Surgical Ampullectomy with Complete Resection of the Common Bile Duct: a New Procedure for Radical Resection of Non-invasive Ampulloma with Biliary Extension

Intra-ampullary Papillary Tubular Neoplasm (IAPN): Clinicopathologic Analysis of 72 Cases Highlights the Distinctive Characteristics of a Poorly Recognized Entity

The guidelines recently recognized the intra-ampullary papillary tubular neoplasm (IAPN) as a distinct tumor entity. However, the data on IAPN and its distinction from other ampullary tumors remain limited. A detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 72 previously unpublished IAPNs was performed. The patients were: male/female=1.8; mean age=67 years (range: 42 to 86 y); mean size=2.3 cm. Gross-microscopic correlation was crucial. From the duodenal perspective, the ampulla was typically raised symmetrically, with a patulous orifice, and was otherwise covered by stretched normal duodenal mucosa. However, in 6 cases, the protrusion of the intra-ampullary tumor to the duodenal surface gave the impression of an "ampullary-duodenal tumor," with the accurate diagnosis of IAPN established only by microscopic correlation illustrating the abrupt ending of the lesion at the edge of the ampulla. Microscopically, the preinvasive component often revealed mixed phenotypes (44.4% predominantly nonintestinal). The invasion was common (94%), typically small (mean=1.2 cm), primarily pancreatobiliary-type (75%), and showed aggressive features (lymphovascular invasion in 66%, perineural invasion in 41%, high budding in 30%). In 6 cases, the preinvasive component was pure intestinal, but the invasive component was pancreatobiliary. LN metastasis was identified in 42% (32% in those with ≤1 cm invasion). The prognosis was significantly better than ampullary-ductal carcinomas (median: 69 vs. 41 months; 3-year: 68% vs. 55%; and 5-year: 51% vs. 35%, P =0.047). In conclusion, unlike ampullary-duodenal carcinomas, IAPNs are often (44.4%) predominantly nonintestinal and commonly (94%) invasive, displaying aggressive features and LN metastasis even when minimally invasive, all of which render them less amenable to ampullectomy. However, their prognosis is still better than that of the "ampullary-ductal" carcinomas, with which IAPNs are currently grouped in CAP protocols (while IAPNs are kindreds of intraductal tumors of the pancreatobiliary tract, the latter represents the ampullary counterpart of pancreatic adenocarcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma).

Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Transduodenal Ampullectomy and Pancreatoduodenectomy in Ampulla of Vater Cancer: Korean Multicenter Study

Simple Summary

This study used multicenter data to compare the oncological safety of transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA) with that of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) in early ampulla of Vater (AoV) cancer. Data for patients who underwent surgical resection for AoV cancer (pTis–T2 stage) from 2000 to 2019 were collected from 15 institutions. A total of 486 patients were enrolled (PPPD, 418; TDA, 68). The oncologic behavior (tumor size, T stage, differentiation, lymphovascular invasion) in the PPPD group was more aggressive than that in the TDA group at all T stages. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival did not differ between the two groups when considering all T stages or only the Tis + T1 group. In T1 patients, PPPD had survival outcomes superior to those in the TDA group. In the TDA group, lymph node dissection did not affect survival. In conclusion, PPPD should be the standard procedure for early AoV cancer.

Abstract

This study used multicenter data to compare the oncological safety of transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA) with that of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) in early ampulla of Vater (AoV) cancer. Data for patients who underwent surgical resection for AoV cancer (pTis–T2 stage) from January 2000 to September 2019 were collected from 15 institutions. The clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the PPPD and TDA groups. A total of 486 patients were enrolled (PPPD, 418; TDA, 68). The oncologic behavior in the PPPD group was more aggressive than that in the TDA group at all T stages: larger tumor size (p = 0.034), advanced T stage (p < 0.001), aggressive cell differentiation (p < 0.001), and more lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.002). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups when considering all T stages or only the Tis+T1 group. Among T1 patients, PPPD produced significantly better DFS (PPPD vs. TDA, 84.8% vs. 66.6%, p = 0.040) and superior OS (PPPD vs. TDA, 89.1% vs. 68.0%, p = 0.056) than TDA. Lymph node dissection (LND) in the TDA group did not affect DFS or OS (TDA + LND vs. TDA-only, DFS, p = 0.784; OS, p = 0.870). In conclusion, PPPD should be the standard procedure for early AoV cancer.

