Does Reconstruction Type After Gastric Resection Matters for Type 2 Diabetes Improvement?

Roux-en-Y reconstruction alleviates radical gastrectomy-induced colitis via down-regulation of the butyrate/NLRP3 signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Different methods for digestive tract reconstruction have a complex impact on the nutritional status of gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical gastrectomy. Previous studies reported that Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction resulted in obvious weight reduction and improvement in type 2 diabetes in obese patients. We investigated the relationship between R-Y reconstruction, gut microbiota, and the NLRP3 inflammasome in GC patients with poor basic nutrition.

METHODS

Changes in the gut microbiota after radical gastrectomy accomplished by different methods of digestive tract reconstruction were investigated via fecal microbiota transplantation. The underlying mechanisms were also explored by analyzing the role of the microbiota, butyrate, and the NLRP3 inflammasome in the colon tissues of colitis model mice and GC patients after radical gastrectomy.

FINDINGS

R-Y reconstruction effectively relieved intestinal inflammation and facilitated nutrient absorption. 16S rRNA analysis revealed that gavage transplantation with the fecal microbiota of R-Y reconstruction patients could reverse dysbacteriosis triggered by radical gastrectomy and elevate the relative abundance of some short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria. Subsequently, butyrate negatively regulated the NLRP3-mediated inflammatory signaling pathway to inhibit the activation of macrophages and the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators such as caspase-1 and interleukin (IL)-1β, decreasing the level of intestinal inflammation and promoting nutrient absorption.

INTERPRETATION

R-Y reconstruction induced colonization with SCFA-producing bacteria to alleviate radical gastrectomy-induced colitis by down-regulating the NLRP3 signaling pathway. This can be a new strategy and theoretical basis for the management of the postoperative nutritional status of GC patients.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81974375), the BoXi cultivation program (BXQN202130), and the Project of Youth Foundation in Science and Education of the Department of Public Health of Suzhou (KJXW2018001).

Utility of continuous glucose monitoring following gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Glucose fluctuation after gastrectomy represented by dumping syndrome is a well-known post-gastrectomy syndrome that negatively impacts patient quality of life. However, the current methods of post-gastrectomy glucose monitoring do not comprehensively capture the postoperative blood glucose fluctuations that characterize this.

METHODS

We used a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to document the glycemic profiles of patients undergoing gastrectomy and compared these between patients undergoing distal gastrectomy (DG) and total gastrectomy (TG). To evaluate post-gastrectomy syndromes, including dumping syndrome, we used the Post-gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale 37-item questionnaire. The glycemic profiles were also compared using this tool.

RESULTS

We studied 57 patients who had undergone DG and 13 who had undergone TG between September 2017 and September 2019. Our results revealed larger diurnal glycemic variability and longer periods of nocturnal hypoglycemia after gastrectomy. The dumping score was worse in the TG than in the DG group (TG 2.4 ± 1.4 vs. DG 1.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.0061). Importantly, 30 of 57 DG patients (52.6%) and 5 of 13 TG patients (38.5%) experienced postprandial hypoglycemia following hyperglycemia without hypoglycemic symptoms. There was no correlation between the dumping symptom score and glycemic variability (ρ = 0.0545, P = 0.6662).

CONCLUSIONS

CGM demonstrated diurnal glycemic variability and nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Because some hypoglycemic patients did not develop symptoms and glycemic variability was not necessarily associated with dumping symptom, dumping syndrome must only partially explain the postoperative glucose fluctuations.