1
|
Lluís N, Asbun D, Wang JJ, Cao HST, Jimenez RE, Alseidi A, Asbun H. Lymph Node Dissection in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Critical and Updated Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:3001-3013. [PMID: 37550590 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphatic spread of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is common and negatively impacts survival. However, the precise role of lymph node dissection (LND) in oncologic outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains to be established. METHODS Updated evidence on the preoperative diagnosis and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis is reviewed, as well as the potential benefit of LND in patients with iCCA. RESULTS The ability to accurately determine nodal status for iCCA with current imaging modalities is equivocal. LND has prognostic value for both survival and disease recurrence. However, execution rates of LND are highly varied in the literature, ranging from 26.9 to 100%. At least 6 lymph nodes should be examined from nodal stations of the hepatoduodenal ligament and hepatic artery as well as based on the location of the primary tumor. Neoadjuvant therapies may be beneficial if lymph node metastases at diagnosis are suspected. Surgeons performing a minimally invasive approach should focus on increasing LND rates and harvesting ≥ 6 lymph nodes. Lymph node negativity is required in patients with iCCA being considered for liver transplantation under investigational protocols. CONCLUSION Despite an upward trend in the LND rate, the reality is that only 10% of patients with iCCA receive an adequate LND. This review underscores the importance of routinely increasing the rate of adequate LND in these patients in order to achieve accurate staging, appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, and improve the prognosis of clinical outcomes. While prospective data is lacking, the therapeutic impact of LND remains unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Lluís
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
| | - Domenech Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Jaeyun Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ramon E Jimenez
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Horacio Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen Z, Tao L, Cai J, Zheng J, Sheng Y, Yang Z, Gong L, Song C, Gao J, Ying H, Xu J, Liang X. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:126. [PMID: 37032348 PMCID: PMC10084635 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03004-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is controversial in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LLR for the treatment of ICC and explored the independent factors affecting the long-term prognosis of ICC. METHODS We included 170 patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC from December 2010 to December 2021 and divided them into LLR group and open liver resection (OLR) group. We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to reduce the impact of data bias and confounding variables and then compared the short-term and long-term prognosis of LLR and OLR in treating ICC; Cox proportional hazards regression model was adopted to explore the independent factors affecting the long-term prognosis of ICC. RESULTS A total of 105 patients (70 in the LLR group and 35 in the OLR group) were included after 2:1 PSM analysis. There was no difference in demographic characteristics and preoperative indexes between the two groups. The perioperative results of the OLR group were worse than those of the LLR group, that is, the intraoperative blood transfusion rate (24 (68.6) vs 21 (30.0)), blood loss (500 (200-1500) vs 200 (100-525)), and the morbidity of major postoperative complications (9 (25.7) vs 6 (8.5)) in the OLR group were worse than those in LLR group. LLR could enable patients to obtain an equivalent long-term prognosis compared to OLR. The Cox proportional hazards regression model exhibited that no matter before or after PSM, preoperative serum CA12-5 and postoperative hospital stay were independent factors affecting overall survival, while only lymph node metastasis independently influenced recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Compared with ICC treated by OLR, the LLR group obtained superior perioperative period outcomes. In the long run, LLR could enable ICC patients to receive an equivalent long-term prognosis compared to OLR. In addition, ICC patients with preoperative abnormal CA12-5, lymph node metastasis, and more extended postoperative hospital stay might suffer from a worse long-term prognosis. However, these conclusions still need multicenter extensive sample prospective research to demonstrate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zefeng Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liye Tao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingwei Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junhao Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yubin Sheng
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zaibo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linghan Gong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Song
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiaqi Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hanning Ying
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junjie Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laparoscopic versus open liver resections for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer: the Mayo clinic experience. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:339-346. [PMID: 36707278 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding laparoscopic liver resections(LLRs) for Gallbladder cancer(GBC) and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma(iCCA) are sparse. This study compared LLRs with open liver resections(OLRs) in a high-volume center. METHODS Data of patients who underwent LLR or OLR for GBC or iCCA at Mayo-Clinic between 01/2016 and 04/2021 were retrospectively compared. Proportional hazards models were used to compare the approach on survival. RESULTS 32 and 52 patients underwent LLR and OLR during the study period, respectively. 64 and 20 patients had iCCA and GBC, respectively. LLR had lower median blood loss (250 mL vs. 475 mL, p = 0.001) and shorter median length of stay compared to OLR (3.