Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Persistent poverty and incidence-based melanoma mortality in Texas

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown that individuals living in areas with persistent poverty (PP) experience worse cancer outcomes compared to those living in areas with transient or no persistent poverty (nPP). The association between PP and melanoma outcomes remains unexplored. We hypothesized that melanoma patients living in PP counties (defined as counties with ≥ 20% of residents living at or below the federal poverty level for the past two decennial censuses) would exhibit higher rates of incidence-based melanoma mortality (IMM).

METHODS

We used Texas Cancer Registry data to identify the patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma or melanoma in situ (stages 0 through 4) between 2000 and 2018 (n = 82,458). Each patient's PP status was determined by their county of residence at the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

After adjusting for demographic variables, logistic regression analyses revealed that melanoma patients in PP counties had statistically significant higher IMM compared to those in nPP counties (17.4% versus 11.3%) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.35 (95% CI 1.25-1.47).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the relationship between persistent poverty and incidence-based melanoma mortality rates, revealing that melanoma patients residing in counties with persistent poverty have higher melanoma-specific mortality compared to those residing in counties with transient or no poverty. This study further emphasizes the importance of considering area-specific socioeconomic characteristics when implementing place-based interventions to facilitate early melanoma diagnosis and improve melanoma treatment outcomes.

Health Economic Consequences Associated With COVID-19-Related Delay in Melanoma Diagnosis in Europe

Importance

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delayed access to medical care. Restrictions to health care specialists, staff shortages, and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection led to interruptions in routine care, such as early melanoma detection; however, premature mortality and economic burden associated with this postponement have not been studied yet.

Objective

To determine the premature mortality and economic costs associated with suspended melanoma screenings during COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns by estimating the total burden of delayed melanoma diagnoses for Europe.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter economic evaluation used population-based data from patients aged at least 18 years with invasive primary cutaneous melanomas stages I to IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) seventh and eighth editions, including melanomas of unknown primary (T0). Data were collected from January 2017 to December 2021 in Switzerland and from January 2019 to December 2021 in Hungary. Data were used to develop an estimation of melanoma upstaging rates in AJCC stages, which was verified with peripandemic data. Years of life lost (YLL) were calculated and were, together with cost data, used for financial estimations. The total financial burden was assessed through direct and indirect treatment costs. Models were building using data from 50 072 patients aged 18 years and older with invasive primary cutaneous melanomas stages I to IV according to the AJCC seventh and eighth edition, including melanomas of unknown primary (T0) from 2 European tertiary centers. Data from European cancer registries included patient-based direct and indirect cost data, country-level economic indicators, melanoma incidence, and population rates per country. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to September 2022.

Exposure

COVID-19 lockdown-related delay of melanoma detection and consecutive public health and economic burden. As lockdown restrictions varied by country, lockdown scenario was defined as elimination of routine medical examinations and severely restricted access to follow-up examinations for at least 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were the total burden of a delay in melanoma diagnosis during COVID-19 lockdown periods, measured using the direct (in US$) and indirect (calculated as YLL plus years lost due to disability [YLD] and disability-adjusted life-years [DALYs]) costs for Europe. Secondary outcomes included estimation of upstaging rate, estimated YLD, YLL, and DALY for each European country, absolute direct and indirect treatment costs per European country, proportion of the relative direct and indirect treatment costs for the countries, and European health expenditure.

Results

There were an estimated 111 464 (range, 52 454-295 051) YLL due to pandemic-associated delay in melanoma diagnosis in Europe, and estimated total additional costs were $7.65 (range, $3.60 to $20.25) billion. Indirect treatment costs were the main cost driver, accounting for 94.5% of total costs. Estimates for YLD in Europe resulted in 15 360 years for the 17% upstaging model, ranging from 7228 years (8% upstaging model) to 40 660 years (45% upstaging model). Together, YLL and YLD constitute the overall disease burden, ranging from 59 682 DALYs (8% upstaging model) to 335 711 DALYs (45% upstaging model), with 126 824 DALYs for the real-world 17% scenario.

Conclusions and Relevance

This economic analysis emphasizes the importance of continuing secondary skin cancer prevention measures during pandemics. Beyond the personal outcomes of a delayed melanoma diagnosis, the additional economic and public health consequences are underscored, emphasizing the need to include indirect economic costs in future decision-making processes. These estimates on DALYs and the associated financial losses complement previous studies highlighting the cost-effectiveness of screening for melanoma.

