Lower limb fracture presentations at a regional hospital

Effect of Video-Assisted Isometric Strengthening Exercise Program on Pain and Muscle Strength Poststabilization of Lower Limb Fracture

The benefits of isometric strengthening exercises (ISEs) are compromised when patient teaching on ISEs is delayed and/or ineffectively delivered due to healthcare resources constraint, especially when health resources are stretched, as occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to examine the effect of a video-assisted ISE program on pain and muscle strength of patients following surgical stabilization of lower limb fracture. A quasi-experimental study with repeated measures was employed. Primary study outcomes were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory and Manual Muscle Test. Effects over time were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. In comparison with usual care group (n = 32), the intervention group (n = 33) showed better pain reduction over time (p < .001, effect size [ES] = 0.39-1.77) and muscle strength preservation (p < .05; ES = 0.8-0.9). Patient acceptance of the intervention was favorable. Integration of video clips into patient teaching on ISEs is potentially beneficial in managing pain and muscle strength; it can be easily deployed to aid early ISE initiation.

Comparison of epidemiologic features between upper and lower limb injuries and risk factors for intensive care unit admission in a university hospital affiliated with the National Trauma Registry of Iran

PURPOSE

Upper extremity injuries (UEIs) and lower extremity injuries (LEIs) constitute a considerable component of traumas. However, their epidemiologic differences and short-term in-hospital outcomes are not fully elucidated. This study aims to compare such discrepancies in a large-scale study.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients with UEIs and/or LEIs hospitalized from 24th July 2016 to 16th May 2020 in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, and registered at the National Trauma Registry of Iran were enrolled in the study. Relevant demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the National Trauma Registry of Iran database. Patients were grouped into either UEI or LEI. For those with concomitant UEIs and LEIs, the more severe one based on the abbreviated injury scale was defined as the principal diagnosis. In addition, cases with the abbreviated injury scale > 3 for both UEI and LEI or concomitant injuries to body areas other than the limbs were excluded. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, quintile regression models, and logistic regression models with "margins" command were used for statistical analyses, as indicated.

RESULTS

In this research, 3170 eligible cases were identified. For the LEI group, there was a much higher proportion of male patients (86.7% vs. 82.0%) and higher mean age (years, 42.9 vs. 35.3) compared to the UEI group (both p < 0.001). Patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 - 15 were outnumbered in the LEI group (22.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of those with an ISS < 9 was higher in the UEI group (98.1% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.001). The multiple logistic regression model showed a statistically significant association between intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ISS (odds ratio (OR) = 4.01 for ISS 9 - 15 vs. ISS <9, 95% confidence interval (CI)|: 3.01 - 5.35; OR = 17.65 for ISS ≥16 vs. ISS < 9, 95% CI: 4.03 - 77.27), age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.03), cause of injury (OR = 0.27 for blunt trauma vs. road traffic crash, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.90; OR = 0.49 for cut/stab injuries vs. road traffic crash, 95% CI: 0.28 - 0.84) and body region (OR = 1.65 for lower extremity, 95% CI: 1.19 - 2.29). Having adjusted for other covariates, the odds of ICU admission in patients with LEIs was 1.65 times the odds in patients with UEIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LEIs were older and suffered from more severe injuries. In addition, the age- and ISS-adjusted ICU admission and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in LEI patients. The chance of ICU admission was associated with age, cause of injury, ISS, and body region. The findings of this study can aid in the meticulous selection of ICU-candidate patients. In addition, the role of factors other than ISS and age in ICU admission and prolongation of hospitalization should be addressed by prospective studies.

Impacts of Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Combined with General Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask on the Patients with Lower Extremity Fractures

Objective

Surgical reduction is the leading approach to patients with lower extremity fractures. The options of anesthetic drugs during surgery are of great significance to postoperative recovery of patients. There is no consensus on the optimum anesthesia method for patients undergoing lower extremity fracture surgery. Our study is aimed at investigating the impacts of nerve block combined with general anesthesia on perioperative outcomes of the patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 48 patients experienced general anesthesia only, and 42 patients received never block combined with general anesthesia. The perioperative hemodynamics was recorded, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation of blood (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were carried out to evaluate postoperative pain and cognitive status. Furthermore, adverse reactions and recovery condition were observed between the patients receiving different anesthesia methods.

