1
|
Mittelstädt A, Reitberger H, Fleischmann J, Elshafei M, Brunner M, Anthuber A, Krautz C, Lucio M, Merkel S, Grützmann R, Weber GF. Effect of Circular Stapler Diameter on Anastomotic Leakage Rate and Stenosis After Open Total Gastrectomy With Esophagojejunostomy: A Substantive Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Series. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e195. [PMID: 37601147 PMCID: PMC10431426 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) and stenosis (AS) are two of the most severe postoperative complications after total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy. The stapler diameter can be chosen by the surgeon. Therefore, this study aims to assess the correlation between the stapler size as main independent variable as well as other different risk factors and AL and AS. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 356 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy between 2000 and 2018, mostly due to gastric cancer (96.9%). After propensity score matching the outcome parameters AL and AS were compared between the two stapler size groups. We also assessed different risk factors for AL and AS in cancer patients using multivariate analysis. Results Small circular stapler diameter (21/25 mm; n = 147 vs 28/29/31 mm; n = 209) was identified as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of AL (10% vs 4% for smaller vs larger staplers; P = 0.042). In multivariate analysis for the occurrence of AL an ASA score ≥ 3 could be identified as a risk factor (OR 2.85; 95% CI = 1.13-7.15; P = 0.026). Additionally, smaller stapler size could be identified as a risk factor for AS (OR small 1.00, OR large 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.97; P = 0.045). AL was associated with lower survival (18.1 vs 38.16 months; P = 0.0119). Conclusion The application of a larger circular stapler for esophagojejunostomy in open total gastrectomy shows significantly lower rates of AL and stenosis. Therefore, the largest possible stapler diameter should be applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Mittelstädt
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Helena Reitberger
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Fleischmann
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Moustafa Elshafei
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Medicine, Clinic Northwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maximilian Brunner
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Anthuber
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Krautz
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marianna Lucio
- Research Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Merkel
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robert Grützmann
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg F. Weber
- From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeh JH, Yeh YS, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Chang TK, Su WC, Wang JY. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123026. [PMID: 35740693 PMCID: PMC9221037 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary More than 50% of gastric cancer are at least locally advanced at presentation. For such patients, a multimodal approach rather than mere surgical resection leads to better long-term prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is one of the common treatment strategies for local advanced gastric cancer. Based on the experience and evidence from esophago-gastric cancers, the incorporation of systemic and locoregional therapy has shown superior disease control and reduced local recurrence. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen, patient selection, technical consideration and potential biomarkers are still under investigation. Furthermore, the comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy is also an important issue to be answered. In the review article, we addressed the current available evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Future studies and ongoing trials will be necessary to determine the best candidate and the role of newer systemic and radiation therapies in such patients. NCRT is a feasible treatment option for LAGC, with the ability to achieve favorable disease control and enable higher radical resection rates over those afforded by perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. Large clinical trials examining the comparative efficacy of NCRT and NCT are underway. The discrepancy between the satisfactory pCR rates associated with NCRT and the nonsignificant association between NCRT and survival warrants further exploration. Furthermore, newer therapies such as immunotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy may be implemented in con-junction with NCRT, and the development of useful biomarkers may ultimately lead to the de-velopment of personalized treatments for LAGC. These research directions may lead to the dis-covery of the optimal approach to administering NCRT to patients with LAGC. They may also aid in the determination of the optimal candidates for undergoing NCRT. Abstract Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Dachang Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Department of Medical technology, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Sung Yeh
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wen Huang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Kun Chang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Su
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-3122805; Fax: +886-7-3114679
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deng C, Liu Y, Zhang ZY, Qi HD, Guo Z, Zhao X, Li XJ. How to examine anastomotic integrity intraoperatively in totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy? Methylene blue testing prevents technical defect-related anastomotic leaks. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:315-328. [PMID: 35664361 PMCID: PMC9131837 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative methylene blue testing (IMBT), air leak testing, or endoscopy is used to assess the anastomotic integrity of esophagojejunostomy during open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has been widely used to treat gastric cancer in the last few decades. However, reports on testing anastomotic integrity in totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy are limited.
