Cardiac Arrest After Intragastric Balloon Insertion in a Super-Obese Patient

Left renal vein compression complicating intragastric balloon insertion

Obesity is a real public health problem and is of growing concern. People are resorting to surgical or endoscopic means to fight against overweight and obesity. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of these means and in particular the insertion of a gastric balloon which seems to present less risk than surgical methods. Renal complications from intragastric balloon placement are extremely rare. We report here the case of compression of the left renal vein revealed by lumbar pain and hematuria in an overweight 39-year-old woman who benefited from the balloon gastric placement one month before symptoms. The scanner made the diagnosis and showed a good evolution after the withdrawal of the balloon.

Impact of Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy With Intragastric Balloons for the Treatment of Obesity

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to compare the weight loss outcome of intragastric balloons (IGBs) in conjunction with pharmacotherapy vs IGB and intensive lifestyle changes alone.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, non-randomized, retrospective study involving 4 academic hospitals. Patients underwent IGB placement with or without concomitant anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome was percent total weight loss (TBWL) after IGB placement at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

This study included 102 patients, with 23 patients (mean age 46.6 years, 82.6% female) treated with IGB/pharmacotherapy and 79 patients (mean age 46.0 years, 88.6% female) treated with IGB/lifestyle modifications. Patients had a 100% follow-up rate at 6 and 12 months. At 6 months following IGB placement, both groups achieved a similar %TBWL. At 12 months, %TBWL was greater in the IGB/pharmacotherapy group (12.6% ± 1.2 vs 9.7% ± 0.7, P = .04). 65.2% of patients achieved ≥10% TBWL at 12 months in the IGB/pharmacotherapy group, compared to 38.0% in the IGB/lifestyle group (P < .05). The proportion of patients that achieved ≥15% weight loss at 12 months was also significantly different between the IGB/pharmacotherapy and IGB/lifestyle groups (30.4% vs 20.3%, P < .05).

DISCUSSION

IGB with concomitant use of pharmacotherapy did not improve weight loss while the IGB was in place compared to IGB and lifestyle changes. However, patients receiving IGB with pharmacotherapy did have greater weight loss and diminished weight regain after balloon removal compared to those receiving just IGB and lifestyle changes.

Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy: impact on obesity and related comorbidities

The global obesity pandemic is among the most significant public health crises today. Furthermore, obesity remains a major risk factor for many weight-related comorbid conditions including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, liver disease, and cancer. Endoscopic bariatric therapies are currently on the rise as a new tool in the fight against the obesity epidemic, offering patients an alternative to more invasive surgery and a more effective option than diet and lifestyle modifications. The aim of this review article is to summarize the current literature regarding endoscopic bariatric therapies and their impact on obesity and its associated metabolic complications.

Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastric botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of obesity

Background

Obesity is rapidly emerging as one of the greatest challenges of human health. Many randomized trials and open-label human studies described conflicting results of gastric intra-muscular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTA). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance can assure BTA injection into the subserosal layer and muscularis propria of the gastric wall which may optimize the efficacy of injection. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastric BTA injections in weight reduction for obese subjects.

Results

The present study included 25 patients (2 males and 23 females with mean age 35.84 ± 7.776). For nutrient drink tests, median maximum tolerated volumes (MTVs) decreased from 720 cc (range 480–1680) as a baseline value 2 weeks before BTA injection to 360 cc (range 140–820) at 16 weeks after injection. Mean body weight reduction was 11.92 kg (10.8%) after 16 weeks of BTA injection. Mean body weight continued to decrease during the study period from a baseline value of 110 to 98 kg with significant reduction of mean BMI from baseline value of 41.2 to 36.7 at 16 weeks after BTA injection (p < 0.001). The study was completed without major adverse events.

Conclusion

EUS-guided BTA injection into the antral subserosa and muscularis propria could be an effective technique for weight reduction, or as a bridge for surgery, which can be done safely with minimal complications.

Trial registration

NCT03901040

Intragastric Balloon Treatment for Obesity: Review of Recent Studies

INTRODUCTION

The FDA recently approved three intragastric balloon (IGB) devices, ReShape, ORBERA™, and Obalon for treatment of obesity. Given the high cost, complication risk, and invasiveness of bariatric surgery, IGB treatment may present a safer and lower cost option for weight reduction. IGBs are generally placed in the stomach endoscopically for up to 6 months to reduce gastric capacity, enhance feelings of fullness, and induce weight loss. The mechanism of action likely involves stimulation of gastric mechanoreceptors triggering short-acting vagal signals to brain regions implicated in satiety. Balloon efficacy may be influenced by balloon volume, patient gastric capacity, and treatment duration.

