Factors associated with referral for osteoporosis care in men: a real-life study of a nationwide dataset

Bone evaluation study-2: update on the epidemiology of osteoporosis in Germany

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disorder. Our data gives an estimate of around 5.87 million cases of osteoporosis in the general German population in 2018. Only 30% of insured individuals who suffered an osteoporotic fracture and/or had a confirmed diagnosis of osteoporosis, received an appropriate prescription.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disorder. It particularly affects elderly people and increases the risk of atraumatic fractures. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis in the general German population aged ≥ 50 years and to collect data on the frequency of prescription of osteoporosis-specific medication in order to assess the treatment gap.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of anonymized data of individuals aged ≥ 50 years insured under statutory healthcare schemes from the database of the Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin (InGef) for 2018 (study population). Insured individuals with osteoporosis were identified based on osteoporosis diagnoses, osteoporosis-specific prescriptions, or osteoporotic fractures. Thus, we estimated the prevalence of osteoporosis in the general German population aged ≥ 50 years. The prevalence of diagnoses, fractures, and prescriptions was determined for the study population and stratified by age and gender.

RESULTS

Within the study population of 1,599,299 insured individuals, a prevalence of osteoporosis of 15.9% was determined. This estimated approximately 5.87 million cases of osteoporosis for the general German population. 81.6% of the cases were women. Osteoporosis-specific prescriptions were received by 30.0% of the insured individuals in the study population who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis and/or suffered an osteoporotic fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Germany has a high prevalence of osteoporosis. Only a small portion of individuals who may require osteoporosis-specific treatment actually receive it.

Bone health assessment in adults with fragility fracture risk factors between 2002-2014: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lifetime risk of fragility fractures is 50% in post-menopausal women and 20% in men aged >50 years. Identifying people at high risk facilitates early intervention and reduction of biopsychosocial morbidity associated with these fractures.

AIM

To explore if bone health assessment (BHA) rates differ between women and men aged ≥50 years with fragility fracture risk factors.

DESIGN & SETTING

A primary care-based cohort study in North Staffordshire, UK.

METHOD

Patients were identified from the Consultations in Primary Care Archive (CiPCA) database between 2002 and 2014 with one or more fragility fracture risk factors (previous fractures, falls, and prolonged steroid use). Evaluation of BHA within 12 months of presentation of the first risk factor was carried out by searching for codes for fracture risk assessment tools (FRAX and QFracture), bone density measurement, specialist service referral, or if bone-protection medication was started.

RESULTS

A total of 15 581 patients with risk factors were identified; men represented 40.4% of the cohort. The study found 1172 (7.5%) had BHA performed within 1 year of presentation, and 8.9% of women and 5.5% of men had BHAs, which was found with strong statistical evidence (χ2 = 59.88, P = 1 × 10-14). This relationship prevailed after adjusting for other covariates, such as comorbidity and number of consultations, with an odds ratio of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 1.43).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that rates of BHA were generally low and even lower in men compared with women. Primary care clinicians should be alert to fragility fracture risk factors in both men and women to enable early assessment and intervention.

Bone Loss in Inflammatory Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Disease Patients Treated With Low-Dose Glucocorticoids and Prevention by Anti-Osteoporosis Medications

OBJECTIVE

The negative effects of glucocorticoids on bone depend on dose and treatment duration. However, it is unclear whether a safe dose exists, especially for patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs). We undertook this study to determine the effects of glucocorticoid doses on bone health in iRMD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study on women with iRMD. Bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures were assessed prospectively and compared to a matched cohort without iRMD. Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank test were made for iRMD patients (stratified for glucocorticoid use and dose) and the matched cohort. Multivariable Cox regression survival models were also employed to analyze the effect of glucocorticoids on fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 884 women with iRMD and 1,766 controls (matched for age, T score, and 10-year fracture risk) were included in the study and followed up for up to 6 years. BMD decreased significantly in all patients receiving glucocorticoids who were not receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment (-4.26% for ≥5 mg/day of prednisone equivalent, P = 0.0011; -4.23% for 2.5-5 mg/day, P = 0.0422; -2.66% for 0-2.5 mg/day, P = 0.0006). Anti-osteoporosis treatment (largely bisphosphonates) prevented bone loss only in patients receiving <5 mg/day of prednisone equivalent. Fracture incidence was higher in patients with iRMD compared to controls, but only glucocorticoid doses ≥5 mg/day were associated with significantly higher risk of fracture.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoid doses as low as 2.5 mg/day were associated with BMD loss in iRMD patients, but this effect was preventable. BMD loss in patients receiving ≥5 mg/day was not totally prevented by anti-osteoporosis medications currently used in clinical practice, resulting in higher risk of fracture.

Patients with osteoporosis: children of a lesser god

Osteoporosis is a common non-communicable disease with enormous societal costs. Antiosteoporosis medications have been proven efficacious in reducing the refracture rate and mortality; moreover, we have now convincing evidence about the cost-effectiveness of antiosteoporotic medications. However, albeit preventable and treatable, osteoporosis has been somehow neglected by health authorities. Drugs approval has been unnecessarily lengthy, especially when compared with other non-communicable diseases. Herein, we discuss the issue of procrastinating drug approval in osteoporosis and future implications.

Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021

Background

Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field.

Purpose

This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline.

Methods

The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations.

Results

Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively.

Conclusions

The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.

Real-life short-term effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic treatments: a longitudinal cohort study

Introduction:

Randomized clinical trials have shown that anti-osteoporotic treatments can increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the incidence of fragility fractures. However, data on the real-life effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic medications are still scarce.

Methods:

We conducted a cohort study on women at high risk of fracture. We retrieved clinical and densitometric data from the DeFRA database, which derives from the DeFRA tool, a web-based fracture risk assessment tool. Multivariable Cox regression survival models were employed to analyze the effectiveness of different anti-osteoporotic drugs on fracture. In sensitivity analyses, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching analyses.

Results:

Data on 50,862 women were available. Among these, 3574 individuals had at least two consecutive visits. The crude fracture rate was 91.9/1000 person-year for non-treated patients. The crude fracture rate in bisphosphonate users was 72.1/1000 person-year, in denosumab users was 58.2/1000 person-year, and in teriparatide users was 19.3/1000 person-year. Overall, we found that bisphosphonate use was associated with a 30% lower risk of fracture compared to no treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.98]. Treatment with denosumab and teriparatide were associated with 60% and 90% lower risk of fracture, respectively (aHR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.75 and aHR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01–0.70). Bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of fracture only after 1 year of treatment.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, we found that all anti-osteoporotic medications considered in the study effectively reduced the risk of fracture in the real-life. The effect of bisphosphonate on fracture risk was apparent only after the first year of treatment. Our findings do not support the use of bisphosphonates in patients at imminent risk of fracture.

Association between long-term exposure to air pollution and immune-mediated diseases: a population-based cohort study

Objective

Environmental air pollution has been associated with disruption of the immune system at a molecular level. The primary aim of the present study was to describe the association between long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of developing immune-mediated conditions.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study on a nationwide dataset of women and men. Diagnoses of various immune-mediated diseases (IMIDs) were retrieved. Data on the monitoring of particulate matter (PM)10 and PM2.5 concentrations were retrieved from the Italian Institute of Environmental Protection and Research. Generalised linear models were employed to determine the relationship between autoimmune diseases prevalence and PM.

Results

81 363 subjects were included in the study. We found a positive association between PM10 and the risk of autoimmune diseases (ρ+0.007, p 0.014). Every 10 µg/m³ increase in PM10 concentration was associated with an incremental 7% risk of having autoimmune disease. Exposure to PM10 above 30 µg/m3 and PM2.5 above 20 µg/m³ was associated with a 12% and 13% higher risk of autoimmune disease, respectively (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.20, and aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.20). Exposure to PM10 was associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis; exposure to PM2.5 was associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Conclusion

Long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with higher risk of developing autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis, CTDs and IBD. Chronic exposure to levels above the threshold for human protection was associated with a 10% higher risk of developing IMIDs.

The pattern and trends of disease burden due to low bone mineral density from 1990 to 2019 in China: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Osteoporosis is becoming increasing important health problem in China. This study shows that the disease burden of low bone mineral density (BMD) in China is large and will remain increasing with the growth of aging population. In addition, male low BMD should not be ignored. Although burden of low BMD is partially representative of the real burden of osteoporosis, the information provided in our study could be used to better inform targeted public health prevention and management programs for osteopososis.

PURPOSE

We aim to investigate the pattern and trends of disease burden due to low BMD by gender, year, and age in China from 1990 to 2019.

METHODS

Data on summary exposure value (SEV) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to low BMD was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, and analyzed by gender, age, and years. Average annual percent change (AAPC) and annual percent change (APC) were calculated to qualify the trends of burden due to low BMD.

RESULT

In 2019, the age-standardized SEV was higher in females than that in males (23.04, 95% UI = [17.25-29.83] and 12.50, 95% UI = [7.71-19.25], respectively), while the total number of DALYs was higher in males than females with 1,698,705.92 (95% UI = 1,281,580.79 to 2,076,364.25) and 1,621,569 (95% UI = 1,266,284.89 to 2,016,399.16), respectively. Though SEV exhibited decreasing trends during 1990 to 2019 in both sexes, the absolute number of DALYs due to low BMD increased steadily and almost doubled in 2019 compared to that in 1990.

CONCLUSION

The burden of low BMD remains large and continues to increase. Although females are prone to low BMD, the disease burden for males should not be ignored.

An update of the prevalence of osteoporosis, fracture risk factors, and medication use among community-dwelling older adults: results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

The prevalence of self-reported and DXA-confirmed osteoporosis was 7.8% (males 2.2%; females 12.7%), and 3.6% (males 1.2%; females 5.9%), respectively. We found that most community-dwelling older adults at high fracture risk are not taking osteoporosis medication, particularly males. There is a major opportunity for improved primary fracture prevention in the community.