Parenchymal Sparing Resection: Options in Duodenal and Pancreatic Surgery

Parenchymal sparing duodenal and pancreatic resection are safe procedures in selected patients with the aim to reduce endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the tumor is benign or borderline malignant, this appears to be a good option for the surgeon, associated with low rates of severe surgery-related early postoperative complications and low in-hospital mortality. This mini review offers comments, tips and tricks, and a review of literature concerning those different options with specific illustrations in order to clarify their indication.

Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30 mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e. g. diverticulum, size > 4 cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of > 20 mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Surgical ampullectomy with resection of the common bile duct for biliary papillomatosis

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) or biliary papillomatosis is a precursor lesion of papillary cholangiocarcinoma.1 IPNB is recognized as a biliary counterpart of IPMN (pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). IPNB is a rare disease involving entire (diffuse type) or one part (localized type) of biliary tree. Patients without distant metastasis are considered for surgical resection. For patients with distal bile duct papillomatosis, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is recommended for patients with invasive distal bile duct IPNB. PD is a high complex procedure associated with the deterioration of endocrine and exocrine functions leading to a significant impact on quality of life.2 Some authors have reported a new surgical approach leading to a complete resection of the common bile duct without pancreatectomy.3 METHODS: We report the case of a 71-year-old female presented to our department with jaundice. At endoscopic ultrasound with cholangioscopy and CT scan, 2-cm distal bile duct mass tumor with villous component was seen. All needle biopsies were benign, and no distant disease was found. According to the risk of degeneration of this tumor, a surgical resection was decided.

RESULTS

Intraoperative frozen section assessed the benignity of peripancreatic lymph nodes. We performed surgical ampullectomy with resection of the common bile duct. The intrapancreatic common bile duct was completely mobilized between the ampullectomy area and the upper edge of the pancreas. Frozen sections on distal and proximal margins of common bile duct were performed to discard malignancy. Finally, reconstruction consisted on the main pancreatic duct reimplantation to the duodenum and choledochoduodenostomy. The histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of biliary papillomatosis with low-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

This procedure allows complete resection of benign tumors with endobiliary extension and preserve intestinal continuity and pancreatic parenchyma.

Trans-duodenal ampullectomy for ampullary neoplasms: early and long-term outcomes in 36 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Trans-duodenal ampullectomy (TDA) is a surgical option for the treatment of selected ampullary neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with TDA for the treatment of ampullary neoplasms, focusing on indications, technical aspects, and short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

All TDAs for ampullary neoplasms performed between January 2010 and December 2018 at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Patients had ampullary neoplasms with low-grade dysplasia or in situ carcinoma (Tis) not suitable for an endoscopic approach, ampullary carcinoma unfit for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), or ampullary neuroendocrine G1-tumours.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included in the study: 9 (25.0%) with neoplasms with low-grade dysplasia, 4 (11.1%) with G1 neuroendocrine tumours and 23 (63.9%) with Tis or invasive carcinoma. Mean operative time was 252.5 min. Overall and severe (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa) morbidity rate was 44.4% and 13.9%, respectively. No 90-day mortality was observed. At follow-up, no deaths were observed and local recurrence rate was 11.1% for patients with ampullary adenomas with low-grade dysplasia. Among four patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms, only one developed recurrence (pulmonary). Tis, T1 and T2 lesions were found in 16 (69.6%), 2 (8.7%) and 5 (21.7%) patients, respectively: recurrence occurred in 3 patients with Tis lesions (one malignant), no patients with T1 neoplasms and 2 patients with T2 lesions (3 patients had a survival of > 3 years).

CONCLUSIONS

TDA is a feasible and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of ampullary adenomas with low-grade dysplasia when endoscopic approach is contraindicated or has failed. For lesions with evidence of malignancy, TDA seems to be an oncological safe procedure for Tis ampullary cancer and a good palliative procedure for patients unfit for PD. Moreover, TDA may be appropriate for the treatment of G1 ampullary neuroendocrine neoplasms. A large multicentre study of TDA for early ampullary cancers is needed.