METHODS

This review focused on eight recent (2006-present) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL) between IGB and control groups including three reviewed by the FDA. %TBWL based on the reviewed studies was also compared with bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the eight IGB studies, five had balloon treatment duration of 6 months. Efficacy at 6 months, based on a pooled weighted-mean %TBWL, was 9.7%, and the control-subtracted %TBWL was 5.6%. When one study without SDs was removed, the weighted mean %TBWL was 9.3 ± 5.7% SD, and control-subtracted %TBWL was 5.5 ± 7.8%, which was statistically greater than controls. IGB showed lower efficacy than bariatric surgery (median weight loss of 27% for Rouen-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The control-subtracted %TBWL over 6 months of 5.5-5.6% is less than the most efficacious FDA-approved weight loss drug, Qsymia. At the recommended dose, Qsymia has a placebo-subtracted %TBWL at 6 months of approximately 6.6%. The weighted mean reported incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in the IGB group across all eight studies was 10.5%. Only six of the eight reviewed studies reported adverse events (AEs) in the IGB group, with a pooled reported incidence of 28.2%. Recently, the FDA reported new AEs including acute pancreatitis with ReShape and ORBERA™.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, it is unlikely that IGB use will supplant other forms of obesity treatment. The estimated cost of endoscopic balloon implantation and retrieval is US $8,150. Collectively, a relatively small control-subtracted %TBWL and the potential for serious complications makes IGB unlikely to become widely adopted. Given the recent FDA warning, IGB longevity on the market is questionable.

Neurological complications of bariatric surgery

Obesity is reaching pandemic proportions, and the number of bariatric surgeries is increasing. Neurological complications of bariatric procedures are more and more frequently reported and physicians need to recognize and be able to manage them. Neurological complications may result from mechanical or inflammatory mechanisms, but mainly from nutritional deficiencies. Vitamin B12, folate, thiamine, vitamin D, and vitamin E are the most frequent deficiencies. Different patterns of complications can be observed that may differ from time to presentation. At an early stage, immediate peripherical nerve injury, Wernicke's encephalopathy, and polyradiculoneuropathy are the most frequent. Late complications may appear after years and include optic neuropathy, myelopathy, peripherical neuropathy, and myopathy. Bariatric surgery patients should benefit from careful nutritional follow-up with routine monitoring of micronutrients at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months post-op and then annually after surgery, and multivitamin supplementation for life.

Gastric electrical stimulation for the treatment of obesity: from entrainment to bezoars-a functional review

GROWING WORLDWIDE OBESITY EPIDEMIC HAS PROMPTED THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO MAIN TREATMENT STREAMS: (a) conservative approaches and (b) invasive techniques. However, only invasive surgical methods have delivered significant and sustainable benefits. Therefore, contemporary research exploration has focused on the development of minimally invasive gastric manipulation methods featuring a safe but reliable and long-term sustainable weight loss effect similar to the one delivered by bariatric surgeries. This antiobesity approach is based on placing external devices in the stomach ranging from electrodes for gastric electrical stimulation to temporary intraluminal bezoars for gastric volume displacement for a predetermined amount of time. The present paper examines the evolution of these techniques from invasively implantable units to completely noninvasive patient-controllable implements, from a functional, rather than from the traditional, parametric point of view. Comparative discussion over the available pilot and clinical studies related to gastric electrical stimulation outlines the promises and the fallacies of this concept as a reliable alternative anti-obesity strategy.

Neurologic complications of bariatric surgery: involvement of central, peripheral, and enteric nervous systems

Approximately one in three Americans is obese. Current society guidelines recommend bariatric surgery after conservative measures at weight loss have failed. The frequency of bariatric surgeries has increased significantly over the past decade. While considered both safe and effective, bariatric surgery presents a distinct set of risks. This review focuses on the neurological complications of bariatric surgery. Injuries have been reported at all levels of the nervous system, including the central, peripheral, and enteric nervous system. Injury can be classified according to time of presentation and location. The two main mechanisms of nerve injury are from mechanical injury or as a consequence of malnutrition. Encephalopathy, peripheral neuropathies, myelopathies, and radiculoneuropathies have all been reported. Mechanical injuries likely occur from mechanical compression. Malnutrition injuries result from multi-micronutrient deficiencies. The most likely candidates are vitamin B12, folate, zinc, thiamin, copper, vitamin A, and vitamin E deficiencies.