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p = 0.001). LLR and OLR did not differ in post-operative major complication (25% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.62), negative margin (100% vs. 90.4%, p = 0.15) and completeness of lymphadenectomy rates (36.8% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.59). The median number of harvested lymph node was 4.0 and 5.0 for LLR and OLR, respectively (p = 0.347). There were no associations between approach and 3-year overall and disease-free survival between LLR and OLR (49.8% vs. 63.2% and 39.6% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.66 and p = 0.69). DISCUSSION With appropriate patient selection and when compared to OLRs, LLRs for GBC and iCCA are feasible, safe and offer potential short-term benefits without compromising on oncological resection principals and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:700-708. [PMID: 36842897 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) versus open hepatectomy (OH) on the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) through a meta-analysis of studies using propensity score-matched cohorts. METHODS The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until August 31, 2022. Meta-analysis of surgical (major morbidity, the length of hospital stay, 90-day postoperative mortality), oncological (R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate) and survival outcomes (1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival) was performed using a random effects model. Data were summarized as relative risks (RR), mean difference (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Six case-matched studies with 1054 patients were included (LH 518; OH 536). Major morbidity was significantly lower (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88, P = 0.01) and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (MD = -2.44, 95% CI = -4.19 to -0.69, P = 0.006) in the LH group than in the OH group, but there was no significant difference in 90-day postoperative mortality between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival between the LH and OH groups. CONCLUSIONS LH has better surgical outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes and survival outcomes than does OH on ICC. Therefore, laparoscopy is at least not inferior to open surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
5
|
Editorial: Surgical Advances in Pancreaticobiliary Diseases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041268. [PMID: 36835803 PMCID: PMC9964516 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticobiliary diseases include malignant tumors arising in organs with a complex anatomy, such as the pancreas and bile ducts, often presenting as locally advanced or metastatic lesions, and they frequently have a poor prognosis [...].
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao X, Gao FW, Jiang KY, Yang J, Xie QY, Gong J, Yang MY, Mao TY, Lei ZH. Laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1096714. [PMID: 36937400 PMCID: PMC10014898 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1096714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although laparoscopic hepatectomy has been widely used in the treatment of benign and malignant liver diseases, its applicability in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (Lap-ICC) and open hepatectomy (Open-ICC) in ICC patients. Methods The PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and other databases were searched for the relevant literature. The research data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Seventeen studies, including 3975 ICC patients, were selected for the meta-analysis. Compared to Open-ICC, Lap-ICC had lower rates of lymph node dissection (OR=0.44, P=0.01) and metastasis (OR=0.58, P=0.03), along with less intraoperative bleeding (MD=-128.43 ml, P<0.01) lower blood transfusion rate (OR=0.43, P<0.01), shorter hospital stay (MD=-2.75 day, P<0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR=1.60, P<0.01), and lower tumor recurrence rate (OR=0.67, P=0.01). However, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, number of lymph node dissection, incision margin distance, overall complications rate, severe complications rate, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS and OS rates. Conclusion Laparoscopic hepatectomy is partially superior to open hepatectomy in terms of less bleeding, shorter hospital stay and higher R0 resection rate, while the long-term efficacy of the two approaches is similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Feng-wei Gao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
- *Correspondence: Feng-wei Gao, ; Ze-hua Lei,
| | - Kang-yi Jiang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing-yun Xie
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Gong
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Man-yu Yang
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Tian-yang Mao
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Ze-hua Lei
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas and Spleen System Diseases of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China
- *Correspondence: Feng-wei Gao, ; Ze-hua Lei,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sahakyan MA, Aghayan DL, Edwin B, Alikhanov R, Britskaia N, Brudvik KW, D'Hondt M, De Meyere C, Efanov M, Fretland ÅA, Hoff R, Ismail W, Ivanecz A, Kazaryan AM, Lassen K, Magdalenić T, Parmentier I, Røsok BI, Villanger O, Yaqub S. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 58:489-496. [PMID: 36373379 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2143724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. This multicenter study examined the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for ICC. METHODS Patients with ICC who had undergone laparoscopic or open liver resection between 2012 and 2019 at four European expert centers were included in the study. Laparoscopic and open approaches were compared in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for minimizing treatment selection bias and adjusting for confounders (age, ASA grade, tumor size, location, number of tumors and underlying liver disease). RESULTS Of 136 patients, 50 (36.7%) underwent laparoscopic resection, whereas 86 (63.3%) had open surgery. Median tumor size was larger (73.6 vs 55.1 mm, p = 0.01) and the incidence of bi-lobar tumors was higher (36.6 vs 6%, p < 0.01) in patients undergoing open surgery. After propensity score matching baseline characteristics were comparable although open surgery was associated with a larger fraction of major liver resections (74 vs 38%, p < 0.01), lymphadenectomy (60 vs 20%, p < 0.01) and longer operative time (294 vs 209 min, p < 0.01). Tumor characteristics were similar. Laparoscopic resection resulted in less complications (30 vs 52%, p = 0.025), fewer reoperations (4 vs 16%, p = 0.046) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 8 days, p < 0.01). No differences were found in terms of recurrence, recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resection seems to be associated with improved short-term and with similar long-term outcomes compared with open surgery in patients with ICC. However, possible selection criteria for laparoscopic surgery are yet to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of HPB Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia Britskaia
