Operative Results and Perioperative Morbidity After Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with FLOT for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Impact of Intensified Neoadjuvant Treatment

The New Era of Total Neoadjuvant FLOT Therapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison With Standard Perioperative Therapy

BACKGROUND

The FLOT 4-AIO trial established the docetaxel-based regimen's superiority over epirubicin-based triplet therapy in terms of survival rates and acceptable toxicity for locally advanced resectable gastric (LARGC). Yet, fewer than half of the patients achieved completion of eight prescribed FLOT cycles. We proposed that administering all FLOT cycles in the form of total neoadjuvant therapy may improve completion rates and downstaging. This study contrasted total neoadjuvant therapy (FLOT x8) with standard neoadjuvant therapy (FLOT 4+4) for patients LARGC adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection with routine D2 lymphadenectomy, focusing on histopathological outcomes, toxicity, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with histologically confirmed advanced clinical stage cT2 or higher, nodal positive stage (cN+), or both, with resectable gastric tumors and no distant metastases (January 2017 to July 2023). We divided patients into two groups, FLOT 4+4 and FLOT x8; FLOT 4+4 patients underwent four preoperative and four postoperative bi-weekly cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil, while FLOT x8 patients received all eight cycles preoperatively after a gradual practice change starting from January 2020. Propensity score matching adjusted for age, clinical stage, tumor location, and histology.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients in the FLOT x8 group, 37 were propensity-matched to an equal number in the FLOT 4+4 group. Demographics, duration of surgery, and hospital stay showed no significant differences between the groups. The FLOT x8 group exhibited a significantly higher all-cycle completion rate at 89.1% compared to FLOT 4+4's 67.6% (p < 0.01). Both groups demonstrated comparable hematological and non-hematological toxicity rates, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications, and CAP tumor regression grades. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 42.5 and 41.2 in the FLOT 4+4 and FLOT x8 groups, respectively. Similar rates of disease-free survival and overall survival were noted in both groups, despite a trend toward a higher pathological complete response rate, albeit not statistically significant (8.1% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.29), in the FLOT x8 group at a median follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Total neoadjuvant therapy with the FLOT x8 protocol corresponds to higher treatment completion rates, a safety profile similar to standard perioperative therapy, and a twofold increase in complete pathological response. Further research on long-term oncological outcomes is needed to confirm the effectiveness of total neoadjuvant therapy.

Evaluation of pathologic response and surgical safety of total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the potential benefit of extending therapy before surgery remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without immune checkpoint blockade.

METHODS

A cohort of 174 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from October 2021 to March 2024 in the real-world setting were included in this study. Among these patients, 101 were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and 73 were treated with perioperative neoadjuvant therapy (PNT). We compared the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ypN0 rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with pCR or ypN0.

RESULTS

Compared with the PNT group, the patients in the TNT group were more frequently treated with intensive chemotherapy with triplets + immunotherapy. Apart from this, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.8% vs 12.3%), ypN0 (49.5% vs 38.4%), RFS, OS, and postoperative complications (27.7% vs 26.0%) between the TNT and PNT groups. Older age, diffuse type, and stable disease/progressive disease based on clinical efficacy evaluation were independently associated with non-pCR. Stable disease/progressive disease, linitis plastica, and poor differentiation were independently associated with ypN+. Neither the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles nor the specific regimens were associated with pCR or ypN0. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving total gastrectomy, there were still no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.7% vs 2.6%), ypN0 (43.8% vs 39.5%), and postoperative complications (45.8% vs 36.8%) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Although TNT did not increase the postoperative complication rate, it also did not provide any additional short-term benefits compared with PNT for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction represent a large burden of cancer death in the Western World with an increasing incidence. In the past two decades, the overall survival of patients on a potentially curative treatment pathway has more than doubled due to the addition of perioperative oncological therapies to surgery. However, patients often fail to respond to oncological treatment or struggle to complete their treatment after surgery. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for total neoadjuvant therapy and options for assessment of treatment response.

Impact of neoadjuvant FLOT treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer following surgical therapy

Introduction

Therapeutic treatment for advanced-stage (T2–T4) gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention.

Method

Neoadjuvant oncological treatment for GEJ and gastric cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group 1). The new protocol (FLOT, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), included patients with resectable GEJ and gastric cancer who had a clinical stage cT2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group 2). Between 31 December 2008 and 31 October 2022, the effect of different oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T2–T4 tumours were retrospectively evaluated. Results of randomly assigned patients from the earlier ECF/ECX protocol (n = 36) (Group 1) and the new FLOT protocol (n = 52) (Group 2) were compared. Effect of different neoadjuvant therapies on tumour regression, types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and oncological radicality of surgical procedures were analysed.

