Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: an observational study

Interhospital variation in the non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults

Background

Recent randomized trials have suggested non-operative management to be a safe alternative to appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Yet, there remains significant variability in treatment approach. This study sought to characterize center-level variation in non-operative management within a national cohort of adults presenting with appendicitis.

Methods

The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Hierarchical, mixed-effects models were developed to ascertain factors linked with non-operative management. Bayesian methodology was applied to predict random effects, which were then used to rank centers by increasing hospital-attributed rate of non-operative management. Institutions with high center-specific rates of non-operative management (>90th percentile) were considered low-operating hospitals (LOH).

Results

Of an estimated 447,500 patients, 52,523 (11.7 %) were managed non-operatively. Compared to those undergoing appendectomy, the non-operative cohort was older, more commonly male, and of a higher comorbidity burden. Approximately 30 % in the variability of non-operative management was attributable to hospital effects, with absolute, risk-adjusted rates ranging from 0.5 to 22.5 %. Centers with non-operative management rates ≥90th percentile were considered LOH.Following risk adjustment, among patients undergoing appendectomy, care at LOH was linked with greater odds of postoperative infection, resource utilization, and non-elective readmission.

Conclusions

We identified significant interhospital variation in the utilization of non-operative management for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Further, we found LOH to be associated with inferior outcomes following surgical management. Future work is needed to assess the care pathways that contribute to increased utilization of non-operative strategies, and disseminate best practices across institutions.

Does practice make perfect? The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications after intra-abdominal procedures

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the regionalization of surgical procedures. However, evidence on the volume-outcome relationship for emergency intra-abdominal surgery is not well-synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize evidence regarding the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on complications.

METHODS

We identified cohort studies assessing the impact of hospital/surgeon volume on postoperative complications after emergency intra-abdominal procedures, with data collected after the year 2000 through a literature search without language restriction in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. A weighted overall complication rate was calculated, and a random effect regression model was used for a summary odds ratio. A sensitivity analysis with the removal of studies contributing to heterogeneity was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42022358879).

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,153 articles, of which 9 cohort studies were included and determined to be good quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. These studies reported outcomes for the following procedures: cholecystectomy, colectomy, appendectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer repair, adhesiolysis, laparotomy, and hernia repair. Eight studies (2,358,093 patients) with available data were included in the meta-analysis. Low hospital volume was not significantly associated with higher complications. In the sensitivity analysis, low hospital volume was significantly associated with higher complications when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved. Low surgeon volume was associated with higher complications, and these findings remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found that hospital and surgeon volume was significantly associated with higher complications in patients undergoing emergency intra-abdominal surgery when appropriate heterogeneity was achieved.

Inverse association of hospital volume with in-hospital mortality rate of patients receiving EUS-guided interventions for pancreatic fluid collections

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-guided interventions currently serve as first-line treatment for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) but require high-level expertise and multidisciplinary care. Hospital caseload has not been fully examined in relation to clinical outcomes of patients with endoscopically managed PFCs.

METHODS

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (a Japanese nationwide inpatient database), we identified 4053 patients receiving EUS-guided treatment of PFCs at 486 hospitals between 2010 and 2020 and examined an association of hospital volume (average annual number of cases at a hospital) with in-hospital mortality. Associations with bleeding, length of stay, and total costs were examined as secondary analyses. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The hospital volume was inversely associated with the risk of in-hospital mortality (Ptrend < .001). The adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality comparing the extreme quintiles of hospital volume was .17 (95% confidence interval, .09-.33). A restricted cubic spline analysis yielded no statistically significant evidence on the nonlinear relationship (Pnonlinearity = .19). The types of stents (plastic vs lumen-apposing metal stent) seemed to have no effect modification on the volume-mortality relationship (Pinteraction = .58). Higher hospital volume was also associated with lower risk of bleeding, shorter length of stay, and lower medical costs of inpatient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher hospital volume was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality of patients receiving EUS-guided treatment of PFCs. A further investigation is warranted to justify the volume-based selective referral of the patients.