Results

At 15 minutes and 30 minutes after anesthesia, as well as 5 minutes after surgery, significant lower MAP was observed in the patients treated with general anesthesia (83.04 ± 8.661, 79.17 ± 9.427, 86.58 ± 8.913) compared to those receiving never block combined with general anesthesia (90.43 ± 4.618, 88.74 ± 6.224, 92.21 ± 4.015) (P < 0.05), and compared with general anesthesia group (68.5 ± 7.05, 69.63 ± 7.956, 72.75 ± 8.446), the combined anesthesia group (73.52 ± 9.451, 74.17 ± 10.13, 77.62 ± 9.768) showed obvious higher HR (P < 0.05). No significant difference in SpO2 was found between the two groups at multiple time points (P > 0.05). As for the score of VAS and MoCA, remarkably lower VAS and higher MoCA at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery were presented in the combined anesthesia group compared to general anesthesia group (P < 0.05). At 24 h after surgery, the two groups showed normal cognitive function (26.33 ± 0.7244 vs. 28.55 ± 0.7392). Incidence of nausea and vomiting in the combined anesthesia group was lower than that of the general anesthesia group (P < 0.05). The time to out-of-bed activity and hospital stay were shorter in the combined anesthesia group compared with general anesthesia (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of never block combined with general anesthesia contributed to the stability of hemodynamics, alleviation of postoperative pain and cognitive impairment, along with decrease in adverse reactions and hospital stay in the patients with lower extremity fractures.

Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery.

Methods

We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied.

Trial registration

The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9.

Trauma patients with tibia/fibula fractures are associated with an increased risk of torso, severe head, and severe spine injuries compared to patients with femur fractures

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have demonstrated an association between lower extremity fractures and concomitant torso (thorax and abdomen) injuries in trauma patients, they do not compare different types of fractures. Therefore, we investigated the risk of associated torso injuries between femur and tibia/fibula fractures, hypothesizing that trauma patients with femur fractures are at higher risk of torso injuries compared to patients with tibia/fibula fractures.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2010-2016) was queried for patients presenting with either femur or tibia/fibula fractures. Patients with ground-level falls and penetrating injuries were excluded. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

From 162,354 patients, 104,075 (64.1%) patients had femur fractures and 58,279 (35.9%) had tibia/fibula fractures. Compared to those with femur fractures, patients with tibia/fibula fractures had a higher incidence of torso injuries (32.2% vs. 17.7%, p<0.001). The tibia/fibula fracture group was also associated with an increased risk of torso (OR 2.22, CI 2.17-2.27, p<0.001), severe (abbreviated injury scale grade > 3) head (OR 2.38, CI 2.30-2.46, p<0.001), and severe spine injuries (OR 2.33, CI 2.07-2.62, p<0.001) compared to the femur fracture group. Additionally, patients with tibia/fibula fractures had a higher rate of deep vein thrombosis (2.5% vs. 1.8%, p<0.001) than patients with femur fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to previous studies, we demonstrate patients with tibia/fibula fractures have a higher associated risk of torso, severe head and severe spine injuries than patients with femur fractures. Therefore, trauma surgeons should manage tibia/fibula fracture patients with similar clinical vigilance as femur fracture patients.

Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Limb Long Bone Fractures in Children

Objective

The aim of the present paper was to investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for long bone fractures in children.

