Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis

Risk factors for residual lesions after total hysterectomy in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to predict the risk factors for residual lesions in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent total hysterectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 212 patients with histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3) who underwent hysterectomy within 6 months after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Clinical data (e.g., age, menopausal status, HPV type, and Liquid-based cytology test(LCT) type), as well as pathological data affiliated with endocervical curettage (ECC), colposcopy, LEEP and hysterectomy, were retrieved from medical records. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate the relationship between the variables and risk of residual lesions after hysterectomy.

RESULTS

Overall, 75 (35.4%) patients had residual lesions after hysterectomy. Univariate analyses revealed that positive margin (p = 0.003), glandular involvement (p = 0.017), positive ECC (p < 0.01), HPV16/18 infection (p = 0.032) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) I-III (p = 0.014) were factors related to the presence of residual lesions after hysterectomy. Conversely, postmenopausal status, age ≥ 50 years, ≤ 30 days from LEEP to hysterectomy, and LCT type were not risk factors for residual lesions. A positive margin (p = 0.025) and positive ECC (HSIL) (p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for residual lesions in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that positive incisal margins and ECC (≥ CIN2) were risk factors for residual lesions, while glandular involvement and VaIN were protective factors. In later clinical work, colposcopic pathology revealed that glandular involvement was associated with a reduced risk of residual uterine lesions. 60% of the patients with residual uterine lesions were menopausal patients, and all patients with carcinoma in situ in this study were menopausal patients. Therefore, total hysterectomy may be a better choice for treating CIN in menopausal patients with positive margins and positive ECC.

A predictive model for residual lesions after LEEP surgery in CIN III patients

Background and aims

The residual lesions after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) contributes to poor prognosis in patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 (CIN3). The aim of this study is to establish an effective clinical predictive model for residual lesions in CIN3 patients after LEEP.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 436 CIN3 patients who underwent total hysterectomy within 3 months after LEEP. Based on the post-hysterectomy pathologic, the patients were divided into the no residual group and residual group. Clinical parameters were compared between the two groups, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for residual lesions in CIN3 patients after LEEP. Using R software, a nomogram model was established and its effectiveness was evaluated using calibration plots.

Results

There were 178 cases in the residual group and 258 cases in the no residual group. The two groups had no significant difference in general characteristics (p > 0.05). It was found that Post-LEEP follow-up HPV, Post-LEEP follow-up TCT, and the Gland involvement were independent risk factors for residual lesions in CIN3 patients after LEEP (all p < 0.05). The consistency index (C-index) of the nomogram model for predicting residual lesions was 0.975 (0.962-0.988).

Conclusion

The Post-LEEP follow-up HPV, Post-LEEP follow-up TCT, and Gland involvement are independent risk factors related to residual tissue after LEEP surgery in CIN3 patients. The constructed nomogram can effectively predict the presence of residual tissue after LEEP surgery in CIN3 patients and has good practical value.

Role of HPV in the Prediction of Persistence/Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Precancer

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing after excisional treatment of cervical precancer. (2) To determine clinical factors associated with persistence of cervical precancer post-treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients who had a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL]). All patients treated between 2016 and 2018 at a tertiary centre colposcopy unit were included. Persistence/recurrence of disease was defined as high-grade cytology or histology identified during the time of follow-up. Univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to identify factors associated with persistence/recurrence and HPV positivity at exit testing.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 19 months. Of the LEEP specimens, 90.8% (n = 258) demonstrated HSIL and 3.9% (n = 11) had adenocarcinoma in situ. 28.5% (n = 81) of the LEEP specimens had positive margins. In follow-up, 72.9% had negative cytology, 17.6% had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade SIL, 1.8% had atypical squamous cells, HSIL cannot be excluded/low-grade SIL-H, and 6.7% had HSIL. At the final follow-up, 27.8% (n = 79) were HPV+. Overall rate of persistence/recurrence was 11.3% (n = 32); median time to persistence/recurrence was 6.5 months. Multivariate regression models demonstrated that follow-up HPV positivity (OR = 22.0) and positive margins (OR = 3.7) were significantly associated with persistence/recurrence. Similarly, in univariate regression models, positive margins were significant (OR = 2.2) for predicting HPV positivity in exit testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence/recurrence of precancer can occur due to incomplete treatment of lesions by local excision and by the persistence of HPV infection. Surveillance strategies for women treated for cervical precancer require a risk-based approach and should rely on HPV testing.

Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor

BACKGROUND

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is a disease that is closely related to the development of cervical cancer. In clinical work, cold knife conization and a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) are often selected for diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

In this paper, we aimed to discuss additional cuts, a common practice in cervical conization, and determine whether the doctor's choice to use additional cuts in conization can reduce the occurrence of a positive cone margin.

METHODS

From January 2018 to October 2019, 965 patients underwent cervical conization at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, China). Of these, 174 were in the positive cone margin group, and 791 were in the negative cone margin group. Age, preoperative pathology, pathological results of conization, additional cuts, cone depth, and cone volume were studied. Additionally, the additional cut rate and the efficiency of doctors with a habit of additional cuts were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 965 patients included in the study, the median age was 41 years (range 35-50). Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that additional cuts (OR, 2.480; 95% CI 1.608 to 3.826; p = 0.01) and smaller cone depth (OR, 0.591; 95% CI, 0.362 to 0.965, p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for positive margins. Six of the 64 doctors who performed conizations had a habit of making additional cuts, and there was no positive correlation between their additional cut rate and their effective additional cut rate.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that a certain proportion of additional cuts can be effectively excised from the positive margin that cannot be removed in the initial conization. The practice of additional cuts in conization tends to be the personal habit of a small number of doctors.

Overexpression of E6/E7 mRNA HPV Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Residual Disease Progression in Women Undergoing LEEP for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3

The risk of overtreatment or not treating an occult carcinoma exists in women at risk of residual disease after a LEEP excision for CIN3. Our goal was to discover an efficient method to select patients requiring a second LEEP from those requiring a FU only through an mRNA-detection test. In a population of 686 women undergoing a LEEP excision for CIN 3, we selected 285 women at risk of residual disease and subjected them to a search for E6/E7 mRNA HPV. The women with negative mRNA were subjected to a follow up, while the women with positive mRNA were subjected to a second LEEP. The histological examination of the second cone revealed 120 (85.7%) cases of residual disease in the mRNA-positive women: 40 cases of CIN2, 51 cases of CIN3, 11 cases of squamous microinvasive carcinoma, 7 cases of squamous carcinoma, 9 cases of AIS (adenocarcinoma in situ) and 2 cases of adenocarcinoma. Among the mRNA-negative women undergoing a follow up, there were only five cases of residual disease. During the follow-up period of about 6 years, we witnessed the regression of the residual disease and the elimination of the virus, just as predicted by the negative result of the mRNA test. Testing patients for E6/E7 mRNA allowed us to identify women with residual disease (CIN2+) and treat them appropriately.

The characteristics of the residual disease after cervical conization: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary gynecological cancer center

Background

Patients with a biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3 have an increased risk of disease progression to invasive cancer and should be treated with an excisional method. However, after treatment with an excisional method, a high-grade residual lesion may remain in patients with positive surgical margins. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for a residual lesion in patients with a positive surgical margin after cervical cold knife conization.

Methods

Records of 1008 patients who underwent conization at a tertiary gynecological cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and thirteen patients with a positive surgical margin after cold knife conization were included in the study. We have retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of the patients treated with re-conization or hysterectomy.

Results

Residual disease was identified in 57 (50.4%) patients. The mean age of the patients with residual disease was 42.47 ± 8.75 years. Age greater than 35 years (P = 0.002; OR, 4.926; 95%CI [Confidence Interval] - 1.681-14.441), more than one involved quadrant (P = 0.003; OR, 3.200; 95% CI - 1.466-6.987), and glandular involvement (P = 0.002; OR, 3.348; 95% CI - 1.544-7.263) were risk factors for residual disease. The rate of high-grade lesion positivity in post-conization endocervical biopsy at initial conization was similar between patients with and without residual disease (P = 0.16). The final pathology of the residual disease was microinvasive cancer in four patients (3.5%) and invasive cancer in one patient (0.9%).

Conclusion

In conclusion, residual disease is found in about half of the patients with a positive surgical margin. In particular, we found that age greater than 35 years, glandular involvement, and more than 1 involved quadrant were associated with the residual disease.