AIM To explore the effects of IMBT on the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leaks (PALs) and identify the risk factors for PALs in totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.
METHODS From January 2017 to December 2019, patients who underwent totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy at the Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether or not they experienced an IMBT, the patients were divided into an IMBT group and a control group. If the IMBT was positive, an intraoperative suture was required to reinforce the anastomosis. The difference in the incidence of PALs was compared, and the risk factors were investigated.
RESULTS This study consisted of 513 patients, 211 in the IMBT group and 302 in the control group. Positive IMBT was shown in seven patients (3.3%) in the IMBT group, and no PAL occurred in these patients after suture reinforcement. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for predicting positive IMBT were body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.357, P = 0.009), operation time > 4 h (HR = 55.881, P = 0.002), and insufficient surgical experience (HR = 15.286, P = 0.010). Moreover, 15 patients (2.9%) developed PALs in 513 patients, and the rates of PALs were significantly lower in the IMBT group than in the control group [2 of 211 patients (0.9%) vs 13 of 302 patients (4.3%), P = 0.0026]. Further analysis demonstrated that preoperative complications (HR = 13.128, P = 0.017), totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (HR = 9.075, P = 0.043), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 7.150, P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for PALs.
CONCLUSION IMBT is an effective method to evaluate the integrity of anastomosis during totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, thus preventing technical defect-related anastomotic leaks. Preoperative complications, totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are independent risk factors for PALs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Zhen-Yu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Heng-Duo Qi
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Zhi Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Xu Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Li
- Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bracale U, Merola G, Pignata G, Andreuccetti J, Dolce P, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Olmi S, Uccelli M, Gualtierotti M, Ferrari G, De Martini P, Bjelović M, Gunjić D, Silvestri V, Pontecorvi E, Peltrini R, Pirozzi F, Cuccurullo D, Sciuto A, Corcione F. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for stage II and III advanced gastric cancer: long‑term follow‑up data from a Western multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2300-2311. [PMID: 33877411 PMCID: PMC8921054 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08505-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been an increasing interest for the laparoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer, especially among Eastern surgeons. However, the oncological effectiveness of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy (LG) for Advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC) remains a subject of debate, especially in Western countries where limited reports have been published. The aim of this paper is to retrospectively analyze short- and long-term results of LG for AGC in a real-life Western practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive cases of LG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC performed from January 2005 to December 2019 at seven different surgical departments were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was diseases-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), number of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative morbidity and conversion rate. RESULTS A total of 366 patients with stage II and III AGC underwent either total or subtotal LG. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 25 ± 14. The mean hospital stay was 13 ± 10 days and overall postoperative morbidity rate 27.32%, with severe complications (grade ≥ III) accounting for 9.29%. The median follow-up was 36 ± 16 months during which 90 deaths occurred, all due to disease progression. The DFS and OS probability was equal to 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.89) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97) at 1 year, 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.69) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.56-0.71) at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study has led us to conclude that LG for AGC is feasible and safe in the general practice of Western institutions when performed by trained surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Bracale
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Merola
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giusto Pignata
- Department of General Surgery II, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jacopo Andreuccetti
- Department of General and Mininvasive Surgery, San Camillo Hospital of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Pasquale Dolce
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Centre of Bariatric Surgery, San Marco Hospital GSD, Zingonia, BG, Italy
| | - Matteo Uccelli
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Centre of Bariatric Surgery, San Marco Hospital GSD, Zingonia, BG, Italy
| | - Monica Gualtierotti
- Department of Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo De Martini
- Department of Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Miloš Bjelović
- Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dragan Gunjić
- Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Hospital for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vania Silvestri
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pontecorvi
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Peltrini
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- Department of General Surgery, Santa Maria Delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Diego Cuccurullo
- Department of General, Mini-Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, NA, Italy
| | - Antonio Sciuto
- Department of General Surgery, Santa Maria Delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of General Surgery and Specialty, School of Medicine University, Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Operative Results and Perioperative Morbidity After Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with FLOT for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Impact of Intensified Neoadjuvant Treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:58-66. [PMID: 32040809 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04511-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative treatment is the standard of care in Western Europe for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Intensified neoadjuvant treatment within the NeoFLOT trial proved to be safe and effective. Yet, the influence of such intensification with 6 cycles of FLOT in the neoadjuvant setting has not been analyzed regarding its possible impact on perioperative results. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 537 patients were enrolled in this study; of whom, 132 had followed a standard neoadjuvant protocol (CTx), 356 had not received any neoadjuvant treatment (NoCTx), and 49 patients had undergone an intensified chemotherapy within the NeoFLOT trial (IntCTx) with 6 cycles of FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) every 2 weeks. RESULTS Our results reveal no significant difference in perioperative morbidity or mortality with regard to the neoadjuvant treatment. Postoperative bleeding and hematoma occurred less frequently in the IntCTx group compared to the NoCTx and the CTx groups (2.0% vs. 5.33% vs. 5.1%). Postoperative lymph fistulas were slightly more frequent in the IntCTx group (4.1% vs. 0.3% vs. 1.6%). Patients treated within the NeoFLOT trial had a higher risk for blood transfusions (OR 5.5; 95%-KI, 2.49-12.19), whereas patients without neoadjuvant therapy had the longest ICU stay (mean 8.3 vs. CTx 4.5 vs. IntCTx 6.7 days). CONCLUSION The results of the current study indicate that also an intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 6 preoperative cycles of FLOT does not significantly increase perioperative complications. Thus, prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FLOT is safe for patients with locally advanced GC or GEJ tumors.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mixed Type Histology as a Predictive Factor for Esophagojejunostomy Leak in Advanced Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061701. [PMID: 32604802 PMCID: PMC7352589 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Since esophagojejunostomy leak (EJL) after gastrectomy is a potentially fatal complication and may impact the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC), it is important to establish risk factors for the EJL and to prevent this surgical complication. The aim of this study was analysis of predictors for the postoperative clinically apparent EJL. All patients operated for advanced GC between October 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. The evaluation of the EJL and postoperative complications according to the demographic and clinical (categorized) variables was performed with odds ratio test (multivariate analysis was performed with the use of logistic regression method). Among the 114 patients included in the study, 71.1% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 19.3% underwent gastrectomy followed by the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Postoperative EJL was found in 4.6% patients. The risk of EJL was significantly higher for mixed-type GC (OR = 12.45, 95% CI: 1.03-150.10; p = 0.0472). The risk of other postoperative complications was significantly higher in patients undergoing HIPEC (OR = 3.88, 95% CI: 1.40-10.80, p = 0.0094). The number of lymph nodes removed (>38) was characterized by 80% sensitivity and 79.6% specificity in predicting EJL (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87; p < 0.0001). Mixed histological type of GC is a tumor-related risk factor for the EJL. HIPEC was confirmed to be a risk factor for postoperative complications after gastrectomy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin JX, Lin JP, Desiderio J, Xie JW, Gemini A, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu R, Zheng CH, Li P, Parisi A, Huang CM. Difference in the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma between the east and west: a retrospective study from the IMIGASTRIC trial. J Cancer 2019; 10:4106-4113. [PMID: 31417655 PMCID: PMC6692614 DOI: 10.7150/jca.31192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinicopathologic data and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer (GC) between the east and west. Methods: Patient demographics, surgical procedures, pathological information, and postoperative recovery were compared among gastric cancer patients who underwent LG in the clinical trial of IMIGASTRIC (NCT02325453) between 2009 and 2016. Results: More younger males, higher BMI, lower ASA score and less neoadjvant chemotherapy were evident in east patient cohort. Eastern patients had a higher proportion of proximal, differentiated and advanced gastric cancers. More total gastrectomies, larger extent of lymph node (LN) dissection, and higher number of retrieved LNs were found in the eastern