Laparoscopic Repair of Paraesophageal Hernias with a Falciform Ligament Buttress

Utility of falciform ligament flap for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgical repair of hiatal hernia (HH) is plagued by high recurrence rates. Hiatoplasty failure has been identified as a major determinant of recurrent symptoms and HH, but there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach to minimize this complication and hiatal mesh reinforcement remains controversial. The use of the falciform ligament as an autologous rotational flap to support crural repair has been proposed as a potential solution. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the falciform ligament flap (FLF) as an adjunct in HH repair.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Searches were conducted on Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane through May 2024. The primary study outcome was HH recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality rate, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies comprising 469 patients undergoing FLF augmentation during primary or revisional HH repair were included. The majority (80.7%) of patients had HH types III-IV. Crural suture hiatoplasty was performed in all cases, and adjunctive mesh reinforcement was reported in two studies. Postoperative morbidity was 4.6%, and there was no mortality. The overall HH recurrence rate was 5.8% (range 0-15.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study seems to suggest that FLF may reduce postoperative HH recurrence. Well designed and comparative studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these preliminary data.

Utility of Falciform Ligament in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present systematic review was to assess current trends in use of falciform ligament in abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND

The falciform ligament has been proposed in surgical literature as a suitable pedicle or flap with acceptable surgical outcomes; however, it is underutilized in abdominal surgery.

METHODS

We performed a literature search and meta-analysis. All English studies describing use of a falciform ligament were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 547 articles mentioning use of falciform ligament, 32 full text articles were included in this review. The majority were case reports (n = 14). The mremaining papers included retrospective analysis (n = 10), randomized control trials (n = 2), reviews (n = 3), and technique descriptions (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

The falciform ligament appears to be a safe and easily accessible natural tissue with a variety of surgical applications. It is most useful as a pedicle flap and could have benefit in foregut surgery including hepatic, pancreatic, biliary, gastric, and esophageal operations.

Novel use of the falciform ligament for reconstruction of the inferior vena cava and its tributary

Tumor invasion into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic vein (HV) is challenging in cancer surgery with curative intent. Appropriate techniques for venous reconstruction are essential. We have described in detail a novel technique of fashioning an interposition tube graft using the falciform ligament to reconstruct the IVC and HV. The falciform ligament maintains all the benefits of an autologous tissue graft, with the added advantage of its flexibility in customizing graft dimensions. Its use in IVC and HV reconstruction has rarely been reported. The short-term outcomes with this tube graft are promising.

Falciform Ligament Flap as Crural Buttress in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

Background: Crural repair is an essential technical component in laparoscopic hiatal hernia surgery, but there is no consensus regarding the optimal method to prevent postoperative hernia recurrence. Mesh augmentation, especially with permanent materials, is associated with dysphagia and complications. The rotational falciform ligament flap (FLF) has been reported to be effective in reinforcing standard suture closure of the hiatus. Materials and Methods: Patients with primary or secondary hiatal hernia in whom FLF was used to buttress the hiatus repair were included. The FLF was dissected from the anterior abdominal wall, detached from the umbilical area, and transposed below the left lateral liver segment to buttress the cruroplasty. Indocyanine green fluorescence was used to assess vascularization of the flap before and after mobilization. Results: Eighteen consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic FLF cruroplasty reinforcement between October 2019 and January 2021. Indications were primary hiatal hernia (n = 9), recurrent hiatal hernia (n = 4), postsleeve gastrectomy hernia (n = 1), prophylactic hiatal repair during esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction (n = 2), and postesophagectomy hernia (n = 2). All flaps were well vascularized and covered the entire hiatal area. There was no morbidity. At a median follow-up of 8 months (range 3-15), the symptomatic and quality of life scores significantly improved compared with baseline (P < .001), and no anatomic hernia recurrences were detected. Conclusions: FLF is safe for crural buttress and is a viable alternative to mesh in laparoscopic hiatal hernia surgery.

Applications of hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft in abdominal surgery-a review of their utility and efficacy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite their ubiquitous presence, easy availability and diverse possibilities, falciform ligament and hepatic round ligament have been used less frequently than their potential dictates. This article aims to comprehensively review the applications of hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft in abdominal surgery and assess their utility and efficacy.

