1
|
Borie F, Sabbagh C, Fabre JM, Fuchshuber P, Gravié JF, Gugenheim J, Asbun H. SAGES SAFE CHOLE program changes surgeons practice in France-results of the FCVD implementation of SAFE CHOLE in France. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6483-6490. [PMID: 37253869 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10128-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity. METHODS To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program. RESULTS From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Borie
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France.
- Research Unit INSERM University of Montpellier, IDESP Institute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, Montpellier, France.
| | - Charles Sabbagh
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Michel Fabre
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Jean-François Gravié
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Horacio Asbun
- Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kovács N, Németh D, Földi M, Nagy B, Bunduc S, Hegyi P, Bajor J, Müller KE, Vincze Á, Erőss B, Ábrahám S. Selective intraoperative cholangiography should be considered over routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7126-7139. [PMID: 35794500 PMCID: PMC9485186 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09267-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decades of debate surround the use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy. To the present day, the role of IOC is controversial as regards decreasing the rate of bile duct injury (BDI). We aimed to review and analyse the available literature on the benefits of IOC during cholecystectomy. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed until 19 October 2020 in five databases using the following search keys: cholangiogra* and cholecystectomy. The primary outcomes were BDI and retained stone rate. To investigate the differences between the groups (routine IOC vs selective IOC and IOC vs no IOC), we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Of the 19,863 articles, 38 were selected and 32 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Routine IOC showed no superiority compared to selective IOC in decreasing BDI (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66; 1.24). Comparing IOC and no IOC, no statistically significant differences were found in the case of BDI, retained stone rate, readmission rate, and length of hospital stay. We found an increased risk of conversion rate to open surgery in the no IOC group (RR = 0.64, CI 0.51; 0.78). The operation time was significantly longer in the IOC group compared to the no IOC group (WMD = 11.25 min, 95% CI 6.57; 15.93). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that IOC may not be indicated in every case, however, the evidence is very uncertain. Further good quality research is required to address this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Kovács
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Dávid Németh
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Institute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mária Földi
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bernadette Nagy
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Stefania Bunduc
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
- Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Judit Bajor
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Katalin Eszter Müller
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Heim Pál National Institute of Pediatrics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Áron Vincze
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bálint Erőss
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Szabolcs Ábrahám
- Department of Surgery, Szent-Györgyi Albert Medical and Pharmaceutical Centre, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 8, 6720, Szeged, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|