1
|
Nimisha, Saluja SS, Sharma AK, Nekarakanti PK, Apurva, Kumar A, Ahmad E, Husain SA. Impact of ABCB1 and ABCG2 Transporter in Outcome of Gallbladder Cancer. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2024; 14:101410. [PMID: 38716375 PMCID: PMC11070335 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a biologically aggressive malignancy requiring appropriate biomarkers to improve its outcome. Role of ABC transporters (ABCB1 and ABCG2) has been linked to cancer aggressiveness, tumorigenesis and multidrug resistance. Herein, we studied the prognostic implication of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in GBC. METHODS Fresh tissue (tumour & normal) samples collected from 54 patients who underwent R0 resection, were analysed for mRNA and protein expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 by quantitative Real-Time PCR and western blotting, respectively, in this prospective study. The molecular findings were correlated with clinical-pathological parameters using χ2 and fisher exact test. The molecular changes in ABCB1 and ABCG2 were analysed for predicting overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and response to chemotherapy using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 50 ± 13.2 with 26 (48.1%) in patients having early stage gallbladder cancer (GBC). Over-expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 was noted in 32/54 (59%) and 40/54 (74%) cases, respectively. The protein expression of ABCB1(P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (BCRP) was higher in 27/54 (50%) and 37/54 (59%) cases, respectively. The mean OS and DFS was 20.7 ± 11.5 and 19.3 ± 12.2 months at median follow-up of 24 months. The TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and presence of gallstone were significant factors for predicting OS and DFS on multivariate analysis. Both ABCB1 and ABCG2 did not show any significant correlation with OS and DFS with similar incidences of late death and recurrence among over-expression and down-expression. Sub-group comparison suggests that change in expression pattern of ABCB1 and ABCG2 may not affect response to chemotherapy in GBC. CONCLUSION Altered expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 may not be a useful prognostic marker for survival or response to chemotherapy in GBC. Presently, histo-pathological characteristics and associated gallstones are the important predictors for survival and recurrence in GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimisha
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
- Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
| | - Sundeep S. Saluja
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Abhay K. Sharma
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Phani K. Nekarakanti
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Apurva
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Arun Kumar
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Ejaj Ahmad
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Syed A. Husain
- Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ostwal V, Patkar S, Engineer R, Parulekar M, Mandavkar S, Bhargava P, Srinivas S, Krishnatry R, Gudi S, Kapoor A, Pandey D, Patel S, Singhal A, Goel A, Dora TK, Chaudhary D, Chaugule D, Naughane D, Daddi A, Patil R, Ankathi SK, Ramaswamy A, Goel M. Adjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Chemoradiation in Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:1116-1120. [PMID: 38958997 PMCID: PMC11223048 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Importance There is limited evidence with regard to the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy chemoradiotherapy in resected gallbladder cancers (GBCs). Objective To establish a baseline survival rate for operated GBCs in patients receiving either gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or capecitabine and capecitabine concurrent with chemoradiation (CCRT). Design, Setting, and Participants The GECCOR-GB study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 noncomparator "pick the winner" design trial of adjuvant GC and CCRT in patients with resected histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder, (stage II/III) with no local residual tumor (R0) or microscopic residual tumor (R1). The study was carried out in 3 tertiary cancer institutions in India. Patients 18 years or older with adequate end-organ functions, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or lower between May 2019 and February 2022 were enrolled. The cutoff date for data analysis was February 28, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either GC every 3 weeks (maximum of 6 cycles) or CCRT comprising capecitabine with concurrent chemoradiation (capecitabine concurrent with radiotherapy) sandwiched between capecitabine chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year in randomized patients. This study was conducted as 2 parallel, single-stage phase 2 clinical trials. Within each treatment arm, a 1-year DFS rate of less than 59% was considered as insufficient activity, whereas a 1-year DFS rate of 77% or higher would be considered as sufficient activity. Results With a median follow-up of 23 months, 90 patients were randomized, 45 in each arm. Overall, there were 31 women (69%) and 14 men (31%) in the GC arm with a mean (range) age of 56 (33-72) years and 34 women (76%) and 11 men (24%) in the CCRT group with a mean (range) age of 55 (26-69) years. In the GC and CCRT arms, 1-year DFS and estimated 2-year DFS was 88.9% (95% CI, 79.5-98.3) and 74.8% (95% CI, 60.4-89.2), and 77.8% (95% CI, 65.4-90.2) and 74.8% (95% CI, 59.9-86.3), respectively. Completion rates for planned treatment was 82% in the GC arm and 62% in the CCRT arm. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, GC and CCRT crossed the prespecified trial end points of 1-year DFS in patients with resected stage II/III GBCs. The results set a baseline for a larger phase 3 trial evaluating both regimens in operated GBCs. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CTRI/2019/05/019323I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Manali Parulekar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Sarika Mandavkar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Prabhat Bhargava
