1
|
Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopy for colorectal surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:2309-2319. [PMID: 36319866 PMCID: PMC9640416 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04272-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is an alternative to straight laparoscopy (LAP) in colorectal surgery. Many studies have compared the two in terms of efficacy, complications, and outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to uncover if there are any significant differences in conversion rates, operative times, body mass index (BMI), incision lengths, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of stay. METHODS Comprehensive searches were performed on databases from their respective inceptions to 16 December 2021, with a manual search performed through Scopus. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series involving more than 10 patients were included. RESULTS A total of 47 studies were found fitting the inclusion criteria, with 5 RCTs, 41 cohort studies, and 1 case series. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower conversion rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95%CI 0.28-0.60, p < 0.00001), shorter operative times (Mean Difference [MD] - 8.32 min, 95%CI - 14.05- - 2.59, p = 0.004), and higher BMI (MD 0.79, 95%CI 0.46-1.13, p < 0.00001), but it was also associated with longer incision lengths (MD 2.19 cm, 95%CI 1.66-2.73 cm, p < 0.00001), and higher postoperative complication rates (OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.06-1.24, p = 0.0004). Length of stay was not different in HALS as compared to Lap (MD 0.16 days, 95%CI - 0.06-0.38 days, p = 0.16, and intraoperative complications were the same between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS Hand-assisted laparoscopy is a suitable alternative to straight laparoscopy with benefits and risks. While there are many cohort studies comparing HALS and LAP, more RCTs would be needed for a better quality of evidence.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chough I, Zaghiyan K, Ovsepyan G, Fleshner P. It is Not Just Cosmesis: Straight Laparoscopy with Stoma Site Extraction Improves Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Undergoing Total Colectomy. Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481908501026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive approaches to total abdominal colectomy (TAC) in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients include straight laparoscopy (SL), hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), and robotics. In this study, short-term outcomes of patients undergoing SL and HALS TAC were compared. Prospectively collected data on UC patients undergoing TAC were tabulated. The study cohort included 36 (27%) patients in the SL group and 95 (73%) patients in the HALS group. The groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics and demographics. The mean operative time was 151 (range, 73–225) minutes in the SL group versus 164 (range, 103–295) minutes in the HALS group ( P = 0.09). Total 48-hour IV morphine use was 30 (range, 0–186) mg in the SL group compared with 56 (0–275) mg in the HALS group ( P < 0.01). Although overall morbidity was comparable between the groups, Clavien-Dindo Class III complications did not occur in any of the SL group patients versus 11 (11%) of the HALS group patients ( P = 0.03). The postoperative length of stay was 3 (3–21) days in the SL group versus 5 (3–15) days in the HALS group ( P < 0.01). Compared with HALS, SL is associated with lower postoperative narcotic use and hospital length of stay in UC patients undergoing TAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ino Chough
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gayane Ovsepyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phillip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eisenstein S, Stringfield S, Holubar SD. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32:41-53. [PMID: 30647545 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) is probably the most well-known surgical database in North American and worldwide. This clinical database was first proposed by Dr. Clifford Ko, a colorectal surgeon, to the ACS, and NSQIP first started collecting data ca. 2005 with the intent of comparing hospitals (benchmarking) and for hospital-level quality improvement projects. Since then, its popularity has grown from just a few participating hospitals in the United States to more than 708 participating hospitals worldwide, and collaboration allows regional or disease-specific data sharing. Importantly, from a methodological perspective, as the number of hospitals has grown so has the hospital heterogeneity and thus generalizability of the results and conclusions of the individual studies. In this article, we will first briefly present the structure of the database (aka the Participant User File) and other important methodological considerations specific to performing clinical research. We will then briefly review and summarize the approximately 60 published colectomy articles and 30 published articles on proctectomy. We will conclude with future directions relevant to colorectal clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Eisenstein
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California
| | - Sarah Stringfield
