1
|
Mundt MP, McCarthy DE, Baker TB, Zehner ME, Zwaga D, Fiore MC. Cost-Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Primary Care Smoking Treatment Program. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:435-443. [PMID: 37844710 PMCID: PMC10922402 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and disease in the U.S. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness from a healthcare system perspective of a comprehensive primary care intervention to reduce smoking rates. METHODS This pragmatic trial implemented electronic health record prompts during primary care visits and employed certified tobacco cessation specialists to offer proactive outreach and smoking cessation treatment to patients who smoke. The data, analyzed in 2022, included 10,683 patients in the smoking registry from 2017 to 2020. Pre-post analyses compared intervention costs to treatment engagement, successful self-reported smoking cessation, and acute health care utilization (urgent care, emergency department visits, and inpatient hospitalization). Cost per quality-adjusted life year was determined by applying conversion factors obtained from the tobacco research literature to the cost per patient who quit smoking. RESULTS Tobacco cessation outreach, medication, and counseling costs increased from $2.64 to $6.44 per patient per month, for a total post-implementation intervention cost of $500,216. Smoking cessation rates increased from 1.3% pre-implementation to 8.7% post-implementation, for an incremental effectiveness of 7.4%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $628 (95% CI: $568, $695) per person who quit smoking, and $905 (95% CI: $822, $1,001) per quality-adjusted life year gained. Acute health care costs decreased by an average of $42 (95% CI: -$59, $145) per patient per month for patients in the smoking registry. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a comprehensive and proactive smoking cessation outreach and treatment program for adult primary care patients who smoke meets typical cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon P Mundt
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | - Danielle E McCarthy
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark E Zehner
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Deejay Zwaga
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Michael C Fiore
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plever S, Kisely S, Bonevski B, McCarthy I, Emmerson B, Ballard E, Anzolin M, Siskind D, Allan J, Gartner C. Can improvement in delivery of smoking cessation care be sustained in psychiatry inpatient settings through a system change intervention? An analysis of statewide administrative health data. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2023; 57:1375-1383. [PMID: 37038343 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231164566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated maintenance of improved delivery of smoking cessation assistance in adult acute psychiatry inpatient units 3 years post statewide implementation of a system change intervention through analysis of a statewide administrative health dataset. METHOD Rates of documenting smoking status and providing a brief smoking cessation intervention (the Smoking Cessation Clinical Pathway) in all eligible Queensland public adult acute psychiatry inpatient units (N = 57) during the implementation phase (October 2015-September 2017) of a system change intervention were compared to the maintenance phase (October 2017-October 2020) using interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS Across implementation and maintenance phases, the percentage of discharges from psychiatry inpatient units that had a smoking status recorded remained high with the statewide average exceeding 90% (implementation phase 93.2%, 95% confidence interval = [92.4, 93.9]; and maintenance phase 94.6%, 95% confidence interval = [94.0, 95.2]). The percentage of discharges statewide with a completed Pathway stabilised during the maintenance phase (change in slope -3.7%, 95% confidence interval = [-5.2, -2.3]; change in level 0.4%, 95% confidence interval = [-7.0, 7.9]). CONCLUSION An evidence-based smoking cessation intervention implemented with a system change intervention resulted in sustained improvement in addressing smoking in adult inpatient psychiatry units up to 3 years post implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Plever
- The QLD Mental Health Clinical Collaborative, Metro North Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame (Tobacco Endgame CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Steve Kisely
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Billie Bonevski
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame (Tobacco Endgame CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Irene McCarthy
- The QLD Mental Health Clinical Collaborative, Metro North Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brett Emmerson
- The QLD Mental Health Clinical Collaborative, Metro North Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emma Ballard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Melissa Anzolin
- The QLD Mental Health Clinical Collaborative, Metro North Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dan Siskind
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame (Tobacco Endgame CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - John Allan
- Mental Health Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Coral Gartner
