Circulating platelet concentration is associated with bone mineral density in women

Non-linear association of the platelet/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with bone mineral density a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated shared risk factors and pathophysiologic mechanisms between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and platelets have long been recognized as crucial factors for cardiovascular health. The platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) combines platelet count and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, It is a novel biomarker for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. The platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) possibly reflects the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory states in the body. Therefore, we hypothesized that changes in PHR ratios may predict a predisposition to pro-inflammatory and increased bone resorption. However, the relationship between the platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) and bone mineral density (BMD) remains insufficiently understood. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between the platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) index and bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

Data from the NHANES 2005-2018 were analyzed, excluding adults with missing key variables and specific conditions. Nonlinear relationships were explored by fitting smoothed curves and generalized additive models, with threshold effects employed to calculate inflection points. Additionally, subgroup analyses and interaction tests were conducted.

RESULTS

The study included 13,936 individuals with a mean age of 51.19 ± 16.65 years. Fitted smoothed curves and generalized additive models revealed a nonlinear, inverted U-shaped relationship between the two variables. Threshold effect analysis showed a significant negative association between PHR and total femur bone mineral density (BMD) beyond the inflection point of platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) 33.301. Subgroup analyses showed that a significant interaction between these two variables was observed only in the age and sex subgroups (P-interaction < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified a complex, nonlinear, inverted U-shaped relationship between platelet to HDL-C ratio (PHR) and total femur bone mineral density (BMD). These findings underscore the importance of maintaining optimal PHR levels to support bone health, especially in high-risk populations.

Systemic immune-inflammation index and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A cross-sectional study of the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2007-2018

Background

This study aimed to investigate the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and bone mineral density (BMD) and to determine the association between the SII and the risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis among postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years.

Methods

Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. BMD testing was performed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The SII was calculated based on lymphocyte (LC), neutrophil (NC), and platelet (PC) counts. Moreover, the associations of BMD with SII and other inflammatory markers, including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the product of platelet count and neutrophil count (PPN), PC, NC, and LC, were assessed using a multivariable weighted linear regression model. Additionally, the associations of low BMD/osteoporosis with SII and other inflammatory markers were assessed using multivariable weighted logistic regression.

Results

Finally, a total of 893 postmenopausal women with a weighted mean age of 60.90 ± 0.26 years were included finally. This study found that SII was negatively associated with total femur BMD and femoral neck BMD, and postmenopausal women in a higher SII quarter group showed low lumbar spine BMD than the lowest SII quarter group when SII was converted from a continuous variable to a categorical variable. Moreover, increased SII was associated with an increased risk of low BMD and osteoporosis. In addition, this study observed that other inflammatory markers, especially NLR and PPN, were negatively associated with BMD and positively associated with the risk of osteoporosis. Finally, the subgroup analysis showed that the associations between BMD and inflammatory markers were pronounced in postmenopausal women aged ≥65 years or those with normal BMI (<25 kg/m²).

Conclusion

SII may be a valuable and convenient inflammatory marker that could be applied to predict the risk of low BMD or osteoporosis among postmenopausal women aged ≥50. Moreover, postmenopausal women with a high level of SII or other inflammatory markers, such as NLR and PPN, should be aware of the potential risk of osteoporosis. However, given the inherent limitations of the present study, additional large-scale studies are required to investigate the role of SII in osteoporosis further.