Improved Survival in Surgically Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Adjuvant Therapy: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Preoperative prognostic stratification and prediction of long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) frequently receive adjuvant chemotherapy in preoperative and postoperative settings, but prediction of prognostic risk at the time of treatment selection remains challenging.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled DCC patients who underwent initial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative clinical parameters were collected, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 170 patients examined, the median tumor depth was 10 mm, and 37 % of the patients were diagnosed with pT3. Overall, 46 % of patients had lymph node metastasis. The median and 5-year OS was 58.2 months and 50 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size on computed tomography (CT) ≥15 mm and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (≥3 mm) as independent risk factors for OS among various preoperative parameters; the prognosis was stratified based on these two parameters. Patients with one risk factor had similar outcomes (5-year OS: 39 %) to pStage IIB DCC (pT2N1 or pT3), while those with two risk factors had a prognosis akin to pStage IIIA (pN2), with a high early recurrence rate of 64 % (5-year OS: 8 %). Among non-risk group patients with low carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 levels (<37 U/mL), the prognosis was comparable (5-year OS: 72 %) to those with pStage I DCC.

CONCLUSION

A simple stratification approach was developed to predict long-term postoperative outcomes. To improve poor prognosis, intensive therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for patients with two risk factors.

Comprehensive Examination of Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Treated with Novel Targeted Therapies after Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with poor outcomes and limited treatment options, leading to increased use of targeted therapies for its management. Here, we performed one of the largest single-centre reviews evaluating outcomes following personalised targeted agents in CCA patients.

METHODS

All consecutive CCA patients receiving systemic therapy between January 2010 and April 2023 at UCLH were included. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate treatment response, survival outcomes and predictors of clinical benefit in CCA patients treated with molecularly guided therapies. Patient demographic factors, disease characteristics and survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards models.

RESULTS

Of the 227 consecutive CCA patients, 162 (71%) had molecular profiling, of whom 56 (35%) were eligible and 55 received molecular-targeted treatment. CCA histological classifications comprised intrahepatic (N = 32), extrahepatic (N = 11), hilar (N = 4) and unknown (N = 9) subtypes. Most patients received targeted agents based on genomic profiling in a second treatment line setting (N = 34). Frequently observed genomic alterations occurred in the FGFR2 (N = 21), IDH1 (N = 7) and BRCA2 (N = 6) genes. Median progression-free survival (PFS) following first-, second- and third-line systemic therapy and overall survival (OS) were 8.44 (95% CI, 7.49-12.78), 5.65 (95% CI, 3.71-7.13), 5.55 (2.79-12.58) and 29.01 (24.21-42.91) months, respectively. CCA subtype and FGFR/BRCA molecular aberration status were not associated with PFS or OS. However, a prior CCA-related surgical history was predictive of OS (p = 0.02). Stratification by best overall response to second-line targeted agents demonstrated an association with PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.02). Duration of treatment with second-line targeted therapy was associated with OS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving targeted therapeutics achieved promising outcomes, especially those attaining a favourable treatment response and those receiving targeted agents for longer periods. Liquid biopsies can reliably provide information on extended molecular profiling to aid patient selection for personalised therapies.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and causes major economic and health burdens throughout the world. Although the incidence of ICC is relatively low, an upward trend has been seen over the past few decades. Owing to the lack of specific manifestations and tools for early diagnosis, most ICC patients have relatively advanced disease at diagnosis. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to evaluate tumor biology and downstage these patients so that appropriate candidates can be selected for radical liver resection. However, even after radical resection, the recurrence rate is relatively high and is a main cause leading to death after surgery, which makes adjuvant therapy necessary. Because of its low incidence, studies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings of ICC are lagging compared with other types of malignancy. While standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens are not available in the current guidelines due to a lack of high-level evidence, some progress has been achieved in recent years. In this review, the available literature on advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in ICC are evaluated, and possible challenges and opportunities for clinical and translational investigations in the near future are discussed.

