1
|
Gong DC, Baumann AN, Muralidharan A, Piche JD, Anderson PA, Aleem I. The Association of Preoperative Bone Mineral Density and Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00336. [PMID: 39041643 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This is a systematic review. OBJECTIVE To evaluate anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcomes and complications as a function of preoperative bone mineral density (BMD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative BMD optimization is commonly initiated before lumbar spinal fusion, but the effects of BMD on ACDF are less known. Consequently, it remains unclear whether preoperative BMD optimization is recommended before ACDF. METHODS This systematic review included relevant clinical articles using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE from database inception until October 1, 2023. Eligible studies included those evaluating low BMD and outcomes after ACDF. All articles were graded using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) assessment tools. RESULTS The initial retrieval yielded 4271 articles for which 4 articles with 671 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean patient age was 56.4 ± 3.9 years, and 331 patients (49.3%) were female. A total of 265 (39.5%) patients had low BMD (T score<-1.0) before ACDF. Preoperative low BMD was associated with cage subsidence in single-level ACDF (odds ratio (OR) 2.57; P=0.063; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-6.95), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Osteoporosis (T score<-2.5) was associated with the development of adjacent segment disease following ACDF (OR 4.41; P<0.01; 95% CI: 1.98-9.83). Low pre-operative BMD was associated with reoperation within 2 years (P<.05) and strongly associated with pseudarthrosis (OR: 11.01; P=0.002; 95% CI 2.4-49.9). CONCLUSIONS Patients with low BMD who undergo ACDF have higher rates of subsidence, adjacent segment disease, and pseudarthrosis than those with normal BMD. Given the individual and system-wide burdens associated with these complications, some patients may benefit from preoperative BMD screening and optimization before undergoing ACDF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davin C Gong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anthony N Baumann
- College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH
| | - Aditya Muralidharan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Joshua D Piche
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Paul A Anderson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF, Madison WI
| | - Ilyas Aleem
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diltz ZR, West EJ, Colatruglio MR, Kirwan MJ, Konrade EN, Thompson KM. Perioperative Management of Comorbidities in Spine Surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:349-358. [PMID: 37271563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The number of spinal operations performed in the United States has significantly increased in recent years. Along with these rising numbers, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of patient comorbidities. The focus of this article is to review comorbidities in Spine surgery patients and outline strategies to optimize patients and avoid complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary R Diltz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
| | - Eric J West
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
| | - Matthew R Colatruglio
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
| | - Mateo J Kirwan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
| | - Elliot N Konrade
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
| | - Kirk M Thompson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 1211 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA; Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schömig F, Becker L, Schönnagel L, Völker A, Disch AC, Schnake KJ, Pumberger M. Avoiding Spinal Implant Failures in Osteoporotic Patients: A Narrative Review. Global Spine J 2023; 13:52S-58S. [PMID: 37084355 PMCID: PMC10177307 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231159066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVES With an aging population, the prevalence of osteoporosis is continuously rising. As osseous integrity is crucial for bony fusion and implant stability, previous studies have shown osteoporosis to be associated with an increased risk for implant failure and higher reoperation rates after spine surgery. Thus, our review's purpose was to provide an update of evidence-based solutions in the surgical treatment of osteoporosis patients. METHODS We summarize the existing literature regarding changes associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and resulting biomechanical implications for the spine as well as multidisciplinary treatment strategies to avoid implant failures in osteoporotic patients. RESULTS Osteoporosis is caused by an uncoupling of the bone remodeling cycle based on an unbalancing of bone resorption and formation and resulting reduced BMD. The reduction in trabecular structure, increased porosity of cancellous bone and decreased cross-linking between trabeculae cause a higher risk of complications after spinal implant-based surgeries. Thus, patients with osteoporosis require special planning considerations, including adequate preoperative evaluation and optimization. Surgical strategies aim towards maximizing screw pull-out strength, toggle resistance, as well as primary and secondary construct stability. CONCLUSIONS As osteoporosis plays a crucial role in the fate of patients undergoing spine surgery, surgeons need to be aware of the specific implications of low BMD. While there still is no consensus on the best course of treatment, multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and adherence to specific surgical principles help reduce the rate of implant-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Schömig