Endoluminal bariatric techniques

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of new or emerging endoscopic technologies that have the potential to have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent preclinical and clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through January 2011 using the keywords "bariatric," "endoscopic," "intragastric balloon," "duodenojejunal bypass sleeve," and "transoral gastroplasty." Reports on Emerging Technologies are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. These reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Reports on Emerging Technologies are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Intragastric Balloon (BIB system) in the treatment of obesity and preparation of patients for surgery - own experience and literature review

Despite the recognition of bariatric surgery as the only effective method of weight reduction, we remain in search of minimally invasive methods, both for the treatment of obesity and preparation of patients for surgical procedures. The aim of the study was to determine intragastric balloon (Allergan) implantation results as the only method of treating obesity, and patient preparation for further stages of abdominal hernia operations, as well as other surgical procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study presented own results considering the use of Bioenteric Intragastric Balloons (BIB system) in the treatment of pathological obesity, and preparation of patients for bariatric surgery and abdominal hernia operations. The study group comprised 18 female and 7 male patients. Average patient age amounted to 50.6 and 54 years, respectively. Indications for intragastric balloon insertion were as follows: preparation for hernia (10 cases) and bariatric (5 patients) operations, and weight reduction management (8 patients). In two cases the implantation of the intragastric balloon served the preparation for gynecological and orthopedic (vertebral column) operations. One female patient was prepared for both bariatric and hernial surgery. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia. Statistical analysis considered 22 patients (one female patient was excluded from analysis, due to death, two other were excluded because of lack of sufficient data).Results. In case of two patients the intragastric balloon system was removed before 6 months had elapsed because of intolerance. One female patient died during the observation period for reasons not related to the procedure. The obtained BMI reduction ranged between 2 and 6 kg/m2, which amounted to a maximum weight loss of 24 kg. In one patient a weight gain of 2 kg was observed. Considering patients prepared for abdominal hernia operations weight reduction was greater and better maintained after the removal of the BIB system.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the authors of the presented study the intragastric balloon serves its role as a bridge to bariatric procedures and weight reduction, before planned extensive postoperative hernia operations. The use of the intragastric balloon only to reduce weight has no medical and economic justification.

Mechanical ileus induces surgical intervention due to gastric balloon: a case report and review of the literature

A temporary non-surgical approach for treatment of obesity is the gastric balloon that serves as an alternative procedure for many patients with frustrated diet attempts. Deflation and displacement of the balloon resulting in acute intestinal obstruction and subsequent surgical intervention is a rare complication. A BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon was endoscopically implanted in a 35-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 28 kg/m(2). The procedure succeeded without complications, and weight loss was effective during the first 6 months. One year after balloon implantation, the patient presented with abdominal cramps and vomiting due to ileal obstruction. Since endoscopic efforts to remove the deflated and displaced balloon failed, emergency laparotomy and enterotomy were necessary. Vascularization of the dilated small bowel was compromised, but recovered after decompression. Patients' postoperative course was uneventful. The gastric balloon model can be associated with major complications and should be used critically. Removal of the balloon should be assured not later than 6 months when weight loss decreases.

Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: prospective single-center study findings

BACKGROUND

The intragastric balloon (IGB) procedure is an obesity treatment.

METHODS

A BioEnteric IGB was used in 33 patients between February 2006 and February 2009.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients, 19 were female (61.3%). Mean age was 35.48 +/- 9.31 years. Following intravenous sedation, the balloon was inserted and inflated under direct vision by using saline (600 ml) and methylene blue (10 ml) solution. Average weight and mean BMI scores were as follows: 119.34 +/- 22.64 (range 80-170) kg and 41.84 +/- 8.28 (range 30-63.2) kg/m(2). Mean weight and BMI were measured as 104.31 +/- 21.33 (range 64-151) kg and 36.43 +/- 7.36 (range 26-52) kg/m(2) 6 months after the index procedure. Percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) and percent of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) were as follows: 29.16 +/- 15.99% (range 0.00-56.91%) and 35.45 +/- 19.46% (0-75.2%), respectively. All patients lost weight constantly for the 6-month period. Patients showed statistically significant weight and BMI losses for the first 3-month period but these decrements reached a plateau between the 4th and 6th month. Weight loss was not statistically significant during the second 3-month period. Few patients had mild complaints following balloon insertion; there was no balloon intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

IGB is safe and effective for short-term weight reduction in obese patients. Weight reduction during the second half of the treatment period needs closer follow-up.