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Sujay Srinivas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Shivakumar Gudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Akhil Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mahanama Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, India
| | - Durgatosh Pandey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mahanama Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, India
| | - Swapnil Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mahanama Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, India
| | - Abhishek Singhal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mahanama Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, India
| | - Alok Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (HBCH), Civil Hospital Campus, Sangrur, India
| | - Tapas Kumar Dora
- Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (HBCH), Civil Hospital Campus, Sangrur, India
| | - Debashish Chaudhary
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (HBCH), Civil Hospital Campus, Sangrur, India
| | - Deepali Chaugule
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Deepali Naughane
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Anuprita Daddi
- Department of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Rajshree Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Suman Kumar Ankathi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Das SC, Ghosh J, Kanta S, Thakran H, Ganguly S, Biswas B, Banerjee S, Roy MK, Chawala T. Outcomes of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Centre in India. Cureus 2024; 16:e65735. [PMID: 39211665 PMCID: PMC11360279 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has deleterious outcomes, but due to its reduced incidence in Western countries, there is a paucity of data on this disease. Here we report the outcomes of a retrospective analysis of resectable gallbladder cancer from a tertiary cancer centre in eastern India. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates among patients with resectable GBC. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients who underwent radical surgery between 2007 and 2022 and received various neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy methods. Patients who had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy concurrently or who did not receive adjuvant therapy were excluded. All the baseline clinicopathological characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. The survival data were collected from records of follow-up visits as well as telephonic calls to the patients who were lost to follow-up. Simple proportions were used for baseline characteristics, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results A total of 161 patients were identified, and data were captured from electronic medical records. The included patients' ages ranged between 26 and 80 years, with a median age of 56 years. Among the participants, 103 were female (64%) and 58 (36%) were male. Among the 161 patients, the median number of lymph nodes harvested was nine (ranging from one to 43), and only three patients were margin-positive. The tumour, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) distributions were as follows: pT2 in 111 patients (70.25%), pT3 in 44 patients (27.85%), and pT4 in three patients (1.90%). The nodal statuses were pN0 in 91 patients (61.9%), pN1 in 51 patients (34.69%), and pN2 in five patients (3.4%). The majority (64%) received single-agent capecitabine, 27% received gemcitabine-based platinum doublet therapy, and 4.3% received neoadjuvant therapy. Of the full sample, 2.4% received concurrent adjuvant chemo plus radiation therapy, and three patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Additionally, among the 161 patients, 34.16% had a relapse, with 47% being local and 52% being distant relapses. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23-71 months). The 24-month RFS rate was 67.1% (SD+/- 4.3%), and the 24-month OS rate was 78.1% (SD+/- 4.1%). Conclusion Our data, which is from one of the largest samples from India, show that resectable gallbladder cancer has very good outcomes after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was a higher proportion of T2 and node-negative disease, which could have led to better survival compared to published literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joydeep Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Sagar Kanta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Harsh Thakran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Sandip Ganguly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Bivas Biswas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Sudeep Banerjee
- Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) and Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Manas Kumar Roy
- Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) and Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| | - Tanuj Chawala
