Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis at a High-Volume Center

2-Stage and 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis show comparable short- and long-term outcomes

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) represents the standard treatment for therapy-refractory, malignant or complicated ulcerative colitis (UC) and can be performed as a 2-stage or 3-stage procedure. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes after 2- and 3-stage IPAA in patients with UC in our department. A retrospective analysis of 176 patients with UC who received 2- or 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA at our institution from 2001 to 2021 was performed. Outcomes for short-term (morbidity, longer hospital stay, readmission) and long-term (pouch failure and quality of life) parameters were compared between the 2- and 3-stage procedure. Regarding short-term outcomes for all patients, in-hospital morbidity and readmission rates after any surgical stage were observed in 69% and 24%, respectively. Morbidity and readmission did not differ significantly between the 2- and 3-stage procedure in uni- and multivariate analysis. Median length of hospital stay for all stages was 17 days. The 3-stage procedure was identified as an independent factor for longer hospital stay (OR 3.8 (CI 1.3-10.8), p = 0.014). Pouch failure and failure of improved quality of life during long-term follow-up occurred both in 10% of patients, with no significant differences between the 2- and 3-stage procedure in uni- and multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that both the 2- and 3-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA demonstrate favourable and comparable postoperative short- and long-term outcomes, with a high rate of improved quality of life in patients with UC.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarise frequency, type, and heterogeneity of patient-reported outcomes measures [PROMs] in papers reporting on outcomes after ileal pouch anal anastomosis [IPAA].

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of ulcerative colitis [UC] has risen in Western countries, and one in three patients requires surgery. IPAA is a frequently performed procedure for UC, and a lack of standardisation is manifest in reporting outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] despite the clear need for inclusion of PROMs as primary outcomes in IBD trials.

METHODS

Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for studies investigating outcomes in IPAA surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of studies reporting outcomes for IPAA surgery for UC, which included PROMs.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 8028 studies which, after de-duplication and exclusion, were reduced to 79 articles assessing outcomes after IPAA surgery. In all 44 [55.7%] reported PROMs, with 23 including validated questionnaires and 21 papers using authors' questions, 22 different PROMs were identified, with bowel function as the most investigated item. The majority of studies [67/79, 85%] were retrospective, only 14/79 [18%] were prospective papers and only two were [2.5%] randomised, controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Only half of the papers reviewed used PROMs. The main reported item is bowel function and urogenital, social, and psychological functions are the most neglected. There is lack of standardisation for use of PROMs in IPAA. Complexity of UC and of outcomes after IPAA demands a change in clinical practice and follow-up, given how crucial PROMs are, compared with their non-routine use.

Preoperative Use of Multiple Advanced Therapies Is Not Associated With Endoscopic Inflammatory Pouch Diseases

BACKGROUND

Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can experience pouch inflammation postoperatively. The use of antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics may be associated with pouch inflammation, but limited data exist on the impact of multiple advanced therapies on development of subsequent pouch inflammation. The aim of this study was to assess for an association between preoperative use of multiple advanced therapies and risk of endoscopically detected inflammatory pouch diseases (EIPDs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and indeterminate colitis (IBDU) patients who underwent an IPAA at a quaternary care center from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were grouped based on number and type of preoperative drug exposures. The primary outcome was EIPD within 5 years of IPAA.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this analysis. Most of these patients had UC (95.0%) and demonstrated pancolonic disease distribution (86.1%). The majority of patients were male (57.4%) and underwent surgery for medically refractory disease (79.2%). The overall median age at surgery was 38.6 years. Preoperatively, 68 patients were biologic/small molecule-naïve, 125 received anti-TNF agents only, and 105 received non-anti-TNF agents only or multiple classes. Ninety-one patients developed EIPD. There was no significant association between type (P = .38) or number (P = .58) of exposures and EIPD, but older individuals had a lower risk of EIPD (P = .001; hazard ratio, 0.972; 95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.989).

