First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video)

The Lactulose Breath Test Can Predict Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease by Measuring Bacterial Overgrowth in the Small Intestine

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of RGERD in patients typically involves 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, but due to its invasiveness and low patient compliance, new screening methods are needed. In this study, a lactulose breath test (LBT) was conducted to detect the growth of small intestine bacteria (SIBO) and explore the potential relationship between LBT and RGERD to identify a new treatment method for RGERD.

METHODS

A total of 178 patients with gastroesophageal reflux were enrolled from June 2020 to December 2022 in the Gastroenterology Department, Building 3, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University; these patients included 96 patients with nonrefractory GERD (NRGERD) and 82 patients with RGERD. The Gerd Q score, reflux symptom index (RSI) score, gastroscopy results, clinical symptoms, and other related indicators were collected. Statistical methods were used to analyze the gathered data.

RESULTS

The incidence of acid reflux and heartburn in patients with RGERD was significantly greater than that in patients with NRGERD (67.10% vs. 42.70%, P<0.01 and 65.00% vs. 34.40%, P<0.01). The CH4 values of patients with RGERD were significantly greater than those of patients with NRGERD at each time point, and there was a correlation between the CH4 values at 60 min and RGERD (P<0.05). For patients with RGERD, the incidence of abdominal pain, acid regurgitation, and heartburn was greater in the CH4-positive group than in the CH4-negative group (61.90% vs. 57.50%, 69.05% vs. 65.00%, 69.05% vs. 57.50%, P>0.05). The incidence of nausea was also greater in the CH4-positive group than in the CH4-negative group (61.90% vs. 35.00%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Increased CH4 levels are correlated with RGERD. In addition, patients with RGERD may develop SIBO after long-term use of PPIs, and interventions involving SIBO could provide new ideas for the treatment of RGERD.

Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) in PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is substantial. However, limited data exist on their impact on the efficacy of endoscopic treatments like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMD on ARMS efficacy in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.

METHOD

This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with refractory GERD treated with ARMS-b (anti-reflux mucosectomy band-ligation). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was conducted before the procedure to identify EMD presence. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy, defined as >50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included PPI intake, symptom control, ARMS complications, and overall patient satisfaction at 12 months.

RESULTS

The study included 65 patients, with 41 (63.1%) showing EMD on HREM. Treatment efficacy was achieved by 33.8% (22) of patients, with 8 without EMD, 11 having isolated LES hypotonia, and 3 with both LES hypotonia and esophageal body motor disorder. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without EMD regarding the primary endpoint, PPI use, symptom control, or complications. Dysphagia developed in 52.3% (34) within 6 months, leading to esophageal dilatation in 15.3% (10). Two patients experienced acute hemorrhage, and one had perforation.

CONCLUSION

The presence of esophageal motor disorders does not seem to impact ARMS response, suggesting the technique's consideration in this population. Larger studies are essential for confirming these results and exploring treatment response and post-operative predictors.

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to acid inhibitors, especially proton pump inhibitors and potassium-competitive acid blockers. Due to concerns regarding the safety of long-term medication, many patients are unwilling to take lifelong medication. Endoscopic antireflux management offers a minimally invasive option for GERD patients. In recent decades, there have been several endoscopic antireflux therapies, including radiofrequency therapy, transoral fundoplication, and mucosal resection or mucosal ablation. Of these, antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an effective and safe therapy for refractory GERD. This review provides an updated summary of antireflux mucosectomy.

Outcomes and predictors of treatment failure after anti-reflux mucosectomy for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy is a novel endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease that serves as an intermediate therapy between medical and surgical intervention. We aimed to evaluate outcomes and identify predictors of treatment failure in patients requiring anti-reflux mucosectomy.

METHODS

A prospective quality database was retrospectively reviewed. Upper endoscopy, pH testing, and functional luminal impedance planimetry were obtained at preop and 1 year post-operation. Quality of life outcomes were assessed by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life, Reflux Symptom Index, and dysphagia scores preoperatively and up to 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients requiring anti-reflux mucosectomy were analyzed between 2016 and 2023. Preop Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life mean scores improved at all time points 3 weeks to 2 years postoperatively (all P < .05). Preop mean Reflux Symptom Index scores also significantly improved at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year timepoints (all P < .05). Dysphagia at 3 weeks was higher than preop scores (1.2 vs 2.1, P < .01) but returned to baseline. Upon follow-up, 43 patients (74.1%) had symptom improvement off proton pump inhibitors, 29 of whom reported complete symptom resolution. Out of 58 patients, 31 (53.4%) failed treatment due to DeMeester score (n = 22), erosive esophagitis (n = 2), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life ≥13 (n = 4), or <70% symptom resolution in the absence of pH or survey data (n = 3). Current smoking status was predictive of treatment failure (odds ratio 3.52, P < .031). Body mass index, DeMeester score, acid exposure time, and hiatal hernia ≤2 cm were not associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Anti-reflux mucosectomy is associated with significant improvement in quality of life; however, symptom resolution may not correlate with objective reflux control. Smoking is a predictor of treatment failure and should be considered in patient selection.

Medium-term clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy on laryngopharyngeal reflux: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies on the effect of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) are lacking. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to explore the clinical efficacy of ARMS on LPRD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with LPRD by oropharyngeal 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring who underwent ARMS. The effects of ARMS on LPRD were evaluated by comparing the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), reflux symptom index (RSI), and 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring scores before and 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into groups according to gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade to explore the effect of GEFV on prognosis.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study. The oropharyngeal pH monitoring results showed that the effective rate of ARMS was 72.1% (132/183). After surgery, the SF-36 score was higher (P = .000), RSI score was lower (P = .000), and the symptoms of constant throat clearing; difficulty swallowing food, liquids, and pills; coughing after eating or after lying down; troublesome or annoying cough; and breathing difficulties or choking episodes were significantly improved (P < .05). Upright reflux was dominant in GEFV grade I to III patients, and the SF-36, RSI, and upright Ryan index scores were significantly improved after surgery (P < .05). In GEFV grade IV patients, regurgitation was dominant in the supine position, and the above evaluation indexes were worse after surgery (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ARMS is effective for LPRD. The GEFV grade can predict the prognosis of surgery. ARMS is effective in GEFV grade I to III patients, but the effect is not exact in GEFV grade IV patients and may even be aggravated.

Role of endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In general, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is diagnosed clinically based on typical symptoms and/or response to proton pump inhibitor treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is reserved for patients presenting with alarm symptoms, such as dysphagia, odynophagia, significant weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding, or anorexia; those who meet the criteria for Barrett's esophagus screening; those who report a lack or partial response to proton pump inhibitor treatment; and those with prior endoscopic or surgical anti-reflux interventions. Newer endoscopic techniques are primarily used to increase diagnostic yield and provide an alternative to medical or surgical treatment for GERD. The available endoscopic modalities for the diagnosis of GERD include conventional endoscopy with white-light imaging, high-resolution and high-magnification endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, image-enhanced endoscopy (narrow-band imaging, I- SCAN, flexible spectral imaging color enhancement, blue laser imaging, and linked color imaging), and confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopic techniques for treating GERD include esophageal radiofrequency energy delivery/Stretta procedure, transoral incisionless fundoplication, and endoscopic full-thickness plication. Other novel techniques include anti-reflux mucosectomy, peroral endoscopic cardiac constriction, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and endoscopic band ligation. Currently, many of the new endoscopic techniques are not widely available, and their use is limited to centers of excellence.

A novel modified endoscopic method for treating patients with refractory gastro-esophageal disease and moderate hiatus hernia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) with small hiatus hernia. However, evidence of its applicability in patients with larger hernia sac is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ARMS for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm) and determine the appropriate resection range.

METHODS

thirty-six patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia were enrolled. They were divided into 2/3 and 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection groups. The patients received modified ARMS. The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) and DeMeester scores, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were compared pre- and post-procedure. Therapeutic effects and complications of the two mucosal resection ranges were analyzed.

RESULTS

thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study, all of whom had undergone ARMS surgery with at least six-month follow-up. In the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester score improved significantly compared with those before surgery (p < 0.001). In the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, AET and DeMeeter score worsened after six months (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, there was no significant improvement in the ratio of esophagitis grade C/D and LES resting pressure after treatment compared with the baseline values (p > 0.05), and no postoperative bleeding or perforation was observed. The incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis in the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group was lower than that in the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

modified ARMS is effective for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia, but it cannot significantly increase the postoperative resting pressure of the LES. The 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis.

The status of endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is exceedingly common and can significantly impact quality of life through heartburn, troublesome regurgitation, or atypical symptoms. The initial approach is conservative lifestyle changes followed by medications with escalation to antireflux surgery as needed. Endoscopic therapy may represent a bridge between pharmacotherapy and surgery and represents an appropriate option for select individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

Appropriate patient selection for endoscopic antireflux therapies is critical to the success of the intervention. Candidates for endoscopic treatment with trans-oral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) include those with a small (<2 cm) or no hiatal hernia and a Hill valve grade 1 or 2. Transoral incisionless fundoplication with concomitant hiatal hernia repair (cTIF) is a safe and effective option that addresses both the crural diaphragm and gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV).

SUMMARY

Endoscopic interventions for GERD continue to evolve and are not all created equal. Given our current understanding of the mechanisms of GERD, the TIF procedure stands out in its ability to re-create the optimal GEFV. In those patients with altered anatomy, endoscopic approaches may offer at least partial benefit.

Anti-reflux mucosal resection for treatment of refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy and impact on perioperative indicators

BACKGROUND

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) is difficult to treat and recurrent. For such patients, anti-reflux mucosal resection (ARMS) is the main clinical treatment, but its advantages and disadvantages remain unclear.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic ARMS in the treatment of RGERD and its impact on perioperative indicators.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with RGERD were selected from January 2019 to December 2021 and divided into either a control group or an observation group using the random number table method, with 51 cases in each group. The control group underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and the observation group underwent ARMS treatment. The operation conditions, postoperative recovery, GerdQ score before and after surgery, extraesophageal symptom score, high-resolution esophageal manometry parameters [abdominal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, LES resting pressure (LESP), upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure (UESP), and distal systolic integral (DCI)], 24 h pH-impedance monitoring indexes (DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, fluid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux), gastric dynamics indicators [serum motilin (MTL) and gastrin (GAS)], and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the observation group, the operation time was shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05), but the difference in hospitalization time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The GerdQ score and extraesophageal symptom score decreased in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), and these scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 and 6 months after surgery, the length of the LES in the abdominal segment was longer in both groups than that before surgery (P < 0.05), and longer in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), while LESP, UESP, and DCI were higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, liquid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux were lower in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery, and lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum MTL and GAS were higher in the two groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery than those before surgery, and were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARMS for treatment of RGERD can significantly optimize the surgical situation, promote clinical symptom regression, improve esophageal and gastric dynamics, reduce gastric reflux events, and reduce the incidence of complications.

Anti-reflux mucosal resection for treatment of refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy and impact on perioperative indicators

BACKGROUND

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) is difficult to treat and recurrent. For such patients, anti-reflux mucosal resection (ARMS) is the main clinical treatment, but its advantages and disadvantages remain unclear.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic ARMS in the treatment of RGERD and its impact on perioperative indicators.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with RGERD were selected from January 2019 to December 2021 and divided into either a control group or an observation group using the random number table method, with 51 cases in each group. The control group underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and the observation group underwent ARMS treatment. The operation conditions, postoperative recovery, GerdQ score before and after surgery, extraesophageal symptom score, high-resolution esophageal manometry parameters [abdominal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, LES resting pressure (LESP), upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure (UESP), and distal systolic integral (DCI)], 24 h pH-impedance monitoring indexes (DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, fluid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux), gastric dynamics indicators [serum motilin (MTL) and gastrin (GAS)], and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the observation group, the operation time was shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05), but the difference in hospitalization time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The GerdQ score and extraesophageal symptom score decreased in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), and these scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 and 6 months after surgery, the length of the LES in the abdominal segment was longer in both groups than that before surgery (P < 0.05), and longer in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), while LESP, UESP, and DCI were higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, liquid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux were lower in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery, and lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum MTL and GAS were higher in the two groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery than those before surgery, and were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARMS for treatment of RGERD can significantly optimize the surgical situation, promote clinical symptom regression, improve esophageal and gastric dynamics, reduce gastric reflux events, and reduce the incidence of complications.

Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Gastrointestinal motility disorders have a wide range of symptoms and affect patients' quality of life. With the advancement of endoscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy in motility disorders is becoming more significant. Endoscopy is necessary to rule out possible organic diseases in patients with suspected motility disorders and provide significant clues for their diagnosis. Moreover, interventional endoscopy may be a primary or alternative treatment option for selected patients with motility disorders, and it is becoming a promising field as new therapeutic applications are developed and utilized for various motility disorders. This review may provide suitable indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Endoscopic Treatment of Reflux: A Comprehensive Review

The last decade has seen the rise of multiple novel endoscopic techniques to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, many of which are efficacious when compared with traditional surgical options and allow relief from long-term dependence on antacid medications. This review will explore the latest endoscopic treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease including a description of the technique, review of efficacy and safety, and future directions.

Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

There have been many devices and ideas to treat reflux disease endoscopically. Several devices have been tried and even FDA approved but now are no longer used. The push for these therapies is to find effective reflux control with lower risk and faster recovery. In this article we describe an endoscopic suturing device (TIF), radiofrequency device (Stretta) and a newer technique that has a lot of promise called antireflux mucosectomy. All these procedures seem to help control reflux at a minimum of morbidity given current information. As reflux is so prevalent a shift to these techniques for appropriate patients is likely to improve patient care.

Outcomes after anti-reflux procedures: Nissen, Toupet, magnetic sphincter augmentation or anti-reflux mucosectomy?

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment options of gastroesophageal reflux disease have changed significantly in the last 50 years. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) and Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMs) are gaining traction but there is a paucity of literature comparing these novel options to Toupet fundoplication and gold standard Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database, evaluating patients undergoing Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative variables including Reflux symptom index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 649 patients underwent anti-reflux surgery. Patients who underwent Nissen or Toupet were younger than those undergoing MSA or ARMs (65 ± 12 and 67 ± 14 years vs 56 ± 14 and 56 ± 18 years, P < 0.01). Average operative time for Nissen was 127 ± 40 min which was similar to a Toupet at 122 ± 32 min. These durations were significantly longer than for MSA, averaging 79 ± 29, and ARMs, at a mean 35 ± 3 min (all P < 0.001). Length of stay was significantly different among all four groups with Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs patients staying a median of 31, 24, 7, and 3 h post operatively, respectively (all P < 0.001). Complications and re-admissions were similarly low among all groups. Despite minor differences in RSI and GERD-HRQL scores at isolated follow-up time points, quality of life scores seems to be similar overall at up to 5 years follow-up. Gas bloat and dysphagia did not differ among groups at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel anti-reflux surgery options provide similar GERD-related quality of life compared to traditional full or partial fundoplications with the added benefit of shorter operative time and faster recovery.

Objective Outcomes of an Extended Anti-reflux Mucosectomy in the Treatment of PPI-Dependent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a choice for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We present an extended anti-reflux mucosectomy, named ligation-assisted anti-reflux mucosectomy (L-ARMS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the procedure and short-term outcomes on PPI use and symptom resolution.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for retrospective review of a prospectively collected database including patients who underwent L-ARMS. L-ARMS includes mucosa ligation and endoscopic mucosectomy without submucosal injection around the squamocolumnar junction. The GERD symptoms, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results, and manometry were collected by chart review. Voluntary validated surveys assessed symptomatic improvement over time.

RESULTS

There were 69 patients available for review. The procedure was technically completed in all cases with no severe complications, and the average operation time was 33 min. At 6 months after L-ARMS, treatment with PPIs had been halted in 55.1% of the patients, 30.4% of the enrolled patients used PPIs occasionally, and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, DeMeester scores, and GERD-health-related quality of life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) scores showed a significant improvement compared with the baseline measurements (P < 0.001). Forty-five patients complained of mild dysphagia and were relieved in 4 weeks with no specific treatment. Compared to patients without dysphagia, patients complained of dysphagia after surgery had better clinical benefits indicated by GERD-HRQL and DeMeester score.

CONCLUSIONS

As a modified ARMS, L-ARMS is an effective procedure for controlling GERD symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, and LES pressure, which can be safely performed endoscopically in a time-saving and simple manner.

Clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy vs. Stretta radiofrequency in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective, single-center cohort study

Background

Currently, antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) are the most commonly used minimally invasive antireflux therapies. To date, there have not been any reports comparing ARMS and SRF. Our aim was to compare the clinical efficacies of these two therapeutic methods.

Methods

We analyzed data from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, including 39 who received ARMS treatment and 30 who received SRF treatment between January 2020 and May 2021. Symptom control, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) score, gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) withdrawal, and PPI reduction were analyzed and compared.

Results

After 6 months of follow-up, the results showed that both therapies were effective in improving symptoms and quality of life. No difference was found between the ARMS group and SRF group in GERDQ score, GERD-HRQL score, PPI withdrawal rate, or PPI reduction rate (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the PPI withdrawal rate between the two therapies among patients with gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade II and grade III (P>0.05), but the PPI withdrawal rate in the ARMS group was significantly higher than that in the SRF group among patients with GEFV grade IV (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical efficacies of ARMS and SRF 6 months postoperation were equivalent. The results showed that both ARMS and SRF treatment were acceptable for patients with GEFV grades II and III, while ARMS should be selected for patients with GEFV grade IV.

Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Panacea for proton pump inhibitors dependent/refractory patients

Endoscopic therapies in proton pump inhibitors (PPI) dependent/refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are increasingly indicated in patients who are not suitable or willing for chronic medical therapy and surgical fundoplication. Currently available endoluminal anti-reflux procedures include radiofrequency therapy (Stretta), suturing/plication and mucosal ablation/resection techniques at the gastroesophageal junction. Meticulous work up and patient selection results in a favorable outcome with these endoscopic therapies, especially the quality of life and partially the PPI independence. Stretta can be considered in patients with PPI refractory GERD and might have a role in patients with reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn. Endoscopic fundoplication using the Esophyx device and the GERD-X device have strong evidence (multiple randomized controlled trials) in patients with small hiatus hernia and high volume reflux episodes. Mucosal resection/ablation techniques like anti-reflux mucosectomy and anti-reflux mucosal ablation have shown promising results but need long term follow-up studies to prove their efficacy. The subset of PPI dependent GERD population will benefit from endoscopic therapies and the future of endoscopic management of GERD looks promising.

A Prospective Trial to Access the Optimal Circumference of Resection in Antireflux Mucosectomy for Treatment-refractory GERD

OBJECTIVE

There is still no gold standard regarding the optimal circumference of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) in patients with treatment-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of resection procedures when the circumferences are different.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with treatment-refractory GERD were allocated into group A (16 cases) and group B (16 cases) by randomization. In group A and group B, a 2/3 and 1/2 circumference, 1.5 cm wide mucosal resection of the gastric cardia was performed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG), DeMeester scores and acid exposure time (AET) were accessed at baseline and at 24 months after treatment. Physical component summaries (PCS), mental component summaries (MCS), and RE-specific summary (RES) scores were calculated.

RESULTS

All patients had successful surgical procedures and no bleeding, perforation, or dysphagia occurred. The PCS, MCS, and RES scores of post-ARMS were higher than those of pre-ARMS in groups A and B, and the FSSG, DeMeester scores and AET decreased after ARMS in both groups, with differences that were statistically significant (P<0.05). The changes in PCS, MCS, RES, FSSG, DeMeester scores, and AET were greater in group A than in group B, with significant differences in PCS, MCS, RES, and FSSG scores (P<0.05), but no significant differences in, DeMeester scores and AET (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARMS is an effective treatment for treatment-refractory GERD. Moreover, we recommend the 2/3 circumference, 1.5 cm wide mucosal resection of the gastric cardia.

Antireflux mucosal intervention (ARMI) procedures for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatments are increasingly being offered for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Three procedures have similar concepts and techniques: antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS), antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA), and antireflux band ligation (ARBL); we have collectively termed them antireflux mucosal intervention (ARMI). Here, we systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes and technical aspects.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to October 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate. The secondary outcomes were acid exposure time, DeMeester score, need for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), endoscopic findings, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included. The pooled clinical success rate was 73.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 69%-78%) overall, 68.6% (95% CI = 62.2%-74.4%) with ARMS, 86.7% (95% CI = 78.7%-91.9%) with ARMA, and 76.5% (95% CI = 65%-85.1%) with ARBL. ARMI resulted in significantly improved acid exposure time, DeMeester score, and degree of hiatal hernia. Furthermore, 10% of patients had dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation after ARMS or ARMA, and ARMS was associated with a 2.2% perforation rate. By contrast, no bleeding, perforation, or severe dysphagia was noted with ARBL. Severe hiatal hernia (Hill grade III) may predict treatment failure with ARMA.

CONCLUSIONS

The three ARMI procedures were efficacious and safe for PPI-refractory GERD. ARMA and ARBL may be preferred over ARMS because of fewer adverse events and similar efficacy. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal technique and patient selection.

The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease that may cause a huge economic burden. Endoscopy is performed not only to rule out other organic diseases but also to diagnose reflux esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus. Non‐erosive GERD (non‐erosive reflux disease [NERD]) is called endoscopy‐negative GERD; however, GERD‐related findings could be obtained through histological assessment, image‐enhanced endoscopy, and new endoscopic modalities in patients with NERD. Moreover, endoscopy is useful to stratify the risk for the development of GERD. In addition, endoscopic treatments have been developed. These techniques could significantly improve patients’ quality of life as well as symptoms.

Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study

Background

Antireflux mucosectomy, a new endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, consists of endoscopic mucosal resection at the esophagogastric junction. This study aim was to evaluate the medium-term efficacy of the antireflux mucosectomy technique for patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (proton pump inhibitor treatment-dependent or proton pump inhibitor treatment-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease).

Methods

Between January 2017 and June 2018, 13 patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease without hiatal hernia, with positive pH reflux, were included in this monocentric prospective pilot study. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined by improvement evaluated by the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were technical success, decreased use of proton pump inhibitors, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

Results

Thirteen patients [females = 8 (62%)], mean age 59 (range, 54-68), were included. The antireflux mucosectomy procedure had technical success in all patients. At 24 months, for 11 patients, gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms were significantly improved, and mean gastroesophageal reflux disease score decreased from 33 (range, 26-42) to 3 (range, 0-7) (p = 0.001). Ninety-one percent (n = 10) of patients had a lower proton pump inhibitor intake at 24 months. One patient had 3 endoscopic balloon dilatations for EGJ stenosis, two patients had melena ten days after procedure, and seven patients had thoracic or abdominal pain. Patient's satisfaction at 24 months was 81%.

Conclusions

In patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease, despite occurrence of several short-term adverse events, antireflux mucosectomy seemed effective in improving gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms at 24 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials: NCT03357809.

Endoscopic Management of GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has consistently been the most frequently diagnosed gastrointestinal malady in the USA. The mainstay of therapy has traditionally been medical management, including lifestyle and dietary modifications as well as antacid medications. In those patients found to be refractory to medical management or with a contraindication to medications, the next step up has been surgical anti-reflux procedures. Recently, though innovative advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have created numerous options for the endoscopic management of GERD, in this review, we discuss the various endoscopic therapy options, as well as suggested strategies we use to recommend the most appropriate therapy for patients.

Comparison of 180° anti-reflux mucosectomy versus 270° anti-reflux mucosectomy for treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a novel endoscopic treatment for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). Several studies have validated its safety and effectiveness, but postoperative dysphagia remains in concern. Since the influence of different resection ranges on efficacy and complications of ARMS has rarely been studied, this study aimed to compare outcomes of 180°ARMS and 270°ARMS in treatment of rGERD.

METHODS

This study was conducted from August 2017 to September 2020. 39 eligible patients underwent either 180° ARMS or 270° ARMS and followed up at 6 months postoperation. Primary outcome measure was assessed by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, PPI use, gastroesophageal flap valve grade, presence of reflux esophagitis, acid exposure time (AET), distal contractile integral (DCI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) measured by high-resolution manometry (HRM) and complication rate. Per-protocol analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among 39 patients, 18 underwent 180° ARMS, while 21 underwent 270° ARMS. At postoperative 6 months follow-up period, primary outcome showed no significant difference between two groups (p = 0.34). Similarly, no significant difference was demonstrated between groups regarding most secondary outcomes except for fewer complaints of newly dysphagia in 180° ARMS group. No other serious complications were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although 180° ARMS and 270° ARMS could be equally effective for treatment of rGERD, 180° ARMS might be more recommended due to lower incidence of newly post-procedural dysphagia.

Endoscopic cardial constriction with band ligation in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a preliminary feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disease, could cause extra-esophageal symptoms. Peroral endoscopic cardial constriction with band ligation (PECC-b) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of GERD in recent years. The goals of this study were to evaluate the clinical efficacy of PECC-b to treat gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients undergoing PECC-b between January 2017 and December 2018 at a single institution was conducted. All patients confirmed GERD by endoscopy, esophageal PH-impedance monitoring, esophageal manometry and symptom questionnaires. The outcome measures included reflux-related scores, patients' satisfaction and drug independence after 12 months following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients, with follow-up of 12 months post surgery, were included in the final analysis. The symptom scores were all significantly decreased as compared with preoperation (P < 0.05). The esophageal symptom scores showed a better improvement than extra-esophageal symptoms (P < 0.001). Fifty-three (77.9%) patients achieved complete drug therapy independence and 52 (76.5%) patients were completely or partially satisfied with the symptom relief following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The PECC-b is a safe, effective and recommended approach for the control of GERD-related symptoms. Further multicenter prospective studies are required to confirm these outcomes.

Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases

OBJECTIVES

Some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for treatment of GERD. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of ARMS performed in patients with PPI-refractory GERD at our institution.

METHODS

A total of 109 patients with PPI-refractory GERD who underwent ARMS were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-ARMS questionnaire scores, acid exposure time (AET), DeMeester score, proximal extent, and PPI discontinuation rate were compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the symptom score (P < 0.01) and 40-50% of patients were able to discontinue PPI after ARMS. In patients who were followed up for 3 years, sustained improvement in subjective symptoms was observed. AET and DeMeester score significantly improved after ARMS (P < 0.01); however, there was no significant improvement in proximal extent (P = 0.0846).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-reflux mucosectomy is an effective minimally invasive therapy for patients with PPI-refractory GERD. The therapeutic efficacy is attributable to suppression of acid backflow due to contraction of the scar tissue in cardia.

Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the most commonly performed bariatric operation worldwide. Development or worsening of pre-existing GERD has been recognized as a significant issue postoperatively. There is a paucity of information concerning the most appropriate preoperative workup and the technical and anatomical factors that may or may not contribute to the occurrence of reflux symptoms. Contemporary data quality is deficient given the predominantly retrospective nature, limited follow-up time, and heterogeneous outcome measures across studies. This has produced mixed results regarding the postoperative incidence and severity of GERD. Ultimately, better-constructed investigations are needed in order to offer evidence-based recommendations that may guide preoperative workup and improved patient selection criteria.

Clinical feasibility of a new antireflux ablation therapy on gastroesophageal reflux disease (with video)

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

New mucosal resective and ablative endoscopic procedures based on gastric cardiac remodeling to prevent reflux have appeared. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new ablative technique named antireflux ablation therapy (ARAT) for control of GERD in patients without hiatal hernia.

METHODS

Patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory GERD without hiatal hernia underwent ARAT between January 2016 and October 2019. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), upper endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and PPI use were documented at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after ARAT.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients were included (61 men [56.5%]; median age, 36.5 years; range, 18-78 years). ARAT was performed on all patients. At the 36-month evaluation, 84 patients had completed the protocol. Median ARAT time was 35.5 minutes (range, 22-51 minutes), and median circumference ablation was 300° (range, 270°-320°). No major adverse events occurred, and 14 of 108 patients (12.9%) presented with stenosis that was responsive to balloon dilation (<5 sessions). At the 3-month evaluation, the acid exposure time (AET), DeMeester score, and GERD-HRQL score had decreased from 18.8% to 2.8% (P = .001), 42.5 to 9.1 (P = .001), and 36.5 to 10 (P = .02), respectively, and these values were maintained up to 36 months. Success (AET <4%) was achieved in 89% and 72.2% at 3 and 36 months, respectively. Related factors at 36 months were as follows: pre-ARAT Hill type II (odds ratio [OR], 3.212; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.431-5.951; P = .033), post-ARAT 3-month Hill type I (OR, 4.101; 95% CI, 1.812-9.121; P = .042), and AET <4% at 3 months (OR, 5.512; 95% CI, 1.451-7.621; P = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

ARAT is a feasible, safe, and effective therapy for early and mid-term treatment of GERD in patients without a sliding hiatal hernia. However, longer follow-up evaluations and randomized comparative studies are needed to clarify its real role. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03548298.).

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a new endoscopic procedure involving a hemi-circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) around the gastroesophageal junction. We aim to compare perioperative and quality of life outcomes of patients with reflux who underwent ARMS to a comparable group who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (NF).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. All patients who underwent ARMS (n = 33) were matched with patients who underwent NF (n = 67). Clinical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were collected preoperatively and up to two years postoperatively, measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia Score. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

While 10 patients (30.3%) who underwent ARMS required additional laparoscopic anti-reflux operations, the ARMS group had shorter OR time (p<0.001), less estimated blood loss (p<0.001), shorter hospital stay (p<0.001), less pain at discharge (p = 0.007), earlier narcotic discontinuation (p<0.001), and earlier return to activities of daily living (p<0.001) compared to the NF group. There was no difference in 30-day complication rates, emergency room visits, or readmission rates between the groups. There was no difference between ARMS and NF groups in terms of GERD-HRQL, RSI, or Dysphagia scores at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years postoperatively. However, the ARMS group reported less symptoms of gas and bloating postoperatively at all time points (all p<0.05). Both groups reported increased dysphagia at 3 weeks postoperatively (p<0.01) but this did not persist at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years.

CONCLUSION

While ARMS had better perioperative outcomes compared to NF, reflux quality of life outcomes were comparable. ARMS can be an effective endoscopic intervention for GERD when performed on appropriately selected patients without limiting future laparoscopic anti-reflux interventions.

Endoscopic treatments for GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition with increasing prevalence and morbidity in the United States and worldwide. Despite advances in medical and surgical therapy over the last 30 years, gaps remain in the therapeutic profile of options. Flexible upper endoscopy offers the promise of filling in these gaps in a potentially minimally invasive approach. In this concise review, we focus on the plethora of endoluminal therapies available for the treatment of GERD. Therapies discussed include injectable agents, electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter, antireflux mucosectomy, radiofrequency ablation, and endoscopic suturing devices designed to create a fundoplication. As new endoscopic treatments become available, we come closer to the promise of the incisionless treatment of GERD. The known data surrounding the indications, benefits, and risks of these historical, current, and emerging approaches are reviewed in detail.

Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become the most commonly used bariatric surgery worldwide. However, there are a proportion of patients who present with a refractory GERD after this procedure. In these patients, when surgical conversion to RYGPB is not possible or declined, we propose to describe the results of an endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy band (ARM-b) technique in 6 LSG patients with refractory GERD. The technical feasibility was 100%; 5 out of 6 patients had a clinical response with a reduction of the GERD-HRQL score of > 50%. Two patients had adverse events: one esophageal stricture and one benign bleeding. ARM-b is feasible and potentially effective to treat patients with refractory GERD after LSG.

Feasibility and outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease: First Indian study (with video)

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a newfangled minimally invasive technique, with successful outcomes for the management of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We present our initial experience (success rate) and safety profile for this procedure.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with daily dependence on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for GER were prospectively enrolled from September 2016 to August 2019 and underwent ARMS using a cap assisted endoscopic mucosal resection. Severity was assessed by gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire. Gastroscopy and 24-h pH-metry was done pre and post procedure. Patient characteristics, PPI requirement, adverse events and follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients [44 (71%) male] underwent successful ARMS with a mean age (SD) of 36 (9.9) years. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients. Intraoperative bleeding was noted in 62 (100%) patients, endoscopic hemostasis was successfully achieved. At follow-up dysphagia was seen in 5 (8%) patients which needed a single session of endoscopic dilation. At 2 months, mean (SD) DeMeester score normalized in 45 (72.5%) patients from 76.8 (18.3) to 14.3 (6.1) (P < 0.001). PPI could be stopped in 43 (69.4%) patients. The mean (SD) GERD-Q score reduced from 10.6 (1.9) to 3.4 (1.5) (P < 0.001). However, in 12 (19.3%) patients low dose of PPIs was continued, while 7 (11.3%) patients continued full dose. Thirty-eight (61.3%) patients telephonically reported symptomatic improvement and were off PPIs at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-reflux mucosectomy is safe and effective for treatment of GER. The long term outcomes are favorable, response is durable and promising at our center. Appropriate patient selection still remains primal to the overall success of ARMS.

Innovations in Endoscopic Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Minimally invasive endoscopic antireflux therapies are critical for bridging the gap between medical and surgical treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although multiple endoscopic devices have been developed, perhaps some of the most exciting options that are currently evolving are the full-thickness suturing techniques using widely available and low-cost platforms. Full-thickness endoscopic suturing can allow for a highly durable recreation of the anatomic and functional components of a lower esophageal sphincter, which are deficient in patients with GERD. Proper patient selection, endoscopic hiatal hernia evaluation, and standardized suturing methods are necessary to ensure success of endoscopic suturing for antireflux therapy.

Novel Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Beyond Proton Pump Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the many areas of unmet needs in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the cornerstone of medical therapy. However, since their introduction, the therapeutic limitations of PPIs in GERD management have been increasingly recognized.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review we discuss the new medical, endoscopic, and surgical therapeutic modalities that have been developed over the last decade. They include the potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) which provide a rapid onset, prolonged, and profound acid suppression, mucosal protectants which promote the physiological protective barrier of the esophageal mucosa, new prokinetics and neuromodulators. There are growing numbers of novel therapeutic endoscopic techniques that are under investigation or were recently introduced into the market, further expanding our therapeutic armamentarium for GERD. The development of diverse therapeutic modalities for GERD, despite the availability of PPIs, suggests that there are many areas of unmet need in GERD that will continue and drive future exploration for novel therapies.

Use of Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) in Foregut Surgery Practice: Experience of More than 400 Cases

BACKGROUND

We provide a comprehensive report of our institution's experience with the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (Endoflip) impedance planimetry system, a device that can be used intraoperatively to objectively evaluate the distensibility of any sphincter of the gastrointestinal tract. We aim to describe the variety of ways in which the Endoflip can be used in a foregut surgeon's practice.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database of all patients in which the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) system was used between February 2013 and June 2019.

RESULTS

During the study period, 402 FLIP cases were performed: 226 fundoplications, 94 peroral endoscopic myotomies, 15 peroral pyloromyotomies, 12 antireflux mucosectomies, 11 magnetic sphincter augmentations, 9 laparoscopic Heller myotomies, 8 pre-esophagectomy esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs), 4 diagnostic EGDs, 8 endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomies, 5 post-peroral endoscopic myotomy EGDs, 8 EGDs with dilations, and 2 transoral incisional fundoplications.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a foregut surgeon's practice, the FLIP can be used to measure the upper esophageal sphincter, lower esophageal sphincter, and pylorus in a variety of clinical scenarios and settings.

A potential simple endoscopic antireflux method, "the Ripple Procedure" to reduce distensibility at the esophagogastric junction in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Currently available endoscopic or minimally invasive antireflux modalities are not widely accepted due to high procedure cost or inconsistent results. Therefore, a simpler and less technically demanding method is required. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of new endoscopic antireflux method (the Ripple Procedure) using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP).

METHODS

This 5-week survival study included 10 domestic pigs (control, n = 4; experimental [Ripple], n = 6). The procedure includes the following steps: (i) semicircular marking along the lesser curvature of the cardia; (ii) submucosal injection; and (iii) semicircular mucosal incision along the marking. Endoscopic and FLIP evaluations were performed preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 14 and 35. Technical feasibility was evaluated, and FLIP parameters, including the distensibility index (DI) at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and histopathological findings, were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The median procedure time was 28 (23.5-33.8) min. There was no significant difference in dysphagia score and body weight between groups. On POD 35, the Ripple group showed significantly lower EGJ DI at 30 mL [2.0 (1.3-2.5) vs 4.9 (2.7-5.0), P = 0.037]. The EGJ DI was significantly reduced at 30 mL, compared with that at the baseline level [- 59.0% (- 68.8% to - 32.1%) vs 27.8% (- 26.3% to 83.1%), P = 0.033]. Histologic evaluation revealed submucosal granulation tissues near the mucosal incision site, with increased intervening fibrosis between lower esophageal sphincter fibers in the Ripple group.

CONCLUSION

The EGJ DI significantly decreased after the Ripple Procedure; hence, the procedure appears to be feasible and effective in this porcine model.

Antireflux mucosectomy for managing reflux symptoms in an obese patient post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective treatment modality for obesity. Commonest delayed complication post LSG is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GER). The prevalence of GER among obese patients is higher than normal individuals. Such patients need long term Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or antireflux procedures to manage reflux. Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) uses techniques of endoscopic mucosal resection to treat reflux for PPI refractory GER. However, it can be technically challenging to perform ARMS with a restricted stomach in patients who have undergone LSG. A 40-year-old female, hypertensive who had previously undergone LSG was treated for GER by a multidimensional approach with ARMS utilizing hypotensive anesthesia. The patient underwent the procedure successfully without any complication. She was discharged and at follow up visit, her reflux symptoms had improved and endoscopy was unremarkable. We describe this unusual case which was treated effectively with ARMS.