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imamura T, Ohgi K, Mori K, Ashida R, Yamada M, Otsuka S, Uesaka K, Sugiura T. Surrogacy of Recurrence-free Survival for Overall Survival as an Endpoint of Clinical Trials of Perioperative Adjuvant Therapy in Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Cancers: A Retrospective Study and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 279:1025-1035. [PMID: 37638472 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the correlation between recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) surgical setting to validate RFS as a surrogate endpoint. BACKGROUND Reliable surrogate endpoints for OS are still limited in the field of HBP surgery. METHODS We analyzed patients who underwent curative resection for HBP disease [986 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 1168 with biliary tract cancer (BTC), 1043 with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1071 with colorectal liver metastasis] from September 2002 to June 2022. We also conducted meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy to validate the surrogacy in PDAC and BTC. RESULTS Correlation coefficients between RFS and OS were low for hepatocellular carcinoma ( p = 0.67) and colorectal liver metastasis ( p = 0.53) but strong for PDAC ( p = 0.80) and BTC ( p = 0.75). In a landmark analysis, the concordance rates between survival or death at 5 years postoperatively and the presence or absence of recurrence at each time point (1, 2, 3, and 4 years) were 50%, 70%, 74%, and 77% for PDAC and 54%, 67%, 73%, and 78% for BTC, respectively, both increasing and reaching a plateau at 3 years. In a meta-analysis, the correlation coefficients for the RFS hazard ratio and OS hazard ratio in PDAC and BTC were p = 0.88 ( P < 0.001) and p = 0.87 ( P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Three-year RFS can be a reliable surrogate endpoint for OS in clinical trials of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for PDAC and BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taisuke Imamura
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsuhisa Ohgi
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Keita Mori
- Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryo Ashida
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mihoko Yamada
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shimpei Otsuka
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of HepatoBiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Kong Y, Yang Q, Zhong C, Zhou D, Wang W. Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma: An updated retrospective cohort analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108047. [PMID: 38401352 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rarity yet high malignancy of gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA) endows it with a distinctive nature. Radical resection remains the foremost therapeutic approach for GBA, while the impact of early recurrence and metastasis on patient prognosis necessitates the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Despite numerous previous studies on this topic, a consensus regarding the authentic efficacy of AC has yet to be reached. METHODS We conducted an updated retrospective cohort analysis utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 2010 to 2020 to explore the association between AC and survival outcomes in patients with resected GBA. RESULTS Our study included 2782 patients from the SEER database, with further evaluation of 843 patients in each cohort following meticulous execution of a 1:1 propensity score matching. Remarkably, the AC cohort exhibited a significant survival advantage when juxtaposed against the non-AC cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified age at diagnosis, year at diagnosis, grade, AJCC T stage, AJCC N stage as well as AC as independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, our findings unveiled that poor/undifferentiated tumor histology, pathological T2 or higher category and pathological N1 category were significantly associated with improved survival when treated with AC while simultaneously observing improved survival across all age categories. CONCLUSION These results provide additional evidence supporting the survival benefits of AC and offer guidance for personalized therapy in patients with resected GBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yizhi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Yang Kong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Qifan Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Cheng Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Dongkai Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Zhejiang Province, 310009, China; Clinical Medicine Innovation Center of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilbur HC, Soares HP, Azad NS. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer: Advances and limitations. Hepatology 2024:01515467-990000000-00725. [PMID: 38266282 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a rare and aggressive consortium of malignancies, consisting of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. While most patients present with metastatic disease, a minority of patients with BTC are eligible for curative surgical resection at the time of presentation. However, these patients have poor 5-year overall survival rates and high rates of recurrence, necessitating the improvement of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of BTC. In this review, we assess the neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials for the treatment of BTC and discuss the challenges and limitations of clinical trials, as well as future directions for the treatment of BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Catherine Wilbur