- Department of HPB Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of HPB Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Hoff
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Warsan Ismail
- Medical Department, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken HF, Baerum, Norway
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.,Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Surgery, Fonna Hospital Trust, Odda, Norway
| | - Kristoffer Lassen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tomislav Magdalenić
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Isabelle Parmentier
- Department of Oncology and Statistics, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bård Ingvald Røsok
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olaug Villanger
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou X, Zhou X, Cao J, Hu J, Topatana W, Li S, Juengpanich S, Lu Z, Zhang B, Feng X, Shen J, Chen M. Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:850844. [PMID: 35392058 PMCID: PMC8980421 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.850844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery care could alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rates of patients. Previous studies showed the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery program in liver surgery, but the exact role in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear. Aim We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after a surgery program in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods The relative studies from a specific search of PUBMED, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane database from June 2008 to February 2022 were selected and included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration to functional recovery, and overall postoperative complication rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cost of hospitalization, readmission rate, Grade I complication rate, and Grade II–V complication rate. Results A total of six studies with 643 patients [enhanced recovery care (n = 274) vs. traditional care (n = 369)] were eligible for analysis. These comprised three randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies. Enhanced recovery care group was associated with decreased hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.83~−0.28, p < 0.0001], shorter duration to functional recovery (SMD = −1.14, 95% CI = −1.92~−0.37, p = 0.004), and lower cost of hospitalization Mean Difference (MD) = −1,539.62, 95% CI = −1992.85~−1086.39, p < 0.00001). Moreover, a lower overall postoperative complication rate was observed in enhanced recovery care group [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.51~0.80, p < 0.0001] as well as lower Grade II–V complication rate (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38~0.80, p = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (MD = −65.75, 95% CI = −158.47~26.97, p = 0.16), operative time (MD = −5.44, 95% CI = −43.46~32.58, p = 0.78), intraoperative blood transfusion rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.41~1.22, p = 0.22], and Grade I complication rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53~1.03, p = 0.07). Conclusion Enhanced recovery care in laparoscopic hepatectomy should be recommended, because it is not only safe and effective, but also can accelerate the postoperative recovery and lighten the financial burden of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyin Zhou
- School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xueyi Zhou
- Department of Nursing, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiasheng Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiahao Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Win Topatana
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shijie Li
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sarun Juengpanich
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ziyi Lu
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xu Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiliang Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mingyu Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Mingyu Chen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hewitt DB, Brown ZJ, Pawlik TM. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 22:27-38. [PMID: 34730474 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.1999809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) incidence continues to rise worldwide, and overall survival remains poor. Complete surgical resection remains the only opportunity for cure in patients with ICC yet only one-third of patients present with resectable disease. AREAS COVERED While the low incidence rate of ICC hinders accrual of patients to large, randomized control trials, larger database and long-term institutional studies provide evidence to guide surgical management of ICC. These studies demonstrate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of aggressive surgical management in appropriately selected patients with ICC. Recent advances in the management of ICC, with a focus on surgical considerations, are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION Historically, little progress has been made in the management of ICC with stagnant mortality rates and poor long-term outcomes. However, regionalization of care to centers with experienced multidisciplinary teams, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, discovery and development of targeted and immunotherapy agents, and combination locoregional and systemic therapies offer signs of progress in the management of ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Brock Hewitt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zachary J Brown
