTH, Tan JH, Tarasconi A, Tartaglia N, Tartaglia G, Tartaglia D, Taylor JV, Tebala GD, Gonsaga RAT, Teuben M, Theodorou A, Tolonen M, Tomasicchio G, Toro A, Torre B, Triantafyllou T, Trigiante Trigiante G, Tripepi M, Trostchansky J, Tsekouras K, Turrado-Rodriguez V, Tutino R, Uccelli M, Uchikov PA, Ugarte-Sierra B, Ukkonen MT, Vailas M, Vassiliu PG, Vazquez AG, Vazquez RG, Verde JE, Verde JM, Veroux M, Viganò J, Vilallonga R, Visconti D, Vittori A, Waledziak M, Wannatoop T, Widmer LW, Wilson MSJ, Wong TH, Xenaki S, Yu B, Yule S, Zachariah SK, Zacharis G, Zaghi C, Zakaria AD, Zambrano DA, Zampitis N, Zampogna B, Zanghã S, Zapsalis K, Zattoni F, Zese M, Farre SP, Atanasov BT, Pegoraro V, Zantedeschi M, Reitano E, Pizzocaro E. Time for a paradigm shift in shared decision-making in trauma and emergency surgery? Results from an international survey

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making (SDM) between clinicians and patients is one of the pillars of the modern patient-centric philosophy of care. This study aims to explore SDM in the discipline of trauma and emergency surgery, investigating its interpretation as well as the barriers and facilitators for its implementation among surgeons.

METHODS

Grounding on the literature on the topics of the understanding, barriers, and facilitators of SDM in trauma and emergency surgery, a survey was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was sent to all 917 WSES members, advertised through the society's website, and shared on the society's Twitter profile.

RESULTS

A total of 650 trauma and emergency surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the initiative. Less than half of the surgeons understood SDM, and 30% still saw the value in exclusively engaging multidisciplinary provider teams without involving the patient. Several barriers to effectively partnering with the patient in the decision-making process were identified, such as the lack of time and the need to concentrate on making medical teams work smoothly.

DISCUSSION

Our investigation underlines how only a minority of trauma and emergency surgeons understand SDM, and perhaps, the value of SDM is not fully accepted in trauma and emergency situations. The inclusion of SDM practices in clinical guidelines may represent the most feasible and advocated solutions.

Cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared to conservative management in people presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis in India

OBJECTIVES

Gallstone diseases impose a significant economic burden on the health care system; thus, determining cost-effective management for gallstones is essential. We aim to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with conservative management in individuals with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis in India.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model was used to compare the costs and QALY of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC), delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC), and conservative management (CM) in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone/cholecystitis from an Indian health system perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test parameter uncertainties.

RESULTS

ELC and DLC, compared to CM, incurred an incremental cost of -₹10,948 ($146) and ₹1,054 ($14) for the 0.032 QALYs gained. The ICER was -₹3,42,758 ($4577) for ELC vs. CM, and ₹33,183 ($443) for DLC vs. CM, suggesting ELC and DLC are cost-effective. ELC saved ₹12,001 ($160) for 0.0002 QALYs gained compared to DLC, resulting in an ICER of -₹6,43,89,441 ($8,59,733). The results were robust to changes in the input parameters in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

ELC is dominant compared to both DLC and CM, and DLC is more cost-effective than CM. Thus, ELC may be preferable to other gallstone disease managements.

Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies

Introduction

Cholecystectomy is a standard treatment in the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Current literature has contradicting views on the cost-effectiveness of different cholecystectomy treatments. We have conducted a systematic reappraisal of literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy in management of gallstone disease.

Methods

We systematically searched for economic evaluation studies from PubMed, Embase and Scopus for eligible studies from inception up to July 2020. We pooled the incremental net benefit (INB) with a 95% CI using a random-effects model. We assessed the heterogeneity using the Cochrane-Q test, I2 statistic. We have used the modified economic evaluation bias (ECOBIAS) checklist for quality assessment of the selected studies. We assessed the possibility of publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger’s test.

Results

We have selected 28 studies for systematic review from a search that retrieved 8710 studies. Among them, seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis, all from high-income countries (HIC). Studies mainly reported comparisons between surgical treatments, but non-surgical gallstone disease management studies were limited. The early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) was significantly more cost-effective compared with the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) with an INB of US$1221 (US$187 to US$2255) but with high heterogeneity (I2=73.32%). The subgroup and sensitivity analysis also supported that ELC is the most cost-effective option for managing gallstone disease or cholecystitis.

Conclusion

ELC is more cost-effective than DLC in the treatment of gallstone disease or cholecystitis in HICs. There was insufficient literature on comparison with other treatment options, such as conservative management and limited evidence from other economies.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42020194052.

A Cost-Utility Study of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Gallstones

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume surgery that is an end-stage treatment for gallstones. There is little understanding of the surgery's effect on the gain in patients' health relative to its cost. The objective of this study is to measure health gain, cost and cost utility of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Participants completed the EQ-5D(3L) pre-operatively and post-operatively. Quality adjusted life years attributable to cholecystectomy were calculated by comparing health state utility values between the pre- and post-operative time points. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost was calculated from a health system perspective and included hospital and specialists' fees (in 2016 Canadian dollars). Cost per QALY was calculated for the entire sample and demographic sub-groups.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 135 participants who completed surveys between February 2013 and June 2017. The response rate among eligible patients was 50%. Assuming that health gain accrued to the participant for 25 years after cholecystectomy, the mean gain in QALYs was 1.7430, corresponding to an average cost per QALY of $2102. Older patients, on average, had less gain in QALYs than younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomies are inexpensive relative to the gains in health they provide patients. The gains in health were not uniform across age categories. These results should provide health system planners confidence that incremental increases in surgical capacity for elective cholecystectomies is beneficial.

