The clinical breast exam: a skill that should not be abandoned

SENODAY: A New Perspective of Handling Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility of a same day breast cancer diagnosis and management protocol, consequently decreasing time to treatment and immediately reassuring patients with benign diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 women underwent breast exam during SENODAY in our cancer center between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients are first seen by a breast surgeon who mentions whether the patient's history and physical exam are suspicious of malignancy. Patients are then sent to the radiologist who performs a complete radiologic assessment, classifies the lesions, and performs a biopsy when necessary. The specimen is sent to the pathologist who uses the imprint cytology technique to obtain a preliminary diagnosis. Effective counseling is established in case of breast cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 60 women, 25 patients were reassured by breast imaging and 35 underwent histopathological analysis (17 patients with a 1-day protocol and 18 with the standard definitive technique). Clinical examination was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89.47%. The positive predictive value was 80 % and the negative predictive value was 100%. However, we did not find a strong correlation between imaging and definitive pathology. Moreover, on imprint cytology, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%. Finally, the mean time-to-treat was 28.6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

SENODAY reassured 68.3% of patients. It also offered effective counseling and a treatment plan to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients within 1 day. Same day histological diagnosis by imprint cytology is effective and feasible with an excellent accuracy.

Real-World Breast Cancer Patient Follow-Up Practices by Medical Oncologists in India-A Survey Report

Amol PatelBackground  In India, breast cancer patients' post-treatment follow-up practices are not known. We did this survey to understand how the breast cancer patients are followed-up and tried to explore the challenges associated with it. Methods  We conducted a survey-based study among Indian oncologists. Seven questions were framed pertaining to follow-up practices. Answers were provided in the form of multiple options. Google forms platform was used. Survey was circulated through social media apps and through mail. We sought suggestions and opinions to address the challenges from participants. Results  A total of 158 medical oncologists responded to this survey. 10% were not aware that only history and clinical examination are the scientific recommendations for follow-up. Ninety percent of the medical oncologists felt clinical breast examination as an uncomfortable practice for patients and physicians and 39% ordered a chest X-ray and an ultrasound abdomen. Annual mammogram was ordered by 83%, and blood investigations were recommended by 14% routinely. The majority (49.6%) felt that the absence of a female attendant, physician and patient factors were responsible for nonadherence to clinical breast examination. The DEXA scan was recommended by 84 (53%) medical oncologists regularly for patients on aromatase inhibitors, while 23 (14%) did not recommend it. Conclusion  There is a disparity between scientific recommendations and real-world follow-up practices. A large number of medical oncologists relied on chest X-ray and ultrasound abdomen. There is an unmet need to address this issue.

Immigrant assimilation and profiles of breast cancer screening behaviors among U.S. immigrant women

Previous researchers have shown that despite increased prevention and cancer risk awareness, many immigrant women do not receive cancer screenings in a timely manner. We use data from the National Health Interview Survey and Latent Class Analysis to characterize immigrant women in the U.S. in accordance to their risk of engaging in breast cancer prevention. We identify three latent profiles based on use of cancer screenings, sociodemographic characteristics, family cancer history, and immigrant acculturation. Our results show that cancer screening behaviors of immigrants are consistent with patterns of both classic and segmented assimilation, as well as with greater immigrant diversity.

Estimation of the benefit and harms of including clinical breast examination in an organized breast screening program

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the value of clinical breast examination (CBE) in addition to mammography for breast screening. The study investigates the associations between risk factors such as mammographic density, hormone therapy use and family history and the effectiveness of screening mammography with or without CBE.

METHODS

The cohort consists of women 50-69 years old screened at the Ontario Breast Screening Program. The associations of the risk factors were investigated using a joint logistic regression model that accommodates the partially unobserved disease status, clustered data structures, individual risk factors, and the dependence between true and false detection.

RESULTS

Having high mammographic density, a first degree relative with breast cancer and using hormone therapy generally increased a woman's probability of being referred correctly. For low risk group (defined as without dense breasts, family history, and not currently using hormone therapy), the average loss of specificity ranged from 3.6% to 5.7% and the gain of sensitivity was between 10.6% and 21.2% with the addition of CBE.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of CBE to mammography would increase the overall sensitivity and decrease the specificity. CBE can be targeted to those women in which it has the highest net benefit.

The impact of screening on cancer incidence and mortality in Missouri, USA, 2004-2013

OBJECTIVES

Population-based evidence regarding impact of cancer screenings and cancer rates in Missouri is lacking. This study examined whether screenings of breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer impact early-stage cancer incidence and mortality in Missouri.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an ecological study based on county-specific estimates of selected cancer screening prevalence and early-stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality.

METHODS

County-specific prevalence of clinical breast examination, mammography, Pap test, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) were generated from Missouri County-Level Study (2003, 2007, and 2011). County-specific crude incidence and mortality were calculated (2004-2013). Pearson's correlation and Poisson regression were used to test association between cancer rate and screening prevalence. Covariates included county-level mean age, percentage of whites, percentage with low income, percentage with less than high school education high school, percentage with no insurance, and percentage having difficulties accessing care.

