Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of Feasibility and Safety from a Single Western Center

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery is increasingly implemented for the resection of right-sided colonic cancer, possibly resulting in improved 5-year overall and disease-free survival compared to non-CME surgery. However, it is not clear what surgical platform should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the following outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic CME-surgery for right-sided colonic cancer: (i) short-term clinical outcomes, (ii) pathological specimen quality, and (iii) long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception until August 2021. Pooled proportions were calculated by applying the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was explored by I-square and supplemented by sensitivity- and meta-regression analyses. The risk of bias was evaluated by either MINORS or Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies with 5.357 patients (740 robot-assisted and 4617 laparoscopic) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 17% [95% CI (14-20%)] in the robot-assisted group and 13% [95%CI (12-13%)] in the laparoscopic group. Robot-assisted CME was associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher amount of harvested lymph nodes, and better 3-year oerall and disease-free survival. MINORS and RoB2 indicated a serious risk of bias across studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

This review which includes predominantly non-randomized studies suggests a possible advantage of the robot-assisted CME compared with a laparoscopic technique for several short-term outcomes.

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Propensity-score-matched analysis of D2 and D3 right hemicolectomy for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer is associated with improved oncological outcomes, but can potentially be associated with higher rates of complications compared to conventional D2 right hemicolectomy. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, comparing to conventional right hemicolectomy.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, 360 patients underwent right hemicolectomy for colonic malignancies. Data was retrospectively analysed from a prospectively collected database. A propensity-score-matched analysis was performed between the two groups to evaluate their outcomes.

RESULTS

About 88(24.4%) patients underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, with the rest undergoing D2 right hemicolectomy. After propensity-matched analysis, D3 right hemicolectomy had a higher lymph node yield (median of 26 versus 23, p = 0.005), lower overall recurrence rate (11.7% versus 25.7%, p = 0.03), and lower overall mortality rate (14.5% versus 30.1%, p = 0.02) There were no significant differences in the complication rates. There were no anastomotic leaks. D3 right hemicolectomy was associated with an improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (P = 0.21), and also an improved 3-year overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio of 0.68 (P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

D3 right hemicolectomy is associated with a higher lymph node yield, without increasing morbidity or mortality. It is also associated with significantly lower recurrence and overall mortality rates in this study. Short term 3-year DFS and OS also trend towards favouring D3 right hemicolectomy. However, this study is limited by the small sample size and retrospective nature.

Laparoscopic surgery does not reduce the need for red blood cell transfusion after resection for colorectal tumour: a propensity score match study on 728 patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal tumour often present with anaemia, and up to 60% will receive red blood cells (RBC) transfusion. Some evidence suggests a correlation between RBC transfusion and worse outcomes. Since laparoscopy minimizes intraoperative blood loss, we retrospectively investigated its role in reducing haemoglobin (Hb) drop and requirements for postoperative RBC transfusions.

METHODS

Patients were identified from consecutive cases undergone elective surgery for non-metastatic colorectal tumour between 2005 and 2019. Laparoscopic cases were matched 1:1 with open controls through propensity score matching (PSM). The main outcome measures were postoperative Hb drop and requirement for RBC. The secondary aim was evaluation of risk factors for postoperative RBC transfusions.

RESULTS

After application of PSM, 364 patients treated by laparoscopy were matched with 364 patients undergone open surgery. The two groups presented similar clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as comparable postoperative outcomes. 56 patients in the open group and 47 in the laparoscopic group required postoperative RBC (P = 0.395). No difference was observed in terms of mean number of RBC units (P = 0.608) or Hb drop (P = 0.129). Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative anaemia and occurrence of postoperative complications as relevant risk factors for postoperative RBC transfusion, while surgical approach did not prove statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy did not influence postoperative requirements for RBC transfusions after elective colorectal surgery. Preoperative anaemia and occurrence of postoperative complications represent the major determinants for postoperative transfusions after open as well as laparoscopic surgery.

Tunnel versus medial approach in laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of the tunnel approach in laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

METHODS

From July 2016 to October 2018, a total of 106 consecutive patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University were enrolled. The patients were stratified into either a tunnel approach (TA) (n = 56) group or traditional medial approach (MA) (n = 50) group according to the surgical technique performed. The baseline demographics, perioperative outcomes and oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. The TA group had significantly less blood loss [20.0 (10.0-40.0) vs. 100 (100.0-150.0) ml, p < 0.001] and a shorter operation time [128.4 ± 16.7 vs. 145.6 ± 20.3 min, p < 0.001] than the MA group. The time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were similar [3.0 (2.0-4.0) vs. 3.0 (3-4.0) days, p = 0.329; 10.4 ± 2.6 vs. 10.7 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.506] between the two groups. The conversion to laparotomy and complication rates were similar between groups (0 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.203; 14.3% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.603, respectively). No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. The TA group did not have significantly better survival outcomes than the MA group (p = 0.372).

CONCLUSIONS

The TA seems to allow for more favourable results in terms of blood loss and operative time than the MA, with similar results regarding time to first flatus, hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, conversion rate and oncologic outcomes; moreover, the TA is easier for beginners to master.

Comparison of Short-term Results after Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Standard Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of a Western Center Cohort

Purpose

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) right colectomy is a technically demanding procedure infrequently employed in Western centers. This retrospective cohort study aims to analyze the safety of laparoscopic CME colectomy compared to standard colectomy for right-sided colon cancer in a Western series.

Methods

Prospectively collected data from 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic CME right colectomy were compared to the ones of 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic standard right colectomy.

Results

No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the CME and standard right colectomy groups. No differences were demonstrated in terms of blood loss (P = 0.060), intraoperative complications (P = 1), conversion rate (P = 0.102), and operative time (P = 0.473). No deaths were observed in either group, while complication rate was 40.0% in the CME and 49.1% in the standard group (P = 0.353). Severe complications occurred in 10.0% vs. 9.1% (P = 0.842), redo surgery in 5.0% vs. 7.3% (P = 0.708), and unplanned readmission in 5.0% vs. 5.5% (P = 1) after CME and standard colectomy, respectively. A significant difference in favor of CME was observed in the total length of specimen (P < 0.001), proximal (P = 0.018), and distal margins (P = 0.037). The number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly higher in the CME group (27 vs. 22, P = 0.037).

Conclusion

In Western series, where patients have less favorable clinical characteristics, laparoscopic CME allows to obtain better quality surgical specimens and comparable short-term outcomes compared to standard right colectomy.

Is Laparoscopic CME Right Hemicolectomy an Optimal Indication for NET of the Right Colon and Terminal Ileum?

PURPOSE

Since lymphadenectomy is crucial in midgut neuroendocrine tumor (NET) surgery, we adopted laparoscopic CME right hemicolectomy (LRH-CME) for the treatment of right colon and terminal ileum NETs. In this report, we present a series of nine cases of terminal midgut NETs (TM-NETs) treated by LRH-CME with a video demonstrating oncological principles and the surgical technique.

METHODS

From September 2014 to November 2019, nine patients affected by TM-NETs underwent LRH-CME at the Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, ENETS Center of Excellence. Clinicopathological data, post-operative and oncological outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Tumors were in ileocecal valve or terminal ileum (5 cases), right colon (3 cases), and appendix (one case). Surgery had a curative intent (R0 resection) in 7 cases. Surgical debulking was required in 2 metastatic cases. Mean surgical time was 212 + 41 min and blood loss 47 + 24 mL. No postoperative mortality was observed. Post-operative course was uneventful in all except one case (Clavien-Dindo III). Median number of harvested lymph nodes was 21 (range, 11-31) and eight out of 9 patients were node positive (median 3, range 0-6). At a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 6-50), none of the patients suffered from mesenteric locoregional recurrence and all R0 resected patients were disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Terminal midgut NETs represent an optimal indication for LRH-CME which increases the chance of complete resection and allows optimal lymphadenectomy. In expert hands, laparoscopic approach should be favored in consideration of good short-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic complete mesocolon excision (LCME) for right colonic cancer improves oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes after LCME and open total mesocolon excision (OCME) for right-sided colonic cancers.

METHODS

Literature searches of electronic databases and manual searches up to January 31, 2019, were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis model was used. Review Manager Version 5.3 was used for pooled estimates.

RESULTS

After screening 1334 articles, 10 articles with a total of 2778 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared to OCME, LCME improves results in terms of overall morbidity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.0001), blood loss (MD = 56.56, 95% CI 19.05 to 94.06, p = 0.003), hospital stay (MD = 2.18 day, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.83, p = 0.009), and local (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.12, p = 0.03) and distant recurrence (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16, p = 0.0008). There was no significant difference regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, number of harvested lymph nodes, and 3-year disease-free survival. Open approach was significantly better than laparoscopy in terms of operative time (MD = - 34.76 min, 95% CI - 46.01 to - 23.50, p < 0.00001) and chyle leakage (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that LCME in right colon cancer surgery is superior to OCME in terms of overall morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and local and distant recurrence with a moderate grade of recommendation due to the retrospective nature of the included studies.