Dosimetry Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Rapid Arcand Fixed Field Dynamic IMRT for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparative Analysis of Dosimetry: IMRT versus 3DCRT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients with Considering Some Organs in Out - of - Field Borders

Purpose

The local management approach for node-positive breast cancer has undergone substantial evolution. Consequently, there exists a pressing need to enhance our treatment strategies by placing greater emphasis on planning and dosimetric factors, given the availability of more conformal techniques and delineation criteria, achieving optimal goals of radiotherapy treatment. The primary aim of this article is to discuss how the extent of regional nodal coverage influences the choice between IMRT and 3D radiation therapy for patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 15 patients diagnosed with left breast cancer with disease involved lymph nodes were included in this study. Delivering the recommended dose required the use of a linear accelerator (LINAC) with photon beams energy of 6 mega voltage (6MV). Each patient had full breast radiation using two planning procedures: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D conformal). Following the guidelines set forth by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the planned treatment coverage was carefully designed to fall between 95% and 107% of the recommended dose. Additionally, Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs) were generated the dose distribution within these anatomical contours.

Results and Conclusion

The DVH parameters were subjected to a comparative analysis, focusing on the doses absorbed by both Organs at Risk (OARs) and the Planning Target Volume (PTV). The findings suggest that low doses in IMRT plan might raise the risk of adverse oncological outcomes or potentially result in an increased incidence of subsequent malignancies. Consequently, the adoption of inverse IMRT remains limited, and the decision to opt for this therapy should be reserved for situations where it is genuinely necessary to uphold a satisfactory quality of life. Additionally, this approach helps in reducing the likelihood of developing thyroid problems and mitigates the risk of injuries to the supraclavicular area and the proximal head of the humerus bone.

Dosimetric comparison between Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) vs dual arc Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC): Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous non-randomised studies comparing dosimetric outcomes between advanced techniques such as IMRT and VMAT reported conflicting findings. We thus sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to consolidate the findings of these studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PUBMED and EMBASE for eligible studies from their time of inception to 10 March 2022. A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals(CIs) for target volume coverage, organ-at-risk(OAR) doses, monitor units(MUs) and treatment delivery times. We also performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate if different treatment planning systems (TPS) (Eclipse, Monaco and Pinnacle) used affected the pooled mean differences.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (383 patients) were eligible to be included. The pooled results showed that dual arc VMAT reduced D2% of PTV (MD=0.71Gy,95%CI=0.14-1.27,P=0.01), mean left cochlea dose (MD=2.6Gy,95%CI=0.03-5.16,P=0.05), mean right cochlea dose (MD=3.4Gy,95%CI=0.7-6.1,P=0.01), MUs (MD=554.9,95%CI=245.8-863.9,P=0.0004), treatment delivery times (MD=6.7mins,95%CI=4.5-8.9,P<0.0001) and integral dose (MD=0.97Gy,95%CI=0.28-1.67,P=0.006). None of the other indices were significantly better for the IMRT plans. The subgroup analysis showed that the integral dose was significantly lower only for Eclipse (MD=0.88Gy, 95%CI=0.14-1.63, P=0.02). The total MUs was significantly lower only for Eclipse (MD=1035.2, 95%CI=624.6-1445.9, P<0.0001) and Pinnacle (MD=293, 95%CI=15.6-570.5, P=0.04). Similarly, delivery time was also significantly lower only for Eclipse (MD=6.1mins, 95%CI=5.7-6.5, P<0.0001) and Pinnacle (MD=4.9mins, 95%CI=2.6-7.2, P<0.0001). The subgroup analysis however showed that target coverage was superior for the IMRT plans for both Pinnacle (MD=0.48Gy, 95%CI=0.31-0.66, P<0.0001) and Monaco (MD=0.12Gy, 95%CI=0.07-0.17, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dual-arc VMAT plans improved OAR doses, MUs and treatment times as compared to IMRT plans. The different TPS used may modify dosimetric outcomes.

Evaluation of target autocrop function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma SIB IMRT plan

A new target autocrop function was introduced in the Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning software (version 15.5 above) (Lohynská in Klin Onkol 33(4):288-294, 2020). The study aimed to evaluate this new target autocrop impact on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) plan quality and delivery efficiency. Randomly 66 approved NPC simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans were retrospectively studied. The manual cropping-based plans served as reference and were designed using sliding-window IMRT. Reference plans were re-optimized with identical plan parameters following the institutional clinical protocol, except for the redundant optimization objective of the manual cropping targets deleted. Additionally, each target within 5 mm of another had one minimum objective at 100% volume and one maximum objective at 0% volume for the autocrop plans. Plan quality was assessed based on selected parameters, including TCP (tumor control probability), NTCP (normal tissue complication probability), conformality index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and dose-volume characteristics. Additionally, the delivery efficiency, the total plan treatment time defined as a sum of monitor units (MUs) for each treated field, and delivery accuracy, γ passing rate of treatment plan quality assurance (QA) also were compared. Both the manual cropping plans and the autocrop plans could be approved by an experienced oncologist. Overall, the autocrop plans could provide approximately a 13% reduction in linac MU while maintaining comparable plan quality, radiobiological ranking, and accuracy to the manual cropping plans. The new target autocrop tip facilitated the SIB IMRT plans for nasopharyngeal cancer patients. The autocrop could guarantee the quality and delivery accuracy of the radiotherapy plan and improved the planning efficiency, treatment efficiency, and reduced machine wear and tear. It was a promising tool for optimal plan selection for NPC SIB IMRT.

Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy

Purpose

To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer that had received radiotherapy using VMAT in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Each of the patients was planned using coplanar and non-coplanar orientations using an optimized couch angle and fluences. We analyzed the Conformity Index (CI_RTOG), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Heterogeneity Index (HI_RTOG), low dose volume, target and organs-at-risk coverage in both the plans without changing planning optimization parameters.

Results

The prescription dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy. Using ncVMAT, CI_RTOG, DHI and HI_RTOG, and tumor coverage (ID_95%) had improved, low dose spillage volume in the body V_5Gy was increased and V_10Gy was reduced. Integral dose and intensity-modulated radiation therapy factor had increased in ncVMAT. In the case of non-coplanar beam arrangements, maximum dose (D_max) of right and left humeral head were reduced significantly whereas apex of the right and left lung mean dose were increased.

Conclusion

The use of ncVMAT produced better target coverage and sparing of the shoulder and soft tissue of the neck as well as the critical organ compared with the cVMAT in patients of head and neck malignancy.

Radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer using Rapidarc: dosimetric study of military teaching hospital Mohamed V, Morocco

Background

The aim of the present study is to assess efficacy and efficiency of Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique in treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer in our institution and to report toxicity related to this technique.

Methods

Between June 2013 and January 2015, thirty-two patients with non metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer were curatively treated using VMAT Rapidarc. Dose prescription was performed using two different schedules, it consisted of either simultaneous integrated boost or simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy delivering 70 Gy in 35 fractions and 69.96 in 33 fractions respectively. The choice was leaved at the discretion of the treating physician. The optimization process was performed by Eclipse software version 10.0 (Varian Medical Systems), using PRO algorithm (Progressive resolutive optimisation) version 3. Data was collected from dose-volume histograms for both planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR). We calculated the homogeneity index and the conformity index as well as the number of monitor units MU and the treatment delivery time. We also reported acute and late toxicity related to radiation therapy.

Results

For the PTV high risk (HR), intermediate risk (PTV IR) and low risk (LR) the D95% was 97.21 ± 1.5, 97.5 ± 3.3 and 97.10 ± 6.86 respectively. Whereas, The D5% was 104.6 ± 2.16, 103.8 ± 2.1 and 100.89 ± 7.26. The CI for PTV HR was 0.98 ± 0.02 and the HI was 0.08 ± 0.02. The mean treatment delivery time was 2.3 ± 0.2, and the mean MU number was 527.6 ± 131.4. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported in any case. Grade 3 xerostomia was observed in only 3(9.4%) patients and no patients developed grade 3 hearing loss.

Conclusion

Our results confirmed the abilities of VMAT to provide excellent coverage of target volumes while sparing OAR especially the nervous structures and salivary glands.

Dosimetric Comparison between Single and Dual Arc-Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique

Backround:

Plan quality and performance of dual arc (DA) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), single arc (SA) VMAT and nine field (9F) intensity modulated radiotherapy were compared using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique.

Methods:

Twelve patients treated in Elekta Synergy Platform (mlci2) by 9F-IMRT were replanned with SA/DA-VMAT using a CMS Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS) with Monte Carlo simulation. Target delineation was conducted as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Protocols (RTOG0225 and 0615). A 70Gy dose prescribed to PTV70 and 61Gy to PTV61 in 33 fractions was applied for the SIB technique. The conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) for targets and the mean dose and maximum dose for OAR’s, treatment delivery time (min), monitor units (MUs) per fraction, normal tissue integral dose and patient specific quality assurance were analysed.

Results:

Acceptable target coverage was achieved for PTV70 and PTV61 with all the planning techniques. No significant differences were observed except for D98 (PTV61), CI(PTV70) and HI(PTV61). Maximum dose (Dmax) to the spinal cord was lower in DA-VMAT than 9F-IMRT (p=0.002) and SA-VMAT (p=0.001). D50 (%) of parotid glands was better controlled by 9F-IMRT (p=0.001) and DA-VMAT (p=0.001) than SA-VMAT. A lower mean dose to the larynx was achieved with 9F-IMRT (P=0.001) and DA-VMAT (p=0.001) than with SA-VMAT. DA-VMAT achieved higher CI of PTV70 (P= 0.005) than SA-VMAT. For PTV61, DA-VMAT (P=0.001) and 9F-IMRT (P=0.001) achieved better HI than SA-VMAT. The average treatment delivery times were 7.67mins, 3.35 mins, 4.65 mins for 9F-IMRT, SA-VMAT and DA-VMAT, respectively. No significant difference were observed in MU/fr (p=0.9) and NTID (P=0.90) and the patient quality assurance pass rates were >95% (gamma analysis I3mm, 3%).