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patient Co-Morbidity and Functional Status Influence the Occurrence of Hospital Acquired Conditions More Strongly than Hospital Factors. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:163-172. [PMID: 30225796 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3957-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Never events (NE) and hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) are used by Medicare/Medicaid Services to define hospital performance measures that dictate payments/penalties. Pre-op patient comorbidity may significantly influence HAC development. METHODS We studied 8,118,615 patients from the NIS database (2002-2012) who underwent upper/lower gastrointestinal and/or hepatopancreatobiliary procedures. Multivariate analysis, using logistic regression, was used to identify HAC and NE risk factors. RESULTS A total of 63,762 (0.8%) HAC events and 1645 (0.02%) NE were reported. A total of 99.9% of NE were retained foreign body. Most frequent HAC were: pressure ulcer stage III/IV (36.7%), poor glycemic control (26.9%), vascular catheter-associated infection (20.3%), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (13.7%). Factors correlating with HAC included: open surgical approach (AOR: 1.25, P < 0.01), high-risk patients with significant comorbidity [severe loss function pre-op (AOR: 6.65, P < 0.01), diabetes with complications (AOR: 2.40, P < 0.01), paraplegia (AOR: 3.14, P < 0.01), metastatic cancer (AOR: 1.30, P < 0.01), age > 70 (AOR: 1.09, P < 0.01)], hospital factors [small vs. large (AOR: 1.07, P < 0.01), non-teaching vs teaching (AOR: 1.10, P < 0.01), private profit vs. non-profit/governmental (AOR: 1.20, P < 0.01)], severe preoperative mortality risk (AOR: 3.48, P < 0.01), and non-elective admission (AOR: 1.38, P < 0.01). HAC were associated with increased: hospitalization length (21 vs 7 days, P < 0.01), hospital charges ($164,803 vs $54,858, P < 0.01), and mortality (8 vs 3%, AOR: 1.14, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION HAC incidence was highest among patients with severe comorbid conditions. While small, non-teaching, and for-profit hospitals had increased HAC, the strongest HAC risks were non-modifiable patient factors (preoperative loss function, diabetes, paraplegia, advanced age, etc.). This data questions the validity of using HAC as hospital performance measures, since hospitals caring for these complex patients would be unduly penalized. CMS should consider patient comorbidity as a crucial factor influencing HAC development.
Collapse
|
5
|
What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:663-681. [PMID: 29623415 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3036-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Big data" refers to large amount of dataset. Those large databases are useful in many areas, including healthcare. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) are big databases that were developed in the USA in order to record surgical outcomes. The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the type and clinical impact of the information retrieved through NISQP and NIS big database articles focused on laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using The Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. The research was carried out on PubMed database and revealed 350 published papers. Outcomes of articles in which laparoscopic colorectal surgery was the primary aim were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-five studies, published between 2007 and February 2017, were included. Articles included were categorized in groups according to the main topic as: outcomes related to surgical technique comparisons, morbidity and perioperatory results, specific disease-related outcomes, sociodemographic disparities, and academic training impact. CONCLUSIONS NSQIP and NIS databases are just the tip of the iceberg for the potential application of Big Data technology and analysis in MIS. Information obtained through big data is useful and could be considered as external validation in those situations where a significant evidence-based medicine exists; also, those databases establish benchmarks to measure the quality of patient care. Data retrieved helps to inform decision-making and improve healthcare delivery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Overbey DM, Cowan ML, Hosokawa PW, Chapman BC, Vogel JD. Laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients: a comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:3912-3921. [PMID: 28281115 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP)-based evidence indicates that laparoscopic (LAP) colectomy results in improved outcomes compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy in the general population. Previous comparative studies demonstrated that the HAL technique offers distinct advantages for obese patients. The aim of this study was to perform comparative analyses of HAL and LAP colectomy and low anterior resection (LAR) in obese patients. METHODS The ACS-NSQIP public use file and targeted colectomy dataset, 2012-2014, were utilized for patients undergoing colectomy and LAR. Only obese patients (BMI > 30) and laparoscopic or hand-assisted operations were included. Patient, operation, and outcome variables were compared in two separate cohorts: colectomy and LAR. Bivariate analysis compared the approaches, followed by multivariable regression. RESULTS Of 9610 obese patients included, HAL and LAP colectomy were performed in 3126 and 3793 patients and LAR in 1431 and 1260 patients, respectively. In comparison to LAP colectomy, HAL colectomy patients had increased comorbidities including class 2 and 3 obesity. HAL colectomy was associated with higher overall morbidity (20 vs. 16%, p < 0.001), infectious complications (10.2 vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001), anastomotic leaks (3.0 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.03), and ileus (11 vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that overall morbidity (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.44), infectious complications (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59), and ileus (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12-1.57) were each increased in the HAL colectomy cohort but not different for HAL and LAP LAR. CONCLUSIONS In comparison to LAP colectomy, the HAL technique is used more often in obese patients with an increased operative risk profile. While inherent bias and unmeasured variables limit the analysis, the available data indicate that the HAL technique is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Alternatively, HAL and LAP LAR are performed in obese patients with a similar risk profile and result in similar postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas M Overbey
