1
|
Manole TE, Daniel I, Alexandra B, Dan PN, Andronic O. Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Narrative Review. SAUDI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & MEDICAL SCIENCES 2023; 11:187-192. [PMID: 37533654 PMCID: PMC10393091 DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_235_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Parastomal hernia is one of the most common late complications after stoma formation, significantly decreasing patient's quality of life and negatively impacting body image and physical functioning. Progress has been made regarding the surgical technique of stoma creation in different categories of patients, but a better understanding of the risk factors is crucial in reducing the likeliness of parastomal hernia formation and in helping develop risk stratification strategies for pre-and post-operation management. However, currently there is limited consensus on the associated risk factors. Accordingly, for this narrative review, the authors conducted a literature review through three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) and categorized the identified risk factors into the following three categories: patient-, surgery-, and disease-related. Within these categories, the following 10 risk factors were identified and discussed: age, gender, waist circumference, type of ostomy, laparoscopic approach, aperture size >3 cm, stoma not passing through the middle of rectus abdominis muscle, BMI >25 kg/m2, altered collagen metabolism, and diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodora Elena Manole
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ion Daniel
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- IIIrd Department of General Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bolocan Alexandra
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- IIIrd Department of General Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Păduraru N. Dan
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- IIIrd Department of General Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Octavian Andronic
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- IIIrd Department of General Surgery, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paruch JL. Extraction Site in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:47-51. [PMID: 36643827 PMCID: PMC9839428 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The widespread adoption of minimally invasive colorectal surgery has led to improved patient recovery and outcomes. Specimen extraction sites remain a major source of pain and potential postoperative morbidity. Careful selection of the extraction site incision may allow surgeons to decrease postoperative pain, infectious complications, or rates of hernia formation. Options include midline, paramedian, transverse, Pfannenstiel, and natural orifice sites. Patient, disease, and surgeon-related factors should all be considered when choosing a site. This article will review different options for specimen extraction sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Paruch
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
den Hartog FPJ, van Egmond S, Poelman MM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Tanis PJ, Deerenberg EB. The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2022; 25:586-599. [PMID: 36545836 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Minimally invasive colorectal surgery reduces surgical trauma with better preservation of abdominal wall integrity, but the extraction site is still at risk of incisional hernia (IH). The aim of this study was to determine pooled incidence of IH for each type of extraction site and to compare rates of IH after midline, nonmidline and Pfannenstiel extraction. METHOD A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Single-armed and multiple-armed cohort studies and randomized controlled trials regarding minimally invasive colorectal surgery were searched from five databases. Outcomes were pooled and compared with random-effects, inverse-variance models. Risk of bias within the studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tool. RESULTS Thirty six studies were included, with a total 11,788 patients. The pooled extraction site IH rate was 16.0% for midline (n = 4081), 9.3% for umbilical (n = 2425), 5.2% for transverse (n = 3213), 9.4% for paramedian (n = 134) and 2.1% for Pfannenstiel (n = 1449). Nonmidline extraction (transverse and paramedian) showed significantly lower odds ratios (ORs) for IH when compared with midline extraction (including umbilical). Pfannenstiel extraction resulted in a significantly lower OR for IH compared with midline [OR 0.12 (0.50-0.30)], transverse [OR 0.25 (0.13-0.50)] and umbilical (OR 0.072 [0.033-0.16]) extraction sites. The risks of surgical site infection, seroma/haematoma or wound dehiscence were not significantly different in any of the analyses. CONCLUSION Pfannenstiel extraction is the preferred method in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. In cases where Pfannenstiel extraction is not possible, surgeons should avoid specimen extraction in the midline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris P J den Hartog
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah van Egmond
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijn M Poelman
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anand G Menon
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva B Deerenberg