patients. However, more Roux-en-Y anastomosis procedures during distal gastrectomy and intra-corporeal anastomosis were performed in the western patients. The west patients showed faster postoperative recovery than the eastern patients. The mortality rates of the western patients were comparable to those of the eastern patients. However, fewer III-IV complications were evident in the eastern centers. Multivariate analyses revealed that an elderly age, higher ASA score, and more blood loss were the significant independent risk factors of postoperative complications for eastern patients. However, for the western patients, the independent risk factors were neoadjuvant therapy, more retrieval LNs, and pT3-4 stage. Conclusions: The selections and short-term surgical outcomes of LG for GC were widely different between East and West. To obtain more objective and accurate results, these differences should be considered in future international prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jun-Peng Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Alessandro Gemini
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Jia-bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Long-long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ruhong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarriugarte A, Arru L, Makai-Popa S, Goergen M, Ibañez-Aguirre FJ, Azagra JS. Short-term results of near-total (95%) laparoscopic gastrectomy. Cir Esp 2018; 96:634-639. [PMID: 30037472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total gastrectomy is a surgery with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, being considered the treatment of choice in proximal gastric cancer. First described in 1980, our group reported and standardized totally laparoscopic 95% gastrectomy in 2014. This technique aims to reduce the complications of total gastrectomy while maintaining oncological radicality. We present the initial results from a cohort of consecutive cases after performing the technique for 4 years at 2 hospital centers. METHODS A prospective observational study was carried out in 67 patients with laparoscopic 95% gastrectomy between 2014 and 2017. The main objective has been to detect complications (Clavien Dindo> IIIa), focusing on anastomotic leaks as the most important. The secondary objective was to assess the quality of oncological surgery. RESULTS Sixty-seven consecutive patients were included, in whom 95% totally laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed. There was no case of anastomotic leak. Two patients (2.98%) had one or more Clavien Dindo complications equal to or greater than IIIa. The total hospital stay was 6 (3-13) days. R0 radical resection was performed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS 95% gastrectomy allows selected patients to meet the oncological standards of resection in proximal gastric cancer in a reproducible and safe manner, reducing perioperative risks such as anastomotic leakage. It is a non-comparative observational prospective study, so more studies are needed to assess the standardization of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aingeru Sarriugarte
- Servicio de Cirugía General, OSI EECruces, IIS Biocruces, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bizkaia, España; Department of Visceral and Mini-Invasive Surgery CHL, Luxembourg, Luxemburgo.
| | - Luca Arru
- Department of Visceral and Mini-Invasive Surgery CHL, Luxembourg, Luxemburgo
| | - Silviu Makai-Popa
- Department of Visceral and Mini-Invasive Surgery CHL, Luxembourg, Luxemburgo
| | - Martina Goergen
- Department of Visceral and Mini-Invasive Surgery CHL, Luxembourg, Luxemburgo
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Surgical morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:613-619. [PMID: 29503129 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to determine the optimal combination of perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for Western patients with advanced resectable gastric cancer, the international multicentre CRITICS trial (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach) was initiated. In this trial, patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomised before start of treatment between adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus gastric cancer resection. The purpose of this study was to report on surgical morbidity and mortality in this trial, and to identify factors associated with surgical morbidity. METHODS Patients who underwent a gastrectomy with curative intent were selected. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess risk factors for developing postoperative complications. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients were included in the CRITICS trial, of whom 636 patients were eligible for current analyses. Complications occurred in 296 patients (47%). Postoperative mortality was 2.2% (n = 14). Complications due to anastomotic leakage was cause of death in 5 patients. Failure to complete preoperative chemotherapy (OR = 2.09, P = 0.004), splenectomy (OR = 2.82, P = 0.012), and male sex (OR = 1.55, P = 0.020) were associated with a greater risk for postoperative complications. Total gastrectomy and oesophago-cardia resection were associated with greater risk for morbidity compared with subtotal gastrectomy (OR = 1.88, P = 0.001 and OR = 1.89, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION Compared to other Western studies, surgical morbidity in the CRITICS trial was slightly higher whereas mortality was low. Complications following anastomotic leakage was the most important factor for postoperative mortality. Important proxies for developing postoperative complications were failure to complete preoperative chemotherapy, splenectomy, male sex, total gastrectomy, and oesophago-cardia resection.
Collapse
|