Safety of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the older adults with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Evaluation of Risk of Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events in Romosozumab Users Focusing on Comorbidities: Analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database

Background: Romosozumab is associated with an increased risk of cardiac or cerebrovascular events. Identifying the risk factors for these events could contribute to the safe use of romosozumab. Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk factors for cardiac or cerebrovascular events in romosozumab users. Methods: First, disproportionality analysis was performed to compare the frequency of cardiac or cerebrovascular events, using data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Next, multivariate logistic analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for cardiac or cerebrovascular events in romosozumab users. Results: In total, 859 romosozumab users were identified. A disproportionality of both cardiac and cerebrovascular events was observed in only romosozumab users. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the risk of cardiac events in romosozumab users was significantly increased in patients with cardiac disease (odds ratio [OR]: 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-9.9; P < 0.01) and hypertension (OR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7; P = 0.047). In addition, the risk of cerebrovascular events in romosozumab users was significantly increased in the presence of cerebrovascular disease (OR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.2; P = 0.02) and hypertension (OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-3.9; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hypertension may increase the risk of cardiac or cerebrovascular events in romosozumab users. Although additional studies are needed to assess other associated factors, these findings may contribute to the appropriate use of romosozumab and limit adverse events.

Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in elderly patients after hip fracture

BACKGROUND

Two injectable anti-osteoporosis medications, denosumab and zoledronic acid, have been widely used to treat patients with severe osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and adherence of denosumab compared to zoledronic acid in geriatric patients after a hip fracture.

METHODS

A total of 282 patients treated with osteoporotic hip fracture between March 2014 and Aug 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were asked to select the anti-osteoporosis medication after surgery. Treatment persistence was monitored by follow-up visit to the outpatient clinic at postoperative 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 282 individuals with baseline data, 162 patients took subcutaneous denosumab and 120 patients took intravenous zoledronic acid. At postoperative 2 years, the change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline was greater in the denosumab group compared with the zoledronic acid group (p < 0.001). The rate of persistence to denosumab was significantly higher than that for 12-months zoledronic acid (p = 0.01). Serious adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the effectiveness and patients' persistence for two commonly used anti-osteoporosis agents after hip fracture. In this frail, elderly population, half-yearly denosumab was superior to yearly zoledronic acid in BMD and demonstrated significant higher persistence rate, indicating a potential therapeutic advantage that warrants further validation.