Assessing long term quality of life in geriatric patients after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

While cholecystectomy is shown to be safe in older patients, few existent studies investigate associated quality of life. This study examines quality of life in symptomatic geriatric patients after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Patients ≥65 years of age who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary care center were administered the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and a gastrointestinal survey pre-operatively and post-operatively (within 6 and 18 months of surgery). Quality of life characteristics were compared amongst visit type in univariate and multivariate settings, with a mixed-model regression.

RESULTS

Our sample included 30 patients. Pain frequency (p = 0.004) and pain severity (p = 0.013) scores improved with each subsequent visit type. SF-12 mental health aggregate score improved overall from pre-operative to long term follow-up (p = 0.0403).

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that health-related quality of life in geriatric patients improves after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the short and long term.

SUMMARY

Quality of life was assessed in symptomatic geriatric patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain frequency, pain severity, and the SF-12 mental health aggregate scores improved overall from pre-operative to post-operative visit types.

Access through altruism: A community-based free outpatient surgery program for the working poor in the United States

Despite healthcare reform, a large population in the United States is without healthcare coverage. The Surgery for People in Need (SPIN) program offers free outpatient surgical procedures to working, uninsured adults. Taking nearly one year to construct, the program has been operational for three years and has performed 22 procedures. Free surgery programs can improve healthcare access by providing interventions to patients who otherwise have no outlet for surgical care.

Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients admitted with acute gallbladder pathology is unclear. Some studies have shown that emergency cholecystectomy during the index admission can reduce length of hospital stay with similar rates of conversion to open surgery, complications and mortality compared with a 'delayed' operation following discharge. Others have reported that cholecystectomy during the index acute admission results in higher morbidity, extended length of stay and increased costs. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute benign gallbladder disease.

METHODS

Using data from a prospective population-based cohort study examining the outcomes of cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland, a model-based cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service, with a 1-year time horizon for costs and outcomes. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the impact of parameter uncertainty on the results obtained from the model.

RESULTS

Emergency cholecystectomy was found to be less costly (£4570 versus £4720; €5484 versus €5664) and more effective (0·8868 versus 0·8662 QALYs) than delayed cholecystectomy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the emergency strategy is more than 60 per cent likely to be cost-effective across willingness-to-pay values for the QALY from £0 to £100 000 (€0-120 000).

CONCLUSION

Emergency cholecystectomy is less costly and more effective than delayed cholecystectomy. This approach is likely to be beneficial to patients in terms of improved health outcomes and to the healthcare provider owing to the reduced costs.

Anesthesia for the elderly outpatient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the number of ambulatory surgery procedures continues to grow in an aging global society, the implementation of evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly patients will assume increased importance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence supports the expanded use of ambulatory surgery for managing elderly patients undergoing elective surgery procedures.

SUMMARY

This review article describes the demographics of ambulatory surgery in the elderly population. This review article describes the effects of aging on the responses of geriatric patients to anesthetic and analgesic drugs used during ambulatory surgery. Important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with co-existing diseases, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative side-effects (including delirium and cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, dizziness, pain, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) after ambulatory surgery. Finally, we discuss the future challenges related to the continued expansion of ambulatory surgery practice in this growing segment of our surgical population. The role of anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians is of critical importance for optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Providing high-quality, evidence-based anesthetic and analgesic care for elderly patients undergoing elective operations on an ambulatory basis will assume greater importance in the future.

Hospital readmission after emergency room visit for cholelithiasis

BACKGROUND

For patients presenting with symptomatic cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy is the definitive treatment modality. Our goal was to evaluate the surgical follow-up and outcomes in patients seen in the emergency department (ED) for an episode of symptomatic cholelithiasis and discharged home for elective follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients seen in the ED for cholelithiasis and discharged without hospital admission between August 2009 and May 2014. All patients were followed for 2 y from the date of the initial ED visit. We evaluated outpatient surgeon visits, elective and emergent cholecystectomy rates, and additional ED visits. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the time from the initial ED visit to outpatient surgeon evaluation and the time from the initial ED visit to ED readmission.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of symptomatic gallstones. Patients who had an elective cholecystectomy in the 2 y after the initial visit were 12.6%. In this group, the mean time from the initial ED visit to outpatient surgeon follow-up was 7.7 d, and all elective cholecystectomies occurred within 1 mo of the initial visit. Of the 62 patients who did not have an elective cholecystectomy, only 14.5% of patients in this group had outpatient surgeon follow-up at mean time of 137 d from the initial ED visit for symptomatic gallstones. In addition, 37.1% of patients in this group had additional ED visits for gallstone-related symptoms, with 17.7% of patients having two or more additional ED visits, and 12.9% required emergent and/or urgent cholecystectomy. Additional ED visits (43.5%) occurred within 1 mo and 60.9% within 3 mo of their initial ED visit. In patients with additional ED visits for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 60.9% had more than one abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography scan during the course of multiple visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve a timely surgical follow-up leads to multiple ED readmissions and emergent gallstone-related hospitalizations, including emergency cholecystectomy. System-level interventions to ensure outpatient surgical follow-up within 1-2 wk of the initial ED visit has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with symptomatic biliary colic.