Underutilization of Treatment for Regional Gastric Cancer Among the Elderly in the USA

GCclassifier: An R package for the prediction of molecular subtypes of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies, threatening millions of lives worldwide each year. Importantly, GC is a heterogeneous disease, posing a significant challenge to the selection of patients for more optimized therapy. Over the last decades, extensive community effort has been spent on dissecting the heterogeneity of GC, leading to the identification of distinct molecular subtypes that are clinically relevant. However, so far, no tool is publicly available for GC subtype prediction, hindering the research into GC subtype-specific biological mechanisms, the design of novel targeted agents, and potential clinical applications. To address the unmet need, we developed an R package GCclassifier for predicting GC molecular subtypes based on gene expression profiles. To facilitate the use by non-bioinformaticians, we also provide an interactive, user-friendly web server implementing the major functionalities of GCclassifier. The predictive performance of GCclassifier was demonstrated using case studies on multiple independent datasets.

Survival analysis and prognostic model establishment of secondary osteosarcoma: a SEER-based study

Background

Surgical excision is considered one of the most effective treatments for secondary osteosarcoma (SO). It remains unclear whether the survival of patients with secondary osteosarcoma (SO) could be associated with their surgical willingness.

Materials and methods

The statistics of the patients diagnosed with SO between 1975 and 2008 were gathered from the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to their surgical compliance. The authors used the multivariable Logistic regression analysis and cox regression method to reveal the influence of surgical compliance on prognosis and the risk factors of surgical compliance. Additionally, the authors formulated a nomogram model to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the accuracy and practicability of the above prediction model.

Results

Sixty-three (9.2%) of the 688 patients with SO who were recommended for surgical treatment refused to undergo surgery. Lower surgical compliance can be ascribed to an earlier time of diagnosis and refusal of chemotherapy. The lower overall survival (OS) {[hazard ratio (HR)] 1.733, [CI] 1.205-2.494, P value [P]=0.003} of not surgical compliant patients was verified by the multivariate cox regression method, compared with surgical compliant patients. In addition, the discernibility of the nomogram model was proven to be relatively high (C-index=0.748), by which we can calibrate 3-year- and 5-year OS prediction plots to obtain good concordance to the actual situation.

Conclusions

Surgical compliance was proved to be an independent prognostic factor in the survival of patients with SO.

Time to treatment disparities in gastric cancer patients in the United States of America: a comprehensive retrospective analysis

Introduction

Gastric cancer ranks as the 5th most prevalent cancer and the 4th leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Various treatment modalities, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, are available for gastric cancer patients. However, disparities related to age, sex, race, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, and demographic factors often lead to delayed time to treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective study, conducted between 2004 and 2019, we utilized data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to investigate the factors contributing to disparities in the time to first treatment, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy among gastric cancer patients. Our analysis incorporated several variables, and statistical analysis was conducted to provide valuable insights into these disparities.

Results

We observed notable disparities in the timing of treatment for various demographic groups, including age, sex, race, insurance status, geographic location, and facility type. These disparities include longer time to treatment in males (32.67 vs 30.75), Native Americans (35.10 vs 31.09 in Asians), low-income patients (32 vs 31.15), patients getting treatment in an academic setting (36.11 vs 29.61 in community setting), significantly longer time to chemotherapy in 70+ age group (51.13 vs 40.38 in <40 y age group), black race (55.81 vs 47.05 in whites), low income people (49.64 vs 46.74), significantly longer time to radiotherapy in females (101.61 vs 79.75), blacks and Asians (109.68 and 113.96 respectively vs 92.68 in Native Americans) etc. There are various other disparities in time to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Understanding these disparities is crucial in developing targeted strategies to improve timely access to appropriate treatments and enhance outcomes for gastric cancer patients. Future research with updated data and prospective study designs can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing patient outcomes in gastric cancer.

Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND

The intersection of race and older age compounds existing health disparities experienced by historically marginalised communities. Therefore, racialised older adults with cancer are more disadvantaged in their access to cancer clinical trials compared with age-matched counterparts. To determine what has already been published in this area, the rapid scoping review question are: what are the barriers, facilitators and potential solutions for enhancing access to cancer clinical trials among racialised older adults?

METHODS

We will use a rapid scoping review methodology in which we follow the six-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley, including a systematic search of the literature with abstract and full-text screening to be conducted by two independent reviewers, data abstraction by one reviewer and verification by a second reviewer using an Excel data abstraction sheet. Articles focusing on persons aged 18 and over who identify as a racialised person with cancer, that describe therapies/therapeutic interventions/prevention/outcomes related to barriers, facilitators and solutions to enhancing access to and equity in cancer clinical trials will be eligible for inclusion in this rapid scoping review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

Impact of Age on the Treatment and Survival in Esophagogastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The age-specific risks of mortality for patients with esophagogastric cancer and their probability of surgical treatment are not well-known.

METHODS

This population-based, nationwide cohort study included all patients with esophageal or gastric (esophagogastric) cancer in Sweden between 1990 and 2013, with follow-up evaluation throughout 2018. Age at diagnosis (exposure) was categorized into nine 5-year groups. The main outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality, 5-year disease-specific mortality, 5-year disease-specific mortality excluding 90-day all-cause mortality, and non-operation. For mortality outcomes, Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) adjusted for confounders. For non-operation, logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Among 28,725 patients, 11,207 (39.0%) underwent surgery. For those who underwent surgery, the HRs of 5-year all-cause mortality were stable before the ages of 65 to 69 years. After that, it gradually increased for patients 65 to 69 years old (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26), patients 75 to 79 years old (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.56-1.44), and patients older than 85 years (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.60-2.11) compared with those younger than 50 years. Analyses of age as a continuous variable, other mortality outcomes and stratification by comorbidity and tumor type showed similar results. The odds of non-operation increased for patients 75 to 79 years old (OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.84-2.94] for patients 80 to 84 years old and OR, 5.00 [95% CI, 4.31-5.78] for patients ≥85 years old or older), compared with those younger than 50 years.

CONCLUSION

Older age, starting from 65 years, is associated with worse survival after surgery for esophagogastric cancer, and from 75 years with lower odds of surgical treatment.

Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the main treatment option for patients with local gastric cancer. However, surgery alone is usually not sufficient for stomach cancer patients, and combined therapies are recommended for these patients. In recent studies, some preoperative treatments have shown benefits. However, the treatment selection is still uncertain because previous studies failed to obtain a statistically significant difference between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, we plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the benefits among these preoperative treatments.

METHODS/DESIGN

This review includes randomized controlled trials with or without blinding as well as published studies, high-quality unpublished studies, full articles and meeting abstracts with an English context if sufficient results were provided for analysis. Data sources include the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, major relevant international conferences and manual screening of references. Patients with a diagnosis of resectable primary gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma (stage II or higher) who underwent surgery alone or preoperative treatment followed by surgery and who were pathologically confirmed as proposed by the AJCC 2017 guidelines without age, sex, race, subtypes of adenocarcinoma and molecular pathology limitations will be included. The following three interventions will be included: surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemistry followed by surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All-cause mortality, overall survival (OS, the time interval from diagnosis to death) and/or progression-free survival (PFS, the time interval from diagnosis to disease progression or death from any cause) will be defined as major results of concern. The clinical and pathological response rate (according to RECIST and tumour regression score), R0 resection rate, quality of life and grade 3 or above adverse events (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE) will be defined as the secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this systematic review is to compare the benefits of different preoperative treatments for patients with locoregional stomach cancer. This systematic review will improve the understanding of the relative efficacy of these treatment options by providing the latest evidence on the efficacy of various treatment options in the management of gastric cancer patients and may guide clinical practice.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD4202123718.

Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Background

It remains largely unclear how education level, an important socioeconomic factor, affects prognoses for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). We aimed to demonstrate the associations between education level and clinical outcomes in patients with GAC.