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame (Tobacco Endgame CRE), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burns A, Gutta J, Kooreman H, Spitznagle M, Yeager VA. Strategic use of tobacco treatment specialists as an innovation for tobacco cessation health systems change within health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev 2023; 48:323-333. [PMID: 37615942 DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco screening interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving population health, yet many people who want to quit using tobacco lack access to professional assistance. One way to address this gap is to train members of the clinical team as tobacco treatment specialists (TTSs). PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to understand how TTSs have been used across a variety of health care organizations implementing health systems change for tobacco treatment and examine the sustainability of TTSs as a health systems change innovation for tobacco cessation. METHODOLOGY This study used qualitative interviews ( n = 25) to identify themes related to implementing TTSs as a health systems change innovation and examined these themes within the constructs of the theory of innovation implementation. RESULTS Insights about implementing TTSs as an innovation primarily aligned with four theoretical constructs: implementation policies and practices, implementation climate, innovation-values fit, and implementation effectiveness. Specific themes were perceived to facilitate the sustainability of TTSs including team-based TTS efforts, widespread awareness of TTS roles, leadership buy-in, and recognized value of TTS services. Barriers to sustainability included inadequate resources (e.g., time and staff), lack of tracking outcomes, inappropriate referrals, and lack of reimbursement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health care organizations planning to implement health systems change for tobacco cessation can encourage committed use of TTSs as an innovation by considering the insights provided in this study. These primarily related to five overarching implementation considerations: staff selection and training, tracking and dissemination of impacts, adequate resources, referrals and workflow, and billing and reimbursement.
Collapse
|
4
|
van Westen-Lagerweij NA, Willemsen MC, Croes EA, Chavannes NH, Meijer E. The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:654. [PMID: 37337250 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09692-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Ask-Advise-Connect approach can help primary care providers to increase the number of smokers that attempt to quit smoking and enrol into cessation counselling. The approach has not yet been implemented in general practice in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a comprehensive implementation strategy on the delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation within Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A pre-post study was conducted between late 2020 and early 2022, and included 106 Dutch primary care providers (GPs, practice nurses and doctor's assistants). Participation lasted nine months: during the first three months participants delivered smoking cessation care as usual (pre-intervention); the implementation strategy came into effect after three months and participants were followed up for another six months (post-intervention). The implementation strategy consisted of two meetings in which participants were educated about Ask-Advise-Connect, made agreements on the implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect and reflected on these agreements. Participants also received online educational materials and a desk card as reminder. The changes in the proportions of 'Ask' and 'Advise' over time were modelled using linear mixed effects models. A descriptive analysis was conducted with regard to referrals to cessation counselling. RESULTS Participants provided consultations to 29,112 patients (both smokers and non-smokers). Results of the linear mixed effects model show that the proportion of patients that were asked about smoking ('Ask') significantly decreased in the first three months (pre-intervention), but slightly increased again after the implementation strategy came into effect (post-intervention). No significant change over time was found with regard to the proportion of patients advised to quit smoking ('Advise'). Descriptive statistics suggested that more participants proactively (vs. passively) referred patients to cessation counselling post-intervention ('Connect'). CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that a comprehensive implementation strategy can support primary care providers in offering smoking cessation care to patients, even under stressful COVID-19 conditions. Additional implementation efforts are needed to increase the proportion of patients that receive a quit advice and proactive referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi A van Westen-Lagerweij
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc C Willemsen
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A Croes
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Meijer
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Westen-Lagerweij NA, Willemsen MC, Croes EA, Chavannes NH, Meijer E. Implementation of ask-advise-connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation using the CFIR framework. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:26. [PMID: 37161574 PMCID: PMC10169166 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00535-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach can help primary care providers to increase the number of people who attempt to quit smoking and enrol into cessation counselling. We implemented AAC in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we describe how AAC was received in Dutch general practice and assess which factors played a role in the implementation. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the implementation of AAC. Implementation took place between late 2020 and early 2022 among 106 Dutch primary care providers (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses and doctor's assistants). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through four online questionnaires. A descriptive analysis was conducted on the quantitative data. The qualitative data (consisting of answers to open-ended questions) were inductively analysed using axial codes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and interpret findings. RESULTS During the study, most participants felt motivated (84-92%) and able (80-94%) to apply AAC. At the end of the study, most participants reported that the AAC approach is easy to apply (89%) and provides advantages (74%). Routine implementation of the approach was, however, experienced to be difficult. More GPs (30-48%) experienced barriers in the implementation compared to practice nurses and doctor's assistants (7-9%). The qualitative analysis showed that especially external factors, such as a lack of time or priority to discuss smoking due to the COVID-19 pandemic, negatively influenced implementation of AAC. CONCLUSIONS Although AAC was mostly positively received in Dutch general practice, implementation turned out to be challenging, especially for GPs. Lack of time to discuss smoking was a major barrier in the implementation. Future efforts should focus on providing additional implementation support to GPs, for example with the use of e-health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi A van Westen-Lagerweij
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc C Willemsen
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A Croes
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Meijer
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sustained Effects of a Systems-Based Strategy for Tobacco Cessation Assistance. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:428-432. [PMID: 36376144 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary care settings that serve lower-income patients are critical for reducing tobacco-related disparities; however, tobacco-related care in these settings remains low. This study examined whether processes for the provision of tobacco cessation care are sustained 18 and 24 months after implementing a health system-level intervention consisting of electronic health record functionality changes and expansion of rooming staff roles. METHODS This nonrandomized stepped-wedge study included electronic health record data from adults with ≥1 primary care visit to 1 of 8 community-based clinics between August 2016 and September 2019. Generalized estimating equations methods were used to compute ORs of asking about tobacco use and among those who use tobacco, providing brief advice to quit and assessing readiness to quit, contrasting 18 and 24 months after implementation to both preimplementation (baseline) and 12 months after implementation. Using a 2-level model of patients clustered in clinics, outcomes were examined over time by clinic site. Analyses were conducted in 2022. RESULTS A total of 305,665 patient visits were evaluated. Significantly higher odds of all 3 outcomes were observed at 18 and 24 months than at baseline. The odds of asking about tobacco use increased, whereas the odds of advising to quit were similar at 18 and 24 months to those at 12 months. Odds of assessing readiness to quit decreased at 18 months (OR=0.71; 95% CI=0.63, 0.80) and 24 months (OR=0.46; 95% CI=0.40, 0.52). Performance varied significantly by clinical site. CONCLUSIONS Health system changes can have a sustained impact on tobacco assessment and the provision of brief advice among lower-income patients. Strategies to sustain assessment of readiness to quit are warranted.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bird JE, Nguyen CVT, Hohl SD, D’Angelo H, Pauk D, Adsit RT, Fiore M, Minion M, McCarthy D, Rolland B. Using information technology to integrate tobacco use treatment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Cancer Centers. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2023; 4:26334895231185374. [PMID: 37790167 PMCID: PMC10331328 DOI: 10.1177/26334895231185374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer patients who receive evidence-based tobacco-dependence treatment are more likely to quit and remain abstinent, but tobacco treatment programs (TTPs) are not consistently offered. In 2017, the U.S. National Cancer Institute, through the Cancer Moonshot, funded the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I). C3I supports 52 cancer centers to implement and expand evidence-based tobacco treatment in routine oncology care. Integration into routine care involves the use of health information technology (IT), including modifying electronic health records and clinical workflows. Here, we examine C3I cancer centers' IT leadership involvement and experiences in tobacco-dependence treatment implementation. Method This qualitative study of C3I-funded cancer centers integrated data from online surveys and in-person, semistructured interviews with IT leaders. We calculated descriptive statistics of survey data and applied content analysis to interview transcripts. Results Themes regarding IT personnel included suggestions to involve IT early, communicate regularly, understand the roles and influence of the IT team, and match program design with IT funding and resources. Themes regarding electronic health record (EHR) modifications included beginning modifications early to account for long lead time to make changes, working with IT to identify and adapt existing EHR tools for TTP or designing tools that will support a desired workflow developed with end-users, and working with IT personnel to make sure TTPs comply with system and state policies (e.g., privacy laws). Conclusions The experiences of C3I cancer centers regarding the use of health IT to enhance tobacco-dependence treatment program implementation can guide cancer centers and community oncology practices to potentially enhance TTP implementation and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E. Bird
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Claire VT Nguyen
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sarah D. Hohl
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Heather D’Angelo
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle Pauk