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Becker
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Schönnagel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Völker
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander C Disch
- University Comprehensive Spine Center, University Center for Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus John Schnake
- Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St Marien gGmbH, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Pumberger
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albright JA, Chang K, Alsoof D, McDonald CL, Diebo BG, Daniels AH. Sarcopenia and Postoperative Complications, Cost of Care, and All-Cause Hospital Readmission Following Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: A Propensity Matched Cohort Study. World Neurosurg 2023; 169:e131-e140. [PMID: 36307038 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sarcopenia, characterized by decreased muscle mass and function, is projected to affect more than 200 million people worldwide by 2060. This study aimed to evaluate the rates of short-term complications following lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients with and without a recent diagnosis of sarcopenia. METHODS The PearlDiver database was queried to evaluate all patients who underwent index lumbar spine arthrodesis from 2012 to 2019. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare rates of 90-day surgical and medical complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare cumulative rates of reoperation and all-cause hospital readmission. Two sample t testing was used to compare costs of care. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 a priori. RESULTS Of 239,953 patients undergoing lumbar spine arthrodesis, 1087 had a recent diagnosis of sarcopenia (0.45%) before surgery. Patients with sarcopenia were significantly more likely to experience a urinary tract infection (odds ratio = 1.41, P = 0.035) and undergo incision and drainage (odds ratio = 2.66, P = 0.010) within 90 days after lumbar arthrodesis. Patients with sarcopeniawere at a 24% greater risk of 1-year all-cause hospital readmission. The 90-day cost of care was significantly greater in patients with sarcopenia ($37,689.86 vs. $26,635.72; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing lumbar spine arthrodesis, sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including increased costs of care. Spine surgeons should consider screening patients for sarcopenia preoperatively and counsel them regarding their increased risk of complications. Additionally, surgeons may consider preoperative optimization, like the management of low bone density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alex Albright
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
| | - Kenny Chang
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher L McDonald
- Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oitment C, Thornley P, Koziarz F, Jentzsch T, Bhanot K. A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1596-1610. [PMID: 35020520 PMCID: PMC9393983 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211063855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES Review the surgical techniques and construct options aimed at improving the biomechanical strength of cervical constructs. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify all studies examining biomechanical strategies utilized in the osteoporotic cervical spine. Screening was performed in duplicate for all stages of the review process. RESULTS An initial search returned 3887 articles. After deletion of duplications and review of abstracts and full text, 39 articles met inclusion criteria. Overall, the surgical techniques reviewed aimed at obtaining rigid fixation in the setting of poor bone quality, or dispersing the forces at the bone-implant interface. We identified 6 key techniques to improve biomechanical fixation. These include bicortical fixation, appropriate screw selection (size and trajectory), PMMA augmentation, load sharing techniques, consideration of ancillary fixation around the occipitocervical junction, and supplementing the construct with post-operative collar or halo. CONCLUSION The summation of the literature highlights a framework of modalities available to surgeons to improve biomechanical fixation in the cervical spine. While these may improve construct strength in the setting of osteoporosis, there is a paucity of evidence available to make recommendations in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colby Oitment
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada,Dr Colby Oitment, MD, McMaster University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamilton General HospitalAffiliation, McMaster University, 1200 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
| | - Patrick Thornley
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Frank Koziarz
- Department of Graduate Studies, Health Research Methodology (HRM), and Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Thorsten Jentzsch
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kunal Bhanot