Results

When comparing the two groups, we found that in case of the FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Group 2, n = 52), complete regression was achieved in 13.95% of patients, whereas in the case of ECF/ECX (Group 1, n = 36), complete regression occurred in only 9.10% of patients. Furthermore, in the FLOT group, the mean number of lymph nodes removed was slightly higher (24.69 vs. 20.13 in the ECF/ECX group). In terms of the safety resection margin (proximal), no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups. Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects. The occurrence of diarrhea was significantly higher in the FLOT group (p = 0.006). Leukopenia and nausea occurred more commonly with the old protocol (Group 1). The rate of neutropenia was lower following FLOT treatment (p = 0.294), with the lack of grade II and III cases. Anaemia occured at a significantly higher rate (p = 0.036) after the ECF/ECX protocol.

Conclusions

As a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancer, the rate of complete tumour regression increased significantly. The rate of side effects was also appreciably lower following the FLOT protocol. These results strongly suggest a significant advantage of the FLOT neoadjuvant treatment used before surgery.

Prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations for different T-stages in gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment of gastric cancer. Extent of lymphadenectomy may differ depending on T-stage, as the rate of lymph node metastases may differ. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate and compare the prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages.

METHODS

Data reporting and structure of this systematic review follows the PRISMA checklist. The Medline and PubMed databases were systematically searched. The search included the following Mesh terms: "Stomach Neoplasms", "Lymphatic Metastasis" and "Lymph Node Excision". The primary outcome was the highest prevalence of nodal metastases per T-stage.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 175 eligible articles. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and were accordingly analyzed. Concerning the lymph node stations 1 to 7, the lymph nodes along the lesser gastric curvature (station 3) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 5.5%, T2: 21.9%, T3: 41.9%, T4: 71.0%). Concerning the lymph node stations 8 to 20, the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (station 8) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 0.8%, T2: 7.9%, T3: 14.0%, T4: 28.2%).

CONCLUSION

An overall low prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas endorse a more tailored approach based on the different gastric T-stages. In addition, a less extensive lymphadenectomy seems justified in early T1 carcinoma.

SYNOPSIS

This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of nodal metastases for the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages, showing an overall low prevalence in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in the more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas.

Understanding the association between clinical staging accuracy, treatment response, and survival among gastric cancer patients through Bayesian analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) improves survival among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), but it remains unclear whether its benefit is contingent on treatment response.

METHODS

This is a national cohort study of stage Ib-III GC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2006-2015) treated with upfront resection or NAT followed by surgery. Bayesian analysis was used for NAT patients to ascertain staging concordance and to account for down-staging. We used multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the association between staging concordance, treatment, response to NAT, and survival.

RESULTS

The cohort included 13 340 patients treated at 1124 hospitals. Staging concordance ranged from 86.1% for cT3-4N+ to 34.7% for cT2N0 patients. Relative to accurately staged patients treated with upfront surgery, NAT was associated with a decreased risk of death if there was disease down-staging among those with cT1-2N+ (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43 [0.30-0.61]), cT3-4N0 (HR: 0.69 [0.54-0.88]), and cT3-4N+ (HR: 0.51 [0.48-0.58]) tumors, and in the absence of down-staging among cT3-4N+ patients (HR: 0.83 [0.74-0.92]). Conversely, NAT without down-staging increased the risk of death among those with intermediate-stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

NAT is associated with improved survival for GC, but it seems to be contingent on treatment response among patients with intermediate-stage disease.

FLOT-regimen Chemotherapy and Transthoracic en bloc Resection for Esophageal and Junctional Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The FLOT4-AIO trial established the FLOT regimen (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel) as a compelling option for gastric, junctional and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data on FLOT with en-bloc transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) are limited. This study explored operative complications, tolerance, toxicity, physiological impact, and oncologic outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational cohort study on consecutive patients at 3 tertiary centers undergoing FLOT and TTE. Toxicity, operative complications (per ECCG definitions), tumor regression grade (TRG), recurrences and survival were documented, as well as pre- and post FLOT assessment of sarcopenia and pulmonary physiology.

RESULTS

175 patients (cT2-4a, Nany) commenced treatment, 84% male, median age 65, 94% cT3/T4a, 73% cN+. 89% completed 4 preoperative cycles, and 35% all cycles. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (12%), diarrhoea (13%), and infection (15%). Sarcopenia increased from 18% to 37% (p = 0.020), and diffusion capacity (DLCO) decreased by 8% (-34%+25%; p < 0.010). On pathology, ypT3/4 was 59%, and ypN+54%, with 10% TRG 1, 14% TRG 2, and 76% TRG3-5, and R0 95%. 161 underwent TTE, with an in-hospital mortality of 0.6%, 24%-pneumonia, 11%-anastomotic leak, and Clavien Dindo ≥III in 27%. At a median follow up of 12 months (1-85), 33 relapsed, 8 (5%) locally, and 3yr survival was 60%.

CONCLUSION

FLOT and en bloc TTE was safe, with no discernible impact on operative complications, with 24% having a major pathologic response. Caveats include a limited pathologic response in the majority, and negative impact on muscle mass and lung physiology, and low use of adjuvant cycles. These data may provide a real-world benchmark for this complex care pathway.