RESULTS

In the adjusted model, 'ever had Pap test' was significantly associated with an increase of 8% in early-stage cervical cancer incidence. Having clinical breast examination or Pap test in the past was also associated with decreases in mortality by 3% and 4%, respectively, although the association was not significant for Pap test. In addition, having mammography was statistically significantly associated with early-stage breast cancer incidence, and having FOBT or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy was associated with decreased colorectal cancer mortality; however, magnitude for these associations was only around 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides ecological evidence of the effectiveness of screening services in predicting early stage cancer incidence and in reducing mortality across Missouri counties. Further incentive to promote these screenings in Missouri is needed.

To image or not in noncyclic breast pain? A systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Investigation of noncyclic mastalgia in women without signs or risk factors for cancer is controversial. An initial imaging strategy can diagnose breast cancer early, potentially leading to better treatment and survival. However, cancer diagnosis is very uncommon in these cases, and this approach can be harmful, as false positives or suspicion results will lead to unneeded interventions and follow-up. The purpose of this review is to analyse the trade-offs between desirable and undesirable consequences of initial imaging tests against clinical follow-up.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found seven relevant studies, all observational, with some methodological limitations and very low-quality evidence. They showed low breast cancer prevalence (around 1-2%, increasing with age), high sensitivity to rule out disease but moderate specificity to rule it in using mammography and echography, and lacked evidence on follow-up and final outcomes.

SUMMARY

There is a low prevalence of breast cancer in patients with painful breast with negative physical examination, and very little research to inform about the effect of performing or avoiding initial imaging test on outcomes of interest. With such limited evidence, only a weak recommendation to reinforce shared decision making about what should be done in the primary care setting can be made, with the backup of a specialized breast unit.

A Comparison of Compliance and Noncompliance in Breast Cancer Screening among African American Women

African American women are more likely to be diagnosed with late stage breast cancer, due in part to low participation in screening procedures. The purpose of this study was to explore the differences among African American women who were compliant and noncompliant with standard mammography screening recommendations. The study participants were African American women (N = 599) over the age of 40 with no history of cancer, who were recruited to attend a local community health event. Findings revealed that 78 percent of the women reported having had a mammogram within the past year, whereas 22 percent had not. The most commonly reported reasons given by those who did not have a mammogram in the past year were that they simply did not think to do so, or that they were not told to do so by their doctor. Women who reported that they did not have a mammogram last year were significantly less likely to have health insurance, to have had a clinical breast exam at their last checkup, to have had their breasts examined by their doctor at least once per year, or to have previously had a mammogram. There were no group differences in the number of visits to a doctor during the past 12 months. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for health care professionals and suggestions for future research.

The Impact of Primary Care Providers on Patient Screening Mammography and Initial Presentation in an Underserved Clinical Setting

INTRODUCTION

Cancer screening is a key component of primary care, and access to regular screening mammography (SMG) is highly dependent on recommendation and referral by a primary care provider (PCP). Women with no health insurance or who are underinsured often lack access to a regular PCP and thus access to routine screening.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 173 surgical patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2013. The main outcome variables were PCP status, method of cancer detection, and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Additional variables included race, age at diagnosis, family history of breast and ovarian cancer, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

Patients with a PCP received more mammograms (SMG) compared with patients without a PCP (61 vs. 37 %; p = 0.003). The majority (73 %) of patients without a PCP presented symptomatically with a palpable mass versus 42 % of patients with a PCP. A significant difference was noted with regard to final pathologic stage of breast cancer between the two groups (p = 0.019), and Caucasian and African American patients were more likely to have locally advanced breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Underserved patients with a PCP are more likely to present asymptomatically and at an earlier stage of breast cancer compared with patients without a PCP. Community engagement programs that build relationships with patients may help bring vulnerable patients into the healthcare system for routine screening. Moreover, PCP education regarding the subtleties of breast cancer screening guidelines and referral to a breast specialist is also critical in improving outcomes of underserved patients.

Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?

BACKGROUND

Screening clinical breast examination (cbe) is controversial; the use of cbe is declining not only as a screening tool, but also as a diagnostic tool. In the present study, we aimed to assess the value of cbe in breast cancer detection in a tertiary care centre for breast diseases.

METHODS

This retrospective study of all breast cancers diagnosed between July 1999 and December 2010 at our centre categorized cases according to the mean of detection (cbe, mammography, or both). A cbe was considered "abnormal" in the presence of a mass, nipple discharge, skin or nipple retraction, edema, erythema, peau d'orange, or ulcers.