Combined excision and ablation of ampullary tumors with biliary or pancreatic intraductal extension is effective even in malignant neoplasms

Background

The feasibility and outcome of endoscopic resection in ampullary tumors with intraductal growth remains unclear.

Objective

To assess the safety, feasibility and outcomes of these patients treated by thermal ablation.

Methods

Retrospective observational study. All consecutive patients who underwent an endoscopic snare papillectomy with a 6-month minimum follow-up were included. Ablation was performed with cystotomes and soft/forced coagulation. Successful endoscopic treatment was defined as no adenomatous residual tissue or recurrence observed at follow-up.

Results

Of 86 patients presenting with an ampullary tumor, 73 (58 ± 14 years old, 49% men, 34% familial adenomatous polyposis) (median tumor size: 20 mm, range: 8-80) were included. En bloc and curative resection rates were achieved in 46.6% and 83.6%, respectively.Intraductal ingrowth was seen in 18 (24.7%) patients and histologically confirmed in 12 (16.4%). Intraductal ablation achieved a 100% success rate, with a 20-month median follow-up. Most of these patients had malignant forms (n = 8, 66.7%), with a higher adenocarcinoma rate (33.3% versus 3.3%, p = 0.001) compared to extraductal tumors.Overall, there was a 20.5% complication rate with no significant differences between both groups (p = 0.676).

Conclusions

Intraductal ablation achieves a high therapeutic success rate in ampullary tumors with ≤20 mm ductal extension, even in malignant forms or biliary and pancreatic involvement. The technique is feasible, cheap and safe and may avoid major surgery.

Efficacy and safety of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for the eradication of residual neoplasia after endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endobiliary dysplasia may persist after endoscopic papillectomy. Intraductal radiofrequency ablation (ID-RFA) is a potential alternative to complementary surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ID-RFA for the treatment of adenomatous intraductal residue after endoscopic papillectomy.

METHODS

A prospective open-label multicenter study included patients with histologically proven endobiliary adenoma remnant (ductal extent <20 mm) after endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumor. RFA (effect 8, power 10 W, 30 seconds) was performed during ERCP. Biliary ± pancreatic stent was placed at the end of the procedure. Endpoints were (1) the rate of residual neoplasia (ie, low-grade dysplasia [LGD], high-grade dysplasia [HGD], or invasive carcinoma) at 6 and 12 months, (2) rate of surgery, and (3) adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (67 ± 11 years of age, 12 men) were included. The endobiliary adenoma was in LGD in 15 patients and HGD in 5 patients. All underwent 1 successful ID-RFA session with biliary stent placement and recovered uneventfully. Five (25%) received a pancreatic stent. The rates of residual neoplasia were 15% and 30% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Only 2 patients (10%) were referred for surgery. Eight patients (40%) experienced at least 1 adverse event between ID-RFA and 12 months of follow-up. No major adverse event occurred. HGD at inclusion was associated with higher dysplasia recurrence at 12 months (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

ID-RFA of residual endobiliary dysplasia after endoscopic papillectomy can be offered as an alternative to surgery, with a 70% chance of dysplasia eradication at 12 months after a single session and a good safety profile. Patient follow-up remains warranted after ID-RFA. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02825524.).

Transduodenal ampullectomy for ampullary tumors - single center experience of consecutive 26 patients

Purpose

Transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA) has been reported in a limited number of cases and in a small number of case series. The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of patients with ampullary tumors who underwent TDA in a single large-volume center.

Methods

Through a retrospective review of data from 2004 to 2016, we identified 26 patients who underwent TDA at Asan Medical Center.

Results

Eleven of 26 patients underwent TDA for T1 and carcinoma in situ (high-grade dysplasia) cancer; these patients are still alive without recurrence. A major in-hospital complication (3.8%) occurred in 1 case, but there was no case of 90-day mortality. In addition, none of the patients was diagnosed as having newly developed diabetes mellitus after TDA. No significant differences were found between open and laparoscopic-TDA in terms of operation time, painkiller use, and hospital stay.

Conclusion

TDA is a feasible and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of selected patients with ampullary tumors. It is an alternative treatment option in cases of ampullary tumors not amenable to endoscopic papillectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy.