1
|
Iseki M, Mizuma M, Unno M, Maruyama H, Akagi S, Shimoda M, Uemura K, Inoue T, Shiomi H, Watanabe M, Kobayashi M, Matsuda A, Mizuuchi Y, Aoki T, Shinkawa H, Takahata R, Makino K, Arai H, Yokoyama Y, Takeda S, Yaguchi Y, Kitagawa Y. Prognostic impact of postoperative infection after resection of biliary malignancy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surgery 2023; 174:1145-1152. [PMID: 37599194 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative infections in patients who underwent resection for biliary malignancy, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. METHODS This study was conducted in an 11-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent curative resection between April 2013 and March 2015 at 11 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We analyzed the prevalence of postoperative infection, infection-related factors, and prognostic factors. RESULTS Of the total 290 cases, 33 were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 60 were perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 120 were distal cholangiocarcinoma, 55 were gallbladder carcinoma, and 22 were carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Postoperative infectious complications, including remote infection, were observed in 146 patients (50.3%), and Clavien-Dindo ≥III in 115 patients (39.7%). Postoperative infections occurred more commonly in the patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection. Patients with infectious complications had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without (median overall survival 38 months vs 62 months, P = .046). In a diagnosis-specific analysis, although there was no correlation between infectious complications and overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, infectious complications were a significantly poor prognostic factor in gallbladder carcinoma (P = .031). CONCLUSION Postoperative infection after surgery for biliary tract cancer commonly occurred, especially in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection. Postoperative infection is relatively associated with the prognosis of patients with biliary malignancy, especially gallbladder carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Iseki
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Maruyama
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tama-Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Akagi
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Mazda Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsugi Shimoda
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Uemura
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
| | - Toru Inoue
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Japan
| | - Hisanori Shiomi
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Nagahama Red Cross Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| | - Manabu Watanabe
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minako Kobayashi
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Nippon Medical School, Musashikosugi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Mizuuchi
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroji Shinkawa
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Risa Takahata
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medical Risk Management and Infection Control, National Defense Medical Collage, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kenta Makino
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan
| | - Hiroki Arai
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeru Takeda
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterological, Breast, and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Yaguchi
- Clinical Research Support Committee, Japan Society for Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Surgery, Sassa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; The Japan Society of Surgical Infection, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Páez-Carpio A, Hessheimer A, Bermúdez P, Zarco FX, Serrano E, Moreno J, Molina V, Ausania F, Carrero E, Burrel M, Fondevila C, Gómez FM. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for biliary obstruction in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a 10-year analysis of safety and outcomes using the CCI index. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:109. [PMID: 36847837 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02852-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) safety and efficacy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA). METHODS This retrospective observational study included patients with PCCA and obstructive cholestasis referred for a PTBD in our institution between 2010 and 2020. Technical and clinical success rates and major complication and mortality rates one month after PTBD were used as main variables. Patients were divided and analyzed into two groups: > 30 and < 30 Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). We also evaluated post-surgical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. RESULTS Out of 223 patients, 57 were included. Technical success rate was 87.7%. Clinical success at 1 week was 83.6%, before surgery 68.2%, 80.0% at 2 weeks and 86.7% at 4 weeks. Mean total bilirubin (TBIL) values were 15.1 mg/dL (baseline), 8.1 mg/dL one week after PTBD), 6.1 mg/dL (2 weeks) and 2.1 mg/dL (4 weeks). Major complication rate was 21.1%. Three patients died (5.3%). Risk factors for major complications after the statistical analysis were: Bismuth classification (p = 0.01), tumor resectability (p = 0.04), PTBD clinical success (p = 0.04), TBIL 2 weeks after PTBD (p = 0.04), a second PTBD (p = 0.01), total PTBDs (p = 0.01) and duration of drainage (p = 0.03). Major postoperative complication rate in patients who underwent surgery was 59.3%, with a median CCI of 26.2. CONCLUSION PTBD is safe and effective in the management of biliary obstruction caused by PCCA. Bismuth classification, locally advanced tumors, and failure to achieve clinical success in the first PTBD are factors related to major complications. Our sample reported a high major postoperative complication rate, although with an acceptable median CCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Páez-Carpio
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Amelia Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Bermúdez
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federico X Zarco
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Serrano
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julián Moreno
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor Molina
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Ausania
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, ICEDM, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Carrero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando M Gómez