Methods

We included a total of 30,409 patients diagnosed with GAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registry database. Education level, household income, unemployment rate, poverty rate, insurance status, and marital status were selected as sociodemographic variables for the comprehensive analysis. Cox and logistic regression models, Kaplan–Meier curves, and subgroup analyses were the primary statistical methods employed.

Results

A low level of education was correlated with less income, higher unemployment rates, and higher poverty rates (all p < 0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis indicated that a high education level was significantly associated with superior overall survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates in patients with GAC (both p < 0.001). We also corroborated favorable survival outcomes by high education level within almost every clinical and demographic subgroup. Furthermore, chemotherapy combined with surgery could markedly prolong the survival for all patients, including patients of stage IV cancer (both p < 0.001). By using multivariable logistic models, patients in counties with high education levels had a higher probability of chemotherapy receipt (p < 0.001). Contrarily, those in the counties with low levels of education were less likely to receive chemotherapy or undergo surgery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Education level was identified and confirmed as an independent predictor of treatment and survival for GAC patients. Efforts are needed to provide effective interventions for those whose educational status is adverse.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Minimally Invasive Surgical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer: An International Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

No international consensus on the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) exists. In the absence of well-designed, comparative studies between neoadjuvant versus adjuvant strategies, concerns about increased risk of postoperative complications remain barriers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for AGC. We evaluated surgical outcomes of AGC patients who received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy after NAC.

METHODS

We collected data from two high-volume gastric cancer programs in the United States and China between January 2015 and December 2019 with the last follow-up in February 2020. AGC patients undergoing minimally invasive radical surgery were included. After propensity score-matching, surgical outcomes were analyzed. Risk-factor of complications was analyzed in the whole cohort.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 97 patients were included in each cohort. NAC + surgery cohort was younger (58.2 ± 10.3 vs. 61.3 ± 9.6, P = 0.036) with lower preoperative WBC count (5.7 ± 2.8 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 × 10⁹/ml) than the surgery upfront cohort. NAC was not a risk-factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.859; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-1.60; P = 0.633). Overall risk-factors of postoperative complications included age ≥ 60 years (OR, 21.338; 95% CI, 5.00-91.05; P < 0.001), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.83; P < 0.001), operation time ≥ 240 min (OR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.26-24.26; P = 0.012), and ASA classification ≥ II (OR, 13.14; 95% CI, 4.12-24.73; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NAC before minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy does not increase postoperative complications, and these findings support broader application of NAC and MIS for AGC. Additional studies are required to determine the effect of NAC on long-term survival.

Defining Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Older Adults With Cancer: A Scoping Literature Review

PURPOSE

The terms undertreatment and overtreatment are often used to describe inappropriate management of older adults with cancer. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the literature to clarify the meanings behind the use of the terms.

METHODS

We searched PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) for titles and abstracts that included the terms undertreatment or overtreatment with regard to older adults with cancer. We included all types of articles, cancer types, and treatments. Definitions of undertreatment and overtreatment were extracted, and categories underlying these definitions were derived through qualitative analysis. Within a random subset of articles, C.D. and K.P.L. independently performed this analysis to determine final categories and then independently assigned these categories to assess inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Articles using the terms undertreatment (n = 236), overtreatment (n = 71), or both (n = 51) met criteria for inclusion in our review (n = 256). Only 14 articles (5.5%) explicitly provided formal definitions; for the remaining, we inferred the implicit definitions from the terms' surrounding context. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.81) between C.D. and K.P.L. in independently assigning categories of definitions within a random subset of 50 articles. Undertreatment most commonly implied less than recommended therapy (148; 62.7%) or less than recommended therapy associated with worse outcomes (88; 37.3%). Overtreatment most commonly implied intensive treatment of an older adult in whom the harms of treatment outweigh the benefits (38; 53.5%) or intensive treatment of a cancer not expected to affect an older adult in his/her remaining lifetime (33; 46.5%).