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Heloisa P Soares
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nilofer S Azad
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nakachi K, Gotohda N, Hatano E, Nara S, Takahashi S, Kawamoto Y, Ueno M. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer: a review of randomized controlled trials. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:1019-1026. [PMID: 37599063 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The first randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer was reported in 2002. Since then, studies have continued, with efficacy reported for capecitabine in 2018 and S-1 in 2023. Oral fluoropyrimidines have become established as the standard of care. This article reviews the evidence from the randomized controlled trials reported to date and those that are ongoing or from which results have not yet been reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Nakachi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kawamoto
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nimisha, Saluja SS, Sharma AK, Nekarakanti PK, Apurva, Kumar A, Sattar RSA, Anjum H, Batra VV, Husain SA. Molecular aspects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in Gallbladder cancer and its clinical relevance. Mol Cell Biochem 2023; 478:2379-2394. [PMID: 36720839 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04667-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The function of ABC transporters in the body is manifold; such as maintenance of homeostasis, effect on multi-drug resistance and their role in tumor initiation & progression. Evidence pointing towards the direct or indirect role of ABC transporter genes in particular; ABCB1 and ABCG2 in cancer genesis is increasing. However, their role in gallbladder cancer is unexplored. Therefore, we investigated the methylation status and expression pattern of ABCB1 and ABCG2in gallbladder carcinogenesis. The methylation and expression study of ABCB1/MDR1 and ABCG2/BCRP was performed in tumour and normal fresh tissue samples collected from 61 histopathologically diagnosed gallbladder cancer patients. The methylation status was analysed by Methylation-Specific PCR and expression was determined by Real-Time PCR and Immunohistochemistry. Hypomethylation of ABCB1 and ABCG2 was found in 44 (72.13%) and 48 (78.6%) cases, respectively. ABCB1 hypomethylation pattern showed association with female patients (p = 0.040) and GradeII tumors (p = 0.036) while, ABCG2 hypomethylation was more frequent in early tumors (T1-T2). The mRNA expression ofABCB1 and ABCG2 was up-regulated in 33 (54.10%) and 41 (67.21%) patients with fold change of 4.7 and 5.5, respectively. The mRNA expression of both genes showed association with Grade II tumours and the increased fold change of ABCG2 was higher in (T1-T2) depth of invasion (p = 0.02) and Stage I-II disease (p = 0.08). The protein expression on IHC was strongly positive for ABCB1/MDR1and ABCG2/BCRP in 32 (52.46%) and 45 (73.77%) patients, respectively. The protein expression in ABCG2 showed association with patients age > 50 years (p = 0.04) and GradeII differentiation (p = 0.07). Interestingly, the hypomethylation of both the genes showed significant correlation with increased expression. ABCB1/MDR1 and ABCG2/BCRP hypomethylation and overexpression could have a potential role in gallbladder cancer tumorigenesis especially in early stages. The epigenetic change might be a plausible factor for altered gene expression of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimisha
- Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Sundeep Singh Saluja
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Abhay Kumar Sharma
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Phani Kumar Nekarakanti
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Apurva
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Arun Kumar
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Real Sumayya Abdul Sattar
- Central Molecular Lab, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Hasib Anjum
- Department of Pathology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | - Vineeta Vijay Batra
- Department of Pathology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li Q, Liu H, Gao Q, Xue F, Fu J, Li M, Yuan J, Chen C, Zhang D, Geng Z. Textbook outcome in gallbladder carcinoma after curative-intent resection: a 10-year retrospective single-center study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2023:00029330-990000000-00607. [PMID: 37166217 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TO) can guide decision-making among patients and clinicians during preoperative patient selection and postoperative quality improvement. We explored the factors associated with achieving a TO for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) after curative-intent resection and analyzed the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on TO and non-TO patients. METHODS A total of 540 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBC at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated with TO. RESULTS Among 540 patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection, 223 patients (41.3%) achieved a TO. The incidence of TO ranged from 19.0% to 51.0% across the study period, with a slightly increasing trend over the study period. The multivariate analysis showed that non-TO was an independent risk factor for prognosis among GBC patients after resection (P =0.003). Age ≤60 years (P =0.016), total bilirubin (TBIL) level ≤34.1 μmol/L (P <0.001), well-differentiated tumor (P =0.008), no liver involvement (P <0.001), and T1-2 stage disease (P =0.006) were independently associated with achieving a TO for GBC after resection. Before and after propensity score matching (PSM), the overall survival outcomes of non-TO GBC patients who received ACT and those who did not were statistically significant; ACT improved the prognosis of patients in the non-TO group (P <0.050). CONCLUSION Achieving a TO is associated with a better long-term prognosis among GBC patients after curative-intent resection, and ACT can improve the prognosis of those with non-TO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Hengchao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Qi Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Feng Xue