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kawano F, Ito H, Oba A, Ono Y, Sato T, Inoue Y, Mise Y, Saiura A, Takahashi Y. Role of Intraoperative Assessment of Proximal Bile Duct Margin Status and Additional Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Can Local Clearance Trump Tumor Biology? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3348-3359. [PMID: 36790733 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13190-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of the proximal bile duct margin status in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis to assess the bile duct margin status is commonly used during PHCC resection. However, the impact of additional resection after obtaining a positive margin on the long-term outcome remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS Among the 257 patients who underwent PHCC resection, 190 patients with a negative distal margin were included and analyzed. IFS analysis of the proximal bile duct margin was performed in all patients. A positive margin was defined by the presence of either invasive cancer, or carcinoma, in situ. RESULTS IFS analysis revealed an initial positive margin in 69 (36%) patients. Among 20 patients who underwent re-resection, only 11 patients achieved a negative margin (secondary R0). An initial positive margin was associated with poor long-term outcomes: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 25 months for patients with an initial positive margin, but 47 and 63 months for patients with an initial negative margin, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, there was no difference in RFS or OS between patients with a secondary R0 margin, and those with a final R1 margin (14 vs. 16 months for RFS, p = 0.98, and 23 versus 25 months for OS, p = 0.63, respectively). CONCLUSION An IFS-positive proximal hepatic duct margin dictates poor long-term outcomes for patients with resectable PHCC. Additional resection has minimal impact on survival, even when negative margin is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiro Kawano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Survey on the current status of the indication and implementation protocols for bile replacement in patients with external biliary drainage with special reference to infection control. Surg Today 2022; 52:1446-1452. [PMID: 35182252 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02475-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This survey of bile replacement (BR) was conducted on patients with external biliary drainage to assess the current status of indication and implementation protocol of BR with special reference to infection control. METHODS A 12-item questionnaire regarding the performance of perioperative BR was sent to 124 institutions in Japan. RESULTS BR was performed in 29 institutions, and the indication protocol was introduced in 19. BR was performed preoperatively in 11 institutions, pre- and postoperatively in 12, and postoperatively in 6. The methods used for BR administration included oral intake (n = 10), nasogastric tube (n = 1), enteral nutrition tube (n = 3), oral intake and enteral nutrition tube (n = 6), oral intake or nasogastric tube (n = 2), nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 2), and oral intake or nasogastric tube and enteral nutrition tube (n = 5). In 10 of 29 institutions, isolation of multidrug-resistant organisms and a high bacterial load were considered contraindications for the use of BR. Seven institutions experienced environmental contamination. CONCLUSIONS Given the different implementation of BR among institutions, the appropriate indication and protocols for BR should be established for infection control.
Collapse
|
5
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:468-469. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
6
|
Ben Khaled N, Jacob S, Rössler D, Bösch F, De Toni EN, Werner J, Ricke J, Mayerle J, Seidensticker M, Schulz C, Fabritius MP. Current State of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Dis 2021; 40:581-595. [PMID: 34695826 DOI: 10.1159/000520346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its incidence seems to be increasing over the last years. Given the high rate of irresectability at the time of initial diagnosis, new treatment approaches are important to achieve better patient outcomes. Our review provides an overview of current multimodal therapy options across different specialties of gastroenterology/oncology, surgery, and interventional radiology. SUMMARY CCA is subdivided into clinically and molecularly distinct phenotypes. Surgical treatment currently is the only potentially curative therapy, but unfortunately, the majority of all patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, metastatic disease, or limiting comorbidities. However, multimodal treatment options are available to prolong survival, relieve symptoms, and maintain life quality. KEY MESSAGES The treatment of CCA is complex and requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to ensure optimal patient care at specialized centers. Molecular profiling of patients and inclusion into clinical trials is highly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Jacob
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
The role of stent placement above the papilla (inside-stent) as a bridging therapy for perihilar biliary malignancy: an initial experience. Surg Today 2021; 51:1795-1804. [PMID: 33835263 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02268-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD) is a popular preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) method for patients with perihilar biliary malignancy (PHBM), patient discomfort caused by the nasal tube remains a problem. This study aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PBD with the placement of a plastic stent above the papilla [inside-stent (IS)] as a bridging therapy. METHODS The outcomes of 78 patients with potentially resectable PHBM, of whom 29 underwent IS placement and 49 underwent ENBD were evaluated. RESULTS The stent-associated complication rates were not different between the two groups (7% in the IS group and 10% in the ENBD group, P = 0.621). Catheter dislocation occurred less frequently (0% vs. 22%, P = 0.016), and the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was longer (not reached vs. 32 days, P = 0.039) in the IS group than in the ENBD group. Among the patients who underwent resection, their postoperative severe complication rates were not substantially different (26% vs. 25%, P = 0.923). CONCLUSION IS placement is a possible alternative to ENBD as a bridge to a definitive operation for patients with resectable PHBM and a prospective trial to prove its feasibility and safety is therefore warranted.
Collapse
|