CONCLUSION

Undertreatment and overtreatment of older adults with cancer are imprecisely defined concepts. We propose new, more rigorous definitions that account for both oncologic factors and geriatric domains.

National Underutilization of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the landmark MAGIC trial in 2006, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard of care for stage II/III gastric cancer. Nevertheless, many patients still do not begin their treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective of our study was to identify factors associated with underutilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage II and III primary gastric cancer between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared with those who underwent surgery only or surgery followed by chemotherapy. Predictors of receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified using multivariable logistic regression model. Median survival was calculated for each treatment strategy.

RESULTS

We included 15,947 patients with pathological stage II/III gastric cancer. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased from less than 5% before 2006 to 27.5% in 2015. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with no receipt of neoadjuvant therapy included treatment year before 2006 and age greater than 80. Treatment at high-volume centers, academic research programs, or integrated network cancer programs and undergoing total/subtotal or en bloc gastrectomy predicted receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten years after the publication of the MAGIC trial, fewer than 1/3 of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer are receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which has been shown to improve disease-specific survival. Further studies are needed to understand these disparities and ensure both patients and providers are having evidence-based discussions about multimodal therapy for gastric cancer.

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Across Lines of Therapy in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

BACKGROUND

First-line (1L) and second-line (2L) therapies for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) have modest efficacy, and therapeutic options in subsequent lines are limited as disease progresses. We assessed real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC between January 1, 2011 and April 30, 2018 were identified using the Flatiron Health database. Median overall survival (OS) from start of each line of therapy until death was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Duration of therapy (DoT) was time from start date until end date of each line.

RESULTS

We identified 3291 patients with advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC adenocarcinoma. At diagnosis, the median age was 68 years, 60% were white, 53% had initial stage IV disease, and 57% had GC. Of these 3291 patients, most (75%) received at least 1 therapy; 32% received 2L, 14% received third-line (3L) therapy, and 6% received at least 4 lines of therapy (4L+). The median OS from start of 1L was 10.7 months (2L, 7.6 months; 3L, 6.1 months; 4L+, 2.8 months). The median DoT in 1L was 2.2 months (2L, 2.1 months; 3L, 1.7 months; 4L+, 3.0 months). Use of targeted and immunotherapies generally increased progressively with each subsequent line of therapy.

CONCLUSION

One-quarter of patients with advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC remained untreated, and only approximately one-half of patients receiving 1L therapy received subsequent treatment. In all lines of therapy, OS was generally poor and DoT was short. More effective treatment options are needed across all lines of therapy for this highly burdensome disease.

Surgical Compliance and Outcomes in Gastric Cancer: a population-based cohort study

Background: Surgical resection is one of curative treatment for gastric cancer (GC), however, a set of patients show poor surgical compliance in the USA. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical compliance and investigate the difference in survival.

Methods: GC patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) databases. Based on different surgical compliance and treatment regimen, patients were classified into three subgroups: surgical compliance group, surgical noncompliance group, and non-surgical group. Multivariable Logistic regression analysis was adopted to identify the factors related to surgical compliance; Multivariable Cox regression was used to investigate the prognostic factors. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator method.

Results: Of 79374 GC patients who were recommended for surgical therapy, 15201(19.2%) cases did not perform surgery. Poor compliance of surgery was related to old age, American Indian/Alaska Native race, poor grading/late staging, single/widowed status, lower socioeconomic status and earlier time of diagnosis. As expected, GC patients of surgical compliance group showed significantly more favorable survival than the other two groups (P<0.0001); notably, the outcome of surgical noncompliance group came close to that of non-surgical group.

Conclusion: GC patients of poor surgical compliance demonstrated adverse survival, which was comparable to that of non-surgical patients. The poor surgical compliance was associated with older age, American Indian/Alaska Native race, poor tissue differentiation/advanced stage of tumor, single/widowed status, lower socioeconomic status and earlier time of diagnosis.