Is sacral neuromodulation here to stay? Clinical outcomes of a new treatment for fecal incontinence

[Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: Evidence, Programming and Long-term Management]

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has established its role in the treatment of functional pelvic organ-/pelvic floor disorders. Even though the mode of action is not fully understood, SNM has become the preferred surgical treatment of fecal incontinence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A literature search was carried out on programming sacral neuromodulation and long-term outcomes in treating fecal incontinence and constipation.Sacral neuromodulation was found to be successful in the long term. Over the years, the spectrum of indications has expanded, and now includes patients presenting with anal sphincter lesions. The use of SNM for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is currently under clinical investigation. Findings of SNM for constipation are less convincing. In several randomised crossover studies, no success was demonstrated, even though it is possible that subgroups may benefit from the treatment. Currently the application cannot be recommended in general.The pulse generator programming sets the electrode configuration, amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse width. Usually pulse frequency and pulse width follow a default setting (14 Hz, 210 s), while electrode configuration and stimulation amplitude are adjusted individually to the patient need and perception of stimulation.Despite low infection rates and few electrode-/pulse generator dysfunctions, up to 65% of patients require surgical reintervention during long term follow-up - in 50% of cases because of battery depletion, which is an expected event. At least one reprogramming is necessary in about 75% of the patients during the course of the treatment, mostly because of changes in effectiveness, but rarely because of pain. Regular follow-up visits appear to be advisable.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation can be considered to be a safe and effective long-term therapy of fecal incontinence. To optimise the therapeutic effect, a structured follow-up regime is advisable.

Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Objectives

In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking.

Results

Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described.

Conclusions

Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.

Sacral neuromodulation with the InterStim™ system for faecal incontinence: results from a prospective French multicentre observational study

AIM

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) and the safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with the InterStim^TM system for the treatment of faecal incontinence (FI) and establish whether results published predominantly by expert sites are generalisable.

METHOD

This is a prospective, multicentre, observational study that invited all French sites treating FI with the InterStim™ system to enrol subjects indicated for an SNM therapy evaluation. Data were collected at three follow-up visits within 1 and 15 months. Therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated by the reduction in leakages per week and improvements over time in the ability to defer defaecation and QoL (as measured with the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score). Safety was assessed through reported adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 221 subjects with a mean age of 62.1 years were tested (184 women) and 178 received a permanent implant. For all implanted subjects with diary data at baseline and follow-up, a reduction in leakage of more than 50% was observed in 80%, 76% and 83% at 1-3, 4-8 and 9-15 months, respectively. The mean number of leakage episodes and urgency improved significantly compared with the baseline (p < 0.0001). Subjects showed improvements in QoL and time to defer defaecation and were generally satisfied with their therapy. The main device-related adverse event was the requirement to undertake reprogramming (in 52% of subjects with actions following an event). The rates of infection (in 6% of subjects) and surgical revision (in 10% of subjects) were in agreement with literature reports.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the clinical effectiveness, safety and positive effect of SNM on QoL as well as high patient satisfaction for the treatment of FI in real-life.

Five-year single center experience of sacral neuromodulation for isolated fecal incontinence or fecal incontinence combined with low anterior resection syndrome

PURPOSE

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). For low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), however, SNM efficacy is still poorly documented. The primary aim of this study was to report on efficacy of SNM therapy for patients with isolated FI or LARS. Furthermore, we evaluated the safety of the procedure and the relevance of adequate follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed upon a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent SNM therapy for isolated FI or LARS between January 2014 and January 2019. The Wexner and LARS scores were evaluated at baseline, during test phase, after definitive implantation and annually during follow-up. Treatment success was defined as at least 50% improvement of the Wexner score or a reduction to minor or no LARS.

RESULTS

Out of 89 patients with isolated FI or LARS who had a SNM test phase, 62 patients were eligible for implantation of the permanent SNM device. At baseline, 3 weeks, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after definitive implantation the median Wexner score of all patients was 18, 2, 4.5, 5, 5, 4 and 4.5, respectively, and 18, 4, 5.5, 5, 4, 3 and 4, respectively, for patients with FI and LARS. Patients with LARS more frequently required changes in program settings.

CONCLUSIONS

SNM therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with isolated FI and patients with FI and LARS. Adequate follow-up is essential to ensure long-term effectivity, especially for LARS patients.

Anal Sphincteroplasty in the Minimally Invasive Era: Assessment of National Trends and Complications

Fecal incontinence is a debilitating and underreported condition. Despite introduction of novel therapies in recent years, anal sphincteroplasty (AS) remains the surgical choice for certain patients. Previous reports have primarily focused on single-surgeon or single-center experience with AS. The purpose of this study was to assess patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of AS using a national cohort. Patients (n = 586) who underwent AS as a primary procedure between 2009 and 2015 were identified by the CPT code as recorded in the study and were evaluated and examined for association with 30-day complications. The number of sphincteroplasties performed decreased seven-fold between 2009 and 2015. Wound infection, wound dehiscence, and urinary tract infection were the most common complications, occurring in 30 (5.1%), 12 (2.1%), and 6 (1%) patients, respectively. Preoperative steroid use and surgeon specialty were associated with wound complications on multivariate analysis. We present the first national study of patients undergoing AS and identify factors that predispose to wound complications. In addition, we demonstrate that the number of anal sphincteroplasties performed in the United States is decreasing dramatically, likely because of novel therapy for fecal incontinence. We hope that this study will assist in patient counseling and call attention to preserving surgical training as utilization of AS rapidly declines.

