1
|
Hussain KHH, Al Shmanee MZ, Taha FH, Samara KA, Barqawi HJ, Dash NR. Perception, Usability, and Satisfaction with Telemedicine in the United Arab Emirates. Telemed J E Health 2024. [PMID: 39072672 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has become a global tool for enhancing health care accessibility. However, its widespread adoption is still limited by technological illiteracy, lack of appropriate devices, slow internet services, and privacy concerns. In the Middle East and North Africa, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE), there is a dearth of telemedicine research. This study aimed to understand the perceptions and satisfaction levels of the UAE population regarding telemedicine. Methods: Between June and September 2023, a cross-sectional study was undertaken, using an online questionnaire distributed among UAE citizens and residents aged 18 years and above. The survey aimed to gauge the perceptions, usability, and satisfaction levels of telemedicine users, alongside identifying barriers hindering its acceptance. Data analysis was performed using Python 3, using Matplotlib v3.3.4 and Pandas v1.2. Results: The data analysis encompassed 1,013 participants, among whom 66.9% (678/1,013) were familiar with telemedicine. From this group, 29.8% (202/678) had previously utilized it. Of these users, 92.3% (186/202) found it to be useful or highly useful, whereas 83.1% (168/202) expressed overall satisfaction with their telemedicine experience. Among those who had not used telemedicine (47%, 476/1,013), the predominant concerns were a preference for in-person health care consultations for better care (77%, 367/476) and uncertainty about the quality of care offered through telemedicine (62%, 296/476). Conclusions: Despite high awareness of telemedicine in the UAE, its actual usage remains limited, highlighting the necessity for increased promotional efforts. Nevertheless, positive feedback suggests considerable potential for broad adoption. Future studies should address participants' concerns to enhance telemedicine utilization in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marwah Zakariya Al Shmanee
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, Unites Arab Emirates
| | - Fatima Husni Taha
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kamel Aladdein Samara
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Hiba Jawdat Barqawi
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Nihar Ranjan Dash
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee M, Tsai MH, Tillewein H, Luckey GS. Rural-Urban Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Adults with Cancer. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:1539-1548. [PMID: 38301205 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes in health care delivery worldwide, including the widespread adoption of telemedicine. This study examines the prevalence of telemedicine use among cancer survivors in the United States based on rurality and investigates its association with telemedicine use. Methods: The 2021 National Health Interview Survey was used to analyze telemedicine use among cancer survivors during the pandemic. Telemedicine use was the primary outcome, and rurality was the main exposure. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association. Results: Out of 27,500 eligible cancer survivors, 51.6% reported using telemedicine in 2021. Telemedicine usage varied across rural areas, with 41.4% of rural cancer survivors using telemedicine compared with 57.5% of cancer survivors in large metropolitan areas (p < 0.001). Rural cancer survivors had significantly lower odds of using telemedicine during the pandemic compared with large metropolitan cancer survivors. Cancer survivors residing in rural areas were 0.56 times less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.75), and those residing in medium and small metropolitan areas were 0.69 times less likely (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.56-0.86) to report telemedicine use compared with cancer survivors in large metropolitan areas. Conclusions: Substantial disparities in telemedicine use were observed between rural and urban areas among cancer survivors. Rural cancer survivors were less likely to utilize telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ensuring equitable access to telemedicine requires continued reimbursement for telemedicine services, along with additional efforts to improve access to and utilization of health care for rural cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjee Lee
- Department of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
- Simmons Cancer Institute at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Meng-Han Tsai
- Georgia Prevention Institute, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Cancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Heather Tillewein
- Department of Health and Human Performance, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Georgia S Luckey