Five-Year Outcomes of a Melanoma Screening Initiative in a Large Health Care System

Importance

Population-based skin cancer screening is currently not recommended owing to lack of data to quantify the balance of benefits and harms.

Objective

To compare thickness-specific incidence of melanoma in screened vs unscreened patients following the initiation of a primary care-based skin cancer screening initiative.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This observational study of a quality improvement initiative was conducted from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2018, among patients 35 years and older presenting for a primary care visit at primary care practices within an academic and community-based health care system during the study period. Data analysis was performed January 2020 to January 2022.

Interventions

Primary care clinicians were offered training in melanoma identification through skin examination and encouraged to offer annual screening to patients 35 years and older.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Thickness of melanomas diagnosed in screened and unscreened patients.

Results

Among 595 799 analyzed screen-eligible patients, 144 851 (24.3%) were screened at least once. Screened patients were older (median [IQR] age, 59 [49-67] vs 55 [45-66] years) and more likely to be female (82 244 [56.8%] vs 250 806 [55.6%]; P < .001) and non-Hispanic White (124 747 [86.1%] vs 375 890 [83.4%]; P < .001) than unscreened patients. After adjusting for age, sex, and race, screened patients were more likely than unscreened patients to be diagnosed with in situ (incidence, 30.4 vs 14.4; hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% CI, 2.1-3.1; P < .001) or thin invasive (≤1 mm) melanoma (incidence, 24.5 vs 16.1; HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2; P < .001). Screened patients were also more likely than unscreened patients to be diagnosed with in situ (incidence, 26.7 vs 12.9; HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.6; P < .001) or thin invasive (≤1 mm) interval melanomas (melanoma diagnosed at least 60 days after initial screening examination) (incidence, 18.5 vs 14.4; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7; P = .03). Incidence of melanoma thicker than 4 mm in unscreened and screened patients, respectively, was 3.3 and 2.7 (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.4; P = .38) for all melanomas and 2.7 and 1.5 (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2; P = .15) for interval melanomas.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this quality improvement study, primary care-based melanoma screening was associated with increased detection of thin melanoma, raising concern about overdiagnosis. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the influence of screening on the incidence of thick melanoma and outcomes associated with high costs and poor outcomes, such as metastasis.

The heterogeneity of population with high risk for melanoma and other skin cancer: a latent class analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether there is heterogeneity in the risk factors for skin cancer among the high-risk population in Slovenia, a Central European country with the second-largest age-standardized melanoma-related mortality rate in Europe.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected during the 'Euromelanoma Day' 2010-2019. The outcome was the prevalence of newly suspected skin cancer. The independent variables were 17 known risk factors and protective behaviors. We performed a latent class analysis with skin cancer as a covariate.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 1711 participants with a median (interquartile range) age of 52 (39-63) years, 52% of whom were women. During the 10 years, 81 cases of melanoma and 213 cases of other skin cancers were suspected. The model with three latent classes had the best fit. Two latent classes had a high risk for melanoma and other skin cancer: 3 and 19% respectively in class 2; 14 and 29% in class 3. The largest significant differences between the two high-risk classes were the older age and lower frequency of sunscreen use in high-risk class 2 and the number of atypical nevi, a large number of common moles, many moles as the primary motive to participate in Euromelanoma examination and having a skin phototype I or II in the highest-risk latent class 3.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the risk factors for skin cancer among the Euromelanoma high-risk population. This heterogeneity should be tested in other countries, and if the findings are consistent, they should be used to refine secondary prevention programs.

Melanoma in Singapore: A 20-year review of disease and treatment outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Melanomas in Asians have different clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis from melanomas in Caucasians. This study reviewed the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of cutaneous melanoma diagnosed at a tertiary referral dermatology centre in Singapore, which has a multiracial population. The study also determined whether Asians had comparable relapse-free and overall survival periods to Caucasians in Singapore.

METHOD

This is a retrospective review of cutaneous melanoma cases in our centre between 1996 and 2015.

RESULTS

Sixty-two cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 61 patients: 72.6% occurred in Chinese, 19.4% in Caucasians and 3.2% in Indians, with an over-representation of Caucasians. Superficial spreading melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma and nodular melanoma comprised 37.1%, 35.5% and 22.6% of the cases, respectively. The median time interval to diagnosis was longer in Asians than Caucasians; median Breslow's thickness in Asians were significantly thicker than in Caucasians (2.6mm versus 0.9mm, P=0.018) and Asians tend to present at a later stage. The mortality rates for Asians and Caucasians were 52% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

More physician and patient education on skin cancer awareness is needed in our Asian-predominant population for better outcomes.