Spread of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic metastasis is a major route of metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). The present study aimed to elucidate the pattern of lymph node (LN) metastasis and the effectiveness of LN dissection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with DCC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for DCC were enrolled. The nomenclature of the LN stations was defined according to the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery guidelines. Effectiveness of LN dissection of each station was calculated using frequency of LN metastasis to the station and 5-year survival rate of patients with LN metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients included in the study, 46 (43.8%) had LN metastasis, and 43 (41.0%) underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy. LN metastasis, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level > 37 U/mL, and positive bile duct margin were independent risk factors for shorter overall survival (OS). The most common metastatic LN station at surgery was No. 13 (32.7%), followed by No. 12 (19.2%), No. 17 (9.6%), and No. 8 (6.6%). There was no effectiveness of LN dissection of the station No. 8, 14, and 16. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer OS in patients with LN metastasis but not in those with positive ductal margins or serum CA 19-9 level > 37 U/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis in patients with DCC and LN metastasis. However, a more effective therapeutic strategy is required to improve the prognosis of patients with other negative prognostic factors.

Clinical efficacy of adjuvant treatments for patients with resected biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the benefits of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) and identify the optimal adjuvant treatment scheme.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Studies comparing different adjuvant therapies in patients with BTC were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 2021. Additionally, the references were manually searched for the related literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible studies were identified, and data were extracted independently by two authors. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using R software. The pooled outcomes of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were measured using the combined HRs with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible studies reporting three types of adjuvant therapies were included in our network meta-analysis. Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART, HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.93), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT; HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT; HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) were more effective in prolonging OS than that of observation, with no significant difference between the three adjuvant therapies. Moreover, the improvement in DFS was also found in ACRT and ACT compared with that of observation (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75; HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97, respectively). Furthermore, ACRT obtained a slightly better DFS benefit compared with that of ACT (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our primary results demonstrated that, compared with that of observation, ACRT and ACT after radical resection could provide better OS and DFS benefits in patients with BTC. However, ART only showed improvement in OS, but not in DFS. Due to the lack of head-to-head studies of ACT, ACRT and ART, the above results need to be further verified by prospective randomised controlled trials.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for early-stage left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A propensity-matched analysis from a national cohort of distal pancreatectomies

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early-stage distal pancreas adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previous studies focused on adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas or dealt with borderline and locally advanced tumors of the body and tail.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2015. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare overall survival estimates between NAT and upfront resection (UR) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 5003 distal pancreatectomies for PDAC were identified, of whom 408 (9%) received NAT. After 1:1 matching, 353 NAT patients were compared with 353 UR patients. NAT was associated with lower 90-day mortality. There were no differences in the number of lymph nodes retrieved, or length of stay. With matching, the NAT group had higher median overall survival compared with UR (33.0 vs. 27.0 months; p = 0.009) and adjusted overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.77; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The receipt of NAT followed by distal pancreatectomy for early-stage distal PDAC is associated with improved overall survival compared with UR. This study supports the use of NAT in the multimodal therapy paradigm of early-stage adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Preoperative Serum Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients after Radical Resection: A Retrospective Analysis of 119 Patients

Aims

Although prognostic markers are important to establish therapeutic strategies in patients for conducting radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), there is still a lack of simple, valid, and repeatable markers in clinical settings. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of the preoperative serum platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in CCA patients who underwent radical resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed CCA patients who underwent radical resection surgery in our institution from January 2011 to June 2016. Baseline PLR and other clinical pathological data were measured when patients were diagnosed initially. The prognostic value of PLR in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model and the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

This study retrospectively analyzed 119 patients who underwent radical resection of CCA. During a median follow-up time of 11.0 months, there were 99.2% recurrences and 42.9% who died, and the median OS and PFS were 9.4 months and 7.4 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis identified that elevated levels of PLR (PLR > 157.25) as a significant factor predicted poorer OS (P = 0.018, HR: 2.160, 95% CI: 1.139-4.096) and PFS (P = 0.005, HR: 1.930, 95% CI: 1.220-3.053). In subgroup analysis, PLR also effectively predicted OS (P = 0.016, HR: 2.515, 95% CI: 1.143-5.532) and PFS (P = 0.042, HR: 1.908, 95% CI: 0.982-3.713) in CCA patients with positive lymphatic metastasis and/or positive surgical margin who required adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

The preoperative serum PLR is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in CCA patients after radical resection, including patients requiring adjuvant therapy.