Hospital case volume and maternal adverse events following abnormal deliveries: Analysis using a Japanese national in-patient database

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the relationship between the number of deliveries and maternal outcomes in Japan, considering the declining birth rate and the evidence that hospitals with few deliveries have medical safety issues.

METHODS

Hospitalizations for deliveries were analyzed using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 2014 to March 2019, after which maternal comorbidities, maternal end-organ injury, medical treatment during hospitalization, and hemorrhage volume during delivery were compared. Hospitals were divided into four groups based on the number of deliveries per month.

RESULTS

A total of 792 379 women were included in the analysis, among whom 35 152 (4.4%) received blood transfusions, with a median blood loss of 1450 mL during delivery. Regarding complications, pulmonary embolism was significantly more frequent in hospitals with the lowest number of deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Using a Japanese administrative database, this study suggests an association between hospital case volume and the occurrence of preventable complications, such as pulmonary embolisms.

Associations of acute medical care with the transfer and acceptance functions of hospitals in a region in Japan with limited medical resources

BACKGROUND

Japan's health care system may be providing inpatient care inefficiently with a low number of physicians per hospital bed and a long average length of stay (LOS). The present study examined associations of acute medical care with hospital-level factors, such as the transfer and acceptance rates, and mediation effect of LOS, using medical service fees per day as an outcome measure for the provision of acute medical care in hospitals in a region with limited medical resources.

METHODS

To analyze the associations of acute medical care with hospital-level factors, this research used multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM) of a dataset that included 225,203 patients admitted to 99 hospitals in Fukushima, Japan. The characteristics of the patients, medical activities, and hospitals, such as the transfer and acceptance rates, were assumed to have both direct and indirect effects through LOS on medical service fees per day.

RESULTS

The final analysis used data from 165,413 patients discharged or transferred from 79 hospitals. After separating patient-level effects using multilevel SEM, the results revealed that, at the hospital level, the transfer rate had a significant and positive association with increased medical service fees per day, both directly (standardized coefficient [SC] = 0.215) and indirectly (SC = 0.057) through shortened LOS. The number of first hospitalized patients per physician had a significant and positive association with increased medical service fees per day only indirectly through shortened LOS (SC = 0.063). The acceptance rate had a significant and negative association with medical service fees per day only indirectly through prolonged LOS (SC = -0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-level factors, such as enhanced transfer function, reduced acceptance function, and a large number of patients for treatment of acute episodes per physician, had positive associations with increased medical service fees per day, either directly or indirectly through LOS.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis in Children: a Nationwide Retrospective Study on Postoperative Outcomes

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomies for acute appendicitis in children under the circumstance of widespread use of laparoscopic surgery.

METHOD

This study included data on laparoscopic and open appendectomies in children with acute appendicitis from the National Clinical Database, which is a Japanese nationwide surgical database, in 2015. The occurrence rates of complications within 30 days after the surgery and postoperative hospital stay were compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

This study included 4489 appendectomies, of which 3166 surgeries (70.5%) were performed laparoscopically. Appendectomy was performed for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in 1765 (39.3%) and 2724 cases (60.7%), respectively. Postoperative complications within 30 days were observed in 246 operations (5.5%). Organ-space surgical site infection (SSI), deep wound SSIs, and superficial wound SSIs were observed in 2.3%, 1.0%, and 2.4% of operations, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the incidence of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.21, 95% CI 0.90-1.64, p = 0.207) and the length of hospital stay (median 4 days in both groups, p = 0.835) were not significantly different between patients who underwent laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Subgroup analysis in complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis cases also demonstrated no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between those who underwent laparoscopic or open appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that the occurrence of postoperative complication and the length of hospital stay in pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy are similar with those in pediatric patients who underwent open appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Impact of hospital size on the outcomes of appendectomy in children: an analysis of a comprehensive nationwide pediatric dataset

PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes after appendectomy in children according to hospital size.