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chang E, Nickel B, Binkley N, Bernatz J, Krueger D, Winzenried A, Anderson PA. A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2022; 13:21514593221116413. [PMID: 35967749 PMCID: PMC9364193 DOI: 10.1177/21514593221116413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in elective orthopedic surgery. While preoperative bone health optimization decreases osteoporosis-related complications, there is an unmet need to establish who may benefit from preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study assesses a novel, simple screening protocol to identify orthopedic surgical patients for preoperative DXA. Materials/Methods This retrospective cohort study included 628 patients undergoing total knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty or thoracolumbar spine fusion. Inclusion criteria were ≥40 years undergoing primary elective surgery. Screening criteria defining who should obtain DXA due to high osteoporosis risk included: female ≥65, male ≥70, fracture history when ≥50 years, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk (without bone mineral density [BMD]-adjustments) ≥8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by World Health Organization criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5], clinical National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture], and modified clinical criteria [NOF criteria simplified to include any non-traumatic prior fracture and FRAX without BMD]. Results The study included 100 TKAs, 100 THAs, 251 TSAs, and 177 spine fusions, average age 65.6 ± 9.8. DXA was available for 209 patients. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 362 patients. For those with DXA, screening sensitivity was .96 (CI: .78 to .99) and specificity was .19 (CI: .14 to .25) for identifying T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of .99 (CI: .91 to .99) and specificity of .61 (CI: .56 to .66) were found for modified clinical osteoporosis. For modified clinical osteoporosis, 192 patients with osteoporosis met criteria (true pos.), 1 patient with osteoporosis did not meet criteria (false neg.), 170 patients without osteoporosis met criteria (false pos.), and 265 patients without osteoporosis did not meet criteria (true neg.). Discussion/Conclusion A simple screening protocol identifies orthopedic surgical candidates at risk of T-score or clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot Chang
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and
Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF Centennial
Bldg, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brian Nickel
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and
Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF Centennial
Bldg, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and
Public Health Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, WI, USA
| | - James Bernatz
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and
Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF Centennial
Bldg, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Diane Krueger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and
Public Health Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alec Winzenried
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and
Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF Centennial
Bldg, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Paul A. Anderson
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and
Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF Centennial
Bldg, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang W, Li L, Zhou X, Li K, Liu C, Lin X, Lubisi N, Chen J, Si H. Concurrent Treatment with Vitamin K2 and D3 on Spine Fusion in Patients with Osteoporosis-Associated Lumbar Degenerative Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:352-360. [PMID: 34919073 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective and nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial. OBJECTIVE To address the early effects of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and vitamin D3 on fusion rates in patients who have undergone spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Intervertebral pseudarthrosis has been reported after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), especially in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. No study has assessed the early effects of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and vitamin D3 on fusion rates. METHODS Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis who underwent TLIF or PLIF in our department were included. Patients in the VK2+VD3 group received vitamin K2, vitamin D3, and calcium treatment, whereas subjects in the control group only received calcium and vitamin D3. Spine fusion was evaluated by computed tomography. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOA-BPEQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess the clinical and neurological symptoms. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism markers were measured for osteoporotic evaluation. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were included, and nine patients subsequently discontinued because of 2019-nCoV. At six months postoperatively, complete fusion rates were significantly higher in the VK2+VD3 group than that in the control group (91.18% vs 71.43%, P = 0.036). At six months postoperatively, BMD was increased in the VK2+VD3 group and was higher than that in the control group, although there was no significant difference. At three months postoperatively, a significant increase in procollagen type I amino terminal propeptide (91.81%) and a slight decrease in C-terminal end peptide (8.06%) were observed in the VK2+VD3 group. In both groups, the JOA-BPEQ and VAS scores were significantly improved after spine surgery. CONCLUSION Administration of vitamin K2 and vitamin D3 can increase lumbar interbody fusion rates, improve clinical symptoms, promote bone information, and avoid further decline in BMD within six months after TLIF or PLIF.