Race/ethnic difference in trabecular bone score in midlife women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Bone Mineral Density for Osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We primarily aim to review differences in bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis among different racial/ethnic groups and to highlight the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in obesity and diabetes. We also explore the factors contributing to the BMD differences among various subgroups. In addition, we investigate the existing disparities in research, educational initiatives, screening practices, and treatment options for osteoporosis and discuss these findings' clinical and public health implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Racial/ethnic differences in BMD for osteoporosis exist in the USA and other countries. There are disparities regarding osteoporosis screening and treatment. Understanding the factors contributing to these differences can help develop targeted interventions and policies to reduce their impact. Clinicians should consider the racial/ethnic differences in BMD when making treatment decisions and providing preventive care. Future research could contribute to developing effective strategies for preventing osteoporosis among different racial/ethnic groups. This review offered a comprehensive examination of differences in BMD across various racial and ethnic groups, elucidating the influence of genetic, lifestyle, and cultural factors on these differences. This review also highlighted the disparities in osteoporosis screening, treatment options, research on medical effectiveness, and educational outreach tailored to each subgroup. Recognizing the importance of addressing these inequalities, we present this review to advocate for targeted interventions to reduce disparities in osteoporosis and improve bone health for all populations.

Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk among Older US Asian Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding osteoporosis and fracture among older US Asian adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Asian adults have lower (areal) bone density than non-Hispanic White adults and thus are more likely to be diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis, despite their lower risk of hip fracture. The latter may relate to favorable characteristics in hip geometry, volumetric bone density, and bone microarchitecture; lower risk of falls; and other clinical factors. The fracture risk calculator FRAX accounts for the lower risk of hip fracture among US Asian adults. However, data on major osteoporotic fracture risk remain limited. Fracture rates also vary by Asian subgroup, which may have implications for fracture risk assessment. Furthermore, among women receiving bisphosphonate drugs, Asian race is a risk factor for atypical femur fracture, an uncommon complication associated with treatment duration. Recent clinical trial efficacy data pertaining to lower bisphosphonate doses and longer dosing intervals may be relevant for Asian adults. More research is needed to inform osteoporosis care of US Asian adults, including risk-benefit considerations and the optimal duration of bisphosphonate treatment. Greater evidence-based guidance for primary fracture prevention among US Asian adults will ensure health equity in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Ethnicity and Fracture Risk Stratification from Trabecular Bone Score in Canadian Women: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Lumbar spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), a grey-level texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. An unresolved and controversial question is whether there are ethnic differences that affect the utility of TBS for fracture risk assessment. The current analysis examined whether self-identified ethnicity (White, Asian, Black) in women age 40 years and older referred for DXA testing affected fracture risk stratification from TBS using a large clinical registry. The study population comprised 63,078 White women, 1,915 Asian women and 329 Black women (n=329) with mean follow up 9.0±5.2 years. There were between group differences in BMI (Black>White>Asian), lumbar spine fat percentage (Asian>White>Black) and lumbar spine tissue thickness (Black>White>Asian). Despite this, lumbar spine TBS was not significantly different between the subgroups, though there was a significant difference in lumbar spine and total hip BMD (Black >White>Asian). TBS provided significant stratification for MOF and any fracture for all ethnicity subgroups, and for hip fracture in White and Asian subgroups (insufficient numbers for analysis in Black women). No significant difference in White vs. Asian or White vs. Black women were identified using a Bonferroni adjusted p-value. In summary, we found that lumbar spine TBS measurements were similar among White, Asian and Black women referred for DXA assessment in Manitoba, Canada. TBS and BMD measurements significantly stratified fracture risk in all three populations without a meaningful difference between groups. This suggests that TBS does not need to be used differently in White vs. non-White populations.

Effect of soft tissue noise on trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with diabetes: A cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased fracture risk, despite similar or greater BMD compared to nondiabetics. TBS predicts fracture risk in T2D and nondiabetics. However, increased abdominal thickness, a common feature in T2D, may reduce TBS values.

AIM

To study the relationship among glycemic status, BMD and TBS, considering abdominal soft tissue thickness (STT) interference.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of 493 women ≥65 years, with simultaneous DXA scans and HbA1c measures. STT and TBS (iNsight Software, v3.0) were derived from lumbar spine (LS) scans. Subjects were divided according to HbA1c levels: 1 (≥6.5%; n = 116), 2 (5.7-6.4%; n = 217) and 3 (≤5.6%; n = 160). Group 1 was further divided based on HbA1c and/or disease duration: 1a (HbA1c ≥ 7.5%; n = 42), 1b (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and disease duration ≥5 years; n = 63) and 1c (HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and disease duration ≥5 years; n = 30).

FINDINGS

For the entire cohort, mean age, TBS, BMI and STT were 71.8 ± 6.0 years, 1.299 ± 0.101, 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m², and 21.4 ± 2.9 cm, respectively. LS-BMD was similar among groups. BMD in hip sites and STT were higher in group 1. TBS was lower in patients with higher HbA1c (P = 0.020), with a mean TBS in groups 1, 2, and 3 of 1.280, 1.299 and 1.314, respectively. This difference remained after adjusting for age, LS-BMD and BMI (P = 0.010). After replacing BMI with STT, TBS differences were no longer significant (P = 0.270). The same was observed when subgroups 1a and 1b were compared to group 3. However, for subgroup 1c, TBS remained lower compared to group 3, even after adjusting for age, LS-BMD and STT, with a borderline P-value (1.275 vs. 1.308; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Higher HbA1c levels were associated with greater BMD in hip sites, higher abdominal STT and lower TBS values. However, after including the STT in the adjustment, TBS differences among groups disappeared, except in women with higher HbA1c levels and longer disease duration.