CONCLUSION

Development of EIPD was not associated with number or type of preoperative advanced therapies.

The use of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis from 2009 to 2018

AIM

The existing literature was updated, assessing the use of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis in more recent years.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study identifying all patients with ulcerative colitis within the National Inpatient Sample, years 2009-2018. All patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for ulcerative colitis were included. The primary outcome was the trend in total number of total abdominal colectomy, proctocolectomy and simultaneous versus delayed pouch construction.

RESULTS

A total of 1 184 711 ulcerative-colitis-related admissions were identified. An increase of 18.6% in the number of patients was observed, while the number of surgeries decreased. A total of 40 499 patients underwent total colectomy, annually decreasing from 5241 to 3185. The number of proctocolectomies without pouch decreased from 1191 to 530, while the number of patients undergoing pouch construction decreased from 2225 to 1284. The proportion of patients undergoing initial pouch at time of proctocolectomy decreased from 995 (45%) to 265 (21%), while the proportion of patients undergoing delayed pouch construction in 2018 was 79% (n = 1120).

CONCLUSION

Surgery use in ulcerative colitis has decreased in the last decade despite increasing numbers of hospital admissions in patients with this condition. While the overall proportion of patients undergoing pouch construction remained stable, the majority of patients were initially treated with total colectomy and their ileal pouches werre constructed in a delayed fashion.

Short-Term Outcomes for Restorative and Non-Restorative Proctocolectomy in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Curative surgery for ulcerative colitis can be subdivided into restorative (with pouch and anastomosis) and non-restorative operations. Restorative surgery in older adults is controversial, due to concerns about surgical risk and long-term functional outcome. The goal of this study is to compare 30-day outcomes for restorative and non-restorative surgery in older adults with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Initiative Program from 2012-2018. Patients were included if they were >65 years old and had ulcerative colitis. Restorative and non-restorative surgeries were defined with procedure codes. Patient characteristics and adverse surgical outcomes were compared between restorative and non-restorative surgeries utilizing chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association of restorative versus non-restorative surgery with adverse surgical outcomes while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 392 total patients, 95 had restorative and 297 had non-restorative surgery. Patients undergoing restorative surgery, compared to non-restorative surgery, were significantly younger (P<0.01), had lower incidences of steroid usage (P<0.001) and higher rates of readmission (P = 0.02). There were no differences in post-operative complications between the groups in both unadjusted analyses and covariate-adjusted regression analysis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected older patients with ulcerative colitis, restorative surgery is associated with increased readmission, but otherwise similar rates of morbidity or mortality compared to non-restorative surgery. Data regarding postoperative functional outcome and quality of life are also needed to help select the most appropriate curative option for older adults.

Risk factors for readmission with dehydration after ileostomy formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Ileostomy formation is a commonly performed procedure with substantial associated morbidity. Patients with an ileostomy experience high rates of unplanned hospital readmission with dehydration, and such events have a long-term health and economic impact. Reports of the significant risk factors associated with these readmissions have been inconsistent. This study aimed to identify the significant risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL databases. All original research articles reporting risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation in adults were included. The primary outcome was the pooled risk ratio of clinically relevant variables potentially associated with dehydration-related readmission following ileostomy formation. The secondary outcome was the incidence of dehydration-related readmission.

RESULTS

Ten studies (27 089 patients) were included. The incidences of 30- and 60-day readmission with dehydration were 5.0% (range 2.1%-13.2%) and 10.3% (range 7.3%-14.1%), respectively. Eight variables were found to be significantly associated with dehydration-related readmission: age ≥65 years, body mass index ≥30 kg/m² , diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal comorbidity, regular diuretic use, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure and length of stay after index admission. A preoperative diagnosis of colorectal cancer was less likely to result in readmission with dehydration.