METHODS

The records of 11,565 patients with the diagnosis-related group code for appendectomy were extracted from HIRA-Pediatric Patient Sample from 2012 to 2016. The number of hospital visits and the length of stay in hospital within 30 days after appendectomy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients who were treated at large-sized hospitals were more likely to be younger, more likely to reside in metropolitan areas, and tended to receive laparoscopic surgery. The number of hospital visits within 30 days in patients managed by medium- and large-sized hospitals decreased in comparison to small-sized hospitals. The length of hospital stay in large-sized hospitals was decreased in comparison to small- and medium-sized hospitals. A subgroup analysis revealed that complicated appendectomy did not have a significant impact on the difference in the length of hospital stay between hospital sizes.

CONCLUSION

The number of hospital visits and the length of hospital stay was higher in small-sized hospitals in comparison to large-sized hospitals. Appendectomy performed in the larger hospital showed better outcomes in pediatric patients. We recommend that pediatric surgical procedures be performed in large hospitals, and that proper incentives be given for procedures to be performed by pediatric specialists.

The impact of hospital grade, hospital-volume, and surgeon-volume on outcomes for adults undergoing appendicectomy

INTRODUCTION

Acute Appendicitis and appendicectomy are common surgical emergencies worldwide. However, there is a lack of published data on the impact of hospital grade, surgeon- and hospital-volumes on patient outcomes following appendicectomy.

AIM

To establish if hospital grade, hospital-volume, or surgeon-volume impacted patient outcomes following appendicectomy.

METHODS

Using the National Quality Assurance and Improvement System (NQAIS) data for all appendicectomies performed in Ireland between January 2014 and November 2017 were examined. Data relating to patient demographics, type of surgery (open/laparoscopic/laparoscopic converted to open), length of stay (LOS), mortality, admission to critical care and re-admission rates were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 15,896 adult appendicectomies were performed, 14,521 were laparoscopic procedures. Patients treated in district general hospitals (DGHs) had lower LOS (2.96 v 3.37 days, p < 0.0001) than patients treated in tertiary referral hospitals (TRHs), had lower rates of laparoscopic procedures (87.38% v 95.56% p < 0.0001) and higher admission rates to critical care (1.91% v 0.75% p < 0.0001). No significant outcome difference was seen between those treated by high-volume (>62 cases/year) or low volume surgeons (<20 cases/year). Patients treated in high-volume hospitals (>260 cases/year) had higher rates of laparoscopic procedures (94.9% v 83.5%, p < 0.0001), lower rates of admission to critical care (0.85% v 2.25%, p < 0.0001) and lower 7-day re-admission rates (2.54% v 3.55%, p = 0.02) than those operated in low-volume hospitals (<161 cases/year).

CONCLUSION

Patients operated on in high-volume hospitals benefit from higher rates of laparoscopic surgery and fewer critical care admissions. No significant difference in outcome was noted in those patients operated upon by high- or low-volume surgeons or based on hospital grade.

Risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism following emergency appendicectomy in adults

Background

Appendicectomy is the commonest intra-abdominal emergency surgical procedure, and little is known regarding the magnitude and timing of the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgery. This study aimed to determine absolute and relative rates of symptomatic VTE following emergency appendicectomy.

Methods

A cohort study was undertaken using linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data of patients who had undergone emergency appendicectomy from 2001 to 2011. Crude rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for VTE were calculated using Poisson regression, compared with baseline risk in the year before appendicectomy.

Results

A total of 13 441 patients were identified, of whom 56 (0·4 per cent) had a VTE in the first year after surgery. The absolute rate of VTE was highest during the in-hospital period, with a rate of 91·29 per 1000 person-years, which was greatest in those with a length of stay of 7 days or more (267·12 per 1000 person-years). This risk remained high after discharge, with a 19·1- and 6·6-fold increased risk of VTE in the first and second months respectively after discharge, compared with the year before appendicectomy (adjusted IRR: month 1, 19·09 (95 per cent c.i. 9·56 to 38·12); month 2, 6·56 (2·62 to 16·44)).

Conclusion

The risk of symptomatic VTE following appendicectomy is relatively high during the in-hospital admission and remains increased after discharge. Trials of extended thromboprophylaxis are warranted in patients at particularly high risk.