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Jialu Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi''an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710004, China
| | - Mengke Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Jiawei Yuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li J, Rocha FG, Mayo SC. Past, Present, and Future Management of Localized Biliary Tract Malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:83-99. [PMID: 36410923 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Most of the patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) present with advanced disease. Complete staging with multiphasic liver imaging is essential to determine the extent of disease. Operative goals should include a margin-negative resection, portal lymphadenectomy for staging, and sufficient remnant liver volume. Biliary tract malignancies have distinct mutational drivers (GBC and pCCA = ERBB2 in 20%; iCCA = fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 or isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 in 20%) amenable to therapy with inhibitors. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant, peri-operative, and adjuvant treatments continue to evolve and now include targeted inhibitors and the integration of hepatic arterial infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Southwest. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-619, Portland, OR 97239, USA. https://twitter.com/JanetLiMD
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of Surgery, Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-619, Portland, OR 97239, USA. https://twitter.com/FlavioRochaMD
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-619, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common cancer of the biliary tract, characterized by a very poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages owing to its aggressive behaviour and limited therapeutic options. Early detection at a curable stage remains challenging because patients rarely exhibit symptoms; indeed, most GBCs are discovered incidentally following cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. Long-standing chronic inflammation is an important driver of GBC, regardless of the lithiasic or non-lithiasic origin. Advances in omics technologies have provided a deeper understanding of GBC pathogenesis, uncovering mechanisms associated with inflammation-driven tumour initiation and progression. Surgical resection is the only treatment with curative intent for GBC but very few cases are suitable for resection and most adjuvant therapy has a very low response rate. Several unmet clinical needs require to be addressed to improve GBC management, including discovery and validation of reliable biomarkers for screening, therapy selection and prognosis. Standardization of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesion nomenclature, as well as surgical specimen processing and sampling, now provides reproducible and comparable research data that provide a basis for identifying and implementing early detection strategies and improving drug discovery. Advances in the understanding of next-generation sequencing, multidisciplinary care for GBC, neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, and novel systemic therapies including chemotherapy and immunotherapies are gradually changing the treatment paradigm and prognosis of this recalcitrant cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Roa
- Department of Pathology, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Patricia García
- Department of Pathology, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Vinay K Kapoor
- Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (MGMCH), Jaipur, India
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jill Koshiol
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vega EA, Mellado S, Salehi O, Freeman R, Conrad C. Treatment of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1413. [PMID: 35326566 PMCID: PMC8945892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract cancer worldwide and its incidence has significant geographic variation. A unique combination of predisposing factors includes genetic predisposition, geographic distribution, female gender, chronic inflammation, and congenital developmental abnormalities. Today, incidental GBC is the most common presentation of resectable gallbladder cancer, and surgery (minimally invasive or open) remains the only curative treatment available. Encouragingly, there is an important emerging role for systemic treatment for patients who have R1 resection or present with stage III-IV. In this article, we describe the pathogenesis, surgical and systemic treatment, and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A. Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | | | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|