CONCLUSION

Readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation is a significant issue with several risk factors. Awareness of these risk factors will help inform the design of future studies addressing risk prediction, allow risk stratification of ileostomates and aid in the development of personalized prevention strategies.

Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Readmissions reflect adverse patient outcomes, and clinicians currently lack accurate models to predict readmission risk.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to create a readmission risk calculator for use in the postoperative setting after elective colon and rectal surgery.

DESIGN

Patients were identified from 2012-2014 American College of Surgery-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. A model was created with 60% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample using multivariable logistic regression to stratify patients into low/medium- and high-risk categories. The model was validated with the remaining 40% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample and 2016-2018 institutional data.

SETTINGS

The study included both national and institutional data.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent elective abdominal colon or rectal resection were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included reasons for and time interval to readmission.

RESULTS

The model discrimination (c-statistic) was 0.76 ((95% CI, 0.75-0.76); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program model creation cohort (n = 50,508), 0.70 ((95% CI, 0.69-0.70); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program validation cohort (n = 33,714), and 0.62 ((95% CI, 0.54-0.70); p = 0.04) in the institutional cohort (n = 400). High risk was designated as ≥8.7% readmission risk. Readmission rates in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data were 10.7% and 8.8% overall; of patients predicted to be high risk, observed readmission rate was 22.1% in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 12.4% in the institutional cohorts. Overall median interval from surgery to readmission was 14 days in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 11 days institutionally. The most common reasons for readmission were organ space infection, bowel obstruction/paralytic ileus, and dehydration in both the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective observational review.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who undergo elective colon and rectal surgery, use of a readmission risk calculator developed for postoperative use can identify high-risk patients for potential amelioration of modifiable risk factors, more intensive outpatient follow-up, or planned readmission. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. CREACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL DE UNA CALCULADORA DE RIESGO DE REINGRESO PARA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVE: Los reingresos reflejan resultados adversos de los pacientes y los médicos actualmente carecen de modelos precisos para predecir el riesgo de reingreso.Intentamos crear una calculadora de riesgo de readmisión para su uso en el entorno postoperatorio después de una cirugía electiva de colon y recto.Los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección electiva del colon abdominal o rectal se identificaron a partir de los datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica (ACS-NSQIP) del Colegio Americano de Cirugia Nacional 2012-2014. Se creó un modelo con el 60% de la muestra NSQIP utilizando regresión logística multivariable para estratificar a los pacientes en categorías de riesgo bajo / medio y alto. El modelo fue validado con el 40% restante de la muestra NSQIP y datos institucionales 2016-2018.El estudio incluyó datos tanto nacionales como institucionales.El resultado primario fue el reingreso dentro de los 30 días de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron razones e intervalo de tiempo para el reingreso.La discriminación del modelo (estadística c) fue de 0,76 (IC del 95%: 0,75-0,76, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de creación del modelo NSQIP (n = 50,508), 0,70 (IC del 95%: 0,69-0,70, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de validación NSQIP (n = 33,714), y 0,62 (IC del 95%: 0,54-0,70, p = 0,04) en la cohorte institucional (n = 400). Alto riesgo se designó como > 8,7% de riesgo de readmisión. Las tasas de readmisión en NSQIP y los datos institucionales fueron del 10,7% y del 8,8% en general; de pacientes con riesgo alto, la tasa de reingreso observada fue del 22.1% en el NSQIP y del 12.4% en las cohortes institucionales. El intervalo medio general desde la cirugía hasta el reingreso fue de 14 días en NSQIP y 11 días institucionalmente. Las razones más comunes para el reingreso fueron infección del espacio orgánico, obstrucción intestinal / íleo paralítico y deshidratación tanto en NSQIP como en datos institucionales.Esta fue una revisión observacional retrospectiva.Para los pacientes que se someten a cirugía electiva de colon y recto, el uso de una calculadora de riesgo de reingreso desarrollada para el uso postoperatorio puede identificar a los pacientes de alto riesgo para una posible mejora de los factores de riesgo modificables, un seguimiento ambulatorio más intensivo o un reingreso planificado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Extended thromboprophylaxis following colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive systematic clinical review