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Slightam C, SooHoo S, Greene L, Zulman DM, Kimerling R. Development and Validation of a Measure to Assess Patient Experiences With Video Care Encounters. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e245277. [PMID: 38578639 PMCID: PMC10998154 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance As video-based care expands in many clinical settings, assessing patient experiences with this care modality will help optimize health care quality, safety, and communication. Objective To develop and assess the psychometric properties of the video visit user experience (VVUE) measure, a patient-reported measure of experiences with video-based technology. Design, Setting, and Participants In this survey study, veterans completed a web-based, mail, or telephone survey about their use of Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) virtual care between September 2021 and January 2022. The survey was completed by patients who reported having a VHA video visit on their own device or a VHA-issued device and linked to VHA utilization data for the 6 months following the survey. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The survey included 19 items about experiences with video visits that were rated using a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). First, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the factor structure and parsimonious set of items, using the McDonald Omega test to assess internal consistency reliability. Then, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test structural validity, and bivariate correlations between VVUE and VHA health care engagement were calculated to test concurrent validity. Finally, predictive validity was assessed using logistic regression to determine whether VVUE was associated with future VHA video visit use. Results Among 1887 respondents included in the analyses, 83.2% (95% CI, 81.5%-84.8%) were male, 41.0% (95% CI, 38.8%-43.1%) were aged 65 years or older, and the majority had multiple chronic medical and mental health conditions. The exploratory factor analysis identified a 10-item single-factor VVUE measure (including questions about satisfaction, user-centeredness, technical quality, usefulness, and appropriateness), explaining 96% of the total variance, with acceptable internal consistency reliability (ω = 0.95). The confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed a single-factor solution (standardized root mean squared residual = 0.04). VVUE was positively associated with VHA health care engagement (ρ = 0.47; P < .001). Predictive validity models demonstrated that higher VVUE measure scores were associated with future use of video visits, where each 1-point increase on VVUE was associated with greater likelihood of having a video visit in subsequent 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study of veterans using video visits suggest that a brief measure is valid to capture veterans' experiences receiving VHA virtual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindie Slightam
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
| | - Sonya SooHoo
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
| | - Liberty Greene
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Donna M. Zulman
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rachel Kimerling
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
- National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tierney AA, Mosqueda M, Cesena G, Frehn JL, Payán DD, Rodriguez HP. Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:622-641. [PMID: 37707997 PMCID: PMC10924064 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine systems were rapidly implemented in response to COVID-19. However, little is known about their effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability for safety net populations. This study systematically reviewed primary care telemedicine implementation and effectiveness in safety net settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles on telemedicine implementation from 2013 to 2021. The search was done between June and December 2021. Included articles focused on health care organizations that primarily serve low-income and/or rural populations in the United States. We screened 244 articles from an initial search of 343 articles and extracted and analyzed data from N = 45 articles. Results: Nine (20%) of 45 articles were randomized controlled trials. N = 22 reported findings for at least one marginalized group (i.e., racial/ethnic minority, 65 years+, limited English proficiency). Only n = 19 (42%) included African American/Black patients in demographics descriptions, n = 14 (31%) LatinX/Hispanic patients, n = 4 (9%) Asian patients, n = 4 (9%) patients aged 65+ years, and n = 4 (9%) patients with limited English proficiency. Results show telemedicine can provide high-quality primary care that is more accessible and affordable. Fifteen studies assessed barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Common barriers were billing/administrative workflow disruption (n = 9, 20%), broadband access/quality (n = 5, 11%), and patient preference for in-person care (n = 4, 9%). Facilitators included efficiency gains (n = 6, 13%), patient acceptance (n = 3, 7%), and enhanced access (n = 3, 7%). Conclusions: Telemedicine is an acceptable care modality to deliver primary care in safety net settings. Future studies should compare telemedicine and in-person care quality and test strategies to improve telemedicine implementation in safety net settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron A. Tierney
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Mariana Mosqueda
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Cesena
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Frehn
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Denise D. Payán
- Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hector P. Rodriguez
