Do Stage I Colorectal Cancers with Lymphatic Invasion Require a Different Postoperative Approach?

Vertical margin distance in T1 colorectal carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection affects prognosis after additional surgery

PURPOSE : A vertical margin (VM) distance of < 500 µm is a risk factor for recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resected by endoscopy. We aimed to determine the effects of the VM distance on the recurrence and prognosis of T1 CRC.

METHODS

We enrolled 168 patients with T1 CRC who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at multiple centers between 2008 and 2016. None of the patients were followed up for < 5 years. The enrolled 168 patients were classified into patients with VM distance of < 500 µm including positive VM (n = 72 [43%], VM distance < 500 µm group) and patients with VM distance of ≥ 500 µm (n = 96 [57%], VM distance ≥ 500 µm group). The clinicopathological features, recurrence rates, and prognoses were compared between the groups using propensity-score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Tumors recurred in eight of the 168 patients (5%) with VM distance < 500 µm. After PSM, the rate of overall recurrence and local recurrence in the VM distance < 500 µm group were significantly higher than those in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group than that in VM distance < 500 µm group after PSM (100% vs. 89%, p < 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete en bloc resection of T1 CRC via ESD must include a sufficient amount of SM to reduce the risk of metastasis and recurrence after additional surgery.

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative recurrence of stage I colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of a large population

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Patients diagnosed with stage I CRC typically do not require postoperative adjuvant treatment. However, postoperative recurrence is present in at least 40% of patients with CRC and often occurs in those with stage I disease. This study aimed to elucidate the current status of recurrence and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with stage I CRC.

Methods

Data of indicated patients were obtained from 18 registries in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). The multivariable Fine-Gray regression model was used to identify the mortality risk of patients. Disparities in survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with recurrent risk overestimation.

Results

Our study indicated a recurrence rate of 15.04% (1,874/12,452) in stage I CRC cases. Notably, we identified race, age, T stage, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels as independent risk factors for tumor recurrence, substantially impacting prognosis. Furthermore, gender, race (Black), age (>65 years), elevated CEA levels, and refusal or unknown status regarding radiotherapy significantly correlated with an adverse prognosis in patients with stage I CRC.

Conclusions

We identified certain key clinicopathological features of patients with stage I CRC and demonstrated the survival benefits of radiotherapy, offering a new perspective on stage I CRC follow-up and treatment recommendations.

Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer

Purpose

TNM stage I colorectal cancer (CRC) can recur, although the recurrence rate is low. Few studies have evaluated the risk factors for TNM stage I CRC recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the TNM stage I CRC recurrence rate, as well as risk factors for recurrence.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the database of patients who had undergone surgery for TNM stage I CRC between November 2008 and December 2014 without receiving neoadjuvant therapy or transanal excision for rectal cancer. Our analysis included 173 patients. Primary lesions were found in the colon of 133 patients and in the rectum of 40 patients.

Results

The CRC recurrence rate was 2.9% (5 out of 173 patients). For colon cancer patients, tumor size was not associated with higher recurrence risk (P = 0.098). However, for rectal cancer patients, both tumor size (≥3 cm) and T stage were associated with higher recurrence risk (P = 0.046 and P = 0.046, respectively). Of the 5 recurrent cases, 1 patient exhibited disease progression despite treatment, 1 patient maintained stable disease status after recurrence treatment, and 3 patients had no evidence of a tumor after recurrence treatment.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that tumor size and T stage are predictors of stage I rectal cancer recurrence, and careful monitoring and follow-up of patients with larger tumors may be warranted.

Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of Tumor Lymphatic Invasion

Tumor-associated lymphatic vessels play an important role in tumor progression, mediating lymphatic dissemination of malignant cells to tumor-draining lymph nodes and regulating tumor immunity. An early, necessary step in the lymphatic metastasis cascade is the invasion of lymphatic vessels by tumor cell clusters or single tumor cells. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms, which include tumor-specific as well as normal, developmental and immunological processes “hijacked” by tumor cells to gain access to the lymphatic system. Furthermore, we summarize the prognostic value of lymphatic invasion, discuss its relationship with local recurrence, lymph node and distant metastasis, and highlight potential therapeutic options and challenges.

Perineural invasion and number of retrieved lymph nodes are prognostic factors for T2N0 colon cancer

PURPOSE

The prognosis of pathological T2N0 colon cancer has not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to determine the prognostic factors for pathological T2N0 colon cancer by comparing it with those for pathological T3N0 colon cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2007 and December 2015 and included 889 patients with postoperative pathological T2-3N0M0 disease. The clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed to identify the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Pathological T2 (n = 185, 20.8%) and T3 (n = 704, 79.2%) tumors showed no difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (5Y DFS) rate (95.8% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.257) after a median follow-up of 55 months (range, 1-106 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that perineural invasion (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.041, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.122-3.712, p = 0.019) and number of retrieved lymph nodes < 12 (HR = 2.994, 95% CI 1.327-6.753, p = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Pathological T2 tumors with poor prognostic factors showed similar 5Y DFS as that of T3 tumors with poor prognostic factors (88.9% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.916), but not with T3 tumors without poor prognostic factors (88.9% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.089).

CONCLUSION

Pathological T2N0 colon cancer showed oncologic outcomes similar to that of T3N0 colon cancer. Therefore, more intensive surveillance is necessary for patients with high-risk T2N0 colon cancer.