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wencan Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sardar ZM, Coury JR, Cerpa M, DeWald CJ, Ames CP, Shuhart C, Watkins C, Polly DW, Dirschl DR, Klineberg EO, Dimar JR, Krohn KD, Kebaish KM, Tosi LL, Kelly M, Lane NE, Binkley NC, Berven SH, Lee NJ, Anderson P, Angevine PD, Lehman RA, Lenke LG. Best Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Osteoporosis in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Spinal Reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:128-135. [PMID: 34690329 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Expert consensus study. OBJECTIVE This expert panel was created to establish best practice guidelines to identify and treat patients with poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstruction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Currently, no guidelines exist for the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients undergoing spinal reconstructive surgery. Untreated osteoporosis in spine reconstruction surgery is associated with higher complications and worse outcomes. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel with 18 experts was assembled including orthopedic and neurological surgeons, endocrinologists, and rheumatologists. Surveys and discussions regarding the current literature were held according to Delphi method until a final set of guidelines was created with over 70% consensus. RESULTS Panelists agreed that bone health should be considered in every patient prior to elective spinal reconstruction. All patients above 65 and those under 65 with particular risk factors (chronic glucocorticoid use, high fracture risk or previous fracture, limited mobility, and eight other key factors) should have a formal bone health evaluation prior to undergoing surgery. DXA scans of the hip are preferable due to their wide availability. Opportunistic CT Hounsfield Units of the vertebrae can be useful in identifying poor bone health. In the absence of contraindications, anabolic agents are considered first line therapy due to their bone building properties as compared with antiresorptive medications. Medications should be administered preoperatively for at least 2 months and postoperatively for minimum 8 months. CONCLUSION Based on the consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts, we propose best practice guidelines for assessment and treatment of poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstructive surgery. Patients above age 65 and those with particular risk factors under 65 should undergo formal bone health evaluation. We also established guidelines on perioperative optimization, utility of various diagnostic modalities, and the optimal medical management of bone health in this population.Level of Evidence: 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeeshan M Sardar
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Josephine R Coury
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Meghan Cerpa
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Colleen Watkins
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital, WV
| | | | | | | | - John R Dimar
- Norton Leatherman Spine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | | | | | - Laura L Tosi
- Children's National Hospital, George Washington University, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Nathan J Lee
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter D Angevine
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ronald A Lehman
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Och Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ifarraguerri AM, Malyavko A, Stoll WT, Patel S, Thakkar S. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus on 2-year revision rates following lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal conditions: a retrospective cohort study. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2021; 7:475-484. [PMID: 35128121 PMCID: PMC8743293 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To our knowledge, no studies exist that evaluate the impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on long-term revision rates following lumbar fusion. This study aims to understand how HIV impacts 2-year revision rates and 90-day postoperative complication rates following primary lumbar fusion for degenerative spine conditions. METHODS Data collection was done using PearlDiver Patient Records Database, a national insurance database from 2010-2019. Patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion for degenerative diseases were divided into a cohort of patients that are HIV positive (HIV), have asymptomatic HIV (AHIV), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and HIV-negative at the time of their procedure. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine rates of revision surgery, surgical site infection (SSI), neurological complications, sensory deficits, bowel/bladder dysfunction and myelopathies within two years of surgery as well as 90-day postoperative complications. RESULTS In total, 216,587 patients were included in this study. Of these, 631 patients (0.29%) had HIV including 502 patients (0.23%) with asymptomatic HIV and 129 patients (0.06%) with AIDS. Relative to the control cohort, patients with HIV had no difference in odds of two-year revision surgery, SSI, neurological complications, sensory deficits, bowel/bladder dysfunction and myelopathies. Patients with HIV did have increased odds of postoperative pneumonia (OR 1.592; 95% CI: 1.048-2.314; P=0.021). AIDS patients had greater odds of respiratory complications (OR 2.585; 95% CI: 1.075-5.264; P=0.017) and septic complications (OR 2.702; 95% CI: 1.122-5.514; P=0.013) 90-day postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that HIV positive status did not significantly affect two-year revision rates compared to the control group. However, there is a higher rate of pneumonia and respiratory complications among HIV positive patients. Before deciding to proceed with surgical intervention in HIV positive individuals, surgeons must carefully consider each patient's specific diagnosis, comorbidities, and risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Ifarraguerri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alisa Malyavko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - W. Travis Stoll