Conclusion:

DA-VMAT showed better conformity over target dose and spared the OARs better or equal to IMRT. SA-VMAT could not spare the OARs well. DA-VMAT offered shorter delivery time than IMRT without compromising the plan quality.

A pilot study on Hla-G locus control region haplotypes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasias

Human papillomavirus (HPV) can induce cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) grades 1, 2 and 3. Untreated, these lesions may progress to cervical cancer (CC) which is the third most common cancer in women worldwide. HLA-G plays an immunotolerant role in the immune response. The aim of this study was to characterize the configuration of SNPs located at the distal promoter of HLA-G in patients with CIN2 and CIN3 and control women. The study sample was composed of 207 women as follows: 73 diagnosed with CIN2 lesions, 56 with CIN3 and 78 healthy control women. Genotyping was performed by sequence base typing. Eleven haplotype configurations subdivided in two main haplogroups (H1dist and H2dist), were characterized and compared between patients and controls. The haplotypes H1.1Dist (GAGAACGC) and H2.1Dist (AGGTACAC) were more frequent in Euro-Descendants as well as in Brazilian Mixed. Nevertheless, the haplotype H2.1Dist standed out as a susceptibility haplotype in Brazilian Mixed patients while the H1.1Dist presented a protector effect in this same ethnic group. Whether such LCR haplotype configurations can impact on HLA-G gene expression levels in women who developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is still unknown and it is of utmost importance that more investigation on this field be pursued.

Planning for mARC treatments with the Eclipse treatment planning system

While modulated arc (mARC) capabilities have been available on Siemens linear accelerators for almost two years now, there was, until recently, only one treatment planning system capable of planning these treatments. The Eclipse treatment planning system now offers a module that can plan for mARC treatments. The purpose of this work was to test the module to determine whether it is capable of creating clinically acceptable plans. A total of 23 plans were created for various clinical sites and all plans delivered without anomaly. The average 3%/3 mm gamma pass rate for the plans was 98.0%, with a standard deviation of 1.7%. For a total of 14 plans, an equivalent static gantry IMRT plan was also created to compare delivery time. In all but two cases, the mARC plans delivered significantly faster than the static gantry plan. We have confirmed the successful creation of mARC plans that are deliverable with high fidelity on an ARTISTE linear accelerator, thus demonstrating the successful implementation of the Eclipse mARC module.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: treatment outcomes of a prospective, multicentric clinical study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term outcome in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and August 2008, 249 patients with stage III-IVb NPC were treated by IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy in this multicenter prospective study.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 54.1 months, the 5-year actuarial rates of overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 78.4%, 86.8%, 88.4%, 78.0%, respectively. There were 29 local recurrences, 25 regional recurrences and 52 distant metastases, respectively. Distant metastasis is the main cause of treatment failure. N-stage was an independent prognostic factor for LRFS, RRFS, DMFS and OS. Acute toxicity ⩾grade III mainly consisted of mucositis (34.9%), neutropenia (11.2%), xerostomia (5.6%), and dermatitis (5.2%). The main documented late toxicity was xerostomia, and the severity of xerostomia decreased over time. At 24 months after treatment, 13.2% of patients had grade 2 xerostomia, and none had grade 3 or 4 xerostomia.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy resulted in encouraging rates of local and distant control and overall survival with acceptable rates of acute and limited rates of late toxicity in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Distant metastasis remained the main cause of failure. More effective systemic therapy should be explored for patients with advanced N-stage.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc(®): An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency

AIM/BACKGROUND

To evaluate how the use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with RapidArc(®) can improve treatment delivery efficiency based on the analysis of the beam-on times and monitor units (MU) needed to deliver therapy for multiple clinical applications in a large patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 898 treatment courses were delivered in 745 patients treated from October 2008 to March 2013 using RapidArc® treatment plans generated in Eclipse™ TPS. All patients were treated with curative or palliative intent using different techniques including conventional fractionation (83%) and radiosurgery or SBRT (17%), depending on the clinical indications. Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on time and recorded MU values delivered on a Varian Trilogy™ linear accelerator.

RESULTS

For conventional fractionation treatments using RapidArc®, the delivery times ranged from 38 s to 4 min and 40 s (average 2 min and 6 s). For radiosurgical treatments the delivery times ranged from 1 min and 42 s to 9 min and 22 s (average 4 min and 4 s). The average number of MU per Gy was 301 for the entire group, with 285 for the conventional group and 317 for the radiosurgical group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study with a large heterogeneous population, treatments using RapidArc® were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than conventional fractionation. This was highly advantageous, increasing flexibility of the scheduling allowing treatment of radiosurgery patients during the regular daily work schedule. Additionally, reduction of leakage radiation dose was achieved.