Effect of the Patient-Centered Medical Home on Racial Disparities in Quality of Care

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Medical Home for Children Born Premature in the National Survey of Children's Health

OBJECTIVE

Children born premature are more likely to be from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and face chronic health and developmental problems. The medical home aims to comprehensively address health and social needs of all families. This study evaluates racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of a medical home among children born premature compared to children born full-term.

METHODS

A 2017-18 National Survey of Children's Health data set was used to calculate the medical home performance measure and subcomponents for children aged 0 to 17 born premature (n = 5633) or full-term (n = 45,819). Chi square and logistic regression assessed magnitude and significance of variations by race and ethnicity and prematurity status.

RESULTS

Prematurity prevalence differed by race and ethnicity (12.0% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], 12.8% Hispanic, 11.1% Multiracial/Other, 11.0% non-Hispanic White [NHW]). Minoritized children born premature had lower adjusted odds of receiving care in a medical home compared to NHW peers (eg, NHB adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.38-0.76] and Hispanic aOR 0.56 [95% CI: 0.40-0.79]). Differences were greater in magnitude among children born premature compared to full-term peers (eg, NHB premature aOR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.38-0.76] vs NHB full-term aOR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.58-0.78]), with similar results for "personal doctor/nurse" and "usual sick care."

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the medical home among children born premature, some more pronounced than full-term peers. To deliver equitable care for all children, efforts are needed to expand access to and improve the medical home, including reliable routine and sick care and stronger family-provider relationships.

To What Extent Are ACO and PCMH Models Advancing the Triple Aim Objective? Implications and Considerations for Primary Care Medical Practices

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) and patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) have emerged to advance the health care system by achieving the Triple Aim of improving population health, reducing costs, and enhancing the patient experience. This review examines evidence regarding the relationship between these innovative care models and care outcomes, costs, and patient experiences. The 28 articles summarized in this review show that ACO and PCMH models play an important role in achieving the Triple Aim, when compared with conventional care models. However, there can be drawbacks associated with model implementation. The long-term success of these models still merits further investigation.

Integrating Population Health Strategies into Primary Care: Impact on Outcomes and Hospital Use for Low-Income Adults

Objective

Our objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Community-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC).

Patients/Participants

All patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015.

Methods

Outcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data.

Main Outcomes

Diastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined.

Results

From 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04).

Conclusions

Integrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.

Telehealth: Opportunities to Improve Access, Quality, and Cost in Pediatric Care

The use of telehealth technology to connect with patients has expanded significantly over the past several years, particularly in response to the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This technical report describes the present state of telehealth and its current and potential applications. Telehealth has the potential to transform the way care is delivered to pediatric patients, expanding access to pediatric care across geographic distances, leveraging the pediatric workforce for care delivery, and improving disparities in access to care. However, implementation will require significant efforts to address the digital divide to ensure that telehealth does not inadvertently exacerbate inequities in care. The medical home model will continue to evolve to use telehealth to provide high-quality care for children, particularly for children and youth with special health care needs, in accordance with current and evolving quality standards. Research and metric development are critical for the development of evidence-based best practices and policies in these new models of care. Finally, as pediatric care transitions from traditional fee-for-service payment to alternative payment methods, telehealth offers unique opportunities to establish value-based population health models that are financed in a sustainable manner.

Patient centered dental home: Building a framework for dental quality measurement and improvement

INTRODUCTION

This article presents results of the second phase of a project to develop a patient-centered dental home (PCDH) model. Aims of PCDH model development include broadening the scope of prior dental home definitions to include populations across the lifespan, developing a quality measurement framework to facilitate quality assessment and improvement, and promoting opportunities for medical-dental integration through alignment with existing PCMH models. This phase determined the components, or conceptual subdivisions, associated with a previously developed PCDH definition and characteristics.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi process to obtain structured feedback and gain consensus among the project national advisory committee (NAC). The process included a web-based survey that asked NAC members to rank the importance of each potential component on a scale of 1-9. Criteria for consensus on component inclusion/exclusion combined a median rating and measure of disagreement. Respondents were also encouraged to provide open-ended feedback regarding rationale for component ratings and additional suggested components.

RESULTS

A total of 47 out of 51 members completed the survey. All 34 components met the quantitative criteria for inclusion in the PCDH model. Changes were made to components based on open-ended feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

This project phase further developed a PCDH measurement framework that aims to guide practice transformation, quality measurement and improvement in dental care delivery, as well as integration between medicine and dentistry. Using a Delphi approach with a broad group of stakeholders ensured that components had face validity and were conceptually aligned with the PCDH definition and characteristics.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Background

Insight in sex disparities in the detection of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes-related complications may improve diabetes care. The aim of this systematic review is to study whether sex disparities exist in the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications.

Methods

PubMed was systematically searched up to April 2020, followed by manual reference screening and citations checks (snowballing) using Google Scholar. Observational studies were included if they reported on the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors (HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, smoking status, or BMI) and/or screening for nephropathy, retinopathy, or performance of feet examinations, in men and women with diabetes separately. Studies adjusting their analyses for at least age, or when age was considered as a covariable but left out from the final analyses for various reasons (i.e. backward selection), were included for qualitative analyses. No meta-analyses were planned because substantial heterogeneity between studies was expected. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies was used to assess risk of bias.

Results

Overall, 81 studies were included. The majority of the included studies were from Europe or North America (84%).The number of individuals per study ranged from 200 to 3,135,019 and data were extracted from various data sources in a variety of settings. Screening rates varied considerably across studies. For example, screening rates for retinopathy ranged from 13% to 90%, with half the studies reporting screening rates less than 50%. Mixed findings were found regarding the presence, magnitude, and direction of sex disparities with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, with some evidence suggesting that women, compared with men, may be more likely to receive retinopathy screening and less likely to receive foot exams.

Conclusion

Overall, no consistent pattern favoring men or women was found with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, and screening rates can be improved for both sexes.