AIM

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) following major abdominal surgery. The pathogenesis is multifactorial and not fully understood. A combination of pathophysiology, patient and surgical risk factors increase the risk of postoperative VTE in these patients. Despite being at increased risk, IBD patients are not regularly prescribed extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis following colorectal surgery. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence-based guidelines. Thus, the aim of this review is to evaluate the role of extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in IBD patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHOD

A search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed. A qualitative analysis was performed using 10 clinical questions developed by colorectal surgeons and a thrombosis haematologist. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 1229 studies were identified, 38 of which met the final inclusion criteria (37 retrospective, one case-control). Rates of postoperative VTE ranged between 0.6% and 8.9%. Patient-specific risk factors for postoperative VTE included ulcerative colitis, increased age and obesity. Surgery-specific risk factors for postoperative VTE included open surgery, emergent surgery and ileostomy creation. Patients with IBD were more frequently at increased risk in the included studies for postoperative VTE than patients with colorectal cancer. The risk of bias assessment demonstrated low risk of bias in patient selection and comparability, with variable risk of bias in reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of evidence regarding the use of extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with IBD following colorectal surgery. As these patients are at heightened risk of postoperative VTE, future study and consideration of the use of extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is warranted.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.

METHODS

Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Variation in practice of pouch surgery in England - using SWORD data to cut to the chase and justify centralization

AIM

Increasing scrutiny on both individual and unit outcomes after surgical procedures is now expected. In the field of inflammatory bowel disease, this is particularly pertinent for outcomes after ileoanal pouch surgery.

METHOD

The Surgical Workload and Outcomes Research Database (SWORD) relies on administrative data derived from Hospital Episode Statistics collected in England. The platform was interrogated for pouch procedures undertaken in England between April 2009 and December 2016 to assess national caseload and, between April 2012 and December 2016, to assess variation in caseload and outcomes after pouch surgery.

RESULTS

In England there is a suggestion that numbers of pouch procedures may be decreasing. Over 80% of Trusts offering pouch surgery do so at very low volume with less than five procedures per year. There is also a clear phenomenon of the occasional pouch surgeon with 126 surgeons undertaking just one pouch operation during the study period of almost 5 years. Laparoscopic practice varies but 60% of pouches overall were done via an open approach. Mean length of stay was 10.1 days and average 30-day readmission rates were 27.4%. Outside London there appears to be an increasing trend for higher volume units to do more adult pouch procedures and lower volume units to do fewer.

CONCLUSION

Low volume units and occasional pouch surgeons present a strong argument for centralization of pouch surgery. Data from England outside London suggest that this may already be happening.

Obesity and inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review summarizes our current understanding of how obesity impacts diagnostic studies and therapies used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as the safety and efficacy of medical and surgical weight loss therapies in the obese IBD patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many of the diagnostic tools we rely on in the identification and monitoring of IBD can be altered by obesity. Obesity is associated with increased acute phase proteins and fecal calprotectin. It can be more difficult to obtain and interpret cross sectional imaging of obese patients. Recent studies have also shown that common therapies used to treat IBD may be less effective in the obese population and may impact comorbid disease. Our understanding of how best to measure obesity is evolving. In addition to BMI, studies now include measures of visceral adiposity and subcutaneous to visceral adiposity ratios. An emerging area of interest is the safety and efficacy of obesity treatment including bariatric surgery in patients with IBD. A remaining question is how weight loss may alter the course of IBD.

SUMMARY

The proportion of obese IBD patients is on the rise. Caring for this population requires a better understanding of how obesity impacts diagnostic testing and therapeutic strategies. The approach to weight loss in this population is complex and future studies are needed to determine the safety of medical or surgical weight loss and its impact on the course of disease.