RESULTS

During the study period, a complete dataset was available for 6333 treated primary breast cancers. Cancer types were ductal carcinoma in situ (15.3%), invasive ductal carcinoma (75.7%), invasive lobular carcinoma (9.0%), or others (2.2%). Of the 6333 cancers, 36.5% (n = 2312) were detected by mammography alone, 54.8% (n = 3470) by mammography and cbe, and 8.7% (n = 551) by physician-performed cbe alone (or 5.3% if considering ultrasonography). Invasive tumours diagnosed by cbe alone were more often triple-negative, her2-positive, node-positive, and larger than those diagnosed by mammography alone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of cancers would have been missed if cbe had not been performed. Compared with cancers detected by mammography alone, those detected by cbe had more aggressive features. Clinical breast examination is a very low-cost test that could improve the detection of breast cancer and could prompt breast ultrasonography in the case of a negative mammogram.

Do Primary Care Physician Perform Clinical Breast Exams Prior to Ordering a Mammogram?

Both the American Cancer Society and National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend annual clinical breast examination (CBE) along with screening mammogram (SM) for patients starting at 40 years of age. However, patients with a palpable breast mass should have a diagnostic mammogram (DM) during workup. Review at our institution demonstrated that 11% of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and self-identified breast mass had SM instead of DM. This led us to question whether primary care physicians (PCP) perform CBE prior to ordering mammography. As part of the routine preimaging screening, patients were asked if they had undergone breast examination by a medical provider prior to mammogram order. Data on mammogram type, ordering physician specialty, and presence of symptoms on day of mammogram were recorded. Of 6,109 mammograms, 4,823 were ordered by PCPs. CBE was performed prior to 67.2% SM and 64.8% DM (p = 0.12). OB/GYN performed statistically significantly higher CBE (81.6%) compared to internal (45.4%) and family (50.5%) medicine physicians (p < 0.001). Of patients with self-reported breast symptoms, 8.7% had SM ordered rather than DM. Despite recommendations, approximately 1/3 of women report not having CBE prior to mammogram. The chances of having a CBE varied significantly by PCP specialty. Lack of CBE can lead to incorrect type of mammogram, with possibly increased cost and delay in diagnosis. Further evaluation is needed to understand why CBE was not performed in some patients.

Limited adoption of current guidelines for clinical breast examination by primary care physician educators

BACKGROUND

In 2004, the CDC and the American Cancer Society (ACS) published performance guidelines recommending a validated method of clinical breast exams (CBE) using the vertical strips method (VSM) along with other key exam components. We examined the use of the VSM by academic medicine physicians and identified predictor variables for its adoption.

METHODS

Clinician educators in the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and physicians in the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) were administered web-based surveys on CBE practices in 2009.

RESULTS

A total of 1,772 (42%) physicians responded. Only 40% of respondents reported using the VSM, compared with 53% using the circular search method. Variables and their odds ratios (ORs) associated with an increase adoption of the VSM were having a primary teaching hospital affiliation (OR 1.4 [1.1, 1.9]), having taken a course on breast health or breast cancer in the past 5 years (OR 1.5 [1.1, 2.0]), and having completed residency in the past 5 years (OR 2.3 [1.6, 3.4]) and/or 10-15 years (OR 1.6 [1.2, 2.2]) compared to more than 15 years. The extent of teaching responsibilities was not associated with adoption of the VSM.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of physician responders highly involved in education of students and residents continue to practice methods of CBE that do not reflect the current guidelines. Faculty development and training on updated CBE practices may accelerate adoption of guideline-recommended care.

Cultural beliefs and clinical breast examination in Hmong American women: the crucial role of modesty

Despite grave cancer disparities in Hmong American women, investigation of the group's breast cancer screening behavior is sparse. This study examined how cultural factors are associated with breast cancer screening utilization, specifically clinical breast exam (CBE), in this population. One hundred and sixty-four Hmong American women between ages 18 and 67 were recruited from a large Midwestern metropolitan area with a median age of 28.0 years. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of cultural variables with receipt of CBE. Roughly 73% of Hmong American women reported ever having had a CBE. Logistic regression revealed that endorsing more modest views was the greatest barrier to ever having had a CBE. Age and language preference were also found to be significant predictors of past CBE use. Cultural factors should be considered in developing interventions aimed at promoting breast cancer screening in this population. In particular, Hmong American women who have less English proficiency and are relatively younger should be targeted in breast cancer screening efforts.

Imperfect correlation of mammographic and clinical breast tissue density

BACKGROUND

Clinicians determine degree of mammographic density based on tissue firmness on breast examination. The study aimed to compare breast density in mammography and clinical breast examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six-hundred sixty three women 40 years of age or older were studied. The breast exam density was graded from 1 to 4 by two expert surgeons and the mammographic parenchymal density by two expert radiologists. Then for practical reasons, grades 1 and 2 were considered as low-density and grades 3 and 4 as high-density.

RESULTS

High and low densities were detected in 84.5% and 15.5% of clinical breast examinations and 59.7% and 40.3% of mammographies, respectively. The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the breast tissue densities in breast examination with those in mammography.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinically dense breast does not necessarily imply a dense mammographic picture.