Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens

Novel target and PCR assay for identification of hypervirulent ST1 (BI/NAP1/027) Clostridioides difficile and detection of toxigenic C. Difficile

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection and the prevalence of hypervirulent ST1 (BI/NAP1/027)strain are increasing, especially in developing countries. We aimed to develop a new PCR assay for the identification of hypervirulent ST1 strains and toxigenic C. difficile in stool samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established a quadruplex TaqMan real-time PCR (pilW_4-plex PCR) assay targeting the pilW, a ST1-specific type Ⅳ minor pilin gene, and three C. difficile genes including cdtB, tcdB, and hsp. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay was tested using 403C. difficile isolates and 180 unformed stool sample. The results were compared with anaerobic culture-based conventional PCR method and MLST.

RESULTS

The pilW_4-plex PCR identified toxigenic C. difficile in 333 (82.6%, 333/403) isolates with 100% sensitivity and specificity, and in 78 (43.3%, 78/180) stool samples with the sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 93.3%, respectively. Hypervirulent ST1 were detected in 21 strains and nine stool samples by the pilW_4-plex PCR. The pilW_4-plex PCR assay has no cross-reaction with non-toxigenic C. difficile or other bacteria.

CONCLUSION

The pilW_4-plex PCR assay is an accurate and rapid method with high sensitivity and specificity for identification of ST1 and detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool.

Usefulness of Capillary Gel Electrophoresis-Based PCR for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Strains with Hypervirulent Ribotypes

Clostridioides difficile is a complex of anaerobic bacteria responsible for the epidemics of post-antibiotic diarrhea as one of the examples of CDI (Clostridioides difficile infection). As many as 70% of cases concern hospitalized patients, particularly those in intensive care units. Ribotyping is one of the most common methods for differentiating bacterial strains. The purpose of this work was to show the effectiveness of the gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping method and the Webribo database for typing C. difficile isolates, including the hypervirulent 027 ribotype. DNA samples extracted from 69 C. difficile strains with previously marked genotypes were included in this study. PCR was performed using 16S-23S primers, and capillary gel electrophoresis was performed on the Applied Biosystem 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. The Webribo database was applied for ribotype assignment. Out of 69 samples, 48 belonged to already known ribotypes, 13 represented new ribotypes and 8 was indicated as similar to the existing ones, having some differences. Capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR is an effective method for the differentiation of C. difficile ribotypes and can be recognized as a very useful tool in epidemiological studies, while the Webribo database is a useful and an accessible database for a quick analysis of C. difficile ribotypes.

Comparative Evaluation of Three Immunoassays for the Simultaneous Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B

Background: In the medical laboratory, a step-by-step workflow for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) detection using glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B assays for initial screening, along with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), has been recommended recently. In this study, we evaluated these three immunoassays for the simultaneous detection of GDH and Clostridioides difficile (CD) toxin A/B. Methods: A total of 304 stool samples were tested for the presence of GDH antigen and CD toxin A/B using VIDAS C. difficile GDH and toxin A/B (CDAB), RIDASCREEN C. difficile GDH and toxin A/B (RIDA), and C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. As complementary reference methods for GDH and toxin A/B detection in the three immunoassays, CD cultures using ChromID C. difficile agar and the Xpert C. difficile assay, respectively, were tested. Results: All three GDH assays showed overall substantial agreement with the CD culture. All three toxin A/B assays showed overall moderate agreement with the Xpert C. difficile assay. In comparison with consensus results, VIDAS GDH and QCC GDH showed almost perfect agreement, whereas RIDA GDH showed inferior but substantial agreement. All three toxin A/B assays showed almost perfect agreement. Conclusions: Since the QCC GDH and toxin A/B assay is relatively more sensitive and specific than the other two immunoassays for discriminating toxigenic or non-toxigenic CDI, QCC is very helpful for the simultaneous identification of GDH and CD toxin A/B in the initial step of the two-round workflow for diagnosing CDI.

Loop mediated isothermal amplification of Clostridioides difficile isolates in gastrointestinal patients

This study investigated the prevalence of Clostridioides difficile by culture, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR), and loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in patients with suspected C. difficile infections (CDIs). Also, the results of three methods were compared. All stool specimens collected from CDI suspected patients were cultured on selective C. difficile cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar and incubated in an anaerobic jar up to 7 days. The bacterial isolates were identified using standard tests. Multiplex-PCR (M-PCR) was performed for detection of tcdA, tcdB, and tpi genes. The LAMP assay was performed to detect the tcdB gene of C. difficile. C. difficile was isolated from 20.0% (n = 10/50) of samples by culture. M-PCR showed that 34.0% (n = 17/50) of the specimens were positive for C. difficile based on the presence of tpi gene. Out of the 17 C. difficile, 13 strains (76.0%) were positive for tcdB gene using M-PCR. However, the LAMP assay showed that 30.0% (15/50) of specimens were positive for the presence of tcdB gene. M-PCR and LAMP methods showed 100.0% sensitivity compared to the culture method. However, the specificity of the LAMP (87.5%) was relatively higher than the M-PCR (82.5%) compared to the culture. Based on the results of this study, the prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile strains was high in suspected CDI patients. So, the differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains is necessary. Our data showed that the LAMP assay is a good method for direct detection of toxigenic C. difficile strains from stool specimens.

Evaluation of a nucleic acid amplification assay for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection

Clostridioides difficile is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) continues to be challenging. Accurate and rapid identification of C. difficile will reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and ensure contact isolation to control the spread of CDI. In this study, diagnostic performance of BD MAX Cdiff assay (Becton Dickinson, USA) was evaluated for the detection of C. difficile in 2502 fresh stool samples from hospitalized children and adult patients and the results were compared to toxigenic culture. The frequency of CDI in adults and pediatric patients were found as 3.3% and 6.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of BD MAX Cdiff assay were found as; 100%, 99.7%, 93%, and 100% for all patients; 100%, 99.7%, 96.2%, and 100% for pediatric patients; and 100%, 99.6%, 90.2%, and 100% for adult patients, respectively. We concluded that BD MAX Cdiff assay with high sensitivity, specificity, and PPV is useful for the diagnosis of CDI. With a high NPV of 100%, BD MAX Cdiff assay is also suitable for the exclusion of CDI.