METHODS

Medical literature/indexing databases were searched, using internet search engines, for pertinent articles and analysed.

RESULTS

The studied flap and graft have found utility predominantly in the management of diaphragmatic hernias, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, peptic perforations, biliary reconstruction, venous reconstruction, post-operative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, hepatic cyst cavity obliteration, liver bleed, sternal dehiscence, splenectomy, reinforcement of aortic stump, feeding access, diagnostic/therapeutic access into portal system, composite tissue allo-transplant and ventriculo-peritoneal shunting where they have exhibited the desired efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft are versatile and have multifarious applications in abdominal surgery with some novel and unique uses in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery including liver transplantation. Their evident efficacy needs wider adoption to realise their true potential.

A falciform ligament flap surface sealing technique for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted liver surgery

Whether sealing the hepatic resection surface after liver surgery decreases morbidity is still unclear. Nevertheless, various methods and materials are currently in use for this procedure. Here, we describe our experience with a simple technique using a mobilized falciform ligament flap in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). We retrospectively analyzed the charts from 46 patients who received minor MILS between 2011 and 2019 from the same surgical team in a university hospital setting in Germany. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection, and 22 patients received robotic-assisted liver resection. Sixteen patients in the laparoscopic group and fourteen in the robotic group received a falciform ligament flap (FLF) to cover the resection surface after liver surgery. Our cohort was thus divided into two groups: laparoscopic and robotic patients with (MILS + FLF) and without an FLF (MILS-FLF). Twenty-eight patients (60.9%) in our cohort were male. The overall mean age was 56.8 years (SD 16.8). The mean operating time was 249 min in the MILS + FLF group vs. 235 min in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.682). The mean blood loss was 301 ml in the MILS + FLF group vs. 318 ml in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.859). Overall morbidity was 3.3% in the MILS + FLF group vs. 18.8% in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.114). One patient in the MILS-FLF group (overall 2.2%), who underwent robotic liver surgery, developed bile leakage, but this did not occur in the MILS + FLF group. Covering the resection surface of the liver after minor minimally invasive liver resection with an FLF is a simple and cost-effective technique that does not prolong surgical time or negatively affect other perioperative parameters. In fact, it is a safe add-on step during MILS that may reduce postoperative morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts will be needed to substantiate our proof of concept and results.

Common Tenets in Repair of Primary Paraesophageal Hernias: Reducing Tension and Maximizing Length

Tension-free repair remains the most important principle of surgical management of giant paraesophageal hernias. The axial tension is relieved by generous circumferential mobilization of the esophagus in the mediastinum to the level of subcarina. An esophageal lengthening procedure may be necessary for a true short esophagus. The radial tension is managed by mobilizing the left and right diaphragmatic crus. Adjunctive procedures such as pleurotomy or diaphragmatic relaxation incisions may be needed to further reduce the tension on the repair.

Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair with Falciform Ligament Buttress

BACKGROUND

Using synthetic mesh to buttress the crural repair during laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair may be associated with dysphagia and esophageal erosions, while a biologic mesh is expensive and does not decrease long-term recurrence rates. This study documents outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs using the falciform ligament to reinforce the crural repair.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs with a falciform ligament buttress. Preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, medications, radiologic studies, and symptom severity and frequency scores were recorded. Patients with a hiatal defect greater than 5 cm were included, while patients with recurrent hiatal hernia repairs or prior gastric surgery were excluded. Symptom scores were compared pre- and postoperatively with a p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were included with a mean age of 62.4 years, and 57 patients underwent an upper gastrointestinal series at least 12 months from the initial operation with a mean follow-up of 20.6 months. The mean symptom severity score decreased from 14.32 ± 0.93 to 4.75 ± 0.97 (p < 0.001), mean symptom frequency score decreased from 14.99 ± 0.97 to 5.25 ± 0.99 (p < 0.001), and mean total symptom score decreased from 29.31 ± 1.88 to 10.00 ± 1.95 (p < 0.001). Five patients developed recurrent hiatal hernias on upper gastrointestinal series, but only three required operative intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with a falciform ligament buttress is a viable option for a durable closure. Ongoing follow-up will continue to illuminate the value of this approach to decrease morbidity and recurrence rates for hiatal hernia repair.