Grundy Q, Held F, Hart D, Baugh CM, Ladd E, Campbell E, Bero L. Characteristics of Advanced Practice Nurses Receiving Top Industry Payments and Their Practice Settings: a Cross-sectional Study.
J Gen Intern Med 2024;
39:1142-1148. [PMID:
37962732 PMCID:
PMC11116350 DOI:
10.1007/s11606-023-08508-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The pharmaceutical industry promotes prescribing through the cultivation of key opinion leaders. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) are a growing and influential group of prescribers across generalist and specialty practice. Public reporting of industry payments to APNs allows for exploration of their influence within practice settings.
OBJECTIVE
To understand the characteristics of APNs with top industry payments including their positions of influence and other payment recipients at the same address.
DESIGN AND SETTING
Cross-sectional study of US national Open Payments reports of industry payments made between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021.
PARTICIPANTS
APNs who received > $50,000 USD in industry payments for speaking, consulting, and honoraria ("personal fees").
MEASURES
Description of top APN recipients' practice setting type, clinical specialty, presence of other payment recipients, value of payments attributed to the same address, and top manufacturers and therapeutic categories associated with payments to top APN recipients. Structured content analysis of public-facing websites for evidence of APNs' clinical, research, and teaching leadership.
RESULTS
A total of 99 APNs received > $50,000 USD in aggregate personal fees and a median $74,080 USD (IQR $57,303-101,702) in aggregate payments. They shared a practice setting with a median of 1 (IQR 0-5) physician and 0 (IQR 0-3) other APN payment recipients and were often the only (39%, 42/109) or the dominant (45%, 30/67) payment recipient in their practice setting. In total, 36% held clinical leadership positions, 25% led scientific research, and 18% had university appointments. Forty-two percent (37/88) owned a clinical practice, including cosmetic clinics (51%, 19/37) and mental/behavioral health clinics (24%, 9/37).
CONCLUSIONS
Top APN payment recipients attracted high-value payments in practice settings and specialities associated with high-cost drug development; however, there may be little oversight of APNs' industry relationships. Policy development related to industry relationships must be inclusive of and responsive to the activities of interprofessional providers.
Collapse