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Serifis N, Tsilimigras DI, Cloonan DJ, Pawlik TM. Challenges and Opportunities for Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Hepat Med 2021; 13:93-104. [PMID: 34754247 PMCID: PMC8572023 DOI: 10.2147/hmer.s278136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the rarest and most aggressive types of cancer. The symptoms of ICC patients can be vague, leading to late diagnosis and dismal prognosis. In this review, we investigated the treatment options for ICC, as well as ways to overcome challenges in identifying and treating this disease. Imaging remains the gold standard to diagnose ICC. Patients are staged based on the tumor, nodes and metastases (TNM) staging system. Patients eligible for surgical resection should undergo surgery with curative intent with the goal of microscopically disease-free margins (R0 resection) along with lymphadenectomy. Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and liver transplantation have recently been offered as possible ways to improve disease outcomes. ICC recurrence is relatively common and, thus, most patients will need to be treated with systemic therapy. Several clinical trials have recently investigated the use of neoadjuvant (NT) and adjuvant therapies for ICC. NT may offer an opportunity to downsize larger tumors and provide patients, initially ineligible for surgery, with an opportunity for resection. NT may also treat occult micro-metastatic disease, as well as define tumor biology prior to surgical resection, thereby decreasing the risk for early postoperative recurrence. Adjuvant systemic therapy may improve outcomes of patients with ICC following surgery. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating new targeted therapies that hold the hope of improving long-term outcomes of patients with ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Serifis
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel J Cloonan
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bekki Y, Von Ahrens D, Takahashi H, Schwartz M, Gunasekaran G. Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma - Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:776863. [PMID: 34746017 PMCID: PMC8567135 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.776863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second-most common primary liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. While surgical resection with negative margin is the only curative treatment, ICC has very high rate of recurrence, up to 60-70% after curative resection. We reviewed the current data available on risk factors for ICC recurrence, recurrence pattern (location and timing), treatment options, and future directions. The risk factors for recurrence include elevated preoperative CA19-9, presence of liver cirrhosis, nodal metastasis, positive margins, and vascular invasion. Understanding different recurrence patterns, timing course, and risk factors for early recurrence is important to tailor postoperative surveillance and select treatment strategies including systemic or locoregional therapy. Re-resection can be considered for a selected patient population at experienced centers, and can yield long-term survival. ICC remains a dismal disease given the high likelihood of recurrence. Advances in our understanding of the genomic landscape of ICC are beginning to identify targetable alterations in ICC in subsets of patients that allow for personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Bekki
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dagny Von Ahrens
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hideo Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY, United States
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ganesh Gunasekaran
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Salehi O, Kazakova V, Vega EA, Kutlu OC, Alarcon SV, Freeman R, Kozyreva O, Conrad C. Selection criteria for minimally invasive resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a word of caution: a propensity score matched analysis using the national cancer database. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:5382-5391. [PMID: 34750709 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08842-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) vs. open approach (OLR) has been shown to be safe, the perioperative and oncologic safety for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) specifically, necessitating often complex hepatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy, remains ill-defined. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with ICC undergoing liver resection from 2010 to 2016. After 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM), Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests were applied to compare short-term outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression were performed. RESULTS 988 patients met inclusion criteria: 140 (14.2%) MILR and 848 (85.8%) OLR resulting in 115 patients MILR and OLR after 1:1 PSM with c-index of 0.733. MILR had lower unplanned 30-day readmission [OR 0.075, P = 0.014] and positive margin rates [OR 0.361, P = 0.011] and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) [OR 0.941, P = 0.026], but worse lymph node yield [1.52 vs 2.07, P = 0.001]. No difference was found for 30/90-day mortality. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that MILR was associated with poorer overall survival compared to OLR [HR 2.454, P = 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that survival differences from approach were dependent on major hepatectomy, tumor size > 4 cm, or negative margins. CONCLUSION MILR vs. OLR is associated with worse lymphadenectomy and survival in patients with ICC greater than 4 cm requiring major hepatectomy. Hence, MILR major hepatectomy for ICC should only be approached selectively and if surgeons are able to perform an appropriate lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Vera Kazakova
- Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sylvia V Alarcon