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert T. Adsit
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael Fiore
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mara Minion
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle McCarthy
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Betsy Rolland
- Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCarthy DE, Baker TB, Zehner ME, Adsit RT, Kim N, Zwaga D, Coates K, Wallenkamp H, Nolan M, Steiner M, Skora A, Kastman C, Fiore MC. A comprehensive electronic health record-enabled smoking treatment program: Evaluating reach and effectiveness in primary care in a multiple baseline design. Prev Med 2022; 165:107101. [PMID: 35636564 PMCID: PMC9990874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Effective treatments for smoking cessation exist but are underused. Proactive chronic care approaches may enhance the reach of cessation treatment and reduce the prevalence of smoking in healthcare systems. This pragmatic study evaluated a population-based Comprehensive Tobacco Intervention Program (CTIP) implemented in all (6) adult primary care clinics in a Madison, Wisconsin, USA healthcare cooperative, assessing treatment reach, reach equity, and effectiveness in promoting smoking cessation. CTIP launched in 3 waves of 2 clinics each in a multiple baseline design. Electronic health record (EHR) tools facilitated clinician-delivered pharmacotherapy and counseling; guiding tobacco care managers in phone outreach to all patients who smoke; and prompting multimethod bulk outreach to all patients on a smoking registry using an opt-out approach. EHR data were analyzed to assess CTIP reach and effectiveness among 6894 adult patients between January 2018 and February 2020. Cessation treatment reach increased significantly after CTIP launch in 5 of 6 clinics and was significantly higher when clinics were active vs. inactive in CTIP [Odds Ratio (OR) range = 2.0-3.0]. Rates of converting from current to former smoking status were also higher in active vs. inactive clinics (OR range = 2.2-10.5). Telephone treatment reach was particularly high in historically underserved groups, including African-American, Hispanic, and Medicaid-eligible patients. Implementation of a comprehensive, opt-out, chronic-care program aimed at all patients who smoke was associated with increases in the rates of pharmacotherapy and counseling delivery and quitting smoking. Proactive outreach may help reduce disparities in treatment access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E McCarthy
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA.
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Mark E Zehner
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Robert T Adsit
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Nayoung Kim
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Deejay Zwaga
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Katherine Coates
- Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin, 1265 John Q. Hammons Dr., Madison 53717, WI, USA
| | - Hannah Wallenkamp
- Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin, 1265 John Q. Hammons Dr., Madison 53717, WI, USA
| | - Margaret Nolan
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Margaret Steiner
- Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin, 1265 John Q. Hammons Dr., Madison 53717, WI, USA
| | - Amy Skora
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| | - Christian Kastman
- Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin, 1265 John Q. Hammons Dr., Madison 53717, WI, USA
| | - Michael C Fiore
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison 53711, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hitsman B, Matthews PA, Papandonatos GD, Cameron KA, Rittner SS, Mohanty N, Long T, Ackermann RT, Ramirez E, Carr J, Cordova E, Bridges C, Flowers-Carson C, Giachello AL, Hamilton A, Ciecierski CC, Simon MA. An EHR-automated and theory-based population health management intervention for smoking cessation in diverse low-income patients of safety-net health centers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:892-899. [PMID: 36205472 PMCID: PMC9540977 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This study tested the preliminary effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-automated population health management (PHM) intervention for smoking cessation among adult patients of a federally qualified health center in Chicago. Participants (N = 190; 64.7% women, 82.1% African American/Black, 8.4% Hispanic/Latino) were self-identified as smokers, as documented in the EHR, who completed the baseline survey of a longitudinal "needs assessment of health behaviors to strengthen health programs and services." Four weeks later, participants were randomly assigned to the PHM intervention (N = 97) or enhanced usual care (EUC; N = 93). PHM participants were mailed a single-page self-determination theory (SDT)-informed letter that encouraged smoking cessation or reduction as an initial step. The letter also addressed low health literacy and low income. PHM participants also received automated text messages on days 1, 5, 8, 11, and 20 after the mailed letter. Two weeks after mailing, participants were called by the Illinois Tobacco Quitline. EUC participants were e-referred following a usual practice. Participants reached by the quitline were offered behavioral counseling and nicotine replacement therapy. Outcome assessments were conducted at weeks 6, 14, and 28 after the mailed letter. Primary outcomes were treatment engagement, utilization, and self-reported smoking cessation. In the PHM arm, 25.8% of participants engaged in treatment, 21.6% used treatment, and 16.3% were abstinent at 28 weeks. This contrasts with no quitline engagement among EUC participants, and a 6.4% abstinence rate. A PHM approach that can reach all patients who smoke and address unique barriers for low-income individuals may be a critical supplement to clinic-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Hitsman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Phoenix A Matthews
