Complete Impact of Care Fragmentation on Readmissions Following Urgent Abdominal Operations

Care fragmentation is associated with increased mortality after ileostomy creation

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy is the mainstay treatment option for various gastrointestinal conditions. Given the increased risk of post-discharge complications and high readmission rates that can be further aggravated by receiving care at different facilities (care fragmentation), further examination is necessary. We thus used a national cohort to explore the associations of care fragmentation among ileostomy patients experiencing adverse outcomes and increased hospitalization expenditures.

METHODS

All adult hospitalizations for ileostomy were tabulated from the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Those readmitted within 90 days after discharge were included for analysis. Patients treated at a different facility than the original location where the index ileostomy was performed were categorized into the care-fragmented cohort. Multivariable regressions were developed to characterize the association of the care-fragmented cohort with postoperative outcomes, readmissions, and expenditures.

RESULTS

Of 52,254 patients with ileostomy creation hospitalizations with 90-day nonelective readmission, 9,045 (17.3%) experienced care fragmentation. Following risk adjustment, those experiencing care fragmentation faced increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.54-2.12), cardiac (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.85), respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.53-1.91), infectious (adjusted odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.43), and thromboembolic (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45) complications. Furthermore, patients experiencing care fragmentation were more likely to have increased hospitalization costs ($1,700, 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.5).

CONCLUSION

Care fragmentation in ileostomy patients demonstrated an increased risk for mortality, postoperative complications, and increased hospitalization expenses. To mitigate risks for adverse outcomes, future studies should evaluate the impacts of inter-hospital communication with the goal of improving care continuity and optimizing healthcare delivery for care-fragmented populations.

Care Fragmentation After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Care fragmentation (CF), or readmission at a nonindex hospital, has been linked to inferior clinical and financial outcomes for patients. However, its impact on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unclear. This study investigated the prevalence and impact of CF on the outcomes of patients with AMI. All US adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for AMI from January 2010 to November 2019 were identified using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by readmission at an index or nonindex center. Multivariable models were developed to evaluate factors associated with CF, and independent associations with mortality, complications, and resource utilization. A total of 413,819 patients with AMI requiring nonelective readmission within 30 days of discharge were included for analysis. Of these, 25.4% (n = 104,966) experienced CF. The incidence of CF increased from 2010 to 2019 (nptrend <0.001). After adjustment, patients insured by Medicaid faced higher odds of nonindex readmission. CF was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.18), and cardiac (AOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.22), respiratory (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.26), and infectious complications (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.22). Further, CF was linked to increased odds of nonhome discharge (AOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.24) and an additional ∼$5,000 in per-patient hospitalization costs (95% CI 4,260 to 5,100). Approximately 25% of AMI patients experienced CF, which was independently associated with excess mortality, complications, and expenditures. Given the growing national burden of cardiovascular disease, new efforts are needed to mitigate the significant clinical and financial implications of nonindex readmissions and improve value-based healthcare.

Failure to Rescue in Emergency General Surgery: Impact of Fragmentation of Care

OBJECTIVE

Compare EGS patient outcomes after index and nonindex hospital readmissions, and explore predictive factors for nonindex readmission.

BACKGROUND

Readmission to a different hospital leads to fragmentation of care. The impact of nonindex readmission on patient outcomes after EGS is not well established.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2017) was queried for adult patients readmitted after an EGS procedure. Patients were stratified and propensity-matched according to readmission destination: index versus nonindex hospital. Outcomes were failure to rescue (FTR), mortality, number of subsequent readmissions, overall hospital length of stay, and total costs. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed to account for clustering effect within hospitals and adjusting for patient- and hospital-level potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 471,570 EGS patients were identified, of which 79,127 (16.8%) were readmitted within 30 days: index hospital (61,472; 77.7%) versus nonindex hospital (17,655; 22.3%). After 1:1 propensity matching, patients with nonindex readmission had higher rates of FTR (5.6% vs 4.3%; P < 0.001), mortality (2.7% vs 2.1%; P < 0.001), and overall hospital costs [in $1000; 37 (27-64) vs 28 (21-48); P < 0.001]. Nonindex readmission was independently associated with higher odds of FTR [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (1.03-1.36); P < 0.001]. Predictors of nonindex readmission included top quartile for zip code median household income [1.35 (1.08-1.69); P < 0.001], fringe county residence [1.08 (1.01-1.16); P = 0.049], discharge to a skilled nursing facility [1.28 (1.20-1.36); P < 0.001], and leaving against medical advice [2.32 (1.81-2.98); P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

One in 5 readmissions after EGS occur at a different hospital. Nonindex readmission carries a heightened risk of FTR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Prognostic.

STUDY TYPE

Prognostic.

Social vulnerability and fragmentation of postoperative surgical care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Regionalization of hepatopancreatic surgery to high-volume hospitals has been associated with fragmentation of postoperative care and, in turn, inferior outcomes after surgery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of social vulnerability with the likelihood of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care (FPC) after hepatopancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatopancreatic surgery and had at least 1 readmission within 90 days were identified using Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files between 2013 and 2017. Fragmentation of postoperative care was defined as readmission at a hospital other than the index institution where the initial surgery was performed. The association of social vulnerability index and its components with fragmentation of postoperative care was examined.

RESULTS

Among 11,142 patients, 8,053 (72.3%) underwent pancreatectomy, and 3,089 (27.7%) underwent hepatectomy. The overall incidence of fragmentation of postoperative care was 32.9% (n = 3,667). Patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care were older (73 years [interquartile range: 69-77]_FPC vs 72 years [interquartile range: 68-77]_non-FPC) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity score (4 [interquartile range: 2-8]_FPC vs 3 [interquartile range: 2-8]_non-FPC) (both P < .001). Median overall social vulnerability index was higher among patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care (52.5 [interquartile range: 29.3-70.4]_FPC vs 51.3 [interquartile range: 27.9-69.4]_non-FPC, P = .02). On multivariable analysis, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care was higher with increasing overall social vulnerability index (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.30). Additionally, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care were higher among patients with high vulnerability owing to their socioeconomic status (odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.45) or their household composition and disability (odds ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54), whereas high vulnerability owing to minority status and language was inversely associated with fragmentation of postoperative care (odds ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.84).

CONCLUSION

Social vulnerability was strongly associated with the odds of experiencing fragmented postoperative care after hepatopancreatic surgery.