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Shalin Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Savyasachi Thakkar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins University, Columbia, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Althoff AD, Kamalapathy P, Vatani J, Hassanzadeh H, Li X. Osteoporosis is associated with increased minor complications following single level ALIF and PSIF: an analysis of 7,004 patients. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2021; 7:269-276. [PMID: 34734131 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Osteoporosis is a prevalent disease that predisposes patients to fracture and additional post-operative complications, potentially contributing to decreased quality of life. The objective of the current study is to (I) characterize the demographic trends of individuals with osteoporosis undergoing single level posterior spine instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); (II) determine the association between osteoporosis and postoperative complications; (III) identify whether the use of bone strengthening medications is associated with improved outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of the Mariner Claims Database was conducted on patients undergoing single level ALIF (CPT 22558) and PSIF (CPT 22840) between 2011 and 2017. Diagnosis of osteoporosis (CPT 77080, CPT 77801, CPT 77082) included a bone density scan within two years of surgery. Patients with osteoporosis were 1:1 matched to controls. Patients taking bone enhancing medications prior to surgery were compared to those that did not take medications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate post-operative complication risk factors. Results 3,502 patients with diagnosed osteoporosis underwent ALIF and PSIF, of which 788 (22.5%) were treated with supplemental medication. Diagnosis of osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism [1.1% vs. 0.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-4.53, P=0.003] and minor complications (16.7% vs. 12.9%, OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.30, P=0.039). Revision rates two-years post-operatively were not significantly different between patients with osteoporosis and matched controls (P>0.05). There were no differences in outcomes between osteoporotic patients who received medications and those who did not receive medication (P>0.05). Conclusions Osteoporosis is common in a nationally-representative Medicare database cohort. Pre-operative diagnosis of osteoporosis is associated with increased minor complications following ALIF and PSIF. Pre-operative osteoporosis treatment is not associated with a significant difference in post-operative outcomes. The current study can guide pre-operative counseling in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa D Althoff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Pramod Kamalapathy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jasmine Vatani
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Hamid Hassanzadeh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Xudong Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shahrestani S, Chen XT, Ballatori AM, Ton A, Bakhsheshian J, Hah RJ, Wang JC, Buser Z. Complication Trends and Costs of Surgical Management in 11,086 Osteoporotic Patients Receiving Lumbar Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:1478-1484. [PMID: 33813581 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare different aspects of fusion surgery in patients with osteoporosis with regard to graft subtype and surgical approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Osteoporosis and chronic lower back pain are common in elderly populations and significantly increase the risk of compression fractures within the spine. METHODS Using the 2016-2017 National Readmission Database we identified 11,086 osteoporotic patients who received lumbar fusion using ICD-10 coding. Information regarding biologic graft type and surgical approach was collected. Patients were stratified by number of levels fused. Perioperative complications were collected at 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-up intervals. Statistical analysis included univariate testing and multivariate regression modeling, controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS Patients receiving single-level fusion with autologous grafts had higher rates of hardware failure (P = 0.00014) at 30-day follow-up and 90-day follow-up (P < 0.0001) and higher rates of lumbar vertebral fractures at 90-day follow-up (P = 0.045) compared to those treated with nonautologous grafts. Patients receiving lumbar fusion with anterior and posterior approaches had no difference in readmission or infection rates, but the anterior approach was associated with a higher cost. CONCLUSION In this study, osteoporotic patients treated with autologous grafts had higher rates of complications compared to those treated with nonautologous grafts. Anterior and posterior approaches had similar complication rates; however, the anterior approach was associated with a higher total cost.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Shahrestani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
| | - Xiao T Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alexander M Ballatori