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | | | - Kenzie A Cameron
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | - Nivedita Mohanty
- Alliance-Chicago, Chicago, IL 60654, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Timothy Long
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Alliance-Chicago, Chicago, IL 60654, USA
- Near North Health Service Corporation, Chicago, IL 60610, USA
| | - Ronald T Ackermann
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Edgardo Ramirez
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | - Emmanuel Cordova
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | | | - Aida Luz Giachello
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | | | - Melissa A Simon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D'Angelo H, Hohl SD, Rolland B, Adsit RT, Pauk D, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Reach and effectiveness of the NCI Cancer Moonshot-funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:688-692. [PMID: 35195268 PMCID: PMC9154282 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoking cessation results in improved cancer treatment outcomes. However, the factors associated with successful implementation of cessation programs in cancer care settings are not well understood. This paper presents the reach the reach and effectiveness of cessation programs implemented in NCI-Designated Cancer Centers in the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I). An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted among C3I Cancer Centers from July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 (N = 38). Reach was calculated as the proportion of patients reporting current smoking that received cessation treatment and was analyzed overall and by organizational characteristics. Smoking abstinence rates were determined by the proportion of participants self-reporting smoking abstinence in the previous 7 and 30 days at 6 months after treatment. On average, nearly 30% of patients who smoked received any cessation treatment. In-person counseling was most implemented but reached an average of only 13.2% of patients who smoked. Although less frequently implemented, average reach was highest for counseling provided via an interactive voice response system (55.8%) and telephone-based counseling (18.7%). Reach was higher at centers with more established programs, electronic health record referral systems, and higher smoking prevalence. At 6-month follow-up, about a fifth of participants on average had not smoked in the past 7 days (21.7%) or past 30 days (18.6%). Variations in reach by organizational characteristics suggest that leadership engagement and investment in technology-facilitated programs may yield higher levels of reach. Understanding which implementation and intervention strategies facilitate greater cessation treatment reach and effectiveness could lead to improved outcomes among cancer patients who smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather D'Angelo
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sarah D Hohl
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Betsy Rolland
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert T Adsit
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle Pauk
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael C Fiore
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chung K, Rafferty H, Suen LW, Vijayaraghavan M. System-Level Quality Improvement Initiatives for Tobacco Use in a Safety-Net Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13:21501319221107984. [PMID: 35748431 PMCID: PMC9234926 DOI: 10.1177/21501319221107984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The shift from in-person care to telemedicine made it challenging
to provide guideline-recommended tobacco cessation care during
the COVID-19 pandemic. We described quality improvement (QI)
initiatives for tobacco cessation during the COVID-19 pandemic,
focusing on African American/Black patients with high smoking
rates. Methods: The QI initiatives took place in the San Francisco Health Network,
a network of 13 safety-net clinics in San Francisco, California
between February 2020 and February 2022. We conducted direct
patient outreach by telephone and increased staff capacity to
increase cessation care delivery. We examined trends in tobacco
screening, provider counseling, and best practice for cessation
care (ie, the proportion of patients receiving at least 1
smoking cessation service during a clinical encounter). Results: In-person visits at the onset of the pandemic was 20% in April 2020
and increased to 67% by February 2022. During this time, tobacco
screening increased from 29% to 74%. From March 2020 to March
2021, 34% more patients received provider counseling by
telephone than in-person. The trend reversed from April 2021 to
February 2022, where 23% more patients received counseling
in-person than by telehealth. Best practice care increased by
23% from June 2020 to February 2022: 24% for African
American/Black patients and 23% for other patients. Conclusions: Telehealth adaptations to the EHR, targeted outreach to patients,
and a multi-disciplinary medical team may be associated with
increases in cessation care delivery during the COVID-19
pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Chung
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Henry Rafferty
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leslie W Suen