Positive pathological margins after loop electrosurgical excision procedure - Management and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Pathological involvement of cervical conization margins is a risk factor for recurrence, although management of these patients is controversial. We aimed to define risk factors for positive margins and compare recurrence following additional surgical intervention compared to conservative management.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all conizations at our center between 2010 and 2019. Univariate analysis identified characteristics associated with positive margins. Women were stratified by mode of management comparing three groups (surveillance, repeat conization or hysterectomy) then two groups (surveillance vs. additional surgery). Kaplan Meyer survival curves compared cumulative recurrence stratified by mode of management. Pathological results of subsequent surgical procedures were examined for residual disease.

RESULTS

Of 448 conizations performed, 131 (29.2%) had positive margins which were associated with menopause, high-grade cytology and endocervical gland involvement. Women who underwent surveillance (n = 45) were more likely to be nulliparous, with low-grade histology and less endocervical gland involvement. Women who underwent hysterectomy (n = 61) were more likely to be postmenopausal and parous. Recurrence did not differ significantly in the three-group (p = 0.073) or two-group model (6.4% vs. 7.1% p = 0.869). Kaplan Meyer survival curves depicting cumulative recurrence did not differ significantly in either model (log rank test p = 0.642 for the three-group model, and p = 0.868 for the two-group model). Residual disease was found in 51.6% of hysterectomy specimens and 52.6% of repeat conizations.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance is non-inferior to additional surgery in cases with positive conization margins and constitutes a valid option specifically for younger women at risk of future obstetric complications and those susceptible post-hysterectomy complications.

Management of patients with positive margin after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) in the treatment of patients with positive margin in comparison to regular follow-up, and a repeat cervical conization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using 83 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with a positive margin after conization. The management methods and patient prognosis were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-five, 33, and 15 patients were treated for regular follow-up, ALA-PDT, and a repeat cervical conization, respectively. About 33.3% (5/15) patients had residual lesions of low-grade CIN and above after recognization. The clinical characteristics of patients in the three groups were similar. The residual lesion rates of patients selected for follow-up, ALA-PDT, and recognization were 34.3% (12/35), 9.1% (3/33), and 0% (0/15), respectively, at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.004). The HPV clearance rates were 31.3%, 66.7%, and 84.6%, respectively (p = 0.01). Further analysis showed that a positive margin in the inscribed margin of the cervical canal (p = 0.022) and persistent HR-HPV positive tests after initial conization (p = 0.003) significantly increased the risk of residual disease. At 2-year follow-up, the recurrence rates of lesions were 3.3% and 26.1% in the ALA-PDT and follow-up groups, respectively (p = 0.021). Notably, the recurrence rates were not significantly different between the ALA-PDT and recognization groups (3.3% vs. 6.7%) (p = 0.561).

CONCLUSION

ALA-PDT is an effective treatment for patients with a positive margin after cervical conization for high-grade CIN. Compared with regular follow-up, ALA-PDT can reduce residual and recurrence rate. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between AlA-PDT and recognization.

Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study

To explore the optimal way to manage patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and positive margin by identifying the risk factors for its recurrence and residue.A retrospective study was conducted on 267 cases of a pathologically confirmed HSIL with positive margin following conization by loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) between January 2010 and December 2015. One hundred two cases were selected for regular follow-up every 6 months, and 165 cases were selected for a second surgery (repeat cervical conization or hysterectomy) within 3 months of initial LEEP. We analyzed the association between recurrent or residual diseases and these factors: age, menopausal status, ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) results, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection, pathological grades of the margin, number of involved margins, and glandular involvement.The recurrence rate among 102 cases who underwent follow-up was 17.6% (18/102). The factors: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) or higher lesions in the pre-LEEP TCT (P = .038), persistent HR-HPV infection at the 6th month post-LEEP (P = .03), HSIL-positive margin (P = .003), and multifocal-involved margin (P = .002) were significantly associated with recurrent disease, while age, menopause, and pre-LEEP HR-HPV infection were not associated with recurrent disease (P > .05). The residual rate among 165 patients who underwent a second surgery was 45.5% (75/165), of which 15 cases were residual cervical cancer. The factors: menopause (P = .02), ≥ASC-H in pre-LEEP TCT (P = .04), pre-LEEP HR-HPV infection (P = .04), ≥HSIL-positive margin (P < .001), and multifocal-involved margin (P < .001) significantly increased the risk of residual disease. No correlation existed between residual disease and age or glandular involvement (P > .05).For patients with a positive margin after LEEP, regular follow-up or second surgery should be selected according to fertility requirement and pathological characteristics of the positive margin, as well as TCT and HR-HPV infection condition.