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer JP, Fortelny RH, Gök H, Harris HW, Hope W, Horne CM, Jensen TK, Köckerling F, Kretschmer A, López-Cano M, Malcher F, Shao JM, Slieker JC, de Smet GHJ, Stabilini C, Torkington J, Muysoms FE. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1239-1250. [PMID: 36026550 PMCID: PMC10364727 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal wall incision. Surgical technique is an important risk factor for the development of incisional hernia. The aim of these updated guidelines was to provide recommendations to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed on 22 January 2022. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network instrument was used to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses, RCTs, and cohort studies. The GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to appraise the certainty of the evidence. The guidelines group consisted of surgical specialists, a biomedical information specialist, certified guideline methodologist, and patient representative. RESULTS Thirty-nine papers were included covering seven key questions, and weak recommendations were made for all of these. Laparoscopic surgery and non-midline incisions are suggested to be preferred when safe and feasible. In laparoscopic surgery, suturing the fascial defect of trocar sites of 10 mm and larger is advised, especially after single-incision laparoscopic surgery and at the umbilicus. For closure of an elective midline laparotomy, a continuous small-bites suturing technique with a slowly absorbable suture is suggested. Prophylactic mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomy can be considered to reduce the risk of incisional hernia; a permanent synthetic mesh in either the onlay or retromuscular position is advised. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines may help surgeons in selecting the optimal approach and location of abdominal wall incisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva B Deerenberg
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia A Henriksen
- Department of Hepatic and Digestive diseases, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Mediterranean Hospital of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus.,Medical School, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Wichor M Bramer
- Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John P Fischer
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rene H Fortelny
- Certified Hernia Center, Wilhelminenspital, Veinna, Austria.,Paracelsus Medical, University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Hakan Gök
- Hernia Istanbul®, Hernia Surgery Centre, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hobart W Harris
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William Hope
- Department of Surgery, Novant/New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charlotte M Horne
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Department, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas K Jensen
- Department of Hepatic and Digestive diseases, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ferdinand Köckerling
- Hernia Center, Vivantes Humboldt-Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munchen, Germany.,Janssen Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Manuel López-Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Unviversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Flavio Malcher
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health/NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jenny M Shao
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gijs H J de Smet
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cesare Stabilini
- Department of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS and Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Jared Torkington
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Filip E Muysoms
- Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stabilini C, Garcia-Urena MA, Berrevoet F, Cuccurullo D, Capoccia Giovannini S, Dajko M, Rossi L, Decaestecker K, López Cano M. An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure. Hernia 2022; 26:411-436. [PMID: 35018560 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02555-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) across various type of incisions in colorectal surgery (CS) creating a map of evidence to define research trends, gaps and areas of future interest. METHODS Systematic review of PubMed and Scopus from 2010 onwards. Studies included both open (OS) and laparoscopic (LS). The primary outcome was incidence of IH 12 months after index procedure, secondary outcomes were the study features and their influence on reported proportion of IH. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Meta-regression models were performed to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS Ninetyone studies were included reporting 6473 IH. The pooled proportions of IH for OS were 0.35 (95% CI 0.27-0.44) I2 0% in midline laparotomies and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.07), I2 52% for off-midline. In case of LS the pooled proportion of IH for midline extraction sites were 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.16), I2 58% and 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.06), I2 86% in case of off-midline. In Port-site IH was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.04), I2 82%, and for single incision surgery (SILS) of 0.06-95% CI 0.02-0.15, I2 81%. In case of stoma reversal sites was 0.20 (95% CI 0.16-0.24). CONCLUSION Midline laparotomies and stoma reversal sites are at high risk for IH and should be considered in research of preventive strategies of closure. After laparoscopic approach IH happens mainly by extraction sites incisions specially midline and also represent an important area of analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Stabilini
- Department of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M A Garcia-Urena
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University, Henares University Hospital, Carretera Pozuelo-Majadahonda km 1,8, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Cuccurullo
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Monaldi-Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - S Capoccia Giovannini
- Department of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Dajko
- Gastroenterology and Clinical Oncology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rossi
- Department of Surgery (DiSC), University of Genoa, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M López Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d'Hebron Research Institute General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research Group, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|