PURPOSE

To provide an up-to-date prevalence estimate of osteoporosis, fracture risk factors, fracture risk, and the proportion of older Canadians at high fracture risk who are not taking an osteoporosis medication.

METHODS

We included Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) participants: a community-dwelling cohort aged 45 to 85 years who completed the baseline (2015) comprehensive interview and had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans (N = 30,097). We describe the age- and sex-stratified prevalence of (1) self-reported osteoporosis; (2) DXA-confirmed osteoporosis; (3) fracture risk factors and people who are at high risk (FRAX® major osteoporotic fracture probability ≥ 20%); and (4) people who are at high fracture risk not taking osteoporosis medications. Sampling weights, as defined by the CLSA, were applied.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 70.0 (SD 10.3). Overall, 7.8% had self-reported osteoporosis (males 2.2%; females 12.7%) while 3.6% had DXA-confirmed osteoporosis (males 1.2%; females 5.9%), and 2.8% were at high fracture risk (males 0.3%; females 5.1%). Of people who had osteoporosis and were at high risk, 77.3% were not taking an osteoporosis medication (males 92.3%; females 76.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an up-to-date prevalence estimate of osteoporosis for community-dwelling older Canadians. We found that most community-dwelling older adults at high fracture risk are not taking an osteoporosis medication, particularly males. There is a major opportunity for improved primary fracture prevention in the community.

Association between exposure to fine particulate matter and osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study

Long-term environmental air pollution exposure was associated with osteoporosis' risk in a cohort of women at high risk of fracture. Cortical sites seemed to be more susceptible to the exposure's effect.

INTRODUCTION

Environmental air pollution has been associated with disruption of bone health at a molecular level. Particulate matter (PM) exposure can simultaneously stimulate bone resorption and halt bone formation. The primary aim of the present study is to describe the association between long-term exposure to PM and osteoporosis in a large cohort of women at high risk of fracture.

METHODS

Clinical, demographic, and densitometric data were extracted from the DeFRAcalc79 dataset, which gathers data on women at risk for osteoporosis. Data on the monitoring of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were retrieved from the Italian institute of environment protection and research (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, ISPRA). Generalized linear models with robust estimators were employed to determine the relationship between BMD and PM long-term exposure.

RESULTS

A total 59,950 women from 110 Italian provinces were included in the study. PM 2.5 exposure was negatively associated with T-score levels at the femoral neck (β -0.005, 95 CI -0.007 to -0.003) and lumbar spine (β -0.003, 95% CI -0.006 to -0.001). Chronic exposure to PM2.5 above 25 μg/m3 was associated with a 16% higher risk of having osteoporotic T-score at any site (aOR 1.161, 95% CI 1.105 to 1.220), and exposure to PM10 above 30 μg/m3 was associated with a 15% higher risk of having osteoporotic T-score at any site (aOR 1.148, 95% CI 1.098 to 1.200).

CONCLUSION

Long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with higher risk of osteoporosis. Femoral neck site seemed to be more susceptible to the detrimental effect of PM exposure than lumbar spine site.

KEY MESSAGE

Exposure to air pollution is associated with osteoporosis, mainly at femoral site.

The Microbiota-Bone-Allergy Interplay

Emerging knowledge suggests an increasing importance of gut microbiota in health and disease. Allergy and bone metabolism are closely interconnected, and the possible negative effects of common therapies are not the only aspects of this relationship. The immune system is influenced by the microbiota-host interactions, and several pieces of evidence suggest the existence of an interplay between microbiota, bone metabolism, and allergies. Understanding these inter-relationships is essential for the development of new potential strategies of treatment and prevention targeting microbiota. A wide range of substances and germs, prebiotics and probiotics, are capable of influencing and modifying the microbiota. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown in several studies to have different actions based on various factors such as sex, hormonal status, and age. In this review, we summarize the latest knowledge on the topic, and we discuss practical implications and the need for further studies.

Rethinking of osteoporosis through a sex- and gender-informed approach in the COVID-19 era

Standards and models of reference for osteoporosis (OP) have been developed for female individuals as they are more likely to be affected by the disease. Nonetheless, OP is also responsible for one-third of hip fractures in male individuals suggesting that a sexblinded approach to OP may lead to miss opportunities for equity in bone health. OPrelated fractures, especially hip fractures, are a matter of immediate concern as they are associated with limited mobility, chronic disability, loss of independence, and reduced quality of life in both sexes. When it comes to sociocultural gender, the effect of gender domains (i.e., identity, roles, relations, and institutionalized gender) on development and management of OP is largely overlooked despite risk factors or protective conditions are gendered. Clinical trials testing the efficacy and safety of anti-OP drugs as well as non-pharmacological interventions have been conducted mainly in female participants, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The present narrative review deals with the sex and gender-based challenges and drawbacks in OP knowledge and translation to clinical practice, also considering the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.