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,San Francisco Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flocke SA, Albert EL, Lewis SA, Seeholzer EL, Bailey SR. Characteristics of Patients Engaging in Quitline Counseling After an Electronic Referral. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61:e191-e195. [PMID: 34134884 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proactive, electronic referral of primary care patients to quitlines has great potential to provide evidence-based tobacco-cessation assistance to tobacco users. However, the quitline contact rates and engagement of individuals beyond 1 counseling call are poor. This study examines the characteristics of electronically referred patients who engage with the quitline. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 2,407 primary care patients who reported using tobacco and accepted an electronic referral to the quitline. Outcomes included contact, enrollment, and receipt of ≥2 counseling sessions from the quitline. All measures were assessed from the electronic health record. The association of patient characteristics and outcomes was evaluated using logistic regression modeling with generalized estimating equation methods. Data were collected in 2016‒2018 and were analyzed in 2020. RESULTS Among 2,407 referred patients, 794 (33.0%) were contacted; of those, 571 enrolled (71.9%); and of those, 240 (42.0%) engaged in ≥2 quitline counseling sessions. In multivariable analyses, older adults (aged 50-64 and ≥65 years) were significantly more likely to be contacted (OR=2.32, 95% CI=1.6, 3.4) and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.2, 4.7) than those aged 18-34 years. Those with both Medicare and Medicaid insurance coverage were more likely than those with Medicaid only to be contacted (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.4, 2.2), to enroll (OR=1.84, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9), and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS The current quitline phone-based approach is less likely to engage younger adults and those with Medicaid coverage; however, there is a need to improve quitline engagement across all patients. Identification and testing of alternative engagement approaches are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan A Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Elizabeth L Albert
- School of Medicine, Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven A Lewis
- Population Health Research Institute, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eileen L Seeholzer
- Population Health Research Institute, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steffani R Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Flocke SA, Albert EL, Lewis SA, Love TE, Rose JC, Kaelber DC, Seeholzer EL. A cluster randomized trial evaluating a teachable moment communication process for tobacco cessation support. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:85. [PMID: 33947346 PMCID: PMC8097804 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01423-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction This study examines the uptake of a clinician-focused teachable moment communication process (TMCP) and its impact on patient receipt of tobacco cessation support. The TMCP is a counseling method that uses patient concerns to help clinicians guide behavior change discussions about tobacco. We evaluate the added value of the TMCP training in a health system that implemented an Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) systems-based approach. Methods A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included eight community health centers. Training involved a web module and onsite skill development with standardized patients and coaching. Main outcome measures included contact and enrollment in cessation services among patients referred for counseling, prescription of cessation medications and quit attempts. Results Forty-four of 60 eligible clinicians received the TMCP training. Among TMCP-trained clinicians 68% used a TMCP approach (documented by flowsheet use) one or more times, with the median number of uses being 15 (IQR 2–33). Overall, the TMCP was used in 661 out of 8198 visits by smokers (8%). There was no improvement in any of the tobacco cessation assistance outcomes for the AAC + TMCP vs. the AAC only period. Visits where clinicians used the TMCP approach were associated with increased ordering of tobacco cessation medications, (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.9, 3.5) and providing advice to quit OR 3.2 (95% CI 2.2, 4.7). Conclusions Despite high fidelity to the training, uptake of the TMCP approach in routine practice was poor, making it difficult to evaluate the impact on patient outcomes. When the TMCP approach was used, ordering tobacco cessation medications increased. Implications Tobacco cessation strategies in primary care have the potential to reach a large portion of the population and deliver advice tailored to the patient. The poor uptake of the approach despite high training fidelity suggests that additional implementation support strategies, are needed to increase sustainable adoption of the TMCP approach. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02764385, registration date 06/05/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan A Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science, University, 3800 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. .,Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Elizabeth L Albert
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steven A Lewis
- Population Health Research Institute, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Center for Health Care Research and Policy, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA
| | - Thomas E Love
- Population Health Research Institute, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Center for Health Care Research and Policy, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Department of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeanmarie C Rose
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David C Kaelber
- Population Health Research Institute, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eileen L Seeholzer
- Population Health Research Institute, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Center for Health Care Research and Policy, MetroHealth System, OH, Cleveland, USA.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|