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andy Ton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joshua Bakhsheshian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Raymond J Hah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of preoperative treatment of osteoporosis on re-operations, complications and health care utilization in patients undergoing thoraco-lumbar spine fusions. A 5-year national database analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 93:122-129. [PMID: 34656235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify the impact of preoperative treatment of Osteoporosis (OP) on reoperation rates, complications and healthcare utilization following thoraco-lumbar (TL) spine fusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used ICD9/10 and CPT codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000-2018). Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative treatment of OP within one year prior to the index spinal fusion: medication (m-OP) cohort and non-medication (nm-OP) cohort. Outcomes (re-operation rates, re-admission, complications, healthcare utilization) were analyzed at 1-, 12-, 24- and 60-months. RESULTS Of 3606 patients, 65% (n = 2330) of patients did not receive OP medications (nm-OP). At index hospitalization, there were no difference in LOS (median nm-OP: 3 days vs. m-OP:4 days), discharge to home (nm-OP 80% vs. m-OP 75%) and complications (nm-OP 13% vs. m-OP 12%). Reoperation rates were not different among the cohorts at 1- (nm-OP 5.7% vs. m-OP 4.2%), 2- (nm-OP 9.4% vs. m-OP 7.8) and 5 years (nm-OP 16.9% vs. m-OP 14.8%). Patients in m-OP cohort incurred higher overall median payments at 1 year ($17,866 vs. $ 16,010), 2 years ($38,634 vs. $34,454) and 5 years ($94,797 vs. $91,072) compared to nm-OP cohort. CONCLUSION Preoperative treatment of OP had no impact on complications, LOS, discharge disposition following TL fusions at index hospitalization. Similarly, no impact of preoperative treatment was noted in terms of reoperation rates at 12-, 24- and 60 months following the index spine fusion. Patients who received preoperative treatment for OP incurred higher health care utilization at 12-, 24- and 60 months following surgery.
Collapse
|
13
|
The impact of bisphosphonates on postoperative complication rates in osteoporotic patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:1329-1336. [PMID: 33394089 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06706-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To elucidate the effects of bisphosphonates on complications following posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) with a large database study. METHODS The PearlDiver Patient Record Database was queried to identify adult patients who had undergone posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). Those patient cohorts were divided based on a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to surgery and bisphosphonate usage. This yielded three groups: Osteo+Bisph+, Osteo+Bisph-, and Osteo-Bisph-. The primary outcome of the present study was revision rates at 6 months and 1 year following surgery. Incidence of postoperative complications was analyzed, and statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson chi-square analysis. RESULTS Patients taking bisphosphonates did not have significantly different rates of revision surgery at 6 months and 1 year, instrumentation complications, or post-vertebral fractures than patients not taking bisphosphonates. Additionally, osteoporotic patients did not have significantly different rates of these complications than patients without osteoporosis. CONCLUSION Bisphosphonate usage did not significantly affect the rates of postoperative complications following posterior lumbar fusion. Further research is required to fully elucidate the effects of bisphosphonates on outcomes and complications following spine surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee HS, Park JH, Suh DH, Kim HJ, Koo BM, Kim HK, Yang SH, Choi GW. Effects of teriparatide on fusion rates in patients undergoing complex foot and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 26:766-770. [PMID: 31690528 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Here, we determined whether teriparatide treatment would increase fusion rates after foot and ankle arthrodesis by comparing treatment results between patients with high-risk factors for nonunion who received teriparatide against those who did not. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive patients who underwent foot and ankle arthrodesis. The inclusion criterion was the presence of at least one of the following risk factors for nonunion after previous foot and ankle arthrodesis: deformity, bone defects, avascular necrosis, and nonunion. Sixteen patients were finally enrolled and divided into 2 groups: 8 patients received teriparatide treatment after fusion surgery (PTH group), and 8 patients did not (control group). RESULTS The fusion rate was significantly greater in the PTH group than in the control group (100% vs 50%). Four patients in the control group developed nonunion, 3 of whom underwent revision fusion; however, all patients received the teriparatide treatment after revision surgery and subsequently achieved union. No significant differences in demographics, fusion sites, and complication rates were found. CONCLUSION Though the sample size was small, the current study suggests that teriparatide administration may improve fusion rates in patients with high-risk factors for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Seop Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea
| | - Jung Ho Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea
| | - Dong Hun Suh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea
| | - Hak Jun Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bong Mo Koo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea
| | - Hak Kyu Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea
| | - Se Hyun Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, South Korea