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, C302, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,Department of Surgery, VA Eastern Colorado HealthCare System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Michelle L Cowan
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, C302, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,Department of Surgery, VA Eastern Colorado HealthCare System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Patrick W Hosokawa
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brandon C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, C302, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, C302, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilmore BF, Sun Z, Adam M, Kim J, Ezekian B, Ong C, Migaly J, Mantyh CR. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Standard Laparoscopic Colectomy: Are Outcomes and Operative Time Different? J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:1854-1860. [PMID: 27456018 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3206-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HAL colectomy is a technique perceived to provide the benefits of laparoscopic surgery while improving tactile feedback and operative time. Published data are largely limited to small, single-institution studies. METHODS The 2012-2013 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Data Use File was queried for patients undergoing elective SL or HAL colectomy. Patients underwent 1:1 propensity matching and had outcomes compared. An additional subgroup analysis was performed for patients undergoing segmental resections only. RESULTS 13,949 patients were identified, of whom 6084 (43.6 %) underwent HAL colectomy. Patients undergoing HAL versus SL colectomy had higher rates of postoperative ileus (8.7 vs. 6.3 %, p < 0.001), wound complication (8.8 vs. 6.8 %, p = 0.006), and 30-day readmission (7.5 vs. 6.0 %, p = 0.002), without any differences in operative time (156 vs. 157 min, p = 0.713). Amongst segmental colectomies, HAL remained associated with higher rates of wound complications (8.6 vs. 6.5 %, p = 0.016), postoperative ileus (8.9 vs. 6.3 %, p < 0.001), and 30-day readmission (7.1 vs. 5.9 %, p = 0.041) with no difference in operative time between HAL and SL (145 vs. 145 min, p = 0.334). CONCLUSIONS Use of HAL colectomy is associated with increased risk of wound complications, postoperative ileus, and readmissions. Importantly, this technique is not associated with any decrease in operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian F Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Zhifei Sun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Mohamed Adam
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jina Kim
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Cecilia Ong
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - John Migaly
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Christopher R Mantyh
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:64-77. [PMID: 27287905 PMCID: PMC5216072 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer is associated with substantial morbidity despite the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols and laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) is less invasive than laparoscopic assisted hemicolectomy, possibly leading to further decrease in post-operative morbidity and faster recovery. The current standard technique includes an extracorporeal anastomosis with mobilization of the colon, mesenteric traction and a extraction wound located in the mid/upper abdomen with relative more post-operative morbidity compared to extraction wounds located in the lower abdomen. Methods A systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases was performed on studies comparing the intracorporeal versus the extracorporeal performed anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Primary outcomes were mortality, short-term morbidity and length of stay. For quality assessment, the MINORS checklist was used. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and a subgroup analysis was performed for data regarding short-term morbidity and length of stay in studies published in 2012≥. Results A total of 2692 papers were identified, 12 non-randomized comparative studies were included in the analysis with a total number of 1492 patients. No significant change in mortality was found (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.09–1.46; I2 = 0 %). Short-term morbidity decreased significantly in favour of IA (OR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.49–0.93; I2 = 20 %). Length of stay was decreased, but with serious risk of heterogeneity (MD −0.77 days, 95 % CI −1.46 to −0.07; I2 = 81 %). Subgroup analysis for papers published in 2012≥ resulted in an even larger decrease in short-term morbidity (OR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.50–0.85; I2 = 0 %) and a significant decrease in length of stay with low risk of heterogeneity (MD −0.77 days, 95 % CI −1.17 to −0.37; I2 = 4 %). Conclusion Intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is associated with reduced short-term morbidity and decreased length of hospital stay suggesting faster recovery as shown in this meta-analysis.
Collapse
|