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verma H, Hasegawa D, Tepper DL, Burger AP, Weissman MA. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth at an Academic Medical Center Primary Care Clinic. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:103-107. [PMID: 37327015 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the quality of the patient experience differs between video visits and in-person visits for primary care. Methods: Using patient satisfaction survey results from patients who had visits with the internal medicine faculty primary care practice at a large urban academic hospital in New York City from 2018 to 2022, we compared results regarding satisfaction with the clinic, physician, and ease of access to care between patients who attended a video visit and those who attended an in-person appointment. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in patient experience. Results: In total, 9,862 participants were included in analysis. Mean age of respondents attending in-person visits was 59.0; mean age of respondents attending telemedicine visits was 56.0. There was no statistically significant difference in scores between the in-person and telemedicine groups for likelihood of recommending the practice to others, quality of time spent with the doctor, and how well the clinical team explained care. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the telemedicine group compared with the in-person group for ability to get an appointment when needed (4.48 ± 1.00 vs. 4.34 ± 1.04, p < 0.001), how helpful and courteous the person who assisted them was (4.64 ± 0.83 vs. 4.61 ± 0.79, p = 0.009), and ease of reaching the office through phone (4.55 ± 0.97 vs. 4.46 ± 0.96, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated parity in patient satisfaction for traditional in-person visits and telemedicine visits in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Verma
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daisuke Hasegawa
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA
| | - Danielle L Tepper
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alfred P Burger
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew A Weissman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Těšinová JK, Dobiášová K, Dušek Z, Tobiášová A. Development of telemedicine in the Czech Republic from patients' and other key stakeholders' perspective. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1202182. [PMID: 37937075 PMCID: PMC10626478 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Telemedicine is a way to improve healthcare outcomes with greater efficiency for both patients and care providers. The great potential of digital technologies also lies in strengthening the patient-centered approach. The early successes and benefits of telemedicine in the Czech Republic, amplified by the COVID-19, have contributed to the fact that wider implementation of telemedicine is already generally supported at the expert and public levels. Our research focuses on the identification of key issues in the implementation of telemedicine and the challenges of telemedicine in the future, from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders. The study is based on a qualitative research approach, combining focus groups with key stakeholders, patient panels and expert panels (2021-2022). The lack of rules and uncoordinated development of various activities proved to be the main barriers to the integration of telemedicine in the health system. This regulatory uncertainty can generate a number of problems in the patient-doctor relationship in practice, including ethical ones, and can also lead to inequalities in access to healthcare and affect the overall quality of care provided. Furthermore, it has been shown that patients' interests in the implementation of telemedicine are: 1. a predictable and reliable framework that guarantees them certainty and security in the provision of telemedicine services, 2. telemedicine solutions that increase the availability and efficiency of the care provided while bringing comfort, and 3. user-friendly and simple solutions. At the same time, patients want to understand the new environment and be active participants in the process of digital innovation, including the practical implementation of telemedicine. The research team has developed recommendations for further developments in the implementation of telemedicine that reflect the patient's interest and can be implemented at three levels - the health system, institutional, and community level. In countries with a well-developed and institutionalized patient movement, the community level can be represented by patient organizations, thus becoming the link between telemedicine policy making and implementation at the individual level of healthcare provision. For the further development of telemedicine, the development of a national strategy involving all key stakeholders, including patients, in the implementation has proven essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolana Kopsa Těšinová
- Institute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Karolína Dobiášová
- Institute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | | | - Alena Tobiášová
- Institute of Public Health and Medical Law, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pogorzelska K, Marcinowicz L, Chlabicz S. Understanding satisfaction and dissatisfaction of patients with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory qualitative study in primary care. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293089. [PMID: 37847684 PMCID: PMC10581451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare organizations had to face challenging circumstances and modify the usual modality of service provision, introducing telehealth services in their routine patient care to lessen the risk of direct human-to-human exposure. Patients expressed concerns about personal visits to healthcare units and the possibility of accessing telemedicine turned out to be an effective tool for the continuity of care. Due to the limited experience with telemedicine before the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland, we sought to fill this gap by studying the experiences of Polish patients. Our study aimed to understand how patients define satisfaction and dissatisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary care. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty semi-structured interviews with primary care patients in the Podlaskie Voivodeship, Poland were conducted to understand satisfaction with telemedicine. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The qualitative content analysis process involved familiarizing ourselves with the data, extracting text regarding satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the teleconsultation, condensing it into meaningful units assigning codes to them, and organizing codes into subcategories and categories. The entire analysis process was done through reflection and discussion until a consensus was reached between the researchers. RESULTS From the participants' perspective, satisfaction with telemedicine was associated with receiving enough space to express their concerns. It was reported that they trusted their primary care physicians and felt comfortable during telemedicine consultations. Participants noted that connecting with a known, trusted doctor was more important than having a face-to-face visit with an unfamiliar physician. In our study, the participants equated satisfaction with treatment effectiveness. It was emphasized that in the event of unknown or unstable conditions, patients would prefer to be seen in person and receive a physical examination. CONCLUSION In our research telemedicine met with a positive reception and was recognized by the majority of patients who made use of it as a valuable channel of contact with a primary care physician. In order to increase the level of patient satisfaction, the focus should be on improving aspects such as physician engagement and showing empathy during telemedicine, as well as providing complete, exhaustive information on the treatment process. Respecting patient needs and preferences during performing telemedicine visits is the goal of patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Pogorzelska
- Department of Family Medicine, The Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Ludmila Marcinowicz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Maternity Care, The Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Slawomir Chlabicz
- Department of Family Medicine, The Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johnson EE, Kruis R, Verdin R, Wells E, Ford DW, Sterba KR. Development of an Implementation Science Telehealth Toolkit to Promote Research Capacity in Evaluation of Telehealth Programs. TELEMEDICINE REPORTS 2023; 4:286-291. [PMID: 37817872 PMCID: PMC10561742 DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Background The field of telehealth is rapidly growing and expanding access to quality health care, although there have been varied implementation outcomes in telehealth modalities. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research can provide a systematic approach to identifying barriers and facilitators to telehealth implementation processes and outcomes. Methods An interdisciplinary research and clinical team developed an implementation science telehealth toolkit to guide D&I evaluations of new and existing telehealth innovations. Results The toolkit includes a separate section to correspond to each step in the D&I evaluation process. Each section includes resources to guide evaluation steps, telehealth specific considerations, and case study examples based on three completed telehealth evaluations. Discussion The field of telehealth is forecasted to continue to expand, with potential to increase health care access to populations in need. This toolkit can help guide health care stakeholders to develop and carry out evaluations to improve understanding of telehealth processes and outcomes to maximize implementation and sustainability of these valuable innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E. Johnson
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan Kruis
- Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca Verdin
- Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Elana Wells
- Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Dee W. Ford
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R. Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Campanozzi LL, Gibelli F, Bailo P, Nittari G, Sirignano A, Ricci G. The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: A literature review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1109323. [PMID: 36891330 PMCID: PMC9986277 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare in the third millennium is largely delivered through systems involving the use of the technological devices and services, foremost among them telemedicine. For the adequate delivery of digital medicine services, however, it is necessary for users to be digitally literate, that is, able to consciously make use of technology. In order to understand how relevant digital literacy is in determining the effectiveness of e-Health services, we performed a traditional literature review on 3 major databases by combining the terms "Digital Literacy" and "Computer Literacy" with the terms "Telemedicine" and "Telehealth". Starting from an initial library of 1,077 papers, we selected 38 articles. At the outcome of the search, we found that digital literacy is a pivotal element in conditioning the effectiveness of telemedicine and digital medicine services in general, however, with some limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Filippo Gibelli
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Paolo Bailo
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Giulio Nittari
- Telemedicine and Telepharmacy Centre, School of Medicinal and Health Products Sciences, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Ascanio Sirignano
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Giovanna Ricci
- Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|