Methods

A total of 350 children with limb fractures from June 2012 to June 2018 were recruited and randomized into two groups: an ESIN group (n = 175) treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and an MPIF group (n = 175), treated with metal plate internal fixation. Both groups received the same physical examination and routine medication. Operation related indexes, clinical efficacy, complications, and postoperative quality of life scores were analyzed and compared.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and fracture healing time in the ESIN group were 43.74 ± 4.96 min, 8.14 ± 1.34 mL, 5.97 ± 1.88 days, and 55.89 ± 5.61 days, respectively, which were all significantly less than those in the MPIF group (all P < 0.001). In terms of common complications after limb fracture treatment, there were 6 cases of osteomyelitis, 5 cases of skin irritation response, and 7 cases of inflammatory granuloma in the MPIF group. There were 2 cases of skin irritation response and 5 cases of inflammatory granuloma in the ESIN group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the ESIN group was 4.00%, which was significantly lower than that in MPIF group (10.29%) (P < 0.05). The effective rate for recovery condition in the ESIN group (93.71%) was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (P < 0.001). The quality of life scores after treatment in both groups were improved, while the score in the ESIN group was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (79.43%) (P < 0.001). The postoperative satisfaction rate in the ESIN group (94.29%) was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (86.29%) (P < 0.05). The quality of life scores after treatment in both groups were improved, while the score in the ESIN group was significantly higher than that in the MPIF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative satisfaction rate and the acceptance rate for adjacent joint function in the ESIN group (100%) were significantly higher than those in the MPIF group (92.00%) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is a minimally invasive procedure for long bone fractures in children. It can effectively improve the operation‐related indicators and postoperative quality of life and reduce the incidence of complications.

Gait Symmetry Analysis in Patients after Treatment of Pilon Fractures by the Ilizarov Method

The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the gait parameters in patients who had undergone treatment of pilon fractures by the Ilizarov method. We analyzed gait parameters in patients who had undergone treatment for pilon fractures by the Ilizarov method; 20 patients aged 47.0 years (25.2–78.6) were included in the study. The control group consisted of 32 healthy volunteers. Gait examination was performed using the pedobarographic platform. Statistically significant differences in the following gait parameters: maximum forefoot force (%), step length (cm), and step time (s) were found between the study group and the control group, between the nonoperated leg, and both the operated leg and the dominant limb. Statistically significant differences in the study group between the treated lower limb and the healthy lower limb were only observed in the case of the maximum forefoot force parameter (%). Healthy subjects from the control group obtained significantly higher values during locomotion for stride time, cadence step, and velocity than the patients, with stride time being statistically significantly shorter and the velocity and the cadence step higher. We observed symmetry in the gait parameters after treating pilon fractures by the Ilizarov method. This method of stabilization allows the restoration of gait parameters, with results similar to those obtained after the treatment of other motor organ pathologies described in the literature, although different from those observed in healthy subjects. In particular, the biomechanics of the lower limbs remain disturbed.

Cost-effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy in adults with severe open fractures of the lower limb: evidence from the WOLLF randomized controlled trial

Aims

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in comparison with standard wound management after initial surgical wound debridement in adults with severe open fractures of the lower limb.

Patients and Methods

An economic evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the United Kingdom NHS and Personal Social Services, based on evidence from the 460 participants in the Wound Management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (WOLLF) trial. Economic outcomes were collected prospectively over the 12-month follow-up period using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Bivariate regression of costs (given in £, 2014 to 2015 prices) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted to estimate the incremental cost per QALY gained associated with NPWT dressings. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken to assess the impacts of uncertainty and heterogeneity, respectively, surrounding aspects of the economic evaluation.

Results

The base case analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £267 910 per QALY gained, reflecting higher costs on average (£678; 95% confidence interval (CI) -£1082 to £2438) and only marginally higher QALYS (0.002; 95% CI -0.054 to 0.059) in the NPWT group. The probability that NPWT is cost-effective in this patient population did not exceed 27% regardless of the value of the cost-effectiveness threshold. This result remained robust to several sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

This trial-based economic evaluation suggests that NPWT is unlikely to be a cost-effective strategy for improving outcomes in adult patients with severe open fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1392–1401.