International Continence Society best practice statement for use of sacral neuromodulation

AIMS

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an accepted therapy for a variety of conditions. However, despite over 20 years of experience, it remains a specialized procedure with a number of subtleties. Here we present the recommendations issued from the International Continence Society (ICS) SNM Consensus Panel.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the ICS, eight urologists, three colorectal surgeons and two urogynecologists, covering a wide breadth of geographic and specialty interest representation, met in January 2017 to discuss best practices for neuromodulation. Suggestions for statements were submitted in advance and specific topics were assigned to committee members, who prepared and presented supporting data to the group, at which time each topic was discussed in depth. Best practice statements were formulated based on available data. This document was then circulated to multiple external reviewers after which final edits were made and approved by the group.

RESULTS

The present recommendations, based on the most relevant data available in the literature, as well as expert opinion, address a variety of specific and at times problematic issues associated with SNM. These include the use of SNM for a variety of underlying conditions, need for pre-procedural testing, use of staged versus single-stage procedures, screening for success during the trial phase, ideal anesthesia, device implantation, post-procedural management, trouble-shooting loss of device function, and future directions for research.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines undoubtedly constitute a reference document, which will help urologists, gynecologists, and colorectal surgeons optimize their use of SNM for refractory urinary urgency and frequency, UUI, NOR, and FI.

Dynamic Article: Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation using a 2-staged approach is an established therapy for fecal incontinence. Office-based percutaneous nerve evaluation is a less-invasive alternative to the stage 1 procedure but is seldom used in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical success of percutaneous nerve evaluation versus a staged approach.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-institution database of patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-six consecutive patients were treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous nerve evaluation was compared with a staged approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the proportion of patients progressing to complete implantation based on >50% improvement in Wexner score during the testing phase.

RESULTS

Percutaneous nerve evaluation was performed in 45 patients, whereas 41 underwent a staged approach. The mean baseline Wexner score did not differ between testing groups. Success was similar between the staged approach and percutaneous nerve evaluation (90.2% versus 82.2%; p = 0.36). The mean 3-month Wexner score was not significantly different between testing methods (4.4 versus 4.1; p = 0.74). However, infection was more likely to occur after the staged approach (10.5% versus 0.0%; p < 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective nature and potential for selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous nerve evaluation offers a viable alternative to a staged approach in the evaluation of patients for sacral neuromodulation in the setting of fecal incontinence. Not only are success rates similar, but percutaneous nerve evaluation also has the benefit of limiting patients to 1 operating room visit and has lower rates of infection as compared with the traditional staged approach for sacral neuromodulation.

Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration

AIM: To investigate the nature and severity of AE related to sacral neurostimulation (SNS).

METHODS: Based on Pubmed and Embase searches, we identified published trials and case series of SNS for fecal incontinence (FI) and extracted data on adverse events, requiring an active intervention. Those problems were operationally defined as infection, device removal explant or need for lead and/or generator replacement. In addition, we analyzed the Manufacturer and User Device Experience registry of the Federal Drug Administration for the months of August - October of 2015. Events were included if the report specifically mentioned gastrointestinal (GI), bowel and FI as indication and if the narrative did not focus on bladder symptoms. The classification, reporter, the date of the recorded complaint, time between initial implant and report, the type of AE, steps taken and outcome were extracted from the report. In cases of device removal or replacement, we looked for confirmatory comments by healthcare providers or the manufacturer.

RESULTS: Published studies reported adverse events and reoperation rates for 1954 patients, followed for 27 (1-117) mo. Reoperation rates were 18.6% (14.2-23.9) with device explants accounting for 10.0% (7.8-12.7) of secondary surgeries; rates of device replacement or explant or pocket site and electrode revisions increased with longer follow up. During the period examined, the FDA received 1684 reports of AE related to SNS with FI or GI listed as indication. A total of 652 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 52.7% specifically listing FI. Lack or loss of benefit (48.9%), pain or dysesthesia (27.8%) and complication at the generator implantation site (8.7%) were most commonly listed. Complaints led to secondary surgeries in 29.7% of the AE. Reoperations were performed to explant (38.2%) or replace (46.5%) the device or a lead, or revise the generator pocket (14.6%). Conservative management changes mostly involved changes in stimulation parameters (44.5%), which successfully addressed concerns in 35.2% of cases that included information about treatment results.

CONCLUSION: With reoperation rates around 20%, physicians need to fully disclose the high likelihood of complications and secondary interventions and exhaust non-invasive treatments, including transcutaneous stimulation paradigms.

Does preoperative anal physiology testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To determine the value of preoperative anal physiology testing and transanal ultrasonography in predicting clinical response to sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

METHODS

We report a retrospective study of all patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in a single practice between 2011 and 2014 was performed. Patient demographics included age, gender, comorbidities, presence of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect, and history of prior anal sphincter repair. Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) scores were used to assess the severity of fecal incontinence at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between preoperative physiology testing and ultrasonography and patient outcome.

RESULTS

Sacral neuromodulation was trialed in 60 patients, of whom 31 had anorectal physiology testing and 29 did not. Patients who were tested were younger (60.9 vs. 71.4 years, p = 0.013) and more likely to have had a prior overlapping sphincteroplasty (40.5% vs. 15%, p = 0.043). Among patients who progressed to complete system implantation, CCF scores at 3 and 12 months were similar whether they had physiology testing or not. Likewise, patient outcome did not correlate with the finding of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the test results and the 3-month CCF scores. CCF scores 3 months after full system implantation did not correlate with the presence or size of an external sphincter defect, resting or squeeze pressure, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, or minimum detectable volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal physiology testing and ultrasonography were not predictive of clinical outcomes among patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.