Comparing Rates of Linage Diversification with Rates of Size and Shape Evolution in Catarrhine Crania

Skull variation in Afro-Eurasian monkeys results from both adaptive and non-adaptive evolutionary processes

Afro-Eurasian monkeys originated in the Miocene and are the most species-rich modern primate family. Molecular and fossil data have provided considerable insight into their evolutionary divergence, but we know considerably less about the evolutionary processes that underlie these differences. Here, we apply tests developed from quantitative genetics theory to a large (n > 3000) cranio-mandibular morphometric dataset, investigating the relative importance of adaptation (natural selection) and neutral processes (genetic drift) in shaping diversity at different taxonomic levels, an approach applied previously to monkeys of the Americas, apes, hominins, and other vertebrate taxa. Results indicate that natural selection, particularly for differences in size, plays a significant role in diversifying Afro-Eurasian monkeys as a whole. However, drift appears to better explain skull divergence within the subfamily Colobinae, and in particular the African colobine clade, likely due to habitat fragmentation. Small and declining population sizes make it likely that drift will continue in this taxon, with potentially dire implications for genetic diversity and future resilience in the face of environmental change. For the other taxa, many of whom also have decreasing populations and are threatened, understanding adaptive pressures similarly helps identify relative vulnerability and may assist with prioritising scarce conservation resources.

Morphological integration of the hominoid postcranium

Previous research has suggested that magnitudes of integration may be distinct in the postcranium of hominoids when compared to other primate species. To test this hypothesis, we estimated and compared magnitudes of integration of eight postcranial bones from three-dimensional surface scans for 57 Hylobates lar, 58 Gorilla gorilla, 60 Pan troglodytes, 60 Homo sapiens, 60 Chlorocebus pygerythrus, and 60 Macaca fascicularis. We tested the hypotheses that 1) magnitudes of integration would be distinct in the postcranium of hominoids compared to cercopithecoids, with the explicit prediction that magnitudes of integration would be lower in hominoids than in cercopithecoids, and 2) girdle elements (scapula, os coxa) would have lower magnitudes of integration across all taxa. Integration was quantified using the integration coefficient of variation from interlandmark distances reflecting anatomical and developmental modules defined according to a priori criteria. A resampling protocol was employed to generate distributions of integration values that were then compared statistically using Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni adjustment. Support for hypothesis 1 was mixed: with the exception of Gorilla, hominoid taxa were less integrated than the cercopithecoids for all anatomical modules. However, Homo, Gorilla, and, to a lesser extent, Pan showed higher integration than Hylobates and the cercopithecoids for homologous limb elements, with magnitudes of integration for both modules being lowest for Hylobates. These results generally support the hypothesis of distinct patterns of magnitudes of integration in the hominoid postcranium. The high integration of Gorilla may be explained by the effects of overall body size. The results supported the predictions of the second hypothesis. Regardless of taxon, the os coxa and scapula were generally the least integrated skeletal elements, while the femur and radius were the most integrated. The lower integration of the girdle elements suggests that the geometric complexities of particular elements may significantly influence study outcomes.