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA. .,Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brustia R, Laurent A, Goumard C, Langella S, Cherqui D, Kawai T, Soubrane O, Cauchy F, Farges O, Menahem B, Hobeika C, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Okumura S, Hofmeyr S, Ferrero A, Pruvot FR, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, Vibert E, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching. Surgery 2021; 171:1290-1302. [PMID: 34535270 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence. METHODS Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described. RESULTS During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSION The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. https://twitter.com/raffaele.brustia
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Takayuki Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Francois Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Benjamin Menahem
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Shinya Okumura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Stefan Hofmeyr
- Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - François-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Univ Lille, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care), Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France and Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Beal EW, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Surgical Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Emerging Principles. J Clin Med 2020; 10:E104. [PMID: 33396821 PMCID: PMC7796337 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare, aggressive cancer of the biliary tract. It often presents with locally advanced or metastatic disease, but for patients with early-stage disease, surgical resection with negative margins and portahepatis lymphadenectomy is the standard of care. Recent advancements in ICC include refinement of staging, improvement in liver-directed therapies, clarification of the role of adjuvant therapy based on new randomized controlled trials, and advances in minimally invasive liver surgery. In addition, improvements in neoadjuvant strategies and surgical techniques have enabled expanded surgical indications and reduced surgical morbidity and mortality. However, recurrence rates remain high and more effective systemic therapies are still necessary to improve recurrence-free and overall survival. In this review, we focus on current and emerging surgical principals for the management of ICC including preoperative evaluation, current indications for surgery, strategies for future liver remnant augmentation, technical principles, and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH 43201, USA; (E.W.B.); (J.M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:725-735. [PMID: 32607841 PMCID: PMC7471173 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive techniques have increasingly found their way into liver surgery in recent years. A multitude of mostly retrospective analyses suggests several advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery. Due to the speed and variety of simultaneous technical and strategic developments, it is difficult to maintain an overview of the current status and perspectives in laparoscopic liver surgery. Purpose This review highlights up-to-date aspects in laparoscopic liver surgery. We discuss established indications with regard to their development over time as well as continuing limitations of applied techniques. We give an assessment based on the current literature and according to our own center experiences, not least with regard to a highly topical cost discussion. Conclusions While in the beginning mainly benign tumors were laparoscopically operated on, liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma are now among the most frequent indications. Technical limitations remain and should be evaluated with the overall aim not to endanger quality standards in open surgery. Financial aspects cannot be neglected with the necessity of cost-covering reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gringeri E, Gambato M, Sapisochin G, Ivanics T, Lynch EN, Mescoli C, Burra P, Cillo U, Russo FP. Cholangiocarcinoma as an Indication for Liver Transplantation in the Era of Transplant Oncology. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1353. [PMID: 32380750 PMCID: PMC7290472 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) arises from the biliary tract epithelium and accounts for 10-15% of all hepatobiliary malignancies. Depending on anatomic location, CCA is classified as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA). The best treatment option for pCCA is liver resection and when a radical oncological surgery is obtained, 5-year survival rate are around 20-40%. In unresectable patients, following a specific protocol, liver transplantation (LT) for pCCA showed excellent long-term disease-free survival rates. Fewer data are available for iCCA in LT setting. Nevertheless, patients with very early unresectable iCCA appear to achieve excellent outcomes after LT. This review aims to evaluate existing evidence to define the current role of LT in the management of patients with CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Gringeri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.G.); (U.C.)
| | - Martina Gambato
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.N.L.); (P.B.); (F.P.R.)
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada; (G.S.); (T.I.)
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada; (G.S.); (T.I.)
| | - Erica Nicola Lynch
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.N.L.); (P.B.); (F.P.R.)
| | - Claudia Mescoli
- Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy;
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.N.L.); (P.B.); (F.P.R.)
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.G.); (U.C.)
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy; (E.N.L.); (P.B.); (F.P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wei F. Reply to the Letter: "Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Has Superiority in R0 Resection over Open Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? The Evidence Is Unreliable". J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:451-453. [PMID: 31823325 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04477-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fangqiang Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|