| | - Gi Won Choi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Khalid SI, Nunna RS, Maasarani S, Belmont E, Deme P, Chilakapati S, Eldridge C, Singh R, Bagley CA, Adogwa O. Association of osteopenia and osteoporosis with higher rates of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 49:E6. [PMID: 32738806 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.focus20289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis who require surgery for symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis may have higher rates of postoperative pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery than patients with normal bone mineral densities (BMDs). To this end, the authors compared rates of postoperative pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery following single-level lumbar fusion in patients with normal BMD with those in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The secondary outcome was to investigate the effects of pretreatment with medications that prevent bone loss (e.g., teriparatide, bisphosphonates, and denosumab) on these adverse outcomes in this patient cohort. METHODS Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Based on 1:1 propensity matching for baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities, 3 patient groups were created: osteopenia (n = 1723, 33.3%), osteoporosis (n = 1723, 33.3%), and normal BMD (n = 1723, 33.3%). The rates of postoperative pseudarthrosis and revision surgery were compared between groups. RESULTS The matched populations analyzed in this study included a total of 5169 patients in 3 groups balanced at baseline, with equal numbers (n = 1723, 33.3%) in each group: patients with a history of osteopenia, those with a history of osteoporosis, and a control group of patients with no history of osteopenia or osteoporosis and with normal BMD. A total of 597 complications were recorded within a 2-year follow-up period, with pseudarthrosis (n = 321, 6.2%) being slightly more common than revision surgery (n = 276, 5.3%). The odds of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in patients with osteopenia were almost 2-fold (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.26-2.30) and 3-fold (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.89-3.94) higher, respectively, than those in patients in the control group. Similarly, the odds of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in patients with osteoporosis were almost 2-fold (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.43-2.59) and > 3-fold (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.27-4.65) higher, respectively, than those in patients in the control group. Pretreatment with medications to prevent bone loss prior to surgery was associated with lower pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion are significantly higher in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis than in patients with normal BMD. Pretreatment with medications to prevent bone loss prior to surgery decreased these complication rates, although the observed differences did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed I Khalid
- 1Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
| | - Ravi S Nunna
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago
| | - Samantha Maasarani
- 3Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Erika Belmont
- 3Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Palvasha Deme
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sai Chilakapati
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cody Eldridge
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ravinderjit Singh
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Carlos A Bagley
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Owoicho Adogwa
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anderson PA, Jeray KJ, Lane JM, Binkley NC. Bone Health Optimization: Beyond Own the Bone: AOA Critical Issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:1413-1419. [PMID: 31393435 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.18.01229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, osteoporosis management is in crisis because of inadequate delivery of care, competing guidelines, and confusing recommendations. Additionally, patients are not readily accepting the diagnosis of poor bone health and often are noncompliant with treatment recommendations. Secondary fracture prevention, through a program such as Own the Bone, has improved the diagnosis and medical management after a fragility fracture. In patients who undergo elective orthopaedic procedures, osteoporosis is common and adversely affects outcomes. Bone health optimization is the process of bone status assessment, identification and correction of metabolic deficits, and initiation of treatment, when appropriate, for skeletal structural deficits. The principles of bone health optimization are similar to those of secondary fracture prevention and can be initiated by all orthopaedic surgeons. Patients who are ≥50 years of age should be assessed for osteoporosis risk and, if they are in a high-risk group, bone density should be measured. All patients should be counseled to consume adequate vitamin D and calcium and to discontinue use of any toxins (e.g., tobacco products and excessive alcohol consumption). Patients who meet the criteria for pharmaceutical therapy for osteoporosis should consider delaying surgery for a minimum of 3 months, if feasible, and begin medication treatment. Orthopaedic surgeons need to assume a greater role in the care of bone health for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Anderson
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kyle J Jeray
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina
| | | | - Neil C Binkley
- University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Since FDA approval in 2002, teriparatide has gained popularity as an anabolic therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis. Animal studies have suggested a role for teriparatide in spine surgery. Several recent studies have demonstrated adjunctive use of teriparatide in osteoporotic patients undergoing spine fusions improves fusion rates, decreases time to union, and decreases osteoporosis-related complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis. On the basis of the available literature, we outline an algorithm for the use of teriparatide in spine surgery.
Collapse
|